Search (77 results, page 1 of 4)

0.081872545 = product of:
  0.16374509 = sum of:
    0.10977616 = weight(_text_:26 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10977616 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.62429106 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
    0.05396893 = product of:
      0.10793786 = sum of:
        0.10793786 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10793786 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

22. 1.2012 13:01:26

0.081804164 = product of:
  0.16360833 = sum of:
    0.11891922 = weight(_text_:description in 509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11891922 = score(doc=509,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.5136877 = fieldWeight in 509, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=509)
    0.0446891 = product of:
      0.0893782 = sum of:
        0.0893782 = weight(_text_:access in 509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0893782 = score(doc=509,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.5295981 = fieldWeight in 509, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Bibliography on all aspects of online public access catalogues, covering the period to 1988. Citations are listed in subject order supplemented by an author index. A description of the subject coverage, source of citations and how to use the bibliography is given in the introduction.

0.07487409 = product of:
  0.14974818 = sum of:
    0.071351536 = weight(_text_:description in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071351536 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.3082126 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
    0.07839665 = sum of:
      0.037919957 = weight(_text_:access in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037919957 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04979191 = queryNorm
          0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
      0.040476695 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040476695 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04979191 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This paper surveys the English-language literature on cataloging and classification published during 2011 and 2012, covering both theory and application. A major theme of the literature centered on Resource Description and Access (RDA), as the period covered in this review includes the conclusion of the RDA test, revisions to RDA, and the implementation decision. Explorations in the theory and practical applications of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), upon which RDA is organized, are also heavily represented. Library involvement with linked data through the creation of prototypes and vocabularies are explored further during the period. Other areas covered in the review include: classification, controlled vocabularies and name authority, evaluation and history of cataloging, special formats cataloging, cataloging and discovery services, non-AACR2/RDA metadata, cataloging workflows, and the education and careers of catalogers.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.049082495 = product of:
  0.09816499 = sum of:
    0.071351536 = weight(_text_:description in 2156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071351536 = score(doc=2156,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.3082126 = fieldWeight in 2156, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2156)
    0.026813459 = product of:
      0.053626917 = sum of:
        0.053626917 = weight(_text_:access in 2156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053626917 = score(doc=2156,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.31775886 = fieldWeight in 2156, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2156)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Data occupy a key role in our information society. However, although the amount of published data continues to grow and terms such as data deluge and big data today characterize numerous (research) initiatives, much work is still needed in the direction of publishing data in order to make them effectively discoverable, available, and reusable by others. Several barriers hinder data publishing, from lack of attribution and rewards, vague citation practices, and quality issues to a rather general lack of a data-sharing culture. Lately, data journals have overcome some of these barriers. In this study of more than 100 currently existing data journals, we describe the approaches they promote for data set description, availability, citation, quality, and open access. We close by identifying ways to expand and strengthen the data journals approach as a means to promote data set access and exploitation.

0.04756769 = product of:
  0.19027077 = sum of:
    0.19027077 = weight(_text_:description in 3713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19027077 = score(doc=3713,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.8219003 = fieldWeight in 3713, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3713)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Description or citation of some 6000 titles

0.04756769 = product of:
  0.19027077 = sum of:
    0.19027077 = weight(_text_:description in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19027077 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.8219003 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.04756769 = product of:
  0.19027077 = sum of:
    0.19027077 = weight(_text_:description in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19027077 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.8219003 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.04756769 = product of:
  0.19027077 = sum of:
    0.19027077 = weight(_text_:description in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19027077 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.8219003 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.04756769 = product of:
  0.19027077 = sum of:
    0.19027077 = weight(_text_:description in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19027077 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.8219003 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.04756769 = product of:
  0.19027077 = sum of:
    0.19027077 = weight(_text_:description in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19027077 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.8219003 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.040936273 = product of:
  0.081872545 = sum of:
    0.05488808 = weight(_text_:26 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05488808 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
    0.026984464 = product of:
      0.05396893 = sum of:
        0.05396893 = weight(_text_:22 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05396893 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22
23.12.2006 11:13:26

0.040084027 = product of:
  0.08016805 = sum of:
    0.05488808 = weight(_text_:26 in 3695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05488808 = score(doc=3695,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 3695, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3695)
    0.025279973 = product of:
      0.050559945 = sum of:
        0.050559945 = weight(_text_:access in 3695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050559945 = score(doc=3695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 3695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3695)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Points out that expert systems have great potential to enhance access to information retrieval systems as they use expertise to carry out tasks such as diagnosis and planning and make expertise available to nonexperts. Potential end users of online information retrieval systems are frequently deterred by the complexity of theses systems. Expert systems can mediate between the searcher and the information retrieval system and might be the key both to increasing and end user searching and to improving the quality of searches overall

Source

Annual review of information science and technology. 26(1991), S.113-154

0.03760556 = product of:
  0.15042225 = sum of:
    0.15042225 = weight(_text_:description in 4283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15042225 = score(doc=4283,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.64976925 = fieldWeight in 4283, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4283)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Information retrieval - the retrieval, primarily, of documents or textual material - is fundamentally a linguistic process. At the very least we must describe what we want and match that description with descriptions of the information that is available to us. Furthermore, when we describe what we want, we must mean something by that description. This is a deceptively simple act, but such linguistic events have been the grist for philosophical analysis since Aristotle. Although there are complexities involved in referring to authors, document types, or other categories of information retrieval context, here I wish to focus an one of the most problematic activities in information retrieval: the description of the intellectual content of information items. And even though I take information retrieval to involve the description and retrieval of written text, what I say here is applicable to any information item whose intellectual content can be described for retrieval-books, documents, images, audio clips, video clips, scientific specimens, engineering schematics, and so forth. For convenience, though, I will refer only to the description and retrieval of documents. The description of intellectual content can go wrong in many obvious ways. We may describe what we want incorrectly; we may describe it correctly but in such general terms that its description is useless for retrieval; or we may describe what we want correctly, but misinterpret the descriptions of available information, and thereby match our description of what we want incorrectly. From a linguistic point of view, we can be misunderstood in the process of retrieval in many ways. Because the philosophy of language deals specifically with how we are understood and mis-understood, it should have some use for understanding the process of description in information retrieval. First, however, let us examine more closely the kinds of misunderstandings that can occur in information retrieval. We use language in searching for information in two principal ways. We use it to describe what we want and to discriminate what we want from other information that is available to us but that we do not want. Description and discrimination together articulate the goals of the information search process; they also delineate the two principal ways in which language can fail us in this process. Van Rijsbergen (1979) was the first to make this distinction, calling them "representation" and "discrimination.""

0.037002854 = product of:
  0.07400571 = sum of:
    0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 4243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04116606 = score(doc=4243,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 4243, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4243)
    0.03283965 = product of:
      0.0656793 = sum of:
        0.0656793 = weight(_text_:access in 4243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0656793 = score(doc=4243,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.38917357 = fieldWeight in 4243, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4243)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Inequities in information creation, production, distribution, and use are nothing new. Throughout human history some people have been more educated, better connected, more widely traveled, or more wellinformed than others. Until recently, relatively few have enjoyed the benefits of literacy, and even fewer could afford to own books. In the age of mass media, societies and social groups have varied dramatically in terms of their access to and uses of print, radio, television, film, telephone, and telegraph. What is new, however, is the growing attention being given to informational inequities in an increasingly information-driven global economy. Across disciplinary, national, and cultural boundaries, the widespread agreement is that the use of newer information and communication technologies (ICTs), particularly the Internet, has accelerated the production, circulation, and consumption of information in every form. But also a growing sense has arisen that ICTs have helped to exacerbate existing differences in information access and use, and may even have fostered new types of barriers. As Hess and Ostrom (2001, p. 45) point out, "Distributed digital technologies have the dual capacity to increase as well as restrict access to information."

Date

23.10.2005 19:49:26

0.02744404 = product of:
  0.10977616 = sum of:
    0.10977616 = weight(_text_:26 in 311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10977616 = score(doc=311,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.62429106 = fieldWeight in 311, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=311)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Library resources and technical services. 26(1982), S.263-376

0.02744404 = product of:
  0.10977616 = sum of:
    0.10977616 = weight(_text_:26 in 3724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10977616 = score(doc=3724,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.62429106 = fieldWeight in 3724, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3724)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

13. 7.2008 9:26:44

0.026538998 = product of:
  0.10615599 = sum of:
    0.10615599 = sum of:
      0.0656793 = weight(_text_:access in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0656793 = score(doc=2548,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04979191 = queryNorm
          0.38917357 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
      0.040476695 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040476695 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04979191 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.024013536 = product of:
  0.096054144 = sum of:
    0.096054144 = weight(_text_:26 in 7019) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.096054144 = score(doc=7019,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.5462547 = fieldWeight in 7019, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7019)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Online. 18(1994) no.1, S.14-26

0.024013536 = product of:
  0.096054144 = sum of:
    0.096054144 = weight(_text_:26 in 1596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.096054144 = score(doc=1596,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.5462547 = fieldWeight in 1596, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1596)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

12.12.2014 18:26:13

0.023783846 = product of:
  0.09513538 = sum of:
    0.09513538 = weight(_text_:description in 5148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09513538 = score(doc=5148,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.41095015 = fieldWeight in 5148, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5148)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Cologne Library School ran a project to construct a database for literature on content cataloguing and fringe disciplines. Software was the BISMAS 1.0 programme and is now the 1.5 version. The category scheme, indexes and retrieval possibilities are described. Retrieval is mainly free text, using the whole document description and all descriptive categories. BISMAS does not permit standard data file administration so a further database was provided ...