-
McDonough, J.P.: SGML and USMARC standard : applying markup to bibliographic data (1998)
0.08
0.08050447 = product of:
0.1207567 = sum of:
0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06780831 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
0.052948397 = product of:
0.10589679 = sum of:
0.10589679 = weight(_text_:publishing in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10589679 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.4318339 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The recent increase in electronic publishing has led many in the library community to consider altering standards for bibliographic data to promote greater compatibility between digital works and their bibliographic representation. SGML has been prominently mentioned as a mechanism for encoding bibliographic data. Examines the problems and potential of applying SGML to to USMARC record standard, with a particular emphasis on issues of field order and repeatability, character set encoding, and obsolete fields
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.07
0.07085174 = product of:
0.106277615 = sum of:
0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06780831 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.03846931 = product of:
0.07693862 = sum of:
0.07693862 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07693862 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Electronic Resources: Selection and Bibliographic Control
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004)
0.06
0.06334015 = product of:
0.09501022 = sum of:
0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06780831 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
0.02720191 = product of:
0.05440382 = sum of:
0.05440382 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05440382 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper provides an introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), a MARC21 compatible XML schema for descriptive metadata. It explains the requirements that the schema targets and the special features that differentiate it from MARC, such as user-oriented tags, regrouped data elements, linking, recursion, and accommodations for electronic resources.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
-
El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001)
0.06
0.06334015 = product of:
0.09501022 = sum of:
0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06780831 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.02720191 = product of:
0.05440382 = sum of:
0.05440382 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05440382 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article is a survey of representative metadata efforts comparing them to MARC 21 metadata in order to determine if new electronic formats require the development of a new set of standards. This study surveys the ongoing metadata projects in order to identify what types of metadata exist and how they are used and also compares and analyzes selected metadata elements in an attempt to illustrate how they are related to MARC 21 metadata format elements.
- Date
- 23. 1.2007 11:22:30
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.02
0.019234657 = product of:
0.05770397 = sum of:
0.05770397 = product of:
0.11540794 = sum of:
0.11540794 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11540794 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.02
0.018134607 = product of:
0.05440382 = sum of:
0.05440382 = product of:
0.10880764 = sum of:
0.10880764 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10880764 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Markup and metadata (1998)
0.02
0.017649466 = product of:
0.052948397 = sum of:
0.052948397 = product of:
0.10589679 = sum of:
0.10589679 = weight(_text_:publishing in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10589679 = score(doc=1835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.4318339 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Digital publishing technologies. 3(1998) no.4, S.11-14
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.02
0.01586778 = product of:
0.047603343 = sum of:
0.047603343 = product of:
0.095206685 = sum of:
0.095206685 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095206685 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.02
0.01586778 = product of:
0.047603343 = sum of:
0.047603343 = product of:
0.095206685 = sum of:
0.095206685 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095206685 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Lupovici, C.: ¬L'¬information secondaire du document primaire : format MARC ou SGML? (1997)
0.02
0.015443282 = product of:
0.046329845 = sum of:
0.046329845 = product of:
0.09265969 = sum of:
0.09265969 = weight(_text_:publishing in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09265969 = score(doc=892,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.37785465 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Secondary information, e.g. MARC based bibliographic records, comprises structured data for identifying, tagging, retrieving and management of primary documents. SGML, the standard format for coding content and structure of primary documents, was introduced in 1986 as a publishing tool but is now being applied to bibliographic records. SGML now comprises standard definitions (DTD) for books, serials, articles and mathematical formulae. A simplified version (HTML) is used for Web pages. Pilot projects to develop SGML as a standard for bibliographic exchange include the Dublin Core, listing 13 descriptive elements for Internet documents; the French GRISELI programme using SGML for exchanging grey literature and US experiments on reformatting USMARC for use with SGML-based records
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.01
0.012823104 = product of:
0.03846931 = sum of:
0.03846931 = product of:
0.07693862 = sum of:
0.07693862 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07693862 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.01
0.0090673035 = product of:
0.02720191 = sum of:
0.02720191 = product of:
0.05440382 = sum of:
0.05440382 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05440382 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004)
0.01
0.0090673035 = product of:
0.02720191 = sum of:
0.02720191 = product of:
0.05440382 = sum of:
0.05440382 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05440382 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
-
Guenther, R.S.: Using the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) for resource description : guidelines and applications (2004)
0.01
0.00793389 = product of:
0.023801671 = sum of:
0.023801671 = product of:
0.047603343 = sum of:
0.047603343 = weight(_text_:22 in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047603343 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.89-98
-
Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004)
0.01
0.00793389 = product of:
0.023801671 = sum of:
0.023801671 = product of:
0.047603343 = sum of:
0.047603343 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047603343 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
-
Eden, B.L.: Metadata and librarianship : will MARC survive? (2004)
0.01
0.00793389 = product of:
0.023801671 = sum of:
0.023801671 = product of:
0.047603343 = sum of:
0.047603343 = weight(_text_:22 in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047603343 = score(doc=4750,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.6-7
-
Keith, C.: Using XSLT to manipulate MARC metadata (2004)
0.01
0.0068004774 = product of:
0.020401431 = sum of:
0.020401431 = product of:
0.040802862 = sum of:
0.040802862 = weight(_text_:22 in 4747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040802862 = score(doc=4747,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4747, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4747)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.122-130
-
Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004)
0.01
0.0068004774 = product of:
0.020401431 = sum of:
0.020401431 = product of:
0.040802862 = sum of:
0.040802862 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040802862 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
-
Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004)
0.01
0.0068004774 = product of:
0.020401431 = sum of:
0.020401431 = product of:
0.040802862 = sum of:
0.040802862 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040802862 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
-
Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003)
0.01
0.0056670653 = product of:
0.017001195 = sum of:
0.017001195 = product of:
0.03400239 = sum of:
0.03400239 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03400239 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05019314 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
