-
Danskin, A.: Linked and open data : RDA and bibliographic control (2012)
0.14
0.14337601 = product of:
0.19116801 = sum of:
0.10090631 = weight(_text_:description in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10090631 = score(doc=304,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.43587846 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
0.07130171 = weight(_text_:26 in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07130171 = score(doc=304,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.40548897 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
0.018959979 = product of:
0.037919957 = sum of:
0.037919957 = weight(_text_:access in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037919957 = score(doc=304,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- RDA: Resource Description and Access is a new cataloguing standard which will replace the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition, which has been widely used in libraries since 1981. RDA, like AACR2, is a content standard providing guidance and instruction on how to identify and record attributes or properties of resources which are significant for discovery. However, RDA is also an implementation of the FRBR and FRAD models. The RDA element set and vocabularies are being published on the Open Metadata Registry as linked open data. RDA provides a rich vocabulary for the description of resources and for expressing relationships between them. This paper describes what RDA offers and considers the challenges and potential of linked open data in the broader framework of bibliographic control.
- Date
- 26. 6.2012 20:18:37
26. 6.2012 20:26:43
-
Resource Description & Access (RDA) (o.J.)
0.12
0.11702848 = product of:
0.23405696 = sum of:
0.19027077 = weight(_text_:description in 2438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19027077 = score(doc=2438,freq=8.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.8219003 = fieldWeight in 2438, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2438)
0.043786198 = product of:
0.087572396 = sum of:
0.087572396 = weight(_text_:access in 2438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.087572396 = score(doc=2438,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.51889807 = fieldWeight in 2438, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2438)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- RDA Blog or Resource Description & Access Blog is a blog on Resource Description and Access (RDA), a new library cataloging standard that provides instructions and guidelines on formulating data for resource description and discovery, organized based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), intended for use by libraries and other cultural organizations replacing Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2). Free for everyone Forever.
-
RDA: Ressource Description and Access : Draft of RDA; pt.1 (2005)
0.11
0.105363436 = product of:
0.21072687 = sum of:
0.16648692 = weight(_text_:description in 1070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16648692 = score(doc=1070,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.71916276 = fieldWeight in 1070, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1070)
0.044239953 = product of:
0.08847991 = sum of:
0.08847991 = weight(_text_:access in 1070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08847991 = score(doc=1070,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.5242754 = fieldWeight in 1070, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1070)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
-
Hartmann, S.; Haffner, A.: Linked-RDA-Data in der Praxis (2010)
0.10
0.09983213 = product of:
0.19966426 = sum of:
0.09513538 = weight(_text_:description in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09513538 = score(doc=1679,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.41095015 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
0.104528874 = sum of:
0.050559945 = weight(_text_:access in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050559945 = score(doc=1679,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
0.05396893 = weight(_text_:22 in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05396893 = score(doc=1679,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Durch den neuen Erschließungsstandard "Resource Description and Access" (RDA) lassen sich bibliografische Daten sowie Normdaten Semantic-Web-konform repräsentieren. Der Vortrag soll aufzeigen, welche Auswirkungen RDA auf die Katalogisierung in Bibliotheken und den Zugang zu den erschlossenen Ressourcen im Semantic Web hat. Anhand erster Erfahrungen aus praktischen Umsetzungen wird erläutert, wie bibliografische Daten durch RDA und Linked-Data-Technologien besser zugänglich gemacht und vor allem nachgenutzt werden können.
- Date
- 13. 2.2011 20:22:23
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.09
0.09158988 = product of:
0.18317977 = sum of:
0.14270307 = weight(_text_:description in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14270307 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.6164252 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.040476695 = product of:
0.08095339 = sum of:
0.08095339 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08095339 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Turner, J.M.; Mathieu, S.: Audio description text for indexing films (2007)
0.09
0.087732136 = product of:
0.17546427 = sum of:
0.1441819 = weight(_text_:description in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1441819 = score(doc=701,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.6228132 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.03128237 = product of:
0.06256474 = sum of:
0.06256474 = weight(_text_:access in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06256474 = score(doc=701,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.3707187 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Access to audiovisual materials should be as open and free as access to print-based materials. However, we have not yet achieved such a reality. Methods useful for organising print-based materials do not necessarily work well when applied to audiovisual and multimedia materials. In this project, we studied using audio description text and written descriptions to generate keywords for indexing moving images. We found that such sources are fruitful and helpful. In the second part of the study, we looked at the possibility of automatically translating keywords from audio description text into other languages to use them as indexing. Here again, the results are encouraging.
-
Information als Rohstoff für Innovation : Programm der Bundesregierung 1996-2000 (1996)
0.08
0.081872545 = product of:
0.16374509 = sum of:
0.10977616 = weight(_text_:26 in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10977616 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.62429106 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
0.05396893 = product of:
0.10793786 = sum of:
0.10793786 = weight(_text_:22 in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10793786 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 2.1997 19:26:34
-
Delsey, T.: ¬The Making of RDA (2016)
0.07
0.07487409 = product of:
0.14974818 = sum of:
0.071351536 = weight(_text_:description in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071351536 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.3082126 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.07839665 = sum of:
0.037919957 = weight(_text_:access in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037919957 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.040476695 = weight(_text_:22 in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040476695 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The author revisits the development of RDA from its inception in 2005 through to its initial release in 2010. The development effort is set in the context of an evolving digital environment that was transforming both the production and dissemination of information resources and the technologies used to create, store, and access data describing those resources. The author examines the interplay between strategic commitments to align RDA with new conceptual models, emerging database structures, and metadata developments in allied communities, on the one hand, and compatibility with AACR2 legacy databases on the other. Aspects of the development effort examined include the structuring of RDA as a resource description language, organizing the new standard as a working tool, and refining guidelines and instructions for recording RDA data.
- Date
- 17. 5.2016 19:22:40
-
Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: RDA: a content standard to ensure the quality of data : history of a relationship (2016)
0.06
0.06385989 = product of:
0.12771977 = sum of:
0.10090631 = weight(_text_:description in 2948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10090631 = score(doc=2948,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.43587846 = fieldWeight in 2948, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2948)
0.026813459 = product of:
0.053626917 = sum of:
0.053626917 = weight(_text_:access in 2948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053626917 = score(doc=2948,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.31775886 = fieldWeight in 2948, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2948)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- RDA Resource Description and Access are guidelines for description and access to resources designed for digital environment and released, in its first version, in 2010. RDA is based on FRBR and its derived models, that focus on users' needs and on resources of any kind of content, medium and carrier. The paper discusses relevance of main features of RDA for the future role of libraries in the context of semantic web and metadata creation and exchange. The paper aims to highlight many consequences deriving from RDA being a content standard, and in particular the change from record management to data management, differences among the two functions realized by RDA (to identify and to relate entities) and functions realized by other standard such as MARC21 (to archive data) and ISB (to visualize data) and show how, as all these functions are necessary for the catalog, RDA needs to be integrated by other rules and standard and that these tools allow the fulfilment of the variation principle defined by S.R. Ranganathan.
-
Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.06
0.06057233 = product of:
0.12114466 = sum of:
0.10090631 = weight(_text_:description in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10090631 = score(doc=2655,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.43587846 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.020238347 = product of:
0.040476695 = sum of:
0.040476695 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040476695 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The term "facet" was introduced into the field of library classification systems by Ranganathan in the 1930's [Ranganathan, 1962]. A facet is a viewpoint or aspect. In contrast to traditional classification systems, faceted systems are modular in that a domain is analyzed in terms of baseline facets which are then synthesized. In this paper, the term "facet" is used in a broader meaning. Facets can describe different aspects on the same level of abstraction or the same aspect on different levels of abstraction. The notion of facets is related to database views, multicontexts and conceptual scaling in formal concept analysis [Ganter and Wille, 1999], polymorphism in object-oriented design, aspect-oriented programming, views and contexts in description logic and semantic networks. This paper presents a definition of facets in terms of faceted knowledge representation that incorporates the traditional narrower notion of facets and potentially facilitates translation between different knowledge representation formalisms. A goal of this approach is a modular, machine-aided knowledge base design mechanism. A possible application is faceted thesaurus construction for information retrieval and data mining. Reasoning complexity depends on the size of the modules (facets). A more general analysis of complexity will be left for future research.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
-
Danskin, A.; Gryspeerdt, K.: Changing the Rules? : RDA and cataloguing in Europe. (2014)
0.06
0.06020768 = product of:
0.12041536 = sum of:
0.09513538 = weight(_text_:description in 5137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09513538 = score(doc=5137,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.41095015 = fieldWeight in 5137, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5137)
0.025279973 = product of:
0.050559945 = sum of:
0.050559945 = weight(_text_:access in 5137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050559945 = score(doc=5137,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 5137, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5137)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper provides an overview of plans to implement RDA: Resource Description & Access in Europe to replace existing cataloguing rules. It is based on survey information gathered by EURIG and CILIP CIG. It includes background on the development of RDA as a replacement for AACR2.
-
Meßmer, G.: Mit RDA fit für die Zukunft (2015)
0.06
0.06020768 = product of:
0.12041536 = sum of:
0.09513538 = weight(_text_:description in 2476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09513538 = score(doc=2476,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.41095015 = fieldWeight in 2476, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2476)
0.025279973 = product of:
0.050559945 = sum of:
0.050559945 = weight(_text_:access in 2476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050559945 = score(doc=2476,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 2476, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2476)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Mit der Einführung von RDA ist die Internationalisierung der Erschließungsstandards im deutschen Sprachraum abgeschlossen. Der Vortrag stellt Pluspunkte des Umstiegs auf das internationale Regelwerk Resource Description and Access (RDA) vor und stellt Aufwand und positive Aspekte des Regelwerkumstiegs gegenüber.
-
Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: ¬The international diffusion of RDA : a wide overview on the new guidelines (2016)
0.06
0.06020768 = product of:
0.12041536 = sum of:
0.09513538 = weight(_text_:description in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09513538 = score(doc=2944,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.41095015 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
0.025279973 = product of:
0.050559945 = sum of:
0.050559945 = weight(_text_:access in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050559945 = score(doc=2944,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This issue of Jlis.it is focused on RDA, Resource Description and Access. In light of increasing international acceptance of this new cataloging content standard, the editors of Jlis.it wish to capture the background of how RDA came to be and the implications of its implementation at this time. This special issue offers a wide overview on the new guidelines from their making to their spreading around the world.
-
Aitchison, C.R.: Cataloging virtual reality artworks: challenges and future prospects (2021)
0.06
0.057262912 = product of:
0.114525825 = sum of:
0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08324346 = score(doc=711,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 711, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=711)
0.03128237 = product of:
0.06256474 = sum of:
0.06256474 = weight(_text_:access in 711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06256474 = score(doc=711,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.3707187 = fieldWeight in 711, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=711)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In 2019, Pepperdine Libraries acquired two virtual reality artworks by filmmaker and artist Paisley Smith: Homestay and Unceded Territories. To bring awareness to these pieces, Pepperdine Libraries added these works to the library catalog, creating bibliographic records for both films. There were many challenges and considerations in cataloging virtual reality art, including factors such as the nature of the work, the limits found in Resource Description and Access (RDA) and MARC, and providing access to these works. This paper discusses these topics, as well as provides recommendations for potential future standards for cataloging virtual works.
-
Broughton, V.: Faceted classification in support of diversity : the role of concepts and terms in representing religion (2020)
0.06
0.056258798 = product of:
0.112517595 = sum of:
0.071351536 = weight(_text_:description in 5992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071351536 = score(doc=5992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.3082126 = fieldWeight in 5992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5992)
0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 5992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04116606 = score(doc=5992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 5992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5992)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The paper examines the development of facet analysis as a methodology and the role it plays in building classifications and other knowledge-organization tools. The use of categorical analysis in areas other than library and information science is also considered. The suitability of the faceted approach for humanities documentation is explored through a critical description of the FATKS (Facet Analytical Theory in Managing Knowledge Structure for Humanities) project carried out at University College London. This research focused on building a conceptual model for the subject of religion together with a relational database and search-and-browse interfaces that would support some degree of automatic classification. The paper concludes with a discussion of the differences between the conceptual model and the vocabulary used to populate it, and how, in the case of religion, the choice of terminology can create an apparent bias in the system.
- Date
- 27. 9.2020 20:26:16
-
Xu, G.; Cao, Y.; Ren, Y.; Li, X.; Feng, Z.: Network security situation awareness based on semantic ontology and user-defined rules for Internet of Things (2017)
0.06
0.05572748 = product of:
0.11145496 = sum of:
0.08408859 = weight(_text_:description in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08408859 = score(doc=306,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.36323205 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.027366372 = product of:
0.054732744 = sum of:
0.054732744 = weight(_text_:access in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054732744 = score(doc=306,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.3243113 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Internet of Things (IoT) brings the third development wave of the global information industry which makes users, network and perception devices cooperate more closely. However, if IoT has security problems, it may cause a variety of damage and even threaten human lives and properties. To improve the abilities of monitoring, providing emergency response and predicting the development trend of IoT security, a new paradigm called network security situation awareness (NSSA) is proposed. However, it is limited by its ability to mine and evaluate security situation elements from multi-source heterogeneous network security information. To solve this problem, this paper proposes an IoT network security situation awareness model using situation reasoning method based on semantic ontology and user-defined rules. Ontology technology can provide a unified and formalized description to solve the problem of semantic heterogeneity in the IoT security domain. In this paper, four key sub-domains are proposed to reflect an IoT security situation: context, attack, vulnerability and network flow. Further, user-defined rules can compensate for the limited description ability of ontology, and hence can enhance the reasoning ability of our proposed ontology model. The examples in real IoT scenarios show that the ability of the network security situation awareness that adopts our situation reasoning method is more comprehensive and more powerful reasoning abilities than the traditional NSSA methods. [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7999187/]
- Content
- DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2734681.
- Source
- IEEE Access. 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2734681, 5, (21046-21056) [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=7999187]
-
Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.: Semantic interoperability on the Web (2000)
0.05
0.05342743 = product of:
0.10685486 = sum of:
0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08324346 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
0.023611406 = product of:
0.04722281 = sum of:
0.04722281 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04722281 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- XML will have a profound impact on the way data is exchanged on the Internet. An important feature of this language is the separation of content from presentation, which makes it easier to select and/or reformat the data. However, due to the likelihood of numerous industry and domain specific DTDs, those who wish to integrate information will still be faced with the problem of semantic interoperability. In this paper we discuss why this problem is not solved by XML, and then discuss why the Resource Description Framework is only a partial solution. We then present the SHOE language, which we feel has many of the features necessary to enable a semantic web, and describe an existing set of tools that make it easy to use the language.
- Date
- 11. 5.2013 19:22:18
-
Coyle, K.; Hillmann, D.: Resource Description and Access (RDA) : cataloging rules for the 20th century (2007)
0.05
0.053216573 = product of:
0.106433146 = sum of:
0.08408859 = weight(_text_:description in 2525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08408859 = score(doc=2525,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.36323205 = fieldWeight in 2525, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2525)
0.02234455 = product of:
0.0446891 = sum of:
0.0446891 = weight(_text_:access in 2525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0446891 = score(doc=2525,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.26479906 = fieldWeight in 2525, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2525)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- There is evidence that many individuals and organizations in the library world do not support the work taking place to develop a next generation of the library cataloging rules. The authors describe the tensions existing between those advocating an incremental change to cataloging process and others who desire a bolder library entry into the digital era. Libraries have lost their place as primary information providers, surpassed by more agile (and in many cases wealthier) purveyors of digital information delivery services. Although libraries still manage materials that are not available elsewhere, the library's approach to user service and the user interface is not competing successfully against services like Amazon or Google. If libraries are to avoid further marginalization, they need to make a fundamental change in their approach to user services. The library's signature service, its catalog, uses rules for cataloging that are remnants of a long departed technology: the card catalog. Modifications to the rules, such as those proposed by the Resource Description and Access (RDA) development effort, can only keep us rooted firmly in the 20th, if not the 19th century. A more radical change is required that will contribute to the library of the future, re-imagined and integrated with the chosen workflow of its users.
-
Godby, C.J.; Young, J.A.; Childress, E.: ¬A repository of metadata crosswalks (2004)
0.05
0.052681718 = product of:
0.105363436 = sum of:
0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08324346 = score(doc=1155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
0.022119977 = product of:
0.044239953 = sum of:
0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044239953 = score(doc=1155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper proposes a model for metadata crosswalks that associates three pieces of information: the crosswalk, the source metadata standard, and the target metadata standard, each of which may have a machine-readable encoding and human-readable description. The crosswalks are encoded as METS records that are made available to a repository for processing by search engines, OAI harvesters, and custom-designed Web services. The METS object brings together all of the information required to access and interpret crosswalks and represents a significant improvement over previously available formats. But it raises questions about how best to describe these complex objects and exposes gaps that must eventually be filled in by the digital library community.
-
Becker, S.: Ein Regelwerk für alle? : RDA im Archiv des Deutschen Literaturarchivs Marbach (2015)
0.05
0.052681718 = product of:
0.105363436 = sum of:
0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08324346 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
0.022119977 = product of:
0.044239953 = sum of:
0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044239953 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Resource Description and Access (RDA) gilt als Standard nicht nur für Bibliotheken, sondern für alle sammelnden Kultureinrichtungen wie Archive und Museen. Es ist aber fraglich, ob ein einziges Regelwerk die Anforderungen an die Erschliessung einer Materialvielfalt, wie sie drei so verschiedene Institutionstypen mit sich bringt, abdecken kann. Zwar gibt es derzeit keine Planungen, RDA künftig auch für den Bereich unikaler Materialien einzusetzen, dennoch ist es notwendig, eine Anpassung bestehender Regelwerke vorzunehmen, um in Zukunft in einer vernetzten Welt bestehen zu können. In diesem Beitrag werden die bisherigen Überlegungen und Entwicklungen beschrieben und eine künftige Lösung skizziert.
