Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Cox, A.M."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Cox, A.M.; Corrall, S.: Evolving academic library specialties (2013) 0.02 
    0.016952079 = product of:
  0.050856233 = sum of:
    0.050856233 = weight(_text_:electronic in 999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050856233 = score(doc=999,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.259166 = fieldWeight in 999, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=999)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The purpose of this review is to examine the shaping of librarianship in the academic context through the literature of career specialties, with Abbott's (1988) system of professions providing an analytic framework. The specialties investigated are systems librarian, electronic resource librarian, digital librarian, institutional repository manager, clinical librarian and informationist, digital curator/research data manager, teaching librarian/information literacy educator, and information and knowledge manager. Piecemeal literature based on job advertisements, surveys, and individual case studies is consolidated to offer a novel perspective on the evolution of the profession. The resilience of the profession's core jurisdiction is apparent despite pressures to erode it. Forays into teaching, and more recently into open access and data management, can be understood as responses to such pressure. The attractions but also the risks of embedded roles and overextended claims become apparent when comparing past and prospective specialties.
  2. Cox, A.M.; Tam, W.W.T.: ¬A critical analysis of lifecycle models of the research process and research data management (2018) 0.01 
    0.0056670653 = product of:
  0.017001195 = sum of:
    0.017001195 = product of:
      0.03400239 = sum of:
        0.03400239 = weight(_text_:22 in 4638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03400239 = score(doc=4638,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4638, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4638)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Authors