-
Wang, J.; Halffman, W.; Zhang, Y.H.: Sorting out journals : the proliferation of journal lists in China (2023)
0.04
0.042534273 = product of:
0.12760282 = sum of:
0.12760282 = sum of:
0.09360043 = weight(_text_:publishing in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09360043 = score(doc=1055,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.38169086 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
0.03400239 = weight(_text_:22 in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03400239 = score(doc=1055,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Journal lists are instruments to categorize, compare, and assess research and scholarly publications. Our study investigates the remarkable proliferation of such journal lists in China, analyses their underlying values, quality criteria and ranking principles, and specifies how concerns specific to the Chinese research policy and publishing system inform these lists. Discouraged lists of "bad journals" reflect concerns over inferior research publications, but also the involved drain on public resources. Endorsed lists of "good journals" are based on criteria valued in research policy, reflecting the distinctive administrative logic of state-led Chinese research and publishing policy, ascribing worth to scientific journals for its specific national and institutional needs. In this regard, the criteria used for journal list construction are contextual and reflect the challenges of public resource allocation in a market-led publication system. Chinese journal lists therefore reflect research policy changes, such as a shift away from output-dominated research evaluation, the specific concerns about research misconduct, and balancing national research needs against international standards, resulting in distinctly Chinese quality criteria. However, contrasting concerns and inaccuracies lead to contradictions in the "qualify" and "disqualify" binary logic and demonstrate inherent tensions and limitations in journal lists as policy tools.
- Date
- 22. 9.2023 16:39:23
-
Shen, R.; Wang, J.; Fox, E.A.: ¬A Lightweight Protocol between Digital Libraries and Visualization Systems (2002)
0.02
0.019234657 = product of:
0.05770397 = sum of:
0.05770397 = product of:
0.11540794 = sum of:
0.11540794 = weight(_text_:22 in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11540794 = score(doc=666,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:15:14
-
Lu, C.; Bu, Y.; Wang, J.; Ding, Y.; Torvik, V.; Schnaars, M.; Zhang, C.: Examining scientific writing styles from the perspective of linguistic complexity : a cross-level moderation model (2019)
0.01
0.0132371 = product of:
0.0397113 = sum of:
0.0397113 = product of:
0.0794226 = sum of:
0.0794226 = weight(_text_:publishing in 5219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0794226 = score(doc=5219,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.32387543 = fieldWeight in 5219, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5219)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Publishing articles in high-impact English journals is difficult for scholars around the world, especially for non-native English-speaking scholars (NNESs), most of whom struggle with proficiency in English. To uncover the differences in English scientific writing between native English-speaking scholars (NESs) and NNESs, we collected a large-scale data set containing more than 150,000 full-text articles published in PLoS between 2006 and 2015. We divided these articles into three groups according to the ethnic backgrounds of the first and corresponding authors, obtained by Ethnea, and examined the scientific writing styles in English from a two-fold perspective of linguistic complexity: (a) syntactic complexity, including measurements of sentence length and sentence complexity; and (b) lexical complexity, including measurements of lexical diversity, lexical density, and lexical sophistication. The observations suggest marginal differences between groups in syntactical and lexical complexity.
-
Hicks, D.; Wang, J.: Coverage and overlap of the new social sciences and humanities journal lists (2011)
0.01
0.0068004774 = product of:
0.020401431 = sum of:
0.020401431 = product of:
0.040802862 = sum of:
0.040802862 = weight(_text_:22 in 4192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040802862 = score(doc=4192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4192)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:21:28
-
He, R.; Wang, J.; Tian, J.; Chu, C.-T.; Mauney, B.; Perisic, I.: Session analysis of people search within a professional social network (2013)
0.01
0.0056670653 = product of:
0.017001195 = sum of:
0.017001195 = product of:
0.03400239 = sum of:
0.03400239 = weight(_text_:22 in 743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03400239 = score(doc=743,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 743, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 19. 4.2013 20:31:22
-
Jiang, Z.; Gu, Q.; Yin, Y.; Wang, J.; Chen, D.: GRAW+ : a two-view graph propagation method with word coupling for readability assessment (2019)
0.01
0.0056670653 = product of:
0.017001195 = sum of:
0.017001195 = product of:
0.03400239 = sum of:
0.03400239 = weight(_text_:22 in 5218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03400239 = score(doc=5218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5218)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 15. 4.2019 13:46:22
