Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dilevko, J."
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Gottlieb, L:; Dilevko, J.: User preferences in the classification of electronic bookmarks : implications for a shared system (2001) 0.02 
    0.024468219 = product of:
  0.073404655 = sum of:
    0.073404655 = weight(_text_:electronic in 5912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073404655 = score(doc=5912,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.37407395 = fieldWeight in 5912, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5912)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Using the financial industry as a context, the following study seeks to address the issue of the classification of electronic bookmarks in a multi-user system by investigating what factors influence how individuals develop categories for bookmarks and how they choose to classify bookmarks within those organizational categories. An experiment was conducted in which a sample of 15 participants was asked to bookmark and to categorize 60 web sites within Internet Browser folders of their own creation. Based on the data collected during this first component of the study, individual, customized questionnaires were composed for each participant. Whereas some of the questions within these surveys focused on particular classificatory decisions regarding specific bookmarks, others looked at how the participant defined, utilized, and structured the category folders that comprised his or her classification system. The results presented in this paper focus on issues investigated in Kwasnik's (Journal of Documentation, 1991, 47, 389-398) study of the factors that inform how individuals organize their personal, paper-based documents in office environments. Whereas classificatory attributes culled from questionnaire responses nominally resembled those identified by Kwasnik, it was found that a number of these factors assumed distinctive definitions in the electronic environment. The present study suggests that the application of individual instances of classificatory attributes and the distinction between Content and Context Attributes emphasized by Kwasnik play a minimal role in the development of a multi-user classification system for bookmarks
  2. Gottlieb, L.; Dilevko, J.: Investigating how individuals conceptually and physically structure file folders for electronic bookmarks : the example of the financial services industry (2003) 0.02 
    0.02397386 = product of:
  0.07192158 = sum of:
    0.07192158 = weight(_text_:electronic in 5150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07192158 = score(doc=5150,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.3665161 = fieldWeight in 5150, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5150)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Gottlieb and Dilevko asked 15 graduate accounting and business management students to create electronic folders for 60 URLs and file bookmarks in the folders. Questionnaires tailored to each individual's work were then administered to determine the rationale for the decisions made both on folder scheme design and URL assignment. Any category, whether or not it contained URLs, or only sub-categories was counted as a folder. On the average 15.73 folders were created with a range from 6 to 31. Eight of the participants utilized superordinate folders containing primary folders with URLs. The average number of primary folders was 12.93 with a range of 6 to 24. Seven participants created sub-folders, i.e. folders containing both URLs and other primary folders. Subject categories differed widely as did assignment criteria. It appears that intended use and relevance to current projects was a strong influence.
  3. Dilevko, J.; Dali, K.: ¬The challenge of building multilingual collections in Canadian public libraries (2002) 0.01 
    0.00793389 = product of:
  0.023801671 = sum of:
    0.023801671 = product of:
      0.047603343 = sum of:
        0.047603343 = weight(_text_:22 in 139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047603343 = score(doc=139,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 139, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=139)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Authors