Search (49 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Olson, H.A.; Boll, J.J.: Subject access in online catalogs (2001) 0.06
    0.064314656 = product of:
      0.12862931 = sum of:
        0.09702934 = weight(_text_:26 in 4137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09702934 = score(doc=4137,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.5518006 = fieldWeight in 4137, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4137)
        0.031599965 = product of:
          0.06319993 = sum of:
            0.06319993 = weight(_text_:access in 4137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06319993 = score(doc=4137,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.37448242 = fieldWeight in 4137, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4137)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    26. 8.2005 15:12:32
    26. 8.2005 15:17:50
  2. Aluri, R.D.; Kemp, A.; Boll, J.J.: Subject analysis in online catalogs (1991) 0.04
    0.043169998 = product of:
      0.086339995 = sum of:
        0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048027072 = score(doc=863,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 863, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=863)
        0.038312923 = product of:
          0.07662585 = sum of:
            0.07662585 = weight(_text_:access in 863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07662585 = score(doc=863,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.45403582 = fieldWeight in 863, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=863)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    26. 8.2005 15:16:28
    Footnote
    2. Aufl. unter: Olson, H.A., J.J. Boll: Subject access in online catalogs. 2nd ed. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited 2001. xv, 333 S. ISBN 1-56308-800-2
    LCSH
    Catalogs, On / line / Subject access
    Subject
    Catalogs, On / line / Subject access
  3. Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995) 0.04
    0.040936273 = product of:
      0.081872545 = sum of:
        0.05488808 = weight(_text_:26 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05488808 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
        0.026984464 = product of:
          0.05396893 = sum of:
            0.05396893 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05396893 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    2. 4.1996 20:53:26
    Source
    Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22
  4. Devadason, F.J.; Intaraksa, N.; Patamawongjariya, P.; Desai, K.: Faceted indexing application for organizing and accessing internet resources (2003) 0.03
    0.032721665 = product of:
      0.06544333 = sum of:
        0.04756769 = weight(_text_:description in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04756769 = score(doc=3966,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.20547508 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
        0.01787564 = product of:
          0.03575128 = sum of:
            0.03575128 = weight(_text_:access in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03575128 = score(doc=3966,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.21183924 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Organizing and providing access to the resources an the Internet has been a problem area in spite of the availability of sophisticated search engines and other Software tools. There have been several attempts to organize the resources an the WWW. Some of them have tried to use traditional library classification schemes such as the Library of Congress Classification, the Dewey Decimal Classification and others. However there is a need to assign proper subject headings to them and present them in a logical or hierarchical sequence to cater to the need for browsing. This paper attempts to describe an experimental system designed to organize and provide access to web documents using a faceted pre-coordinate indexing system based an the Deep Structure Indexing System (DSIS) derived from POPSI (Postulate based Permuted Subject Indexing) of Bhattacharyya, and the facet analysis and chain indexing System of Ranganathan. A prototype software system has been designed to create a database of records specifying Web documents according to the Dublin Core and input a faceted subject heading according to DSIS. Synonymous terms are added to the standard terms in the heading using appropriate symbols. Once the data are entered along with a description and URL of the Web document, the record is stored in the system. More than one faceted subject heading can be assigned to a record depending an the content of the original document. The system stores the surrogates and keeps the faceted subject headings separately after establishing a link. Search is carried out an index entries derived from the faceted subject heading using chain indexing technique. If a single term is input, the system searches for its presence in the faceted subject headings and displays the subject headings in a sorted sequence reflecting an organizing sequence. If the number of retrieved headings is too large (running into more than a page) then the user has the option of entering another search term to be searched in combination. The system searches subject headings already retrieved and look for those containing the second term. The retrieved faceted subject headings can be displayed and browsed. When the relevant subject heading is selected the system displays the records with their URLs. Using the URL the original document an the web can be accessed. The prototype system developed under Windows NT environment using ASP and web server is under rigorous testing. The database and indexes management routines need further development.
  5. Devadason, F.J.; Intaraksa, N.; Patamawongjariya, P.; Desai, K.: Faceted indexing based system for organizing and accessing Internet resources (2002) 0.03
    0.028631456 = product of:
      0.057262912 = sum of:
        0.04162173 = weight(_text_:description in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04162173 = score(doc=97,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.17979069 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
        0.015641185 = product of:
          0.03128237 = sum of:
            0.03128237 = weight(_text_:access in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03128237 = score(doc=97,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.18535934 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Organizing and providing access to the resources an the Internet has been a problem area in spite of the availability of sophisticated search engines and other Software tools. There have been several attempts to organize the resources an the World Wide Web. Some of them have tried to use traditional library classification schemes such as the Library of Congress Classification, the Dewey Decimal Classification and others. However there is a need to assign proper subject headings to them and present them in a logical or hierarchical sequence to cater to the need for browsing. This paper attempts to describe an experimental system designed to organize and provide access to web documents using a faceted pre-coordinate indexing system based an the Deep Structure Indexing System (DSIS) derived from POPSI (Postulate based Permuted Subject Indexing) of Bhattacharyya, and the facet analysis and chain indexing system of Ranganathan. A prototype Software System has been designed to create a database of records specifying Web documents according to the Dublin Core and to input a faceted subject heading according to DSIS. Synonymous terms are added to the Standard terms in the heading using appropriate symbols. Once the data are entered along with a description and the URL of the web document, the record is stored in the System. More than one faceted subject heading can be assigned to a record depending an the content of the original document. The System stores the Surrogates and keeps the faceted subject headings separately after establishing a link. The search is carried out an index entries derived from the faceted subject heading using the chain indexing technique. If a single term is Input, the System searches for its presence in the faceted subject headings and displays the subject headings in a sorted sequence reflecting an organizing sequence. If the number of retrieved Keadings is too large (running into more than a page) the user has the option of entering another search term to be searched in combination. The System searches subject headings already retrieved and looks for those containing the second term. The retrieved faceted subject headings can be displayed and browsed. When the relevant subject heading is selected the system displays the records with their URLs. Using the URL, the original document an the web can be accessed. The prototype system developed in a Windows NT environment using ASP and a web server is under rigorous testing. The database and Index management routines need further development.
  6. Stone, A.T.: Up-ending Cutter's pyramid : the case for making subject references to broader terms (1996) 0.02
    0.02286569 = product of:
      0.09146276 = sum of:
        0.09146276 = sum of:
          0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 7238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044239953 = score(doc=7238,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 7238, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7238)
          0.04722281 = weight(_text_:22 in 7238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04722281 = score(doc=7238,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7238, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7238)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Subject access in library OPACs might be improved for some users by taking advantage of all of the hierarchical relationships which are indicated on existing LCSH entries. Recommends that cross references pointing to broader terms be displayed, in addition to those for narrower and related terms to which users have traditionally benn directed. Traces the old practice back to Charles Cutter, reports on deliberations of the ALCTS Subject Analysis Committee nearly 120 years later. Discusses practical concerns related to implementing the change, including the accuracy of hierarchical relationships in the LCSH system and possible techniques for using the MARC format to generate the cross references
    Date
    22. 4.1997 20:43:23
  7. Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998) 0.02
    0.02211583 = product of:
      0.08846332 = sum of:
        0.08846332 = sum of:
          0.054732744 = weight(_text_:access in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054732744 = score(doc=2337,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.3243113 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
          0.03373058 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03373058 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Despite early claims to the contemporary, thesauri continue to find use as access tools for information in the full-text environment. Their mode of use is changing, but this change actually represents an expansion rather than a contrdiction of their utility. Thesauri and similar vocabulary tools can complement full-text access by aiding users in focusing their searches, by supplementing the linguistic analysis of the text search engine, and even by serving as one of the tools used by the linguistic engine for its analysis. While human indexing contunues to be used for many databases, the trend is to increase the use of machine aids for this purpose. All machine-aided indexing (MAI) systems rely on thesauri as the basis for term selection. In the 21st century, the balance of effort between human and machine will change at both input and output, but thesauri will continue to play an important role for the foreseeable future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
  8. Lorenzo, L.; Mak, L.; Smeltekop, N.: FAST Headings in MODS : Michigan State University libraries digital repository case study (2023) 0.02
    0.020810865 = product of:
      0.08324346 = sum of:
        0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08324346 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Michigan State University Libraries (MSUL) digital repository contains numerous collections of openly available material. Since 2016, the digital repository has been using Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject headings as its primary subject vocabulary in order to streamline faceting, display, and search. The MSUL FAST use case presents some challenges that are not addressed by existing MARC-focused FAST tools. This paper will outline the MSUL digital repository team's justification for including FAST headings in the digital repository as well as workflows for adding FAST headings to Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) metadata, their maintenance, and utilization for discovery.
  9. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000) 0.02
    0.019599162 = product of:
      0.07839665 = sum of:
        0.07839665 = sum of:
          0.037919957 = weight(_text_:access in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037919957 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
          0.040476695 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040476695 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), a system originally designed as a tool for subject access to the Library's own collection in the late nineteenth century, has become, in the course of the last century, the main subject retrieval tool in library catalogs throughout the United States and in many other countries. It is one of the largest non-specialized controlled vocabularies in the world. As LCSH enters a new century, it faces an information environment that has undergone vast changes from what had prevailed when LCSH began, or, indeed, from its state in the early days of the online age. In order to continue its mission and to be useful in spheres outside library catalogs as well, LCSH must adapt to the multifarious environment. One possible approach is to adopt a series of scalable and flexible syntax and application rules to meet the needs of different user communities
    Date
    27. 5.2001 16:22:21
  10. Geißelmann, F. (Hrsg.): Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen (1994) 0.02
    0.016168486 = product of:
      0.064673945 = sum of:
        0.064673945 = sum of:
          0.03128237 = weight(_text_:access in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03128237 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.18535934 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
          0.033391573 = weight(_text_:22 in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033391573 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    15. 7.2018 16:22:16
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungen VÖB 48(1995) H.1, S.66-68 (K. Niedermair) - Vgl. auch Lepsky, K. in: Bibliotheksdienst 29(1995) H.3, S.500-519; Bibliothek: Forschung u. Praxis 19(1995) H.2, S.251-254 (G. Hartwieg; auch in: LDV-Forum Bd. 12, Nr. 2, Jg. 1995, S.22-29 [unter: http://www.jlcl.org/1995_Heft2/Rezensionen_19-27.pdf]) .
    LCSH
    Online library catalogs / Subject access
    Subject
    Online library catalogs / Subject access
  11. Mixter, J.; Childress, E.R.: FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) users : summary and case studies (2013) 0.01
    0.014864903 = product of:
      0.05945961 = sum of:
        0.05945961 = weight(_text_:description in 2011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05945961 = score(doc=2011,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.25684384 = fieldWeight in 2011, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2011)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Over the past ten years, various organizations, both public and private, have expressed interest in implementing FAST in their cataloging workflows. As interest in FAST has grown, so too has interest in knowing how FAST is being used and by whom. Since 2002 eighteen institutions (see table 1) in six countries have expressed interest in learning more about FAST and how it could be implemented in cataloging workflows. Currently OCLC is aware of nine agencies that have actually adopted or support FAST for resource description. This study, the first systematic census of FAST users undertaken by OCLC, was conducted, in part, to address these inquiries. Its purpose was to examine: how FAST is being utilized; why FAST was chosen as the cataloging vocabulary; what benefits FAST provides; and what can be done to enhance the value of FAST. Interview requests were sent to all parties that had previously contacted OCLC about FAST. Of the eighteen organizations contacted, sixteen agreed to provide information about their decision whether to use FAST (nine adopters, seven non-adopters).
  12. Cochrane, P.A.: Subject access in the online catalog (1982) 0.01
    0.012639986 = product of:
      0.050559945 = sum of:
        0.050559945 = product of:
          0.10111989 = sum of:
            0.10111989 = weight(_text_:access in 2898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10111989 = score(doc=2898,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.5991719 = fieldWeight in 2898, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2898)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  13. Nicholson, J.; Lake, S.: Implementation of FAST in two digital repositories : breaking silos, unifying subject practices (2023) 0.01
    0.012006768 = product of:
      0.048027072 = sum of:
        0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048027072 = score(doc=1174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    23.11.2023 19:26:16
  14. Bates, M.J.: Subject access in online catalogs: a design model (1986) 0.01
    0.011059988 = product of:
      0.044239953 = sum of:
        0.044239953 = product of:
          0.08847991 = sum of:
            0.08847991 = weight(_text_:access in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08847991 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.5242754 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  15. Zeng, L.: Achieving compatibility of indexing languages in online access environment (1992) 0.01
    0.011059988 = product of:
      0.044239953 = sum of:
        0.044239953 = product of:
          0.08847991 = sum of:
            0.08847991 = weight(_text_:access in 1284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08847991 = score(doc=1284,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.5242754 = fieldWeight in 1284, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1284)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  16. Hjoerland, B.; Kyllesbech Nielsen, L.: Subject access points in electronic retrieval (2001) 0.01
    0.011059988 = product of:
      0.044239953 = sum of:
        0.044239953 = product of:
          0.08847991 = sum of:
            0.08847991 = weight(_text_:access in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08847991 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.5242754 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  17. Studwell, W.E.: Of eggs and baskets : getting more access out of LC Subject Headings in an online environment (1991) 0.01
    0.011059988 = product of:
      0.044239953 = sum of:
        0.044239953 = product of:
          0.08847991 = sum of:
            0.08847991 = weight(_text_:access in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08847991 = score(doc=515,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.5242754 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries using the LCSH can increase the effectiveness of their subject access. This can be accomplished through one of four methods for applying an increased number of headings: the addition of subject headings in situations where none have been supplied by LC; the use of pattern secondary headings; the use of major + minor techniques; and the use of minor + major techniques. Each of these methods will provide additional subject access to supplement that produced by the Library of Congress
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Enhancing Access to Information: Designing Catalogs for the 21st Century
  18. Wool, G.: Filing and precoordination : how subject headings are displayed in online catalogs and why it matters (2000) 0.01
    0.010291515 = product of:
      0.04116606 = sum of:
        0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04116606 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 2.2001 11:34:26
  19. Lester, M.A.: Coincidence of user vocabulary and Library of Congress Subject Headings : experiments to improve subject access in academic library online catalogs (1989) 0.01
    0.009479989 = product of:
      0.037919957 = sum of:
        0.037919957 = product of:
          0.075839914 = sum of:
            0.075839914 = weight(_text_:access in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075839914 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.4493789 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  20. Congreve, J.: Problems of subject access : automatic generation of printed indexes and online thesaural control (1986) 0.01
    0.00893782 = product of:
      0.03575128 = sum of:
        0.03575128 = product of:
          0.07150256 = sum of:
            0.07150256 = weight(_text_:access in 2305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07150256 = score(doc=2305,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.4236785 = fieldWeight in 2305, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2305)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A research project in progress at Middlesex Polytechnic is examining the problems of providing adequate subject access from MARC-based cataloguing systems. Various forms of printed index are being evaluated and an experimental OPAC is being designed. The PRECIS RIN file will be tested as a basis for online thesaural control and as a browsing facility

Years

Languages

  • e 45
  • d 3
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 40
  • m 6
  • s 3
  • el 2
  • d 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…