Search (131 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Information Gateway"
  1. CORC : new tools and possibilities for cooperative electronic resource description (2001) 0.09
    0.09376466 = product of:
      0.18752933 = sum of:
        0.11891922 = weight(_text_:description in 1994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11891922 = score(doc=1994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.5136877 = fieldWeight in 1994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1994)
        0.0686101 = weight(_text_:26 in 1994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0686101 = score(doc=1994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.3901819 = fieldWeight in 1994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1994)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    25. 3.2003 17:16:26
  2. Koch, T.: Quality-controlled subject gateways : definitions, typologies, empirical overview (2000) 0.09
    0.08735311 = product of:
      0.17470622 = sum of:
        0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08324346 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
        0.09146276 = sum of:
          0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044239953 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
          0.04722281 = weight(_text_:22 in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04722281 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    'Quality-controlled subject gateways' are Internet services which apply a rich set of quality measures to support systematic resource discovery. Considerable manual effort is used to secure a selection of resources which meet quality criteria and to display a rich description of these resources with standards-based metadata. Regular checking and updating ensure good collection management. A main goal is to provide a high quality of subject access through indexing resources using controlled vocabularies and by offering a deep classification structure for advanced searching and browsing. This article provides an initial empirical overview of existing services of this kind, their approaches and technologies, based on proposed working definitions and typologies of subject gateways
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:37:55
  3. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.06
    0.061404407 = product of:
      0.122808814 = sum of:
        0.08233212 = weight(_text_:26 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08233212 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.4682183 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
        0.040476695 = product of:
          0.08095339 = sum of:
            0.08095339 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08095339 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    1. 7.1996 21:26:02
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
  4. Soergel, D.: Digital libraries and knowledge organization (2009) 0.05
    0.04688233 = product of:
      0.09376466 = sum of:
        0.05945961 = weight(_text_:description in 672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05945961 = score(doc=672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.25684384 = fieldWeight in 672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=672)
        0.03430505 = weight(_text_:26 in 672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03430505 = score(doc=672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=672)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter describes not so much what digital libraries are but what digital libraries with semantic support could and should be. It discusses the nature of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) and how KOS can support digital library users. It projects a vision for designers to make and for users to demand better digital libraries. What is a digital library? The term \Digital Library" (DL) is used to refer to a range of systems, from digital object and metadata repositories, reference-linking systems, archives, and content management systems to complex systems that integrate advanced digital library services and support for research and practice communities. A DL may offer many technology-enabled functions and services that support users, both as information producers and as information users. Many of these functions appear in information systems that would not normally be considered digital libraries, making boundaries even more blurry. Instead of pursuing the hopeless quest of coming up with the definition of digital library, we present a framework that allows a clear and somewhat standardized description of any information system so that users can select the system(s) that best meet their requirements. Section 2 gives a broad outline for more detail see the DELOS DL Reference Model.
    Date
    26. 7.2000 20:00:49
  5. Sieglerschmidt, J.: ¬The spell of ubiquitous knowledge : Europeana, a portal to european cultural and scientific knowledge (2009) 0.04
    0.040084027 = product of:
      0.08016805 = sum of:
        0.05488808 = weight(_text_:26 in 3932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05488808 = score(doc=3932,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 3932, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3932)
        0.025279973 = product of:
          0.050559945 = sum of:
            0.050559945 = weight(_text_:access in 3932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050559945 = score(doc=3932,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 3932, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3932)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The target of Europeana is to make Europe's cultural and scientific resources accessible for all. In detail the aims are: - Providing access to Europe's cultural and scientific heritage through a cross-domain portal, - co-operating in the delivery and sustainability of the joint portal, - stimulating initiatives to bring together existing digital content, - supporting digitisation of Europe's cultural and scientific heritage.
    Date
    26. 8.2010 13:14:01
  6. Schaer, P.: Integration von Open-Access-Repositorien in Fachportale (2010) 0.04
    0.038897026 = product of:
      0.1555881 = sum of:
        0.1555881 = sum of:
          0.1083653 = weight(_text_:access in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1083653 = score(doc=2320,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.64210355 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
          0.04722281 = weight(_text_:22 in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04722281 = score(doc=2320,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Open Access Repositorien sind Online-Archive für frei im Internet zugängliche Publikationen im Volltext. Open Access Materialien oder die Open Access Repositorien selbst sind allerdings nur unzureichend in zentrale Fachportale (z.B. virtuelle Fachbibliotheken) eingebunden. Der Beitrag stellt SSOAR - Social Science Open Access Repository, einen disziplinären Open Access Volltextserver für die Sozialwissenschaften vor und zeigt wie dieser in das sozialwissenschaftliche Fachportal Sowiport integriert wird.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  7. Choi, Y.; Syn, S.Y.: Characteristics of tagging behavior in digitized humanities online collections (2016) 0.04
    0.03816245 = product of:
      0.0763249 = sum of:
        0.05945961 = weight(_text_:description in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05945961 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.25684384 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
        0.01686529 = product of:
          0.03373058 = sum of:
            0.03373058 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03373058 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this study was to examine user tags that describe digitized archival collections in the field of humanities. A collection of 8,310 tags from a digital portal (Nineteenth-Century Electronic Scholarship, NINES) was analyzed to find out what attributes of primary historical resources users described with tags. Tags were categorized to identify which tags describe the content of the resource, the resource itself, and subjective aspects (e.g., usage or emotion). The study's findings revealed that over half were content-related; tags representing opinion, usage context, or self-reference, however, reflected only a small percentage. The study further found that terms related to genre or physical format of a resource were frequently used in describing primary archival resources. It was also learned that nontextual resources had lower numbers of content-related tags and higher numbers of document-related tags than textual resources and bibliographic materials; moreover, textual resources tended to have more user-context-related tags than other resources. These findings help explain users' tagging behavior and resource interpretation in primary resources in the humanities. Such information provided through tags helps information professionals decide to what extent indexing archival and cultural resources should be done for resource description and discovery, and understand users' terminology.
    Date
    21. 4.2016 11:23:22
  8. Haslhofer, B.; Knezevié, P.: ¬The BRICKS digital library infrastructure (2009) 0.03
    0.034817442 = product of:
      0.069634885 = sum of:
        0.03430505 = weight(_text_:26 in 3384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03430505 = score(doc=3384,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 3384, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3384)
        0.035329834 = product of:
          0.07065967 = sum of:
            0.07065967 = weight(_text_:access in 3384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07065967 = score(doc=3384,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.41868407 = fieldWeight in 3384, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3384)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Service-oriented architectures, and the wider acceptance of decentralized peer-to-peer architectures enable the transition from integrated, centrally controlled systems to federated and dynamic configurable systems. The benefits for the individual service providers and users are robustness of the system, independence of central authorities and flexibility in the usage of services. This chapter provides details of the European project BRICKS, which aims at enabling integrated access to distributed resources in the Cultural Heritage domain. The target audience is broad and heterogeneous and involves cultural heritage and educational institutions, the research community, industry, and the general public. The project idea is motivated by the fact that the amount of digital information and digitized content is continuously increasing but still much effort has to be expended to discover and access it. The reasons for such a situation are heterogeneous data formats, restricted access, proprietary access interfaces, etc. Typical usage scenarios are integrated queries among several knowledge resource, e.g. to discover all Italian artifacts from the Renaissance in European museums. Another example is to follow the life cycle of historic documents, whose physical copies are distributed all over Europe. A standard method for integrated access is to place all available content and metadata in a central place. Unfortunately, such a solution requires a quite powerful and costly infrastructure if the volume of data is large. Considerations of cost optimization are highly important for Cultural Heritage institutions, especially if they are funded from public money. Therefore, better usage of the existing resources, i.e. a decentralized/P2P approach promises to deliver a significantly less costly system,and does not mean sacrificing too much on the performance side.
    Date
    26. 7.2000 20:00:49
  9. Qin, J.; Chen, J.: ¬A multi-layered, multi-dimensional representation of digital educational resources (2003) 0.03
    0.033989757 = product of:
      0.067979515 = sum of:
        0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 3818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04116606 = score(doc=3818,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 3818, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3818)
        0.026813459 = product of:
          0.053626917 = sum of:
            0.053626917 = weight(_text_:access in 3818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053626917 = score(doc=3818,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.31775886 = fieldWeight in 3818, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3818)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Semantic mapping between controlled vocabulary and keywords is the first step towards knowledge-based subject access. This study reports the preliminary result of a semantic mapping experiment for the Gateway to Educational Materials (GEM). A total of 3,555 keywords were mapped with 322 concept names in the GEM controlled vocabulary. The preliminary test to 10,000 metadata records presented widely varied sets of results between the mapped and non-mapped data. The paper discussed linguistic and technical problems encountered in the mapping process and raised issues in the representation technologies and methods, which will lead to future study of knowledge-based access to networked information resources.
    Date
    31. 8.2005 21:56:26
  10. Koch, T.; Neuroth, H.; Day, M.: Renardus: Cross-browsing European subject gateways via a common classification system (DDC) (2003) 0.03
    0.028631456 = product of:
      0.057262912 = sum of:
        0.04162173 = weight(_text_:description in 3821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04162173 = score(doc=3821,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.17979069 = fieldWeight in 3821, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3821)
        0.015641185 = product of:
          0.03128237 = sum of:
            0.03128237 = weight(_text_:access in 3821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03128237 = score(doc=3821,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.18535934 = fieldWeight in 3821, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3821)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    "1. The EU projeet Renardus Renardus is a project funded by the European Commission as part of the Information Society Technologies (IST) programme, part of the European Union's 5th Framework Programme. Partners in Renardus include national libraries, research centres and subject gateway services from Denmark, Finland, Germany, The Netherlands, Sweden and the UK, co-ordinated by the National Library of the Netherlands. The project aims to develop a Web-based service to enable searching and browsing across a range of distributed European-based information services designed for the academic and research communities - and in particular those services known as subject gateways. These gateways are services that provide access to Internet resources. They tend to be selective with regard to the resources they give access to, and are usually based an the manual creation of descriptive metadata. Services typically provide users with both search and browse facilities, and offen offer hierarchical browse structures based an subject classification schemes (Koch & Day, 1997). Predecessor projects like the EU project DESIRE have already developed solutions for the description of individual resources and for automatic classification at the level of an individual subject gateway using established classification systems. Renardus intends to develop a service that can cross-search and cross-browse a number of distributed subject gateways through the use of a common metadata profile and by the mapping all locally-used classification schemes to a common scheme. A thorough review of existing data models (Becker, et al., 2000) was used as the basis for the agreement of a minimum set of Dublin Core-based metadata elements that could be utilised as a common data model. A comprehensive mapping effort from the individual gateways' metadata element sets and content encoding schemes to the common profile has taken place. This provides the infrastructure for interoperability between all participating databases and thus is the necessary prerequisite for cross-searching."
  11. Zia, L.L.: new projects and a progress report : ¬The NSF National Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education Digital Library (NSDL) program (2001) 0.03
    0.026340859 = product of:
      0.052681718 = sum of:
        0.04162173 = weight(_text_:description in 1227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04162173 = score(doc=1227,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.17979069 = fieldWeight in 1227, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1227)
        0.011059988 = product of:
          0.022119977 = sum of:
            0.022119977 = weight(_text_:access in 1227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022119977 = score(doc=1227,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.13106886 = fieldWeight in 1227, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1227)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The National Science Foundation's (NSF) National Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education Digital Library (NSDL) program comprises a set of projects engaged in a collective effort to build a national digital library of high quality science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) educational materials for students and teachers at all levels, in both formal and informal settings. By providing broad access to a rich, reliable, and authoritative collection of interactive learning and teaching resources and associated services in a digital environment, the NSDL will encourage and sustain continual improvements in the quality of STEM education for all students, and serve as a resource for lifelong learning. Though the program is relatively new, its vision and operational framework have been developed over a number of years through various workshops and planning meetings. The NSDL program held its first formal funding cycle during fiscal year 2000 (FY00), accepting proposals in four tracks: Core Integration System, Collections, Services, and Targeted Research. Twenty-nine awards were made across these tracks in September 2000. Brief descriptions of each FY00 project appeared in an October 2000 D-Lib Magazine article; full abstracts are available from the Awards Section at <http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/ehr/due/programs/nsdl/>. In FY01 the program received one hundred-nine proposals across its four tracks with the number of proposals in the collections, services, and targeted research tracks increasing to one hundred-one from the eighty received in FY00. In September 2001 grants were awarded to support 35 new projects: 1 project in the core integration track, 18 projects in the collections track, 13 in the services track, and 3 in targeted research. Two NSF directorates, the Directorate for Geosciences (GEO) and the Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences (MPS) are both providing significant co-funding on several projects, illustrating the NSDL program's facilitation of the integration of research and education, an important strategic objective of the NSF. Thus far across both fiscal years of the program fifteen projects have enjoyed this joint support. Following is a list of the FY01 awards indicating the official NSF award number (each beginning with DUE), the project title, the grantee institution, and the name of the Principal Investigator (PI). A condensed description of the project is also included. Full abstracts are available from the Awards Section at the NSDL program site at <http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/ehr/due/programs/nsdl/>. (Grants with shared titles are formal collaborations and are grouped together.) The projects are displayed by track and are listed by award number. In addition, six of these projects have explicit relevance and application to K-12 education. Six others clearly have potential for application to the K-12 arena. The NSDL program will have another funding cycle in fiscal year 2002 with the next program solicitation expected to be available in January 2002, and an anticipated deadline for proposals in mid-April 2002.
  12. Campbell, D.: Australian subject gateways : political and strategic issues (2000) 0.03
    0.026132219 = product of:
      0.104528874 = sum of:
        0.104528874 = sum of:
          0.050559945 = weight(_text_:access in 4875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050559945 = score(doc=4875,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 4875, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4875)
          0.05396893 = weight(_text_:22 in 4875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05396893 = score(doc=4875,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4875, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4875)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The key political and strategic issues which needs to be addressed for the future development of the Australian subject gateways are: continued quality of content creation, integration of access to print and electronic resources, archiving and persistent identification, sustainability of services and service integration. These issues will be more effectively tackled internationally, and the Australian subject gateways are keen to work with international collaborators to achieve a mutually beneficial outcome
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:16
  13. Place, E.: International collaboration on Internet subject gateways (2000) 0.03
    0.02558517 = product of:
      0.05117034 = sum of:
        0.03430505 = weight(_text_:26 in 4584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03430505 = score(doc=4584,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 4584, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4584)
        0.01686529 = product of:
          0.03373058 = sum of:
            0.03373058 = weight(_text_:22 in 4584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03373058 = score(doc=4584,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4584, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4584)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:35:35
    Source
    IFLA journal. 26(2000) no.1, S.52-56
  14. Ohly, H.P.: ¬The organization of Internet links in a social science clearing house (2004) 0.03
    0.025226578 = product of:
      0.10090631 = sum of:
        0.10090631 = weight(_text_:description in 2641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10090631 = score(doc=2641,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.43587846 = fieldWeight in 2641, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2641)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The German Internet Clearinghouse SocioGuide has changed to a database management system. Accordingly the metadata description scheme has become more detailed. The main information types are: institutions, persons, literature, tools, data sets, objects, topics, processes and services. Some of the description elements, such as title, resource identifier, and creator are universal, whereas others, such as primary/secondary information, and availability are specific to information type and cannot be generalized by referring to Dublin Core elements. The quality of Internet sources is indicated implicitly by characteristics, such as extent, restriction, or status. The SocioGuide is managed in DBClear, a generic system that can be adapted to different source types. It makes distributed input possible and contains workflow components.
  15. Collier, M.: ¬The business aims of eight national libraries in digital library co-operation : a study carried out for the business plan of The European Library (TEL) project (2005) 0.03
    0.025052518 = product of:
      0.050105035 = sum of:
        0.03430505 = weight(_text_:26 in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03430505 = score(doc=4951,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
        0.015799982 = product of:
          0.031599965 = sum of:
            0.031599965 = weight(_text_:access in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031599965 = score(doc=4951,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.18724121 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - To describe the process and results of the business-planning workpackage of The European Library (TEL) project, in which eight national libraries collaborated on a joint approach to access to their digital libraries. Design/methodology/approach - The methodology was in three parts: first, a literature review and the mapping of the partners' existing and planned digital products and services, then a structured interview or survey to determine the partners' business requirements from TEL, then a harmonization process, and finally the results were then combined with normal business planning elements to produce a mission and final business plan. Findings - Business planning for digital libraries has hitherto not been widely reported. The methodology proved to be an effective method of achieving mutual agreement among partners with widely different aims and characteristics. Eleven harmonized service aspirations were agreed and five categories of business aims. Research limitations/implications - Focused on the business aims of national libraries, but the methodology can be relevant to other collaborative projects. Together with the few existing other reports, this can form the basis for a new field of work. Practical implications - The work described led directly to the creation of an operational service, which will be open to all European national libraries. Originality/value - As far as is known, the first reporting of a collaborative international planning process for a digital library, and maybe the first multi-partner business plan between national libraries.
    Date
    15. 2.2006 11:26:57
  16. Dani, A.; Chatzopoulou, C.; Siatri, R.; Mystakopoulos, F.; Antonopoulou, S.; Katrinaki, E.; Garoufallou, E.: Digital libraries evaluation : measuring Europeana's usability (2015) 0.03
    0.025052518 = product of:
      0.050105035 = sum of:
        0.03430505 = weight(_text_:26 in 2395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03430505 = score(doc=2395,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 2395, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2395)
        0.015799982 = product of:
          0.031599965 = sum of:
            0.031599965 = weight(_text_:access in 2395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031599965 = score(doc=2395,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.18724121 = fieldWeight in 2395, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2395)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Europeana is an international trusted digital initiative providing access, from a single entry point, to prized collections from a number of European cultural institutions. Advanced Internet and digital technologies present new ways to connect with users; and there is a need continued evaluation of digital libraries. This paper reports on a task oriented, usability study exploring a number of aspects including user satisfaction specific to the Europeana Digital Library. Participants were students from Library Science and Information Systems department, who had some basic experience searching digital collections for information. Participants performed 13 tasks, and focused on the Hellenistic collection. Methodologically, the test was consisted of a list of tasks that among others aimed to assess user satisfaction and interest while performing them. The method applied was measuring Effectiveness, Efficiency, Learnability and Satisfaction. Despite the fact that it was not the first time that they came in contact with a digital library, several participants had difficulties while performing selected tasks, especially when they involved a variety of search types. In general, all of the participants seemed to comprehend how Europeana is organized, although the results also indicate that participants had feelings that expectations were not met when performing more complex tasks.
    Date
    19.12.2014 19:26:51
  17. Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000) 0.02
    0.02286569 = product of:
      0.09146276 = sum of:
        0.09146276 = sum of:
          0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044239953 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
          0.04722281 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04722281 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Information subject gateways provide targeted discovery services for their users, giving access to Web resources selected according to quality and subject coverage criteria. Information gateways recognise that they must collaborate on a wide range of issues relating to content to ensure continued success. This report is informed by discussion of content activities at the 1999 Imesh Workshop. The author considers the implications for subject based gateways of co-operation regarding coverage policy, creation of metadata, and provision of searching and browsing across services. Other possibilities for co-operation include working more closely with information providers, and diclosure of information in joint metadata registries
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:54
  18. Price, A.: NOVAGate : a Nordic gateway to electronic resources in the forestry, veterinary and agricultural sciences (2000) 0.02
    0.02286569 = product of:
      0.09146276 = sum of:
        0.09146276 = sum of:
          0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 4874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044239953 = score(doc=4874,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 4874, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4874)
          0.04722281 = weight(_text_:22 in 4874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04722281 = score(doc=4874,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4874, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4874)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    NOVAGate is a subject-based information gateway covering electronic resources in the agricultural, veterinary and related fields. The service, which opened in July 1998, is produced by the veterinary and agricultural libraries of the 5 Nordic countries - Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden - which serve the NOVA University. The gateway covers Nordic and European resources as well as the resources of international organizations, but being planned is a network of subject gateways which will give access to a wide range of international quality resources within the agricultural, veterinary and related fields. The service uses the ROADS software
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:00
  19. Cervone, F.: Library portals and gateways (2009) 0.02
    0.02286569 = product of:
      0.09146276 = sum of:
        0.09146276 = sum of:
          0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 3839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044239953 = score(doc=3839,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 3839, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3839)
          0.04722281 = weight(_text_:22 in 3839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04722281 = score(doc=3839,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3839, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3839)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries have had web presences since the introduction of the World Wide Web. Providing access to information provided by the library has been attempted through various means throughout the years but no method has been as popular or pervasive as the uses of library gateways and portals. Development of gateways and portals in libraries has been affected by many factors many of which have been outside the direct control of libraries or librarians. Both the history of library practice in this area and these external factors have had a substantial impact on the state of library portal and gateway development today.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:27
  20. Zia, L.L.: ¬The NSF National Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education Digital Library (NSDL) Program : new projects from fiscal year 2004 (2005) 0.02
    0.022577878 = product of:
      0.045155756 = sum of:
        0.035675768 = weight(_text_:description in 1221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035675768 = score(doc=1221,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.1541063 = fieldWeight in 1221, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1221)
        0.009479989 = product of:
          0.018959979 = sum of:
            0.018959979 = weight(_text_:access in 1221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018959979 = score(doc=1221,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.11234473 = fieldWeight in 1221, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1221)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In fall 2004, the National Science Foundation's (NSF) National Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education Digital Library (NSDL) program made new grants in three tracks: Pathways, Services, and Targeted Research. Together with projects started in fiscal years (FY) 2000-03 these new grants continue the development of a national digital library of high quality educational resources to support learning at all levels in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). By enabling broad access to reliable and authoritative learning and teaching materials and associated services in a digital environment, the National Science Digital Library expects to promote continual improvements in the quality of formal STEM education, and also to serve as a resource for informal and lifelong learning. Proposals for the FY05 funding cycle are due April 11, 2005, and the full solicitation is available at <http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf05545>. Two NSF directorates, the Directorate for Geosciences (GEO) and the Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences (MPS) have both provided significant co-funding for over twenty projects in the first four years of the program, illustrating the NSDL program's facilitation of the integration of research and education, an important strategic objective of the NSF. In FY2004, the NSDL program introduced a new Pathways track, replacing the earlier Collections track. The Services track strongly encouraged two particular types of projects: (1) selection services and (2) usage development workshops. * Pathways projects provide stewardship for educational content and services needed by a broad community of learners; * Selection services projects identify and increase the high-quality STEM educational content known to NSDL; and * Usage development workshops engage new communities of learners in the use of NSDL and its resources.
    These three elements reflect a refinement of NSDL's initial emphasis on collecting educational resources, materials, and other digital learning objects, towards enabling learners to "connect" or otherwise find pathways to resources appropriate to their needs. Projects are also developing both the capacities of individual users and the capacity of larger communities of learners to use and contribute to NSDL. For the FY2004 funding cycle, one hundred forty-four proposals sought approximately $126.5 million in total funding. Twenty-four new awards were made with a cumulative budget of approximately $10.2 million. These include four in the Pathways track, twelve in the Services track, and eight in the Targeted Research track. As in the earlier years of the program, sister directorates to the NSF Directorate for Education and Human Resources (EHR) are providing significant co-funding of projects. Participating directorates for FY2004 are GEO and MPS. Within EHR, the Advanced Technological Education program and the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research are also co-funding projects. Complete information on the technical and organizational progress of NSDL including links to current Standing Committees and community workspaces may be found at <http://nsdl.org/community/nsdlgroups.php>. All workspaces are open to the public, and interested organizations and individuals are encouraged to learn more about NSDL and join in its development. Following is a list of the new FY04 awards displaying the official NSF award number, the project title, the grantee institution, and the name of the Principal Investigator (PI). A condensed description of the project is also included. Full abstracts are available from the NSDL program site (under Related URLs see the link to NSDL program site (under Related URLs see the link to Abstracts of Recent Awards Made Through This Program.) The projects are displayed by track and are listed by award number. In addition, seven of these projects have explicit relevance to applications to pre-K to 12 education (indicated with a * below). Four others have clear potential for application to the pre-K to 12 arena (indicated with a ** below).

Years

Languages

  • e 83
  • d 48

Types

  • a 114
  • el 29
  • m 6
  • s 4
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…