Search (10826 results, page 2 of 542)

  1. Roosa, M.: Sound and audio archives (2009) 0.12
    0.12077427 = product of:
      0.16103236 = sum of:
        0.10090631 = weight(_text_:description in 3883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10090631 = score(doc=3883,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.43587846 = fieldWeight in 3883, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3883)
        0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 3883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04116606 = score(doc=3883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 3883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3883)
        0.018959979 = product of:
          0.037919957 = sum of:
            0.037919957 = weight(_text_:access in 3883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037919957 = score(doc=3883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 3883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3883)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    This entry provides an overview of sound archives, including reasons why sound archives exist, their history and organization; types of sound recordings collected, methods of description, and access to and preservation of recorded sound materials. Recorded sound formats (e.g., cylinders, discs, long playing (LP) records, etc.) are covered in the context of how they have been (and are currently being) collected, described, preserved, and made available. Select projects and programs undertaken by regional, special, and national sound archives are covered. Professional associations that focus on sound archiving are described as are funding avenues for sound archives. Description is also included of work being carried out in the United States to modify copyright law to better enable sound archives to preserve their holdings for future generations of users.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:30:26
  2. Assumpção, F.S.; Santarem Segundo, J.E.; Ventura Amorim da Costa Santos, P.L.: RDA element sets and RDA value vocabularies : vocabularies for resource description in the Semantic Web (2015) 0.12
    0.12077427 = product of:
      0.16103236 = sum of:
        0.10090631 = weight(_text_:description in 2389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10090631 = score(doc=2389,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.43587846 = fieldWeight in 2389, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2389)
        0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 2389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04116606 = score(doc=2389,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 2389, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2389)
        0.018959979 = product of:
          0.037919957 = sum of:
            0.037919957 = weight(_text_:access in 2389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037919957 = score(doc=2389,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 2389, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2389)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Considering the need for metadata standards suitable for the Semantic Web, this paper describes the RDA Element Sets and the RDA Value Vocabularies that were created from attributes and relationships defined in Resource Description and Access (RDA). First, we present the vocabularies included in RDA Element Sets: the vocabularies of classes, of properties and of properties unconstrained by FRBR entities; and then we present the RDA Value Vocabularies, which are under development. As a conclusion, we highlight that these vocabularies can be used to meet the needs of different contexts due to the unconstrained properties and to the independence of the vocabularies of properties from the vocabularies of values and vice versa.
    Date
    19.12.2014 19:26:51
  3. Morrow, B.: IMPACT public access catalogue (1989) 0.12
    0.11956271 = product of:
      0.23912542 = sum of:
        0.08233212 = weight(_text_:26 in 4059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08233212 = score(doc=4059,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.4682183 = fieldWeight in 4059, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4059)
        0.1567933 = sum of:
          0.075839914 = weight(_text_:access in 4059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.075839914 = score(doc=4059,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.4493789 = fieldWeight in 4059, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4059)
          0.08095339 = weight(_text_:22 in 4059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08095339 = score(doc=4059,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4059, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4059)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    CD-ROM librarian. 4(1989), no.1, S.22-26
  4. Horikoshi, K.; Sugita, S.; Nonaka, Y.; Kamiya, S.; Sugita, I.; Asoshina, H.: junii2 and AIRway : an application profile for scholarly works and its application for link resolvers (2008) 0.12
    0.11889295 = product of:
      0.15852393 = sum of:
        0.04756769 = weight(_text_:description in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04756769 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.20547508 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
        0.02744404 = weight(_text_:26 in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02744404 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.15607277 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
        0.0835122 = sum of:
          0.056527738 = weight(_text_:access in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056527738 = score(doc=2663,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.33494726 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
          0.026984464 = weight(_text_:22 in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026984464 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    A large number of scholarly works is self-archived at the university's Open Access repositories. Researchers can search these materials using general web search engines such as Google, as well as with OAI-PMH-based search engines such as OAIster (http://www.oaister.org/). The archives can also be accessed using federated search services such as MetaLib by setting the repositories as a search target. However, it remains difficult for researchers to access materials in these repositories using standard academic databases such as Thomson Reuters' Web of Science. The National Institute of Informatics (NII) in Japan has developed a DC application profile called junii2 (http://ju.nii.ac.jp/oai/junii2.xsd) for scholarly works. The AIRway Project (Access path to Institutional Resources via link resolvers) has used this profile to develop a new way of connecting university repositories with academic databases via link resolvers. junii2 is designed as an OpenURL-compliant schema (info:ofi/fmt:xml:xsd:journal), and has now been widely adopted by more than 70 university repositories in Japan. A particular feature is its ability to describe variant self-archived materials with a version description function (specifying whether it is an author's draft or the final published version) and information on the availability of the full text in the repository. AIRway is an internet server that harvests metadata from university repositories. After harvesting metadata, AIRway separates the metadata of materials whose full texts are available in the repositories from others. A link resolver sends an OpenURL request to the AIRway server before creating its navigation window. If metadata of the requested material are found in the AIRway server and the material's full text is available in a repository, the AIRway server provides the xml for the metadata of the material to the link resolver. Rather than being a new service system for end users, it is a back-end knowledgebase for existing link resolvers. 1CATE (OCLC's link resolver) and some installations of SFX (Ex Libris' link resolver) now use AIRway as one of their knowledgebases. In this way, junii2 and AIRway make Open Access scholarly works in university repositories accessible through general academic databases. This will be particularly effective if, for example, someone without a license to access an electronic journal finds a research paper on the journal in the search results of an academic database. The AIRway Project is funded by the NII Institutional Repositories Program (http://www.nii.ac.jp/irp/en/).
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  5. Resource Description & Access (RDA) (o.J.) 0.12
    0.11702848 = product of:
      0.23405696 = sum of:
        0.19027077 = weight(_text_:description in 2438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19027077 = score(doc=2438,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.8219003 = fieldWeight in 2438, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2438)
        0.043786198 = product of:
          0.087572396 = sum of:
            0.087572396 = weight(_text_:access in 2438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.087572396 = score(doc=2438,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.51889807 = fieldWeight in 2438, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2438)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    RDA Blog or Resource Description & Access Blog is a blog on Resource Description and Access (RDA), a new library cataloging standard that provides instructions and guidelines on formulating data for resource description and discovery, organized based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), intended for use by libraries and other cultural organizations replacing Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2). Free for everyone Forever.
  6. Parker, V.: Cataloguing map series and serials (1999) 0.12
    0.11616145 = product of:
      0.15488194 = sum of:
        0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 5323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08324346 = score(doc=5323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 5323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5323)
        0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 5323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048027072 = score(doc=5323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 5323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5323)
        0.023611406 = product of:
          0.04722281 = sum of:
            0.04722281 = weight(_text_:22 in 5323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04722281 = score(doc=5323,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5323, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5323)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article defines and outlines the characteristics of map series, map sets, map serials, maps in multiple editions and multi-sheet single maps. Brief instructions on sources of information and general methodology used in gathering information prior to creating the entry are presented. The different methods which may be used for cataloguing series and serials are explored. There is also a brief section on cataloguing bi- and multi-lingual works in a bilingual environment. For each relevant area of description, instructions and examples are given to illustrate problems. Sections on analysis (including multi-level cataloguing).
    Date
    26. 7.2006 10:44:22
  7. Malmsten, M.: Making a library catalogue part of the Semantic Web (2008) 0.12
    0.11616145 = product of:
      0.15488194 = sum of:
        0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08324346 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
        0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048027072 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
        0.023611406 = product of:
          0.04722281 = sum of:
            0.04722281 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04722281 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Library catalogues contain an enormous amount of structured, high-quality data, however, this data is generally not made available to semantic web applications. In this paper we describe the tools and techniques used to make the Swedish Union Catalogue (LIBRIS) part of the Semantic Web and Linked Data. The focus is on links to and between resources and the mechanisms used to make data available, rather than perfect description of the individual resources. We also present a method of creating links between records of the same work.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  8. Kandoian, N.A.: Cataloging early printed maps (1999) 0.12
    0.11504287 = product of:
      0.1533905 = sum of:
        0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 5331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08324346 = score(doc=5331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 5331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5331)
        0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 5331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048027072 = score(doc=5331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 5331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5331)
        0.022119977 = product of:
          0.044239953 = sum of:
            0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 5331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044239953 = score(doc=5331,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 5331, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5331)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    In the context of machine readable cataloging for national bibliographic databases, this paper describes the cataloging of monographic early printed maps whether published separately or extracted from other publications. It deals with description and access to capture the essence of a rare or ''antique'' map to create a useful surrogate. The step-by-step approach, rather than breaking new ground, integrates rules and guidance from multiple sources, both cataloging tools and supplementary materials, in a narrative fashion, with reference to the sources, their specific rules, and stated policies. Reference is made throughout the text to ten sample catalog records, with MARC 21 tagging, that are appended to the article.
    Date
    26. 7.2006 12:06:12
  9. Smits, J.: Metadata : an introduction (1999) 0.12
    0.11504287 = product of:
      0.1533905 = sum of:
        0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 5333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08324346 = score(doc=5333,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 5333, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5333)
        0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 5333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048027072 = score(doc=5333,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 5333, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5333)
        0.022119977 = product of:
          0.044239953 = sum of:
            0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 5333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044239953 = score(doc=5333,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 5333, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5333)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    With the transition from cartographic materials to spatial information the nature and amount of access data for the library field is changing. Besides bibliographic data there exists now a range of metadata, each kind for specific purposes within specific user fields. To define their relation to each other they have been put into a diagram. Through the Resource Description Framework these should all be available through a common interface for Internet-searching. To prevent confusion spatial metadata is defined. Spatial metadata introduces new elements to descriptions with new application possibilities.
    Date
    26. 7.2006 12:05:51
  10. Taniguchi, S.: User tasks in the RDA-based model (2013) 0.12
    0.11504287 = product of:
      0.1533905 = sum of:
        0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 1956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08324346 = score(doc=1956,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 1956, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1956)
        0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 1956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048027072 = score(doc=1956,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 1956, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1956)
        0.022119977 = product of:
          0.044239953 = sum of:
            0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 1956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044239953 = score(doc=1956,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 1956, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1956)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    I examine user tasks and their related issues in the model that reflects Resource Description and Access (RDA) directly, which complements prior studies that dealt mainly with entities and their attributes and relationships. First, the definitions of user tasks in Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD), and RDA, respectively, are reviewed. Then, mappings between attributes and relationships of the RDA entities to the user tasks are proposed for the RDA-based model; the mapping covering Group 1 and 2 entities, and that for the other entities. The resultant RDA mappings and those shown in FRBR and FRAD are compared, which reveals the superiority of the former mappings.
    Date
    29. 5.2015 19:14:26
  11. Gorman, M.: ¬The origins and making of the ISBD : a personal history, 1966-1978 (2014) 0.12
    0.11504287 = product of:
      0.1533905 = sum of:
        0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 1995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08324346 = score(doc=1995,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 1995, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1995)
        0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 1995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048027072 = score(doc=1995,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 1995, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1995)
        0.022119977 = product of:
          0.044239953 = sum of:
            0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 1995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044239953 = score(doc=1995,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 1995, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1995)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    What follows are my memories of the events, starting almost five decades ago, that led to the International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD)-still the most successful and widely used international cataloging standard in history. Many of the documents of the time were little more than ephemera (working papers and the like) and some are not now available to me. I have checked my recollections in all the documents to which I have access and apologize in advance for any errors of time or place. I also apologize for the, alas, unavoidable, given the nature of the essay, many repetitions of the words "I" and "me."
    Date
    30. 5.2015 17:59:26
  12. Mlodzka-Stybel, A.: Towards continuous improvement of users' access to a library catalogue (2014) 0.11
    0.11375579 = product of:
      0.22751158 = sum of:
        0.11772404 = weight(_text_:description in 1466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11772404 = score(doc=1466,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.5085249 = fieldWeight in 1466, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1466)
        0.10978755 = sum of:
          0.06256474 = weight(_text_:access in 1466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06256474 = score(doc=1466,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.3707187 = fieldWeight in 1466, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1466)
          0.04722281 = weight(_text_:22 in 1466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04722281 = score(doc=1466,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1466, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1466)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The paper discusses the issue of increasing users' access to library records by their publication in Google. Data from the records, converted into html format, have been indexed by Google. The process covered basic formal description fields of the records, description of the content, supported with a thesaurus, as well as an abstract, if present in the record. In addition to monitoring the end users' statistics, the pilot testing covered visibility of library records in Google search results.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  13. Taniguchi, S.: Modeling resource description tasks in RDA (2015) 0.11
    0.113011986 = product of:
      0.22602397 = sum of:
        0.203904 = weight(_text_:description in 2013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.203904 = score(doc=2013,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.8807909 = fieldWeight in 2013, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2013)
        0.022119977 = product of:
          0.044239953 = sum of:
            0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 2013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044239953 = score(doc=2013,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 2013, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2013)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This study aims to model the resource description tasks that are performed by catalogers. First, a model of authority data creator tasks is derived from Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD), since FRAD partially includes such task modeling. Second, modeling of resource description tasks in line with Resource Description and Access (RDA) is conducted to cover the whole resource description tasks including those on descriptive data as well as those on authority data, and also to reflect RDA instructions as much as possible. Third, the modeling of resource description tasks is compared with that of user tasks in order to understand their differences.
  14. Nasatir, M.: ¬The cataloging and classification of machine-readable data files : Pt.3: Subject description of machine-readable data files (1982) 0.11
    0.112517595 = product of:
      0.22503519 = sum of:
        0.14270307 = weight(_text_:description in 3921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14270307 = score(doc=3921,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.6164252 = fieldWeight in 3921, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3921)
        0.08233212 = weight(_text_:26 in 3921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08233212 = score(doc=3921,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.4682183 = fieldWeight in 3921, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3921)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    6. 1.2007 14:26:53
  15. Maxwell, R.L.: Handbook for RDA : Maxwell's handbook for RDA ; explaining and illustrating RDA: resource description and access using MARC 21 (2013) 0.11
    0.10858533 = product of:
      0.21717066 = sum of:
        0.17477486 = weight(_text_:description in 2085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17477486 = score(doc=2085,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.75496364 = fieldWeight in 2085, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2085)
        0.042395804 = product of:
          0.08479161 = sum of:
            0.08479161 = weight(_text_:access in 2085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08479161 = score(doc=2085,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.5024209 = fieldWeight in 2085, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2085)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    IntroductionDescribing manifestations and items -- Describing persons -- Describing families -- Describing corporate bodies -- Describing geographic entities -- Describing works -- Describing expressions -- Recording relationships -- Appendix A. Printed books and sheets -- Appendix B. Cartographic resources -- Appendix C. Unpublished manuscripts and manuscript collections -- Appendix D. Notated music -- Appendix E. Audio recordings -- Appendix F. Moving image resources -- Appendix G. Two-dimensional graphic resources -- Appendix H. Three-dimensional resources and objects -- Appendix I. Digital resources -- Appendix J. Microform resources -- Appendix K. Bibliographic records serials and integrating resources -- Appendix L. Analytical description.
    LCSH
    Resource description and access
    RSWK
    Resource description and access / MARC 21 / Einführung
    Subject
    Resource description and access / MARC 21 / Einführung
    Resource description and access
  16. Montviloff, N.: ¬An overview of the Anglo-American cataloging code and comparison between the code and Russian bibliographic standards (1997) 0.11
    0.10797428 = product of:
      0.21594857 = sum of:
        0.11891922 = weight(_text_:description in 7906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11891922 = score(doc=7906,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.5136877 = fieldWeight in 7906, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7906)
        0.09702934 = weight(_text_:26 in 7906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09702934 = score(doc=7906,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.5518006 = fieldWeight in 7906, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7906)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a brief overview of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Code discussing its development, organisation, underlying concepts, and similarities and differences between the Code and the Russian Rules for Bibliographic Description
    Date
    1. 7.1996 21:26:02
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 26(1997) no.1, S.17-19
  17. Tosaka, Y.; Park, J.-r.: RDA: Resource description & access : a survey of the current state of the art (2013) 0.11
    0.10555364 = product of:
      0.14073819 = sum of:
        0.08408859 = weight(_text_:description in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08408859 = score(doc=677,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.36323205 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
        0.03430505 = weight(_text_:26 in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03430505 = score(doc=677,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
        0.02234455 = product of:
          0.0446891 = sum of:
            0.0446891 = weight(_text_:access in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0446891 = score(doc=677,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.26479906 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Resource Description & Access (RDA) is intended to provide a flexible and extensible framework that can accommodate all types of content and media within rapidly evolving digital environments while also maintaining compatibility with the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition (AACR2). The cataloging community is grappling with practical issues in navigating the transition from AACR2 to RDA; there is a definite need to evaluate major subject areas and broader themes in information organization under the new RDA paradigm. This article aims to accomplish this task through a thorough and critical review of the emerging RDA literature published from 2005 to 2011. The review mostly concerns key areas of difference between RDA and AACR2, the relationship of the new cataloging code to metadata standards, the impact on encoding standards such as Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC), end user considerations, and practitioners' views on RDA implementation and training. Future research will require more in-depth studies of RDA's expected benefits and the manner in which the new cataloging code will improve resource retrieval and bibliographic control for users and catalogers alike over AACR2. The question as to how the cataloging community can best move forward to the post-AACR2/MARC environment must be addressed carefully so as to chart the future of bibliographic control in the evolving environment of information production, management, and use.
    Date
    23. 3.2013 12:26:02
  18. RDA: Ressource Description and Access : Draft of RDA; pt.1 (2005) 0.11
    0.105363436 = product of:
      0.21072687 = sum of:
        0.16648692 = weight(_text_:description in 1070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16648692 = score(doc=1070,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.71916276 = fieldWeight in 1070, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1070)
        0.044239953 = product of:
          0.08847991 = sum of:
            0.08847991 = weight(_text_:access in 1070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08847991 = score(doc=1070,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.5242754 = fieldWeight in 1070, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1070)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
  19. Cook, M.: ¬The international description standards : an interim report (1995) 0.10
    0.104129 = product of:
      0.208258 = sum of:
        0.18613803 = weight(_text_:description in 1551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18613803 = score(doc=1551,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.8040484 = fieldWeight in 1551, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1551)
        0.022119977 = product of:
          0.044239953 = sum of:
            0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 1551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044239953 = score(doc=1551,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 1551, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1551)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the progress amde to date towards the designing and accepting of international standards for archival description. The International Council on Archives (ICA) set up the Ad Hoc Commission on Archival Description (ICA/DDS) in 1990 and its Statement of Principles regarding Archival Description (the Madrid Principles) was received by the ICA at the International Congress on Archives in Montreal in 1992. Discusses these principles and their implications. Describes the General International Standard Archival Description, ISAD(G) and considers access points and authorities. Indicates future developments in the international dascription standards
  20. Bianchini, C.; Willer, M.: ISBD resource and Its description in the context of the Semantic Web (2014) 0.10
    0.104129 = product of:
      0.208258 = sum of:
        0.18613803 = weight(_text_:description in 1998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18613803 = score(doc=1998,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.8040484 = fieldWeight in 1998, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1998)
        0.022119977 = product of:
          0.044239953 = sum of:
            0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 1998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044239953 = score(doc=1998,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 1998, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1998)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores the question "What is an International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD) resource in the context of the Semantic Web, and what is the relationship of its description to the linked data?" This question is discussed against the background of the dichotomy between the description and access using the Semantic Web differentiation of the three logical layers: real-world objects, web of data, and special purpose (bibliographic) data. The representation of bibliographic data as linked data is discussed, distinguishing the description of a resource from the iconic/objective and the informational/subjective viewpoints. In the conclusion, the authors give views on possible directions of future development of the ISBD.

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications