Search (43 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Allen, R.B.: Retrieval from facet spaces (1996) 0.10 
    0.09961921 = product of:
  0.14942881 = sum of:
    0.083908506 = weight(_text_:electronic in 6028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.083908506 = score(doc=6028,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.4276021 = fieldWeight in 6028, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6028)
    0.0655203 = product of:
      0.1310406 = sum of:
        0.1310406 = weight(_text_:publishing in 6028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1310406 = score(doc=6028,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.5343672 = fieldWeight in 6028, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6028)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    Paper presented at EP'96: the Electronic Publishing, Document Manipulation and Typography Conference, held in Palo Alto, CA, 24-26 Sep 96
    Source
    Electronic publishing. 8(1995) nos.2/3, S.247-257
  2. Allen, R.B.: ¬Two digital library interfaces that exploit hierarchical structure (1995) 0.09 
    0.085387886 = product of:
  0.12808183 = sum of:
    0.07192158 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07192158 = score(doc=2416,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.3665161 = fieldWeight in 2416, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2416)
    0.056160256 = product of:
      0.11232051 = sum of:
        0.11232051 = weight(_text_:publishing in 2416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11232051 = score(doc=2416,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.45802903 = fieldWeight in 2416, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2416)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Footnote
    Auch unter: http:// awi.aw.com/DAGS95/Papers/allen.html. - http://superbook.bellcore.com/PAPERS/RBA/LIBR/libr.html - Vortrag anläßlich: DAGS95: Electronic publishing and the information superhighway.
    Source
    DAGS95: Electronic publishing and the information superhighway, May 30 - June, 2, Boston. Proceedings
  3. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.06 
    0.06334015 = product of:
  0.09501022 = sum of:
    0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06780831 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
    0.02720191 = product of:
      0.05440382 = sum of:
        0.05440382 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05440382 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
  4. Robbio, A. de; Maguolo, D.; Marini, A.: Scientific and general subject classifications in the digital world (2001) 0.06 
    0.05679862 = product of:
  0.085197926 = sum of:
    0.058723725 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058723725 = score(doc=2,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.29925916 = fieldWeight in 2, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2)
    0.026474198 = product of:
      0.052948397 = sum of:
        0.052948397 = weight(_text_:publishing in 2) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052948397 = score(doc=2,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.21591695 = fieldWeight in 2, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    In the present work we discuss opportunities, problems, tools and techniques encountered when interconnecting discipline-specific subject classifications, primarily organized as search devices in bibliographic databases, with general classifications originally devised for book shelving in public libraries. We first state the fundamental distinction between topical (or subject) classifications and object classifications. Then we trace the structural limitations that have constrained subject classifications since their library origins, and the devices that were used to overcome the gap with genuine knowledge representation. After recalling some general notions on structure, dynamics and interferences of subject classifications and of the objects they refer to, we sketch a synthetic overview on discipline-specific classifications in Mathematics, Computing and Physics, on one hand, and on general classifications on the other. In this setting we present The Scientific Classifications Page, which collects groups of Web pages produced by a pool of software tools for developing hypertextual presentations of single or paired subject classifications from sequential source files, as well as facilities for gathering information from KWIC lists of classification descriptions. Further we propose a concept-oriented methodology for interconnecting subject classifications, with the concrete support of a relational analysis of the whole Mathematics Subject Classification through its evolution since 1959. Finally, we recall a very basic method for interconnection provided by coreference in bibliographic records among index elements from different systems, and point out the advantages of establishing the conditions of a more widespread application of such a method. A part of these contents was presented under the title Mathematics Subject Classification and related Classifications in the Digital World at the Eighth International Conference Crimea 2001, "Libraries and Associations in the Transient World: New Technologies and New Forms of Cooperation", Sudak, Ukraine, June 9-17, 2001, in a special session on electronic libraries, electronic publishing and electronic information in science chaired by Bernd Wegner, Editor-in-Chief of Zentralblatt MATH.
  5. Vizine-Goetz, D.: OCLC investigates using classification tools to organize Internet data (1998) 0.06 
    0.05542263 = product of:
  0.08313394 = sum of:
    0.059332274 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059332274 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.30236036 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
    0.023801671 = product of:
      0.047603343 = sum of:
        0.047603343 = weight(_text_:22 in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047603343 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The knowledge structures that form traditional library classification schemes hold great potential for improving resource description and discovery on the Internet and for organizing electronic document collections. The advantages of assigning subject tokens (classes) to documents from a scheme like the DDC system are well documented
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  6. Chandler, A.; LeBlanc, J.: Exploring the potential of a virtual undergraduate library collection based on the hierarchical interface to LC Classification (2006) 0.05 
    0.04750511 = product of:
  0.071257666 = sum of:
    0.050856233 = weight(_text_:electronic in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050856233 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.259166 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
    0.020401431 = product of:
      0.040802862 = sum of:
        0.040802862 = weight(_text_:22 in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040802862 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The Hierarchical Interface to Library of Congress Classification (HILCC) is a system developed by the Columbia University Library to leverage call number data from the MARC holdings records in Columbia's online catalog to create a structured, hierarchical menuing system that provides subject access to the library's electronic resources. In this paper, the authors describe a research initiative at the Cornell University Library to discover if the Columbia HILCC scheme can be used as developed or in modified form to create a virtual undergraduate print collection outside the context of the traditional online catalog. Their results indicate that, with certain adjustments, an HILCC model can indeed, be used to represent the holdings of a large research library's undergraduate collection of approximately 150,000 titles, but that such a model is not infinitely scalable and may require a new approach to browsing such a large information space.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.04 
    0.040075153 = product of:
  0.12022546 = sum of:
    0.12022546 = sum of:
      0.0794226 = weight(_text_:publishing in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0794226 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05019314 = queryNorm
          0.32387543 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
      0.040802862 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040802862 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05019314 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Networked orientated standards for vocabulary publishing and exchange and proposals for terminological services and terminology registries will improve sharing and use of all knowledge organization systems in the networked information environment. This means that documentary classifications may also become more applicable for use outside their original domain of application. The paper summarises some characteristics common to documentary classifications and explains some terminological, functional and implementation aspects. The original purpose behind each classification scheme determines the functions that the vocabulary is designed to facilitate. These functions influence the structure, semantics and syntax, scheme coverage and format in which classification data are published and made available. The author suggests that attention should be paid to the differences between documentary classifications as these may determine their suitability for a certain purpose and may impose different requirements with respect to their use online. As we speak, many classifications are being created for knowledge organization and it may be important to promote expertise from the bibliographic domain with respect to building and using classification systems.
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
  8. Hjoerland, B.; Kyllesbech Nielsen, L.: Subject access points in electronic retrieval (2001) 0.04 
    0.03955485 = product of:
  0.11866455 = sum of:
    0.11866455 = weight(_text_:electronic in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11866455 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.6047207 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  9. Trotter, R.: Electronic Dewey : the CD-ROM version of the Dewey Decimal Classification (1995) 0.04 
    0.03914915 = product of:
  0.11744745 = sum of:
    0.11744745 = weight(_text_:electronic in 1726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11744745 = score(doc=1726,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.5985183 = fieldWeight in 1726, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1726)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper describes the features of Electronic Dewey bringing out the ways in which it differs from the printed version of the Classification. The various search techniques available are discussed and the use of the DDC functions is considered. The paper concludes that while improvements could be made the CD-ROM heralds the electronic age of classification.
  10. Mitchell, J.S.: Flexible structures in the Dewey Decimal Classification (1998) 0.03 
    0.028253464 = product of:
  0.08476039 = sum of:
    0.08476039 = weight(_text_:electronic in 4561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08476039 = score(doc=4561,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.43194336 = fieldWeight in 4561, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4561)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Discusses how a general library classification such as the DDC can be transformed into a general knowledge organisation tool for the world-wide electronic information environment
  11. National Seminar on Classification in the Digital Environment : Papers contributed to the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment, Bangalore, 9-11 August 2001 (2001) 0.02 
    0.024108227 = product of:
  0.03616234 = sum of:
    0.029361863 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029361863 = score(doc=2047,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.14962958 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
    0.0068004774 = product of:
      0.013600955 = sum of:
        0.013600955 = weight(_text_:22 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013600955 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17576782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    2. 1.2004 10:35:22
    Footnote
    AHUJA and SATIJA (Relevance of Ranganathan's Classification Theory in the Age of Digital Libraries) note that traditional bibliographic classification systems have been applied in the digital environment with only limited success. They find that the "inherent flexibility of electronic manipulation of documents or their surrogates should allow a more organic approach to allocation of new subjects and appropriate linkages between subject hierarchies." (p. 18). Ahija and Satija also suggest that it is necessary to shift from a "subject" focus to a "need" focus when applying classification theory in the digital environment. They find Ranganathan's framework applicable in the digital environment. Although Ranganathan's focus is "subject oriented and hence emphasise the hierarchical and linear relationships" (p. 26), his framework "can be successfully adopted with certain modifications ... in the digital environment." (p. 26). SHAH and KUMAR (Model for System Unification of Geographical Schedules (Space Isolates)) report an a plan to develop a single schedule for geographical Subdivision that could be used across all classification systems. The authors argue that this is needed in order to facilitate interoperability in the digital environment. SAN SEGUNDO MANUEL (The Representation of Knowledge as a Symbolization of Productive Electronic Information) distills different approaches and definitions of the term "representation" as it relates to representation of knowledge in the library and information science literature and field. SHARADA (Linguistic and Document Classification: Paradigmatic Merger Possibilities) suggests the development of a universal indexing language. The foundation for the universal indexing language is Chomsky's Minimalist Program and Ranganathan's analytico-synthetic classification theory; Acording to the author, based an these approaches, it "should not be a problem" (p. 62) to develop a universal indexing language.
    SELVI (Knowledge Classification of Digital Information Materials with Special Reference to Clustering Technique) finds that it is essential to classify digital material since the amount of material that is becoming available is growing. Selvi suggests using automated classification to "group together those digital information materials or documents that are "most similar" (p. 65). This can be attained by using Cluster analysis methods. PRADHAN and THULASI (A Study of the Use of Classification and Indexing Systems by Web Resource Directories) compare and contrast the classificatory structures of Google, Yahoo, and Looksmart's directories and compare the directories to Dewey Decimal Classification, Library of Congress Classification and Colon Classification's classificatory structures. They find differentes between the directories' and the bibliographic classification systems' classificatory structures and principles. These differentes stem from the fact that bibliographic classification systems are used to "classify academic resources for the research community" (p. 83) and directories "aim to categorize a wider breath of information groups, entertainment, recreation, govt. information, commercial information" (p. 83). NEELAMEGHAN (Hierarchy, Hierarchical Relation and Hierarchical Arrangement) reviews the concept of hierarchy and the formation of hierarchical structures across a variety of domains. NEELAMEGHAN and PRADAD (Digitized Schemes for Subject Classification and Thesauri: Complementary Roles) demonstrate how thesaural relationships (NT, BT, and RT) can be applied to a classification scheme, the Colon Classification in this Gase. NEELAMEGHAN and ASUNDI (Metadata Framework for Describing Embodied Knowledge and Subject Content) propose to use the Generalized Facet Structure framework which is based an Ranganathan's General Theory of Knowledge Classification as a framework for describing the content of documents in a metadata element set for the representation of web documents. CHUDAMANI (Classified Catalogue as a Tool for Subject Based Information Retrieval in both Traditional and Electronic Library Environment) explains why the classified catalogue is superior to the alphabetic cata logue and argues that the same is true in the digital environment.
  12. Koh, G.S.: Options in classification available through modern technology (1995) 0.02 
    0.02260277 = product of:
  0.06780831 = sum of:
    0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06780831 = score(doc=2938,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 2938, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2938)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    System design options and user searching options are discussed. The problems of electronic union catalogs, including a 'virtual union catalog' in particular are considered and enhancements made possible through classification are explored. The combined system of subject headings and classification is presented as the model of the integrated subject searching tool which will meet individualized learning styles and user responsive vocabulary
  13. Tinker, A.J.; Pollitt, A.S.; O'Brien, A.; Braekevelt, P.A.: ¬The Dewey Decimal Classification and the transition from physical to electronic knowledge organisation (1999) 0.02 
    0.02260277 = product of:
  0.06780831 = sum of:
    0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 4468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06780831 = score(doc=4468,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 4468, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4468)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The physical organisation of items on library shelves using any classification scheme is inevitable a compromise. The best efforts to achieve an arrangement that is helpful to users will be thwarted by the multifaceted nature of these items and the specific needs of the user and the library. Items on a particular subject will be scattered throughout the library building(s) across disciplines, by physical form, by frequency of use and whether and for how long they may be borrowed. Even thought he rich information content of multifaceted items may be represented in the notation, the items required by a user will be scattered across library shelves when the item is placed in a single relative location. This paper explores these issues uisng examples from a University Library classified using the DDC. The electronic context of the library OPAC can transcend the constraints imposed by the predominantly physical nature of library collections, yet the current use of classification schemes in on-line systems retains many of these limitations. Examples of such systems applying DDC on the WWW are discussed and compared with a system that seeks to use DDC in what is called view-based searching. The interface and the resulting browsing and searching capability of a view-based OPAC are described. Ways in which subject access to library collections can be improved and disciplinary scatter resolved by assigning multiple class number to items and exploiting the rich Dewey structure in a faceted form are discussed. It is suggested that the informative power of visual classificatory structures at the search interface will be beneficial to the broader learning experience of the user. The paper concludes that the application of classification schemes in electronic interfaces should not be bound by the the physical constraints that no longer apply in an electronic context but be exploited to provide a complete, flexible and individual interface as determined by the needs of each user
  14. Mitchell, J.S.: In this age of WWW is classification redundant? (1998) 0.02 
    0.02260277 = product of:
  0.06780831 = sum of:
    0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 5443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06780831 = score(doc=5443,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 5443, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5443)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Argues that classification systems have an important role to play in knowledge organization in the new world electronic order. The natural language approach is not incompatible with the use of a classification system and classification has untapped potential as a multilingual switching language. Librarians must learn to present classification systems in a language understood by a general audience and promote them as general knowledge organization tools
  15. Saeed, H.; Chaudhry, A.S.: Using Dewey decimal classification scheme (DDC) for building taxonomies for knowledge organisation (2002) 0.02 
    0.02260277 = product of:
  0.06780831 = sum of:
    0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 4461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06780831 = score(doc=4461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 4461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4461)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Terms drawn from DDC indexes and IEEE Web Thesaurus were merged with DDC hierarchies to build a taxonomy in the domain of computer science. When displayed as a directory structure using a shareware tool MyInfo, the resultant taxonomy appeared to be a promising tool for categorisation that can facilitate browsing of information resources in an electronic environment.
  16. Zaytseva, E.: Classification tools for librarians and users : the Russian experience (2008) 0.02 
    0.02260277 = product of:
  0.06780831 = sum of:
    0.06780831 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06780831 = score(doc=2179,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.34555468 = fieldWeight in 2179, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2179)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The paper considers the history of the development of electronic versions of library classifications in Russia. It describes classification tools specially designed for OPAC users and librarians - classifiers and classification editors.
  17. Quick Guide to Publishing a Classification Scheme on the Semantic Web (2008) 0.02 
    0.021840101 = product of:
  0.0655203 = sum of:
    0.0655203 = product of:
      0.1310406 = sum of:
        0.1310406 = weight(_text_:publishing in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1310406 = score(doc=3061,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.5343672 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This document describes in brief how to express the content and structure of a classification scheme, and metadata about a classification scheme, in RDF using the SKOS vocabulary. RDF allows data to be linked to and/or merged with other RDF data by semantic web applications. The Semantic Web, which is based on the Resource Description Framework (RDF), provides a common framework that allows data to be shared and reused across application, enterprise, and community boundaries. Publishing classifications schemes in SKOS will unify the great many of existing classification efforts in the framework of the Semantic Web.
  18. Broughton, V.; Lane, H.: Classification schemes revisited : applications to Web indexing and searching (2000) 0.02 
    0.019978218 = product of:
  0.05993465 = sum of:
    0.05993465 = weight(_text_:electronic in 2476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05993465 = score(doc=2476,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.30543008 = fieldWeight in 2476, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2476)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Basic skills of classification and subject indexing have been little taught in British library schools since automation was introduced into libraries. However, development of the Internet as a major medium of publication has stretched the capability of search engines to cope with retrieval. Consequently, there has been interest in applying existing systems of knowledge organization to electronic resources. Unfortunately, the classification systems have been adopted without a full understanding of modern classification principles. Analytico-synthetic schemes have been used crudely, as in the case of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC). The fully faceted Bliss Bibliographical Classification, 2nd edition (BC2) with its potential as a tool for electronic resource retrieval is virtually unknown outside academic libraries
  19. Vizine-Goetz, D.: Online classification : implications for classifying and document retrieval (1996) 0.02 
    0.019777425 = product of:
  0.059332274 = sum of:
    0.059332274 = weight(_text_:electronic in 5183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059332274 = score(doc=5183,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.30236036 = fieldWeight in 5183, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5183)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Recent advances in automating library classification data are causing the makers and maintainers of DDC and LCC to seek enhancements to these schemes that will facilitate computer-assisted classifying and extend the usefulbess of library classification to electronic collections. To explore the kinds of improvements that are needed to ensure that classification remains a viable subject retrieval tool, DDC numbers applied to over 40.000 records for Internet-accessible resources were analyzed. This analysis is used as a springboard for recommendations for improvements to DDC and LCC
  20. Peereboom, M.: Dwerg tussen reuzen? : het Nederlandse basisclassificatie Web (1997) 0.02 
    0.019777425 = product of:
  0.059332274 = sum of:
    0.059332274 = weight(_text_:electronic in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059332274 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.30236036 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Developments in electronic communication technology have meda online databases a normal part of library collections. To provide users with direct access to Internet resources the Dutch Royal Library has cooperated with several university libraries in the Netherlands to develop the Nederlandse Basisclassificatie Web. Subject specialists select sources, add English summaries and NBW code, and input them to the online database. A Web desk and training workshops have been provided to assist users, and improvements to the system will simplify search procedures

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 36
  • d 6
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 35
  • el 5
  • m 2
  • s 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes