Search (464 results, page 1 of 24)

0.084412016 = product of:
  0.21103004 = sum of:
    0.1924681 = weight(_text_:conversion in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1924681 = score(doc=2425,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.23715246 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.81157964 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
    0.018561937 = product of:
      0.037123874 = sum of:
        0.037123874 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037123874 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13707404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

The FRBR model is by many considered to be an important contribution to the next generation of bibliographic catalogues, but a major challenge for the library community is how to use this model on already existing MARC-based bibliographic catalogues. This problem requires a solution for the interpretation and conversion of MARC records, and a tool for this kind of conversion is developed as a part of the Norwegian BIBSYS FRBR project. The tool is based on a systematic approach to the interpretation and conversion process and is designed to be adaptable to the rules applied in different catalogues.

Source

Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006

0.044899873 = product of:
  0.22449936 = sum of:
    0.22449936 = weight(_text_:conversion in 1095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22449936 = score(doc=1095,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23715246 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.94664574 = fieldWeight in 1095, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1095)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Library of Congress has announced the conversion of its cataloguing records from the Wade-Giles system to the pinyin system for the romanization of Chinese and will soon draw up plans for the actual conversion process

0.044524163 = product of:
  0.07420693 = sum of:
    0.055560756 = weight(_text_:conversion in 1475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055560756 = score(doc=1475,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23715246 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.23428287 = fieldWeight in 1475, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1475)
    0.009365214 = product of:
      0.018730428 = sum of:
        0.018730428 = weight(_text_:29 in 1475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018730428 = score(doc=1475,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13769476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 1475, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1475)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.009280968 = product of:
      0.018561937 = sum of:
        0.018561937 = weight(_text_:22 in 1475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018561937 = score(doc=1475,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13707404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1475, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1475)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)

Abstract

Most Likely, this revision of Cataloguing Theory and Practice 6th Edition by Professor C.G. Viswanathan has the distinction of commanding continued use since 1954, both in India and abroad . Besides providing a comprehensive and balanced perspective of library catalogues from Collimates to AACR-2 1988 revision, enabling students and the faculty of library and information science at universities, and practicing cataloguers towards rationalization, the work projects an analysis of pros and cons of continuing the cataloguing procedures and techniques and maintaining it in the traditional form of cards filed in cabinet or to adopt the MARC techniques, and computerise it online with the advanced countries of the West. The impact of computerisation on the users, library staff and library administration with regard to its cost effectiveness has been discussed. Two new chapters. Computerised Catalogue (chapter-8) and Headings for Name Entries (Chapter-26) according to AACR2, 1988 revision has been added. The data and been brought to date. A brief account of the British Library's Cataloguing Conversion Project of the British Museum's General Catalogue to Machine Readable From presents an exciting experience. The Library of Congress MARC System has also been given due consideration. The select working bibliography of a cataloguer has also been revised. he order of the chapters has been, as in previous editions, retained. It is expected that the sixth edition of Cataloguing Theory and Practice' would command the same respect of the author's colleagues, as justify its value as an unfailing companion in all cataloguing assignments.

Content

Inhalt: 1. Library Catalogue : Its Nature, Factions, and Importance in a Library System 2. History of Modern Library Catalogues 3. Catalogue Codes: Origin, Growth and Development 4. Principles of Planning and Provision of the Library Catalogue 5.Catalogue Entries and their Functions in Achieving the Objectives of the Library Catalogue 6.Descriptive Cataloguing 7. Physical Forms of the Catalogue-I Manual Catalogues 8. Physical Forms of the Catalogues-II Computerised Cataloges 9. Varieties of Catalogues, their Scope and Functions 10. Subject Cataloguing 11. Cataloguing Department: Organization and Administration. 12. Cost Analysis of Cataloguing Procedures and Suggested Economies 13. Co-operation and Centralization in Cataloguing 14. Union Catalogues and Subject Specialisation 15. Cataloguing of Special Material 16. Arrangement, Filing, Guiding of catalogue and Instructions for its Use 17. Education and Training of Cataloguers 18.Documentation : An Extension of Cataloguing and Classification Applied to Isolates 19.Catalogue Cards, Their Style and Reproduction Methods 20. Work of Personal Authors 21. Choice and Entry of Personal Names 22. Works of Corporate Authors 23. Legal Publications 24. Choice of Headings for Corporate Bodies 25. Works of Unknown Authorship : Entry under Uniform Titles 26. Acces Points to Books and Meta- Books by A-ACR2 27. AACR2 1988 revision : Choice of Access Points to Name Headings and Uniform Titles 28. Added Entries Other Than Subject Entries 29. Subject Entries 30. Analytiacal Entries 31. Series Note and Series Entry 32. Contents, Notes and Annotation 33. References 34. Display of Entries Appendix-I Select Aids and Guides for the Cataloguer Appendix-II Definitions of Terms Commonly used in Cataloguing Appendix-III Cataloguing Examination: Select Questions Appendix-IV Implications of the adoption of A-ACR2

0.04452067 = product of:
  0.11130167 = sum of:
    0.095247015 = weight(_text_:conversion in 1927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.095247015 = score(doc=1927,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23715246 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.40162778 = fieldWeight in 1927, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1927)
    0.016054653 = product of:
      0.032109305 = sum of:
        0.032109305 = weight(_text_:29 in 1927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032109305 = score(doc=1927,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13769476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1927, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1927)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

This study aims to find a method to change Korean bibliographic records into the FRBR structure. It also intends to verify that this conversion is possible without main entry or uniform headings because there is no rule for choice and form of the main headings in the current Korean Cataloging Rules. In this paper, we reviewed the role of identifiers and role indicators for FRBRizing. Also, we analysed the characteristics of the Korean cataloging environment, focusing on the bibliographic records and authority records based on the current cataloging rules. As a result, we suggested the methodology for FRBRizing Korean bibliographical records by the combination of identifiers and role indicators. Although there is not much information about global identifiers or relator codes in bibliographic records based on the KORMARC at present, the FRBRizing method using identifiers and role indicators would be more effective for the global and networked information environment than the method using main entry or uniform headings.

Date

29. 5.2015 10:46:48

0.038493622 = product of:
  0.1924681 = sum of:
    0.1924681 = weight(_text_:conversion in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1924681 = score(doc=597,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.23715246 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.81157964 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

In 1996, the National Library of Australia (NLA) processed over 500.000 Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (CJK) USMARC records through a program that identified data in the Wade-Giles romanization scheme and converted it to the more user friendly Pinyin romanization scheme. The conversion program was developed by the NLA in response to the needs of member libraries of the Australian National CJK Service. Describes the development of the Pinyin conversion program, the functions of the program itself, and how it has been used in Australia. Outlines the Pinyin word division standards adopted in Australia and briefly discusses the feasibility of an alternative methodology for the automatic creation of Pinyin data

0.038493622 = product of:
  0.1924681 = sum of:
    0.1924681 = weight(_text_:conversion in 531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1924681 = score(doc=531,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.23715246 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.81157964 = fieldWeight in 531, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=531)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Complexities of music materials and the uniform titles and subject headings for them make score retrospective conversion an expensive and time-demanding venture. Careful pre-recon planning and workflow development are therefore important in score recon projects. The workflows from seven score recon projects with details of staffing levels and perceived advantages and disadvantages are presented. Pre-recon considerations-source of cataloging information, what to convert, in what order to convert, the level of staffing, and the issue of when and how to do authority work-are discussed in relation to the seven workflows.

Footnote

Simultaneously published as Retrospective Conversion: History, Approaches, Considerations

0.038493622 = product of:
  0.1924681 = sum of:
    0.1924681 = weight(_text_:conversion in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1924681 = score(doc=119,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.23715246 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.81157964 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) has formal relationships with the Library of Congress (LC), Share-VDE, and Linked Data for Production Phase 2 (LD4P2) for work on Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), and PCC institutions have been very active in the exploration of MARC to BIBFRAME conversion processes. This article will review the involvement of PCC in the development of BIBFRAME and examine the work of LC, Share-VDE, and LD4P2 on MARC to BIBFRAME conversion. It will conclude with a discussion of areas for further exploration by the PCC leading up to the creation of PCC conversion specifications and PCC BIBFRAME data.

0.03809881 = product of:
  0.19049403 = sum of:
    0.19049403 = weight(_text_:conversion in 2175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19049403 = score(doc=2175,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.23715246 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.80325556 = fieldWeight in 2175, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2175)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Describes the experience of data conversion and migration at the libraries of the Home Office (HO) and the Dept. of the Environment (DoE), UK. Both HO and DoE libraries had changed from Anglo-American code cataloguing to AACR2 cataloguing in the mid-1970s. Both libraries were selective in identifying records for conversion initially to BLAISE-LOCAS. Conversion to integrated library systems from BLAISE-LOCAS MARC tapes produced problems in both libraries with location/holdings fields which were largely resolved at HO, but not resolved at DoE. HO experienced problems converting to a system with fixed field lengths. HO converted subject keywords to form a rudimentary, non-standard thesaurus which required the addition of Broader Term and Narrower Term to meet the challenge of computerized searching. DoE converted a non-thesaurus subject index to an authority file, but continued to maintain the index on a stand-alone DataEase application for use by cataloguers. Neither library converted acquisitions data

0.037052415 = product of:
  0.092631035 = sum of:
    0.07937251 = weight(_text_:conversion in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07937251 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23715246 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.3346898 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
    0.013258526 = product of:
      0.026517052 = sum of:
        0.026517052 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026517052 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13707404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Source

Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003

0.0359199 = product of:
  0.1795995 = sum of:
    0.1795995 = weight(_text_:conversion in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1795995 = score(doc=690,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23715246 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.7573166 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Examines the positive and neegative aspects of outsourcing as allied to cataloguing, defined as the transfer of cataloguing procedures, for new titles, retrospective conversion, reclassification and acquisitions to commercial groups outside the library. Draws on practical experiences documented and reported in the literature, including the retrospective conversion projects undertaken at Nevada University at Reno

0.034235355 = product of:
  0.08558839 = sum of:
    0.021406204 = product of:
      0.042812407 = sum of:
        0.042812407 = weight(_text_:29 in 6238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042812407 = score(doc=6238,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13769476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 6238, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6238)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.064182185 = product of:
      0.12836437 = sum of:
        0.12836437 = weight(_text_:europe in 6238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12836437 = score(doc=6238,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23842667 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.5383809 = fieldWeight in 6238, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6238)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Traces the common genealogy and chronology of the development of bibliographic utilities from their inception in the late 60s in Europe and North America, each acting as the hub of a bibliographic resource sharing community and establishing private telecommunications connections. Explores the impact of incrementing network bandwidth on the utilities, the expectations of the communities they serve and the prospect of their consequent dependence on common communications highways. Considers the terms and structures being established to manage and resource these common telecommunication networks and the extent to which their governance facilitates accountabiblity to the users and providers they serve

Source

Journal of information networking. 1(1993) no.1, S.29-39

0.034235355 = product of:
  0.08558839 = sum of:
    0.021406204 = product of:
      0.042812407 = sum of:
        0.042812407 = weight(_text_:29 in 5103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042812407 = score(doc=5103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13769476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5103)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.064182185 = product of:
      0.12836437 = sum of:
        0.12836437 = weight(_text_:europe in 5103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12836437 = score(doc=5103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23842667 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.5383809 = fieldWeight in 5103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5103)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Bochum university library's cataloguing automation work of 1963 pioineered developments in Germany and Europe. From 1060 external data were included and standards development began. The Bochum documentation system was taken over and developed by the North Rhine-Westphalian library cooperative. In 1985 online cataloguing was introduced. Some recataloguing is taking place. This work is expensive and time consuming, demanding highly qualified staff. Data once recorded can be reused for different purposes

Pages

S.29-35

0.031749006 = product of:
  0.15874502 = sum of:
    0.15874502 = weight(_text_:conversion in 3316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15874502 = score(doc=3316,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23715246 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.6693796 = fieldWeight in 3316, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3316)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Selective review of english-language articles and books, published in 1989, on aspects of descriptive cataloguing including: theory, AACR, cataloguing manuals, nonbook cataloguing, authority control, shared cataloguing, retrospective conversion, management, expert systems, teaching, training and recruiting

0.031749006 = product of:
  0.15874502 = sum of:
    0.15874502 = weight(_text_:conversion in 5339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15874502 = score(doc=5339,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.23715246 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.6693796 = fieldWeight in 5339, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5339)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Although much has been written about the need for, methodologies, costs, and other aspects of retrospective conversion little exists in the literature regarding retrospective conversion of cartographic materials, and map collections specifically. Reference is usually made to the need to survey the collection for conversion, but the author was unable to locate a description of a random sampling technique that explains how it is applied and what the outcome was. This article introduces the use of a random sampling technique with a major university map collection. The University of Georgia's Maps Collection was surveyed to ascertain how much of the existing maps card catalog needed to be converted to an electronic form for use in the local online public access catalog. In addition, the samples pulled from the survey were searched against the OCLC union catalog to determine the proportions of records that could be found in OCLC and loaded into the Georgia Libraries Information Network (GALIN), the online catalog, with no cataloging intervention versus the degree to which the maps cataloger would have to either adjust existing records available or create original records for the online catalog.

0.031429913 = product of:
  0.15714955 = sum of:
    0.15714955 = weight(_text_:conversion in 3208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15714955 = score(doc=3208,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23715246 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.662652 = fieldWeight in 3208, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3208)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

During the 1990s online systems have become the norm in all but the smallest libraries. However, many library systems had no authority control model and libraries are now finding themselves facing automated authority control for the first time. Drawing on the experiences of the libraries at the University of Colorado at Boulder, the University of Northern Colorado and Texas A&M University, discusses the pre-conversion questions of creating an online authority file and choosing which authority records to load, and the post-conversion questions of handling authority work for ongoing cataloguing, dealing with error reports, and keeping up to date with headings changes

0.031429913 = product of:
  0.15714955 = sum of:
    0.15714955 = weight(_text_:conversion in 5336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15714955 = score(doc=5336,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23715246 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.662652 = fieldWeight in 5336, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5336)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

This article is intended to provide information to the person faced with an uncataloged map collection. The article will discuss how various projects to catalog and classify a large existing map collection were completed at the University of Washington Libraries (UW). Project planning, standards, personnel issues and costs will be discussed. Information will be presented about outsourcing map cataloging, utilizing MARCIVE/U.S. Government Printing Office cataloging records and completing a shelflist conversion project. This article deals with the cataloging and classification of print maps and aerial photographs; atlases an electronic mapping products were not included in these projects.

0.029833892 = product of:
  0.07458473 = sum of:
    0.037460856 = product of:
      0.07492171 = sum of:
        0.07492171 = weight(_text_:29 in 2391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07492171 = score(doc=2391,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13769476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 2391, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2391)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.037123874 = product of:
      0.07424775 = sum of:
        0.07424775 = weight(_text_:22 in 2391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07424775 = score(doc=2391,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13707404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2391, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2391)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Pages

22 S

Source

Beilage zu: Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.10

0.026939923 = product of:
  0.13469961 = sum of:
    0.13469961 = weight(_text_:conversion in 2396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13469961 = score(doc=2396,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23715246 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.56798744 = fieldWeight in 2396, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2396)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The topic was the implementation of format integration which will enalbe materials which have some aspect of seriality but could also be defined as another format, to be catalogues as both. An update of OCLC's format integration was given. The 1st phase, encompassing the changes to fields 010-8XX, will be complete by the end of 1994. The 2nd phase, which will contain changes to the 007 and 008 fields and the introduction of the 006 field, is scheduled for completion by the end 0f 1995. Local system vendors were supportive of format integration and changes to relevant programs were underway in preparation for implementation. In a discussion of conversion of pre-format integration records to format integration MARC it was felt that adequate staff and funding would not be available for massive conversion projects and that only selected records would be converted

0.02561875 = product of:
  0.12809375 = sum of:
    0.12809375 = sum of:
      0.09627328 = weight(_text_:europe in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09627328 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23842667 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
            0.039143547 = queryNorm
          0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
      0.03182046 = weight(_text_:22 in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03182046 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13707404 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.039143547 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Despite witnessing the enormous success of cooperative cataloguing programmes in Europe and North America, libraries in Saudi Arabia and other Arabian Gulf states have made no concerted afforts in initiating similar programmes. Emphasizes the need for cooperation in cataloguing, especially of local materials. Due to unavailability of cataloguing copy from the Library of Congress and other sources for a high percentage of imprints from Arab countries and in the absence of bibliographic cooperation, libraries are doing redundant cataloguing and thus wasting both time and money. Reviews the current state of bibliographic cooperation, discusses prospects for further cooperation, and highlights difficulties in cooperation. Concludes with recommendations that the King Fahd National Library develop a national cooperative cataloguing programme with specific goals, set guidelines and prepare rules and procedures for participating libraries to contribute in various cooperative cataloguing programmes in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Date

22. 2.1999 13:11:38

0.02561875 = product of:
  0.12809375 = sum of:
    0.12809375 = sum of:
      0.09627328 = weight(_text_:europe in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09627328 = score(doc=183,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23842667 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
            0.039143547 = queryNorm
          0.4037857 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
      0.03182046 = weight(_text_:22 in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03182046 = score(doc=183,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13707404 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.039143547 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

OCLC has grown from the original group of Ohio academic libraries to 27,000 libraries located in North America, Europe, Asia, Latin American, and South Africa. Each of the records in WorldCat (the OCLC Online Union Catalog) is a local creation that is available for use across the globe for different purposes. Common issues that must be faced with the expansion of a bibliographic utility include cataloging standards, subject access in languages appropriate to the user, local needs versus global usefulness, and character sets. Progress has been made with the cooperative creation of an international name authority file and the uniform application of ISBD principles. A method of linking various subject vocabularies and an improved infrastructure of MARC formats and character sets are needed. Librarians need new automated tools to provide preliminary access to date available in electronic form and to assist them in organizing and storing that data.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22