Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Robbio, A. de; Maguolo, D.; Marini, A.: Scientific and general subject classifications in the digital world (2001) 0.06
    0.05679862 = product of:
      0.085197926 = sum of:
        0.058723725 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058723725 = score(doc=2,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.29925916 = fieldWeight in 2, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2)
        0.026474198 = product of:
          0.052948397 = sum of:
            0.052948397 = weight(_text_:publishing in 2) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052948397 = score(doc=2,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.21591695 = fieldWeight in 2, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In the present work we discuss opportunities, problems, tools and techniques encountered when interconnecting discipline-specific subject classifications, primarily organized as search devices in bibliographic databases, with general classifications originally devised for book shelving in public libraries. We first state the fundamental distinction between topical (or subject) classifications and object classifications. Then we trace the structural limitations that have constrained subject classifications since their library origins, and the devices that were used to overcome the gap with genuine knowledge representation. After recalling some general notions on structure, dynamics and interferences of subject classifications and of the objects they refer to, we sketch a synthetic overview on discipline-specific classifications in Mathematics, Computing and Physics, on one hand, and on general classifications on the other. In this setting we present The Scientific Classifications Page, which collects groups of Web pages produced by a pool of software tools for developing hypertextual presentations of single or paired subject classifications from sequential source files, as well as facilities for gathering information from KWIC lists of classification descriptions. Further we propose a concept-oriented methodology for interconnecting subject classifications, with the concrete support of a relational analysis of the whole Mathematics Subject Classification through its evolution since 1959. Finally, we recall a very basic method for interconnection provided by coreference in bibliographic records among index elements from different systems, and point out the advantages of establishing the conditions of a more widespread application of such a method. A part of these contents was presented under the title Mathematics Subject Classification and related Classifications in the Digital World at the Eighth International Conference Crimea 2001, "Libraries and Associations in the Transient World: New Technologies and New Forms of Cooperation", Sudak, Ukraine, June 9-17, 2001, in a special session on electronic libraries, electronic publishing and electronic information in science chaired by Bernd Wegner, Editor-in-Chief of Zentralblatt MATH.
  2. Vizine-Goetz, D.: OCLC investigates using classification tools to organize Internet data (1998) 0.06
    0.05542263 = product of:
      0.08313394 = sum of:
        0.059332274 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059332274 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.30236036 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
        0.023801671 = product of:
          0.047603343 = sum of:
            0.047603343 = weight(_text_:22 in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047603343 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The knowledge structures that form traditional library classification schemes hold great potential for improving resource description and discovery on the Internet and for organizing electronic document collections. The advantages of assigning subject tokens (classes) to documents from a scheme like the DDC system are well documented
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  3. Mitchell, J.S.: In this age of WWW is classification redundant? (1998) 0.02
    0.02260277 = product of:
      0.06780831 = sum of:
        0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 5443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06780831 = score(doc=5443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 5443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5443)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that classification systems have an important role to play in knowledge organization in the new world electronic order. The natural language approach is not incompatible with the use of a classification system and classification has untapped potential as a multilingual switching language. Librarians must learn to present classification systems in a language understood by a general audience and promote them as general knowledge organization tools
  4. Broughton, V.; Lane, H.: Classification schemes revisited : applications to Web indexing and searching (2000) 0.02
    0.019978218 = product of:
      0.05993465 = sum of:
        0.05993465 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05993465 = score(doc=2476,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.30543008 = fieldWeight in 2476, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2476)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Basic skills of classification and subject indexing have been little taught in British library schools since automation was introduced into libraries. However, development of the Internet as a major medium of publication has stretched the capability of search engines to cope with retrieval. Consequently, there has been interest in applying existing systems of knowledge organization to electronic resources. Unfortunately, the classification systems have been adopted without a full understanding of modern classification principles. Analytico-synthetic schemes have been used crudely, as in the case of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC). The fully faceted Bliss Bibliographical Classification, 2nd edition (BC2) with its potential as a tool for electronic resource retrieval is virtually unknown outside academic libraries
  5. Peereboom, M.: Dwerg tussen reuzen? : het Nederlandse basisclassificatie Web (1997) 0.02
    0.019777425 = product of:
      0.059332274 = sum of:
        0.059332274 = weight(_text_:electronic in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059332274 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.30236036 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Developments in electronic communication technology have meda online databases a normal part of library collections. To provide users with direct access to Internet resources the Dutch Royal Library has cooperated with several university libraries in the Netherlands to develop the Nederlandse Basisclassificatie Web. Subject specialists select sources, add English summaries and NBW code, and input them to the online database. A Web desk and training workshops have been provided to assist users, and improvements to the system will simplify search procedures
  6. Kent, R.E.: Organizing conceptual knowledge online : metadata interoperability and faceted classification (1998) 0.01
    0.00793389 = product of:
      0.023801671 = sum of:
        0.023801671 = product of:
          0.047603343 = sum of:
            0.047603343 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047603343 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    30.12.2001 16:22:41
  7. Ardo, A.; Lundberg, S.: ¬A regional distributed WWW search and indexing service : the DESIRE way (1998) 0.01
    0.0068004774 = product of:
      0.020401431 = sum of:
        0.020401431 = product of:
          0.040802862 = sum of:
            0.040802862 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040802862 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05019314 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06