Search (106 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Hansen, P.; Karlgren, J.: Effects of foreign language and task scenario on relevance assessment (2005) 0.05
    0.053216573 = product of:
      0.106433146 = sum of:
        0.08408859 = weight(_text_:description in 4393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08408859 = score(doc=4393,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.36323205 = fieldWeight in 4393, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4393)
        0.02234455 = product of:
          0.0446891 = sum of:
            0.0446891 = weight(_text_:access in 4393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0446891 = score(doc=4393,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.26479906 = fieldWeight in 4393, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4393)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to investigate how readers assess relevance of retrieved documents in a foreign language they know well compared with their native language, and whether work-task scenario descriptions have effect on the assessment process. Design/methodology/approach - Queries, test collections, and relevance assessments were used from the 2002 Interactive CLEF. Swedish first-language speakers, fluent in English, were given simulated information-seeking scenarios and presented with retrieval results in both languages. Twenty-eight subjects in four groups were asked to rate the retrieved text documents by relevance. A two-level work-task scenario description framework was developed and applied to facilitate the study of context effects on the assessment process. Findings - Relevance assessment takes longer in a foreign language than in the user first language. The quality of assessments by comparison with pre-assessed results is inferior to those made in the users' first language. Work-task scenario descriptions had an effect on the assessment process, both by measured access time and by self-report by subjects. However, effects on results by traditional relevance ranking were detectable. This may be an argument for extending the traditional IR experimental topical relevance measures to cater for context effects. Originality/value - An extended two-level work-task scenario description framework was developed and applied. Contextual aspects had an effect on the relevance assessment process. English texts took longer to assess than Swedish and were assessed less well, especially for the most difficult queries. The IR research field needs to close this gap and to design information access systems with users' language competence in mind.
  2. Cuadra, C.A.; Katter, R.V.: Experimental studies of relevance judgements: final report : Vol.2: description of individual studies (1967) 0.05
    0.04756769 = product of:
      0.19027077 = sum of:
        0.19027077 = weight(_text_:description in 5356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19027077 = score(doc=5356,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.8219003 = fieldWeight in 5356, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5356)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  3. Wolfram, D.; Volz, A.; Dimitroff, A.: ¬The effect of linkage structure on retrieval performance in a hypertext-based bibliographic retrieval system (1996) 0.05
    0.045020256 = product of:
      0.09004051 = sum of:
        0.067920536 = weight(_text_:26 in 6622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067920536 = score(doc=6622,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.3862604 = fieldWeight in 6622, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6622)
        0.022119977 = product of:
          0.044239953 = sum of:
            0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 6622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044239953 = score(doc=6622,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 6622, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6622)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Investigates how linkage environments in a hypertext based bibliographic retrieval system affect retrieval performance for novice and experienced searchers, 2 systems, 1 with inter record linkages to authors and descriptors and 1 that also included title and abstract keywords, were tested. No significant differences in retrieval performance and system usage were found for most search tests. The enhanced system did provide better performance where title and abstract keywords provided the most direct access to relevant records. The findings have implications for the design of bilbiographic information retrieval systems using hypertext linkages
    Date
    26. 2.1997 20:26:38
  4. Cross-language information retrieval (1998) 0.04
    0.043540955 = product of:
      0.058054607 = sum of:
        0.029729806 = weight(_text_:description in 6299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029729806 = score(doc=6299,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.12842192 = fieldWeight in 6299, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=6299)
        0.017152525 = weight(_text_:26 in 6299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017152525 = score(doc=6299,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.097545475 = fieldWeight in 6299, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=6299)
        0.011172275 = product of:
          0.02234455 = sum of:
            0.02234455 = weight(_text_:access in 6299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02234455 = score(doc=6299,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.13239953 = fieldWeight in 6299, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=6299)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Machine translation review: 1999, no.10, S.26-27 (D. Lewis): "Cross Language Information Retrieval (CLIR) addresses the growing need to access large volumes of data across language boundaries. The typical requirement is for the user to input a free form query, usually a brief description of a topic, into a search or retrieval engine which returns a list, in ranked order, of documents or web pages that are relevant to the topic. The search engine matches the terms in the query to indexed terms, usually keywords previously derived from the target documents. Unlike monolingual information retrieval, CLIR requires query terms in one language to be matched to indexed terms in another. Matching can be done by bilingual dictionary lookup, full machine translation, or by applying statistical methods. A query's success is measured in terms of recall (how many potentially relevant target documents are found) and precision (what proportion of documents found are relevant). Issues in CLIR are how to translate query terms into index terms, how to eliminate alternative translations (e.g. to decide that French 'traitement' in a query means 'treatment' and not 'salary'), and how to rank or weight translation alternatives that are retained (e.g. how to order the French terms 'aventure', 'business', 'affaire', and 'liaison' as relevant translations of English 'affair'). Grefenstette provides a lucid and useful overview of the field and the problems. The volume brings together a number of experiments and projects in CLIR. Mark Davies (New Mexico State University) describes Recuerdo, a Spanish retrieval engine which reduces translation ambiguities by scanning indexes for parallel texts; it also uses either a bilingual dictionary or direct equivalents from a parallel corpus in order to compare results for queries on parallel texts. Lisa Ballesteros and Bruce Croft (University of Massachusetts) use a 'local feedback' technique which automatically enhances a query by adding extra terms to it both before and after translation; such terms can be derived from documents known to be relevant to the query.
    Christian Fluhr at al (DIST/SMTI, France) outline the EMIR (European Multilingual Information Retrieval) and ESPRIT projects. They found that using SYSTRAN to machine translate queries and to access material from various multilingual databases produced less relevant results than a method referred to as 'multilingual reformulation' (the mechanics of which are only hinted at). An interesting technique is Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI), described by Michael Littman et al (Brown University) and, most clearly, by David Evans et al (Carnegie Mellon University). LSI involves creating matrices of documents and the terms they contain and 'fitting' related documents into a reduced matrix space. This effectively allows queries to be mapped onto a common semantic representation of the documents. Eugenio Picchi and Carol Peters (Pisa) report on a procedure to create links between translation equivalents in an Italian-English parallel corpus. The links are used to construct parallel linguistic contexts in real-time for any term or combination of terms that is being searched for in either language. Their interest is primarily lexicographic but they plan to apply the same procedure to comparable corpora, i.e. to texts which are not translations of each other but which share the same domain. Kiyoshi Yamabana et al (NEC, Japan) address the issue of how to disambiguate between alternative translations of query terms. Their DMAX (double maximise) method looks at co-occurrence frequencies between both source language words and target language words in order to arrive at the most probable translation. The statistical data for the decision are derived, not from the translation texts but independently from monolingual corpora in each language. An interactive user interface allows the user to influence the selection of terms during the matching process. Denis Gachot et al (SYSTRAN) describe the SYSTRAN NLP browser, a prototype tool which collects parsing information derived from a text or corpus previously translated with SYSTRAN. The user enters queries into the browser in either a structured or free form and receives grammatical and lexical information about the source text and/or its translation.
  5. Ellis, D.: Progress and problems in information retrieval (1996) 0.04
    0.040936273 = product of:
      0.081872545 = sum of:
        0.05488808 = weight(_text_:26 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05488808 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
        0.026984464 = product of:
          0.05396893 = sum of:
            0.05396893 = weight(_text_:22 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05396893 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    26. 7.2002 20:22:46
  6. Wilbur, W.J.: Human subjectivity and performance limits in document retrieval (1999) 0.03
    0.033960268 = product of:
      0.13584107 = sum of:
        0.13584107 = weight(_text_:26 in 4539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13584107 = score(doc=4539,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.7725208 = fieldWeight in 4539, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4539)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    26. 3.2000 16:26:46
  7. Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989) 0.03
    0.030702204 = product of:
      0.061404407 = sum of:
        0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04116606 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
        0.020238347 = product of:
          0.040476695 = sum of:
            0.040476695 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040476695 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    9. 1.1996 10:22:31
    Source
    ASIS'89. Managing information and technology. Proceedings of the 52nd annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Washington D.C., 30.10.-2.11.1989. Vol.26. Ed.by J. Katzer and G.B. Newby
  8. Logan, E.: Cognitive styles and online behaviour of novice searchers (1990) 0.03
    0.02744404 = product of:
      0.10977616 = sum of:
        0.10977616 = weight(_text_:26 in 6891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10977616 = score(doc=6891,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.62429106 = fieldWeight in 6891, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6891)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 26(1990), S.503-510
  9. Robertson, S.E.: ¬The methodology of information retrieval experiment (1981) 0.03
    0.02744404 = product of:
      0.10977616 = sum of:
        0.10977616 = weight(_text_:26 in 3146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10977616 = score(doc=3146,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.62429106 = fieldWeight in 3146, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3146)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:37:26
  10. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: Retrieval effectiveness (1981) 0.03
    0.02744404 = product of:
      0.10977616 = sum of:
        0.10977616 = weight(_text_:26 in 3147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10977616 = score(doc=3147,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.62429106 = fieldWeight in 3147, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3147)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:37:26
  11. Belkin, N.J.: Ineffable concepts in information retrieval (1981) 0.03
    0.02744404 = product of:
      0.10977616 = sum of:
        0.10977616 = weight(_text_:26 in 3148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10977616 = score(doc=3148,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.62429106 = fieldWeight in 3148, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3148)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:37:26
  12. Tague, J.M.: ¬The pragmatics of information retrieval experimentation (1981) 0.03
    0.02744404 = product of:
      0.10977616 = sum of:
        0.10977616 = weight(_text_:26 in 3149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10977616 = score(doc=3149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.62429106 = fieldWeight in 3149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3149)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:37:26
  13. Barraclough, E.D.: Opportunities for testing with online systems (1981) 0.03
    0.02744404 = product of:
      0.10977616 = sum of:
        0.10977616 = weight(_text_:26 in 3151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10977616 = score(doc=3151,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.62429106 = fieldWeight in 3151, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3151)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:37:26
  14. Keen, E.M.: Laboratory tests of manual systems (1981) 0.03
    0.02744404 = product of:
      0.10977616 = sum of:
        0.10977616 = weight(_text_:26 in 3152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10977616 = score(doc=3152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.62429106 = fieldWeight in 3152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3152)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:37:26
  15. Oddy, R.N.: Laboratory tests : automatic systems (1981) 0.03
    0.02744404 = product of:
      0.10977616 = sum of:
        0.10977616 = weight(_text_:26 in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10977616 = score(doc=3153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.62429106 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:37:26
  16. Heine, M.D.: Simulation, and simulation experiments (1981) 0.03
    0.02744404 = product of:
      0.10977616 = sum of:
        0.10977616 = weight(_text_:26 in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10977616 = score(doc=3154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.62429106 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:37:26
  17. Cooper, W.S.: Gedanken experimentation : an alternative to traditional system testing? (1981) 0.03
    0.02744404 = product of:
      0.10977616 = sum of:
        0.10977616 = weight(_text_:26 in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10977616 = score(doc=3155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.62429106 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:37:26
  18. Sparck Jones, K.: Retrieval system tests 1958-1978 (1981) 0.03
    0.02744404 = product of:
      0.10977616 = sum of:
        0.10977616 = weight(_text_:26 in 3156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10977616 = score(doc=3156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.62429106 = fieldWeight in 3156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3156)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:37:26
  19. Sparck Jones, K.: ¬The Cranfield tests (1981) 0.03
    0.02744404 = product of:
      0.10977616 = sum of:
        0.10977616 = weight(_text_:26 in 3157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10977616 = score(doc=3157,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.62429106 = fieldWeight in 3157, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3157)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:37:26
  20. Evans, L.: ¬An experiment : search strategy variations in SDI (1981) 0.03
    0.02744404 = product of:
      0.10977616 = sum of:
        0.10977616 = weight(_text_:26 in 3158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10977616 = score(doc=3158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.62429106 = fieldWeight in 3158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3158)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:37:26

Years

Languages

  • e 98
  • d 6
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 96
  • s 6
  • m 4
  • el 2
  • r 2
  • More… Less…