Search (205 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.10 
    0.09947254 = product of:
  0.24868134 = sum of:
    0.062170334 = product of:
      0.186511 = sum of:
        0.186511 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.186511 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33185944 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.186511 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.186511 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33185944 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  2. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.08 
    0.08289378 = product of:
  0.20723444 = sum of:
    0.05180861 = product of:
      0.15542583 = sum of:
        0.15542583 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15542583 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33185944 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.15542583 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15542583 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33185944 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  3. Samples, J.; Bigelow, I.: MARC to BIBFRAME : converting the PCC to Linked Data (2020) 0.04 
    0.038493622 = product of:
  0.1924681 = sum of:
    0.1924681 = weight(_text_:conversion in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1924681 = score(doc=119,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.23715246 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.81157964 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) has formal relationships with the Library of Congress (LC), Share-VDE, and Linked Data for Production Phase 2 (LD4P2) for work on Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), and PCC institutions have been very active in the exploration of MARC to BIBFRAME conversion processes. This article will review the involvement of PCC in the development of BIBFRAME and examine the work of LC, Share-VDE, and LD4P2 on MARC to BIBFRAME conversion. It will conclude with a discussion of areas for further exploration by the PCC leading up to the creation of PCC conversion specifications and PCC BIBFRAME data.
  4. Kang, L.; Tan, C.-H.: Do cognitive and affective expressions matter in purchase conversion? : a live chat perspective (2020) 0.03 
    0.032994535 = product of:
  0.16497268 = sum of:
    0.16497268 = weight(_text_:conversion in 5809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16497268 = score(doc=5809,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.23715246 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.6956397 = fieldWeight in 5809, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5809)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Live chat, which is embedded in some shopping websites, allows a retailer to communicate with its shoppers directly and respond to their inquiries promptly. We extended the Speech Act Theory (SAT) to this context by developing the Dialog Conversion Model (DCM) that elucidates the characteristics of online dialog between shoppers and retailers. We validated the DCM using quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative analyses of 1,185 communication sessions and related purchase records reflect that shoppers' cognitive, rather than affective, expressions tend to indicate their purchase intentions, and retailers should emphasize cognitive expressions to the extent possible while being strategic in their choice of expressions. Furthermore, the affective expressions (in positive and negative forms) articulated by retailers have a considerable influence on purchase conversion. However, the same is not true for shoppers. Post-hoc interviews were conducted with shoppers to gain additional insights.
  5. Binding, C.; Gnoli, C.; Tudhope, D.: Migrating a complex classification scheme to the semantic web : expressing the Integrative Levels Classification using SKOS RDF (2021) 0.03 
    0.031749006 = product of:
  0.15874502 = sum of:
    0.15874502 = weight(_text_:conversion in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15874502 = score(doc=600,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.23715246 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.6693796 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Purpose The Integrative Levels Classification (ILC) is a comprehensive "freely faceted" knowledge organization system not previously expressed as SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System). This paper reports and reflects on work converting the ILC to SKOS representation. Design/methodology/approach The design of the ILC representation and the various steps in the conversion to SKOS are described and located within the context of previous work considering the representation of complex classification schemes in SKOS. Various issues and trade-offs emerging from the conversion are discussed. The conversion implementation employed the STELETO transformation tool. Findings The ILC conversion captures some of the ILC facet structure by a limited extension beyond the SKOS standard. SPARQL examples illustrate how this extension could be used to create faceted, compound descriptors when indexing or cataloguing. Basic query patterns are provided that might underpin search systems. Possible routes for reducing complexity are discussed. Originality/value Complex classification schemes, such as the ILC, have features which are not straight forward to represent in SKOS and which extend beyond the functionality of the SKOS standard. The ILC's facet indicators are modelled as rdf:Property sub-hierarchies that accompany the SKOS RDF statements. The ILC's top-level fundamental facet relationships are modelled by extensions of the associative relationship - specialised sub-properties of skos:related. An approach for representing faceted compound descriptions in ILC and other faceted classification schemes is proposed.
  6. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.03 
    0.026074996 = product of:
  0.06518749 = sum of:
    0.05180861 = product of:
      0.15542583 = sum of:
        0.15542583 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15542583 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33185944 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.013378878 = product of:
      0.026757756 = sum of:
        0.026757756 = weight(_text_:29 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026757756 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13769476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  7. Schreur, P.E.: ¬The use of Linked Data and artificial intelligence as key elements in the transformation of technical services (2020) 0.02 
    0.022224303 = product of:
  0.11112151 = sum of:
    0.11112151 = weight(_text_:conversion in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11112151 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23715246 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.46856573 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Library Technical Services have benefited from numerous stimuli. Although initially looked at with suspicion, transitions such as the move from catalog cards to the MARC formats have proven enormously helpful to libraries and their patrons. Linked data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) hold the same promise. Through the conversion of metadata surrogates (cataloging) to linked open data, libraries can represent their resources on the Semantic Web. But in order to provide some form of controlled access to unstructured data, libraries must reach beyond traditional cataloging to new tools such as AI to provide consistent access to a growing world of full-text resources.
  8. Du, C.; Cohoon, J.; Lopez, P.; Howison, J.: Softcite dataset : a dataset of software mentions in biomedical and economic research publications (2021) 0.02 
    0.019049404 = product of:
  0.095247015 = sum of:
    0.095247015 = weight(_text_:conversion in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.095247015 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23715246 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.40162778 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Software contributions to academic research are relatively invisible, especially to the formalized scholarly reputation system based on bibliometrics. In this article, we introduce a gold-standard dataset of software mentions from the manual annotation of 4,971 academic PDFs in biomedicine and economics. The dataset is intended to be used for automatic extraction of software mentions from PDF format research publications by supervised learning at scale. We provide a description of the dataset and an extended discussion of its creation process, including improved text conversion of academic PDFs. Finally, we reflect on our challenges and lessons learned during the dataset creation, in hope of encouraging more discussion about creating datasets for machine learning use.
  9. Smets, A.; Vannieuwenhuyze, J.; Ballon, P.: Serendipity in the city : user evaluations of urban recommender systems (2022) 0.02 
    0.015874503 = product of:
  0.07937251 = sum of:
    0.07937251 = weight(_text_:conversion in 458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07937251 = score(doc=458,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23715246 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.039143547 = queryNorm
        0.3346898 = fieldWeight in 458, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0585327 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=458)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The contemporary city is increasingly being labeled as a smart city consisting of both physical and virtual spaces. This digital augmentation of urban life sets the scene for urban recommender systems to help citizens dealing with the abundance of digital information and corresponding choice overload, for example, by recommending the best place to have dinner based on your personal profile. There are, however, concerns that this kind of algorithmic filtering could lead to homogenization of urban experiences and a decline of social cohesion among citizens. To overcome this issue, scholars increasingly encourage the introduction of serendipity in all types of recommender systems. Nonetheless, it remains unclear how this can be achieved in practice. In this work, we study user evaluations of serendipity in urban recommender systems through a survey among 1,641 citizens. More specifically, we study which characteristics of recommended items contribute to serendipitous experiences and to what extent this increases user satisfaction and conversion. Our results align with findings in other application domains in the sense that there is a strong relation between the relevance and novelty of recommendations and the corresponding experienced serendipity. Moreover, serendipitous recommendations are found to increase the chance of users following up on these recommendations.
  10. Bärnreuther, K.: Informationskompetenz-Vermittlung für Schulklassen mit Wikipedia und dem Framework Informationskompetenz in der Hochschulbildung (2021) 0.01 
    0.0127859535 = product of:
  0.031964883 = sum of:
    0.016054653 = product of:
      0.032109305 = sum of:
        0.032109305 = weight(_text_:29 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032109305 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13769476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.01591023 = product of:
      0.03182046 = sum of:
        0.03182046 = weight(_text_:22 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03182046 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13707404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    30. 6.2021 16:29:52
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 8(2021) Nr.2, S.1-22
  11. Hertzum, M.: Information seeking by experimentation : trying something out to discover what happens (2023) 0.01 
    0.0127859535 = product of:
  0.031964883 = sum of:
    0.016054653 = product of:
      0.032109305 = sum of:
        0.032109305 = weight(_text_:29 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032109305 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13769476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.01591023 = product of:
      0.03182046 = sum of:
        0.03182046 = weight(_text_:22 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03182046 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13707404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:29
  12. Kratochwil, F.; Peltonen, H.: Constructivism (2022) 0.01 
    0.011116682 = product of:
  0.055583406 = sum of:
    0.055583406 = product of:
      0.11116681 = sum of:
        0.11116681 = weight(_text_:europe in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11116681 = score(doc=829,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23842667 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.46625158 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Constructivism in the social sciences has known several ups and downs over the last decades. It was successful rather early in sociology but hotly contested in International Politics/Relations (IR). Oddly enough, just at the moments it made important inroads into the research agenda and became accepted by the mainstream, the enthusiasm for it waned. Many constructivists-as did mainstream scholars-moved from "grand theory" or even "meta-theory" toward "normal science," or experimented with other (eclectic) approaches, of which the turns to practices, to emotions, to new materialism, to the visual, and to the queer are some of the latest manifestations. In a way, constructivism was "successful," on the one hand, by introducing norms, norm-dynamics, and diffusion; the role of new actors in world politics; and the changing role of institutions into the debates, while losing, on the other hand, much of its critical potential. The latter survived only on the fringes-and in Europe more than in the United States. In IR, curiously, constructivism, which was rooted in various European traditions (philosophy, history, linguistics, social analysis), was originally introduced in Europe via the disciplinary discussions taking place in the United States. Yet, especially in its critical version, it has found a more conducive environment in Europe than in the United States.
  13. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.01 
    0.010654963 = product of:
  0.026637405 = sum of:
    0.013378878 = product of:
      0.026757756 = sum of:
        0.026757756 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026757756 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13769476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.013258526 = product of:
      0.026517052 = sum of:
        0.026517052 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026517052 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13707404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  14. Barité, M.; Parentelli, V.; Rodríguez Casaballe, N.; Suárez, M.V.: Interdisciplinarity and postgraduate teaching of knowledge organization (KO) : elements for a necessary dialogue (2023) 0.01 
    0.010654963 = product of:
  0.026637405 = sum of:
    0.013378878 = product of:
      0.026757756 = sum of:
        0.026757756 = weight(_text_:29 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026757756 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13769476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.013258526 = product of:
      0.026517052 = sum of:
        0.026517052 = weight(_text_:22 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026517052 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13707404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Interdisciplinarity implies the previous existence of disciplinary fields and not their dissolution. As a general objective, we propose to establish an initial approach to the emphasis given to interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO, through the teaching staff responsible for postgraduate courses focused on -or related to the KO, in Ibero-American universities. For conducting the research, the framework and distribution of a survey addressed to teachers is proposed, based on four lines of action: 1. The way teachers manage the concept of interdisciplinarity. 2. The place that teachers give to interdisciplinarity in KO. 3. Assessment of interdisciplinary content that teachers incorporate into their postgraduate courses. 4. Set of teaching strategies and resources used by teachers to include interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO. The study analyzed 22 responses. Preliminary results show that KO teachers recognize the influence of other disciplines in concepts, theories, methods, and applications, but no consensus has been reached regarding which disciplines and authors are the ones who build interdisciplinary bridges. Among other conclusions, the study strongly suggests that environmental and social tensions are reflected in subject representation, especially in the construction of friendly knowl­edge organization systems with interdisciplinary visions, and in the expressions through which information is sought.
    Date
    20.11.2023 17:29:13
  15. Barthel, J.; Ciesielski, R.: Regeln zu ChatGPT an Unis oft unklar : KI in der Bildung (2023) 0.01 
    0.009269158 = product of:
  0.046345793 = sum of:
    0.046345793 = product of:
      0.092691585 = sum of:
        0.092691585 = weight(_text_:29 in 925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.092691585 = score(doc=925,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13769476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.6731671 = fieldWeight in 925, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    29. 3.2023 13:23:26
    29. 3.2023 13:29:19
  16. Information : a historical companion (2021) 0.01 
    0.009076732 = product of:
  0.04538366 = sum of:
    0.04538366 = product of:
      0.09076732 = sum of:
        0.09076732 = weight(_text_:europe in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09076732 = score(doc=492,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23842667 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.3806928 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Written by an international team of experts (including Jeremy Adelman, Lorraine Daston, Devin Fitzgerald, John-Paul Ghobrial, Lisa Gitelman, Earle Havens, Randolph C. Head, Niv Horesh, Sarah Igo, Richard R. John, Lauren Kassell, Pamela Long, Erin McGuirl, David McKitterick, Elias Muhanna, Thomas S. Mullaney, Carla Nappi, Craig Robertson, Daniel Rosenberg, Neil Safier, Haun Saussy, Will Slauter, Jacob Soll, Heidi Tworek, Siva Vaidhyanathan, Alexandra Walsham), the book's inspired and original long- and short-form contributions reconstruct the rise of human approaches to creating, managing, and sharing facts and knowledge. Thirteen full-length chapters discuss the role of information in pivotal epochs and regions, with chief emphasis on Europe and North America, but also substantive treatment of other parts of the world as well as current global interconnections. More than 100 alphabetical entries follow, focusing on specific tools, methods, and concepts?from ancient coins to the office memo, and censorship to plagiarism. The result is a wide-ranging, deeply immersive collection that will appeal to anyone drawn to the story behind our modern mania for an informed existence.
    Content
    Cover -- Contents -- Introduction -- Alphabetical List of Entries -- Thematic List of Entries -- Contributors -- PART ONE -- 1. Premodern Regimes and Practices -- 2. Realms of Information in the Medieval Islamic World -- 3. Information in Early Modern East Asia -- 4. Information in Early Modern Europe -- 5. Networks and the Making of a Connected World in the Sixteenth Century -- 6. Records, Secretaries, and the European Information State, circa 1400-1700 -- 7. Periodicals and the Commercialization of Information in the Early Modern Era -- 8. Documents, Empire, and Capitalism in the Nineteenth Century -- 9. Nineteenth-Century Media Technologies -- 10. Networking: Information Circles the Modern World -- 11. Publicity, Propaganda, and Public Opinion: From the Titanic Disaster to the Hungarian Uprising -- 12. Communication, Computation, and Information -- 13. Search -- PART TWO -- Alphabetical Entries -- Glossary -- Index.
  17. Huang, Y.; Cox, A.M.; Sbaffi, L.: Research data management policy and practice in Chinese university libraries (2021) 0.01 
    0.008022773 = product of:
  0.040113866 = sum of:
    0.040113866 = product of:
      0.08022773 = sum of:
        0.08022773 = weight(_text_:europe in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08022773 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23842667 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.33648807 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    On April 2, 2018, the State Council of China formally released a national Research Data Management (RDM) policy "Measures for Managing Scientific Data". In this context and given that university libraries have played an important role in supporting RDM at an institutional level in North America, Europe, and Australasia, the aim of this article is to explore the current status of RDM in Chinese universities, in particular how university libraries have been involved in taking the agenda forward. This article uses a mixed-methods data collection approach and draws on a website analysis of university policies and services; a questionnaire for university librarians; and semi-structured interviews. Findings indicate that Research Data Service at a local level in Chinese Universities are in their infancy. There is more evidence of activity in developing data repositories than support services. There is little development of local policy. Among the explanations of this may be the existence of a national-level infrastructure for some subject disciplines, the lack of professionalization of librarianship, and the relatively weak resonance of openness as an idea in the Chinese context.
  18. Kulczycki, E.; Huang, Y.; Zuccala, A.A.; Engels, T.C.E.; Ferrara, A.; Guns, R.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.; Taskin, Z.; Zhang, L.: Uses of the Journal Impact Factor in national journal rankings in China and Europe (2022) 0.01 
    0.008022773 = product of:
  0.040113866 = sum of:
    0.040113866 = product of:
      0.08022773 = sum of:
        0.08022773 = weight(_text_:europe in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08022773 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23842667 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.33648807 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  19. Kozlowski, D.; Andersen, J.P.; Larivière, V.: ¬The decrease in uncited articles and its effect on the concentration of citations (2024) 0.01 
    0.008022773 = product of:
  0.040113866 = sum of:
    0.040113866 = product of:
      0.08022773 = sum of:
        0.08022773 = weight(_text_:europe in 1208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08022773 = score(doc=1208,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23842667 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.33648807 = fieldWeight in 1208, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1208)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Empirical evidence demonstrates that citations received by scholarly publications follow a pattern of preferential attachment, resulting in a power-law distribution. Such asymmetry has sparked significant debate regarding the use of citations for research evaluation. However, a consensus has yet to be established concerning the historical trends in citation concentration. Are citations becoming more concentrated in a small number of articles? Or have recent geopolitical and technical changes in science led to more decentralized distributions? This ongoing debate stems from a lack of technical clarity in measuring inequality. Given the variations in citation practices across disciplines and over time, it is crucial to account for multiple factors that can influence the findings. This article explores how reference-based and citation-based approaches, uncited articles, citation inflation, the expansion of bibliometric databases, disciplinary differences, and self-citations affect the evolution of citation concentration. Our results indicate a decreasing trend in citation concentration, primarily driven by a decline in uncited articles, which, in turn, can be attributed to the growing significance of Asia and Europe. On the whole, our findings clarify current debates on citation concentration and show that, contrary to a widely-held belief, citations are increasingly scattered.
  20. ¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023) 0.01 
    0.007424775 = product of:
  0.037123874 = sum of:
    0.037123874 = product of:
      0.07424775 = sum of:
        0.07424775 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07424775 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13707404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039143547 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    27. 1.2023 16:22:55

Authors

Languages

  • e 136
  • d 68

Types

  • a 185
  • el 41
  • m 8
  • p 4
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications