Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Data Mining"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Berry, M.W.; Esau, R.; Kiefer, B.: ¬The use of text mining techniques in electronic discovery for legal matters (2012) 0.09
    0.085197926 = product of:
      0.12779689 = sum of:
        0.088085584 = weight(_text_:electronic in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088085584 = score(doc=91,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.44888872 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
        0.0397113 = product of:
          0.0794226 = sum of:
            0.0794226 = weight(_text_:publishing in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0794226 = score(doc=91,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.32387543 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Electronic discovery (eDiscovery) is the process of collecting and analyzing electronic documents to determine their relevance to a legal matter. Office technology has advanced and eased the requirements necessary to create a document. As such, the volume of data has outgrown the manual processes previously used to make relevance judgments. Methods of text mining and information retrieval have been put to use in eDiscovery to help tame the volume of data; however, the results have been uneven. This chapter looks at the historical bias of the collection process. The authors examine how tools like classifiers, latent semantic analysis, and non-negative matrix factorization deal with nuances of the collection process.
    Imprint
    Hershey, PA : IGI Publishing
  2. Biskri, I.; Rompré, L.: Using association rules for query reformulation (2012) 0.01
    0.0132371 = product of:
      0.0397113 = sum of:
        0.0397113 = product of:
          0.0794226 = sum of:
            0.0794226 = weight(_text_:publishing in 92) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0794226 = score(doc=92,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.32387543 = fieldWeight in 92, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=92)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Imprint
    Hershey, PA : IGI Publishing
  3. Mining text data (2012) 0.01
    0.011301385 = product of:
      0.033904154 = sum of:
        0.033904154 = weight(_text_:electronic in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033904154 = score(doc=362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.17277734 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Text mining applications have experienced tremendous advances because of web 2.0 and social networking applications. Recent advances in hardware and software technology have lead to a number of unique scenarios where text mining algorithms are learned. Mining Text Data introduces an important niche in the text analytics field, and is an edited volume contributed by leading international researchers and practitioners focused on social networks & data mining. This book contains a wide swath in topics across social networks & data mining. Each chapter contains a comprehensive survey including the key research content on the topic, and the future directions of research in the field. There is a special focus on Text Embedded with Heterogeneous and Multimedia Data which makes the mining process much more challenging. A number of methods have been designed such as transfer learning and cross-lingual mining for such cases. Mining Text Data simplifies the content, so that advanced-level students, practitioners and researchers in computer science can benefit from this book. Academic and corporate libraries, as well as ACM, IEEE, and Management Science focused on information security, electronic commerce, databases, data mining, machine learning, and statistics are the primary buyers for this reference book.
  4. Hallonsten, O.; Holmberg, D.: Analyzing structural stratification in the Swedish higher education system : data contextualization with policy-history analysis (2013) 0.01
    0.0056670653 = product of:
      0.017001195 = sum of:
        0.017001195 = product of:
          0.03400239 = sum of:
            0.03400239 = weight(_text_:22 in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03400239 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:43:01
  5. Vaughan, L.; Chen, Y.: Data mining from web search queries : a comparison of Google trends and Baidu index (2015) 0.01
    0.0056670653 = product of:
      0.017001195 = sum of:
        0.017001195 = product of:
          0.03400239 = sum of:
            0.03400239 = weight(_text_:22 in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03400239 = score(doc=1605,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.1, S.13-22
  6. Fonseca, F.; Marcinkowski, M.; Davis, C.: Cyber-human systems of thought and understanding (2019) 0.01
    0.0056670653 = product of:
      0.017001195 = sum of:
        0.017001195 = product of:
          0.03400239 = sum of:
            0.03400239 = weight(_text_:22 in 5011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03400239 = score(doc=5011,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5011, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5011)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    7. 3.2019 16:32:22
  7. Jäger, L.: Von Big Data zu Big Brother (2018) 0.00
    0.0045336518 = product of:
      0.013600955 = sum of:
        0.013600955 = product of:
          0.02720191 = sum of:
            0.02720191 = weight(_text_:22 in 5234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02720191 = score(doc=5234,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5234, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5234)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2018 11:33:49