Search (389 results, page 1 of 20)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007) 0.17
    0.16989057 = product of:
      0.25483584 = sum of:
        0.101712465 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101712465 = score(doc=2548,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.518332 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
        0.15312338 = sum of:
          0.11232051 = weight(_text_:publishing in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11232051 = score(doc=2548,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.45802903 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
          0.040802862 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040802862 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05019314 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Oßwald, A.: Identification of electronic documents : the diversification of document supply and its consequences for document description (1992) 0.12
    0.122789904 = product of:
      0.18418485 = sum of:
        0.11866455 = weight(_text_:electronic in 568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11866455 = score(doc=568,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.6047207 = fieldWeight in 568, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=568)
        0.0655203 = product of:
          0.1310406 = sum of:
            0.1310406 = weight(_text_:publishing in 568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1310406 = score(doc=568,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.5343672 = fieldWeight in 568, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=568)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Electronic publishing will complicate the problem of national and international standards of bibliographic description. No agreement exists on the description of electronic documents, especially for those, which are published with little or no relation to the print concept ISO 10956 which is available as Committee Draft, seems a possible perspective but in spite of the diversification of document supply forms little explication is given in the draft to the system requirements for using the documents. Sets forth solutions to this problem
    Source
    Libraries and electronic publishing: promises and challenges for the 90's; Festschrift in honour of Richard M. Dougherty. 14th International Essen Symposium, 14.-17.10.1991. Ed.: A.H. Helal et al
  3. Bothmann, R.: Cataloging electronic books (2004) 0.12
    0.12052008 = product of:
      0.18078011 = sum of:
        0.15697844 = weight(_text_:electronic in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15697844 = score(doc=129,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.7999703 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
        0.023801671 = product of:
          0.047603343 = sum of:
            0.047603343 = weight(_text_:22 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047603343 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Papers on the cataloging of electronic resources have focused on electronic journals and Internet resources such as Web sites and not on electronic books. Electronic books are nonserial monographic resources accessed with a computer either directly or remotely. Rules and standards for cataloging electronic resources have changed and continue to change. This article discusses the electronic book as a unique manifestation and provides practical instruction on the application of current cataloging rules. The cataloging elements covered are control fields and variable data fields, including classification, uniform titles, title information, edition information, type and extent of the resource, publication and distribution information, physical description, series statements, notes, and subject analysis.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Lund, H.: Electronic documents and authorship : who did it? (1994) 0.12
    0.11921728 = product of:
      0.17882591 = sum of:
        0.15162401 = weight(_text_:electronic in 8474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15162401 = score(doc=8474,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.7726838 = fieldWeight in 8474, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8474)
        0.02720191 = product of:
          0.05440382 = sum of:
            0.05440382 = weight(_text_:22 in 8474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05440382 = score(doc=8474,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8474, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8474)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Today's increasing use of electronic documents raises the question: will it be necessary to change the core concepts of author and work within the tradition of Anglo-American Cataloging Rules when dealing with electronic documents? Describes the current definition of author and work as given in the traditional AACR and presents 2 systems working with electronic documents, electronic office systems and groupware
    Source
    New library world. 95(1994) no.1115, S.22-25
  5. Chang, H.-Y.: Cataloguing electronic resources (1997) 0.11
    0.10854568 = product of:
      0.16281852 = sum of:
        0.13561662 = weight(_text_:electronic in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13561662 = score(doc=1770,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.69110936 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
        0.02720191 = product of:
          0.05440382 = sum of:
            0.05440382 = weight(_text_:22 in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05440382 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Considers issues surrounding cataloguing electronic resources on the MELVYL online system at the University of California, USA. Considers implications of the differences between online and paper versions of serials, difficulties in providing precises information on holdings of full text articles, cataloguing rules changes that are need to integrate MARC formats, adding URLs as a subfield, archiving electronic journals and restricting access to electronic materials
    Source
    DLA bulletin. 17(1997) no.1, S.22-24
  6. Simpson, P.; Seeds, R.: Electronic journals in the online catalog : selection and bibliographic control (1998) 0.10
    0.102286205 = product of:
      0.1534293 = sum of:
        0.113717996 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.113717996 = score(doc=2592,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.57951283 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
        0.0397113 = product of:
          0.0794226 = sum of:
            0.0794226 = weight(_text_:publishing in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0794226 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.32387543 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    As the publishing of electronic periodicals increases, so does the user demand for access to these publications and librarians are faced with the tasks of selecting, acquiring and providing access to electronic periodicals. suggests that the principles of selection used for materials in other formats should be the foundation for the selection of electronic periodicals as well but selectors must also be aware of the uniqe aspects of these items, such as licensing agreements and hardware or software required to use them. Acquiring and cataloguing electronic periodicals poses challenges in processes that were created to process items housed in physical carriers. cataloguing of these periodicals requires decision making at several different levels, including: choosing the number of records to be used; and the content of those records
  7. Wendler, R.: Branching out : cataloging skills and functions in the digital age (1999) 0.10
    0.09922923 = product of:
      0.14884384 = sum of:
        0.09589544 = weight(_text_:electronic in 6100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09589544 = score(doc=6100,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.48868814 = fieldWeight in 6100, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6100)
        0.052948397 = product of:
          0.10589679 = sum of:
            0.10589679 = weight(_text_:publishing in 6100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10589679 = score(doc=6100,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.4318339 = fieldWeight in 6100, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6100)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Librarians create metadata including cataloging to manage and provide access to collections. Two recent technological developments, the explosion in electronic publishing and the conversion of metadata previously unavailable online into machine-readable form, are providing challenges to cataloging. Disparate types of resources, such as images and museum objects, archives, and library collections in print and electronic form, must be brought together in a coherent information environment. While catalogers exclusively cannot do these tasks, they and their skills are essential to bring order out of the chaos of the many different access systems
  8. McMillan, G.: Electronic theses and dissertations : merging perspectives (1996) 0.10
    0.09664884 = product of:
      0.14497326 = sum of:
        0.12457183 = weight(_text_:electronic in 5736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12457183 = score(doc=5736,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.6348245 = fieldWeight in 5736, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5736)
        0.020401431 = product of:
          0.040802862 = sum of:
            0.040802862 = weight(_text_:22 in 5736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040802862 = score(doc=5736,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5736, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5736)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the work of the ad hoc task force, coordinated by the Scholarly Communications Project (SCP) at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, to discuss the best means of cataloguing the theses palnned to be produced directly in electronic forms by postgraduate students. The main goals were to determine a process for handling electronic theses so that access would be at least as good as for hard copy and to find a way to derive cataloguing information from the electronic text and avoid rekeying as much as possible. An important part of the study was the application of existing MARC format tagged record structures to the new system. Concludes with brief notes on the concerns of UMI regarding Internet access of electronic theses
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
    Source
    Electronic resources: selection and bibliographic control. Ed.: L.-Y.W. Pattie, u. B.J. Cox
  9. Martin, G.: Control of electronic resources in Australia (1996) 0.10
    0.09643291 = product of:
      0.14464936 = sum of:
        0.11744745 = weight(_text_:electronic in 5107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11744745 = score(doc=5107,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.5985183 = fieldWeight in 5107, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5107)
        0.02720191 = product of:
          0.05440382 = sum of:
            0.05440382 = weight(_text_:22 in 5107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05440382 = score(doc=5107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes various ways that electronic resources on the Internet are being controlled in Australia, and in particular how various special networks and projects are linking users of information with documents, often using the World Wide Web. It also examines the implications for libraries and for cataloguers.
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
    Source
    Electronic resources: selection and bibliographic control. Ed.: L.-Y.W. Pattie, u. B.J. Cox
  10. Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999) 0.10
    0.09643291 = product of:
      0.14464936 = sum of:
        0.11744745 = weight(_text_:electronic in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11744745 = score(doc=6095,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.5985183 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
        0.02720191 = product of:
          0.05440382 = sum of:
            0.05440382 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05440382 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
  11. Huthwaite, A.: AACR2 and other metadata standards : the way forward (2003) 0.09
    0.09428251 = product of:
      0.14142376 = sum of:
        0.101712465 = weight(_text_:electronic in 5508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101712465 = score(doc=5508,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.518332 = fieldWeight in 5508, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5508)
        0.0397113 = product of:
          0.0794226 = sum of:
            0.0794226 = weight(_text_:publishing in 5508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0794226 = score(doc=5508,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.32387543 = fieldWeight in 5508, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5508)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Changes in the environment in which the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, second edition (AACR2), currently operates are examined, including the growth in electronic publishing and use of the Internet, and the development and increasing use of a range of other metadata standards, such as the Dublin Core. AACR2 and other metadata standards, particularly the Dublin Core, are compared. It is argued that AACR2 should continue to be used for describing selected Web-based resources. Criteria for deciding whether to use AACR2 or another metadata standard are defined, drawing on the experiences of two Brisbane universities in developing mechanisms for providing access to electronic resources. Five options are evaluated: catalog only (direct entry); catalog only (indirect entry); subject gateway only; catalog and subject gateway combined; and shared databases, such as CORC. The option chosen by the two universities is identified and explained. Revisions to the rules in AACR2 for cataloging electronic resources resulting from decisions made through 2000 are described. Possible future revisions are also explored.
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Electronic cataloging: AACR2 and metadata for serials and monographs"
  12. Reynolds, R.R.: Harmonizing bibliographic control of serials in the digital age (1999) 0.09
    0.08682557 = product of:
      0.13023835 = sum of:
        0.083908506 = weight(_text_:electronic in 5342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083908506 = score(doc=5342,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.4276021 = fieldWeight in 5342, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5342)
        0.046329845 = product of:
          0.09265969 = sum of:
            0.09265969 = weight(_text_:publishing in 5342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09265969 = score(doc=5342,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.37785465 = fieldWeight in 5342, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5342)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Two forces acting on the bibliographic control of serials are described: the desire to harmonize international standards and practices, and the impact of electronic serials. By breaking out of traditional publishing patterns, electronic serials have called into question current cataloging rules definitions (including the very definition of ''serial''), and practices. Three key standards that affect bibliographic control of serials are currently undergoing revision: AACR2, ISBD(S), and ISSN rules. Areas where harmonization of these rules and standards would be of most benefit to the cataloging and information communities are discussed.
  13. Reynolds, R.R.: ISSN: dumb number, smart solution (2003) 0.09
    0.085197926 = product of:
      0.12779689 = sum of:
        0.088085584 = weight(_text_:electronic in 5514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088085584 = score(doc=5514,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.44888872 = fieldWeight in 5514, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5514)
        0.0397113 = product of:
          0.0794226 = sum of:
            0.0794226 = weight(_text_:publishing in 5514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0794226 = score(doc=5514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.32387543 = fieldWeight in 5514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5514)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Presents an overview of the ISSN (International Standard Serial Number) in relation to current cataloging codes and evolving metadata standards. Covers the evolution and development of ISSN as a serials identifier; harmonization efforts with AACR2; the functions of identifiers in the electronic age; and the ISSN as a solution to current concerns in areas such as identification of serials and continuing resources, check-in, and obtaining metadata for electronic resources. Issues surrounding multiple manifestations and linking are also discussed. The National Serials Data Program functions as the official ISSN Center in the United States. As such, it works closely with the publishing community in assigning 5,000 to 6,000 ISSN numbers per year to American serials. The ISSN has the potential for identifying and providing access to serials and, in the near future, to many continuing resources as well.
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Electronic cataloging: AACR2 and metadata for serials and monographs"
  14. Seaman, D.M.: Selection, access, and control in a library of electronic texts (1996) 0.08
    0.084378794 = product of:
      0.12656818 = sum of:
        0.102766514 = weight(_text_:electronic in 6733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102766514 = score(doc=6733,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.5237035 = fieldWeight in 6733, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6733)
        0.023801671 = product of:
          0.047603343 = sum of:
            0.047603343 = weight(_text_:22 in 6733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047603343 = score(doc=6733,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6733, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6733)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Electronic Text Center, Virginia University, has been mounting SGML full text databases online since 1992 and is actively building a user community around this Internet based resource. Reports the Library's efforts to integrate these databases into the training, cataloguing, preservation and collection development areas of the library's operations with particular reference to problems such as: the desire for software and platform independent texts; and attempts to solve the cataloguing problems involving SGML bibliographic records using such techniques as the Text Encoding Initiative
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
    Source
    Electronic resources: selection and bibliographic control. Ed.: L.-Y.W. Pattie, u. B.J. Cox
  15. Davies-Brown, B.; Williamson, D.: Cataloging at the Library of Congress in the digital age (1996) 0.08
    0.084378794 = product of:
      0.12656818 = sum of:
        0.102766514 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102766514 = score(doc=2118,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.5237035 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
        0.023801671 = product of:
          0.047603343 = sum of:
            0.047603343 = weight(_text_:22 in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047603343 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress is participating in a number of initiatives to explore issues surrounding description and cataloging of digital materials. Additionally, programs have been written by LC staff which enable electronic enhancements in cataloging activities, such as the receipt of online information from publishers in the Electronic CIP Program. This paper is both an overview of the status of cataloging-related digital projects at LC and a description of software which facilitates productivity through the provision of advanced search capabilities and the elimination of repetitive keying.
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
    Source
    Electronic resources: selection and bibliographic control. Ed.: L.-Y.W. Pattie, u. B.J. Cox
  16. Davis-Brown, B.; Williamson, D.: Cataloging at the Library of Congress in the digital age (1996) 0.08
    0.084378794 = product of:
      0.12656818 = sum of:
        0.102766514 = weight(_text_:electronic in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102766514 = score(doc=604,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.5237035 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
        0.023801671 = product of:
          0.047603343 = sum of:
            0.047603343 = weight(_text_:22 in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047603343 = score(doc=604,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress is participating in a number of initiatives to explore issues surrounding description and cataloging of digital materials. Addtionally, programs have been written by LC staff which enable electronic enhancements in cataloging activities, such as the receipt of online information from publishers in the Electronic CIP Program. This paper is both an overview of the status of cataloging-related digital projects at LC and a description of software which facilitates productivity through the provision of software which facilitates productivity through the provision of advanced search capabilities and the elimination of repetitive keying.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Electronic Resources: Selection and Bibliographic Control
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.171-196
  17. ChaPudhry, A.S.; Periasamy, M.: ¬A study of current practices of selected libraries in cataloguing electronic journals (2001) 0.08
    0.084378794 = product of:
      0.12656818 = sum of:
        0.102766514 = weight(_text_:electronic in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102766514 = score(doc=746,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.5237035 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
        0.023801671 = product of:
          0.047603343 = sum of:
            0.047603343 = weight(_text_:22 in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047603343 = score(doc=746,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    MARC records and online policy documents of selected libraries were reviewed to study the approaches taken by libraries worldwide to catalogue electronic journals. In general, libraries catalogue those electronic journals that are subscribed by them on priority basis. Most of them annotate the e-journal to the print record, some prefer to catalogue them separately, while the majority of the libraries adopt both approaches. While most of the libraries studied prefer full record, cataloguing e-journals separately with a brief record (at least containing MARC fields 245, 500, and 856) that identifies and locates the resource seems to be the best practice.
    Date
    22. 1.2007 20:46:57
  18. Cochenour, D.: Linking remote users and information : cataloguing Internet publications (1994) 0.08
    0.0820649 = product of:
      0.123097345 = sum of:
        0.09589544 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09589544 = score(doc=2170,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.48868814 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
        0.02720191 = product of:
          0.05440382 = sum of:
            0.05440382 = weight(_text_:22 in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05440382 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries can add value to Internet resources by adding them to the library's catalogue in a manner consistent with the other resources held within the collection. Reports on OCLC studies into cataloguing Internet resources and accessing electronic periodicals. Existing retrieval methods on the Internet are limited because of shallow directory structures and idiosyncratic naming conventions. Catalogue entries for electronic resources need to provide a complete description of the access methodology if they are to satisfactorily connect remote users without the immediate possibility of backup from reference staff
    Date
    17.10.1995 18:22:54
  19. Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996) 0.08
    0.0820649 = product of:
      0.123097345 = sum of:
        0.09589544 = weight(_text_:electronic in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09589544 = score(doc=6732,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.48868814 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
        0.02720191 = product of:
          0.05440382 = sum of:
            0.05440382 = weight(_text_:22 in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05440382 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the problem of applying standard concepts of cataloguing and bibliographic control to electronic media by studying the degree of fit between the Standford Integrated Digital Library Project (SDLP) and both the USMARC format and the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI). Notes the lack of fit of both USMARC and TEI but stresses the advantages of the latter due its lack of dependency on 3 digit tags and its use of SGML conventions
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
    Source
    Electronic resources: selection and bibliographic control. Ed.: L.-Y.W. Pattie, u. B.J. Cox
  20. Weiss, A.K.: Proliferating guidelines : a history and analysis of the cataloging of electronic resources (2003) 0.08
    0.08140927 = product of:
      0.1221139 = sum of:
        0.101712465 = weight(_text_:electronic in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101712465 = score(doc=71,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.518332 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
        0.020401431 = product of:
          0.040802862 = sum of:
            0.040802862 = weight(_text_:22 in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040802862 = score(doc=71,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloging rules for computer-based materials were first introduced in the 1970s, and since then have undergone almost continuous modification and revision. This article focuses on analysis and comparison of the various codes and guidelines for practice issued for what are now called electronic resources. Creation of new cataloging rules has been spurred by introduction of new physical carriers, the preeminence of materials accessed remotely versus those with physical carriers, the need for guidance in cataloging specific instances of computer-based materials, and the evolution of the theoretical concerns underlying the cataloging codes. Based on this history of constant change, it is easy to predict many more changes in the cataloging standards for computer-based materials in the future. However, continuous changes in the cataloging rules may have produced as much confusion as clarity for working catalogers. Caution should be exercised in the creation of new rules and standards for cataloging electronic resources, as it is possible that older rules and standards may, in fact, be readily adapted to new types of electronic resources.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Years

Languages

  • e 332
  • d 40
  • f 5
  • i 5
  • nl 2
  • no 1
  • s 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 351
  • m 25
  • b 15
  • s 10
  • el 9
  • r 2
  • ? 1
  • n 1
  • p 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects