-
Rousseau, R.; Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Becoming metric-wise : a bibliometric guide for researchers (2018)
0.06
0.062018268 = product of:
0.0930274 = sum of:
0.05993465 = weight(_text_:electronic in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05993465 = score(doc=5226,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.30543008 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
0.03309275 = product of:
0.0661855 = sum of:
0.0661855 = weight(_text_:publishing in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0661855 = score(doc=5226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.26989618 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Imprint
- Cambridge, MA : Elsevier, Chandos Publishing
- LCSH
- Electronic books
- Subject
- Electronic books
-
Rousseau, R.; Ding, J.: Does international collaboration yield a higher citation potential for US scientists publishing in highly visible interdisciplinary Journals? (2016)
0.03
0.026748553 = product of:
0.08024566 = sum of:
0.08024566 = product of:
0.16049132 = sum of:
0.16049132 = weight(_text_:publishing in 2860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16049132 = score(doc=2860,freq=6.0), product of:
0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.6544635 = fieldWeight in 2860, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2860)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Generally, multicountry papers receive more citations than single-country ones. In this contribution, we examine if this rule also applies to American scientists publishing in highly visible interdisciplinary journals. Concretely, we compare the citations received by American scientists in Nature, Science, and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS). It is shown that, statistically, American scientists publishing in Nature and Science do not benefit from international collaboration. This statement also holds for communicated submissions, but not for direct and for contributed submissions, to PNAS.
-
Zhang, L.; Rousseau, R.; Glänzel, W.: Document-type country profiles (2011)
0.02
0.017649466 = product of:
0.052948397 = sum of:
0.052948397 = product of:
0.10589679 = sum of:
0.10589679 = weight(_text_:publishing in 4487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10589679 = score(doc=4487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.4318339 = fieldWeight in 4487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A bibliometric method for analyzing and visualizing national research profiles is adapted to describe national preferences for publishing particular document types. Similarities in national profiles and national peculiarities are discussed based on the publication output of the 26 most active countries indexed in the Web of Science annual volume 2007.
-
Yang, B.; Rousseau, R.; Wang, X.; Huang, S.: How important is scientific software in bioinformatics research? : a comparative study between international and Chinese research communities (2018)
0.02
0.015600072 = product of:
0.046800215 = sum of:
0.046800215 = product of:
0.09360043 = sum of:
0.09360043 = weight(_text_:publishing in 4461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09360043 = score(doc=4461,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.38169086 = fieldWeight in 4461, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4461)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Software programs are among the most important tools in data-driven research. The popularity of well-known packages and corresponding large numbers of citations received bear testimony of the contribution of scientific software to academic research. Yet software is not generally recognized as an academic outcome. In this study, a usage-based model is proposed with varied indicators including citations, mentions, and downloads to measure the importance of scientific software. We performed an investigation on a sample of international bioinformatics research articles, and on a sample from the Chinese community. Our analysis shows that scientists in the field of bioinformatics rely heavily on scientific software: the major differences between the international community and the Chinese example being how scientific packages are mentioned in publications and the time gap between the introduction of a package and its use. Biologists publishing in international journals tend to apply the latest tools earlier; Chinese scientists publishing in Chinese tend to follow later. Further, journals with higher impact factors tend to publish articles applying the latest tools earlier.
-
Jin, B.; Li, L.; Rousseau, R.: Long-term influences of interventions in the normal development of science : China and the cultural revolution (2004)
0.01
0.0132371 = product of:
0.0397113 = sum of:
0.0397113 = product of:
0.0794226 = sum of:
0.0794226 = weight(_text_:publishing in 2232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0794226 = score(doc=2232,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.32387543 = fieldWeight in 2232, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2232)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Intellectual and technological talents and skills are the driving force for scientific and industrial development, especially in our times characterized by a knowledgebased economy. Major events in society and related political decisions, however, can have a long-term effect an a country's scientific weIl-being. Although the Cultural Revolution took place from 1966 to 1976, its aftermath can still be felt. This is shown by this study of the production and productivity of Chinese scientists as a function of their age. Based an the 1995-2000 data from the Chinese Science Citation database (CSCD), this article investigates the year-by-year age distribution of scientific and technological personnel publishing in China. It is shown that the "Talent Fault" originating during the Cultural Revolution still exists, and that a new gap resulting from recent brain drain might be developing. The purpose of this work is to provide necessary information about the current situation and especially the existing problems of the S&T workforce in China.
-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012)
0.01
0.011334131 = product of:
0.03400239 = sum of:
0.03400239 = product of:
0.06800478 = sum of:
0.06800478 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06800478 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 14. 2.2012 12:53:22
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996)
0.01
0.0068004774 = product of:
0.020401431 = sum of:
0.020401431 = product of:
0.040802862 = sum of:
0.040802862 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040802862 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
-
Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006)
0.01
0.0068004774 = product of:
0.020401431 = sum of:
0.020401431 = product of:
0.040802862 = sum of:
0.040802862 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040802862 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:26:24
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.00
0.0045336518 = product of:
0.013600955 = sum of:
0.013600955 = product of:
0.02720191 = sum of:
0.02720191 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02720191 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
