-
Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013)
0.08
0.07518873 = product of:
0.30075493 = sum of:
0.30075493 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30075493 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
-
Tonta, Y.: Scholarly communication and the use of networked information sources (1996)
0.05
0.053185612 = product of:
0.106371224 = sum of:
0.02558738 = weight(_text_:information in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02558738 = score(doc=6389,freq=14.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
0.080783844 = sum of:
0.042300213 = weight(_text_:services in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042300213 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
0.03848363 = weight(_text_:22 in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03848363 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Examines the use of networked information sources in scholarly communication. Networked information sources are defined broadly to cover: documents and images stored on electronic network hosts; data files; newsgroups; listservs; online information services and electronic periodicals. Reports results of a survey to determine how heavily, if at all, networked information sources are cited in scholarly printed periodicals published in 1993 and 1994. 27 printed periodicals, representing a wide range of subjects and the most influential periodicals in their fields, were identified through the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index Journal Citation Reports. 97 articles were selected for further review and references, footnotes and bibliographies were checked for references to networked information sources. Only 2 articles were found to contain such references. Concludes that, although networked information sources facilitate scholars' work to a great extent during the research process, scholars have yet to incorporate such sources in the bibliographies of their published articles
- Source
- IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.240-245
-
Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986)
0.04
0.038550586 = product of:
0.07710117 = sum of:
0.025789656 = weight(_text_:information in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025789656 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.05131151 = product of:
0.10262302 = sum of:
0.10262302 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10262302 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.04
0.038550586 = product of:
0.07710117 = sum of:
0.025789656 = weight(_text_:information in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025789656 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.05131151 = product of:
0.10262302 = sum of:
0.10262302 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10262302 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 41(2007), S.xxx-xxx
-
Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987)
0.04
0.038550586 = product of:
0.07710117 = sum of:
0.025789656 = weight(_text_:information in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025789656 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.05131151 = product of:
0.10262302 = sum of:
0.10262302 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10262302 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
-
Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994)
0.03
0.03373176 = product of:
0.06746352 = sum of:
0.02256595 = weight(_text_:information in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02256595 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.04489757 = product of:
0.08979514 = sum of:
0.08979514 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08979514 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990)
0.03
0.03373176 = product of:
0.06746352 = sum of:
0.02256595 = weight(_text_:information in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02256595 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.04489757 = product of:
0.08979514 = sum of:
0.08979514 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08979514 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:29
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.5, S.368-375
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990)
0.03
0.03373176 = product of:
0.06746352 = sum of:
0.02256595 = weight(_text_:information in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02256595 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.04489757 = product of:
0.08979514 = sum of:
0.08979514 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08979514 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:55
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.5, S.376-386
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.03
0.030735964 = product of:
0.061471928 = sum of:
0.016118534 = weight(_text_:information in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016118534 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.045353394 = product of:
0.09070679 = sum of:
0.09070679 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09070679 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
- Source
- Information Research. 6(2001), no.2
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.03
0.028912935 = product of:
0.05782587 = sum of:
0.019342242 = weight(_text_:information in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019342242 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.03848363 = product of:
0.07696726 = sum of:
0.07696726 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07696726 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.866-867
-
Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995)
0.02
0.023995128 = product of:
0.047990255 = sum of:
0.022334497 = weight(_text_:information in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022334497 = score(doc=5092,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
0.025655756 = product of:
0.05131151 = sum of:
0.05131151 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05131151 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
- Source
- Journal of information; communication; and library science. 2(1995) no.2, S.20-28
-
Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996)
0.02
0.023995128 = product of:
0.047990255 = sum of:
0.022334497 = weight(_text_:information in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022334497 = score(doc=80,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.025655756 = product of:
0.05131151 = sum of:
0.05131151 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05131151 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- There is a decrease in the incidence of explicit references to a paper over time, hence the assumption that information ages. In a study which attempts to discover whether information really ages it is necessary to include eponyms, anonyms and footnote references. Reports a pilot study which demonstrates that there is an increase over time in the frequency of use of eponyms
- Footnote
- Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
-
Robinson, L.; Maguire, M.: ¬The rhizome and the tree : changing metaphors for information organisation (2010)
0.02
0.023620538 = product of:
0.047241077 = sum of:
0.02256595 = weight(_text_:information in 3957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02256595 = score(doc=3957,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3957, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3957)
0.024675125 = product of:
0.04935025 = sum of:
0.04935025 = weight(_text_:services in 3957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04935025 = score(doc=3957,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 3957, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3957)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The paper aims to review Deleuze and Guttari's concept of the rhizome as a model for information organisation. Design/methodology/approach - This is a critical review of selected literature. Findings - The rhizome concept is a promising model for understanding hyperlinked information services. It may be of practical value, particularly if it can be integrated with more traditional forms of information organisation. More research, conceptual and practical, is needed before this can be achieved. Research limitations/implications - The literature review is not comprehensive, and the conclusions are open-ended. Originality/value - This is the only paper to review the rhizome concept in this way.
-
Ortega, J.L.; Aguillo, I.F.: Microsoft academic search and Google scholar citations : comparative analysis of author profiles (2014)
0.02
0.02333082 = product of:
0.04666164 = sum of:
0.016750874 = weight(_text_:information in 1284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016750874 = score(doc=1284,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 1284, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1284)
0.029910767 = product of:
0.059821535 = sum of:
0.059821535 = weight(_text_:services in 1284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059821535 = score(doc=1284,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.344191 = fieldWeight in 1284, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1284)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article offers a comparative analysis of the personal profiling capabilities of the two most important free citation-based academic search engines, namely, Microsoft Academic Search (MAS) and Google Scholar Citations (GSC). Author profiles can be useful for evaluation purposes once the advantages and the shortcomings of these services are described and taken into consideration. In total, 771 personal profiles appearing in both the MAS and the GSC databases were analyzed. Results show that the GSC profiles include more documents and citations than those in MAS but with a strong bias toward the information and computing sciences, whereas the MAS profiles are disciplinarily better balanced. MAS shows technical problems such as a higher number of duplicated profiles and a lower updating rate than GSC. It is concluded that both services could be used for evaluation proposes only if they are applied along with other citation indices as a way to supplement that information.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.6, S.1149-1156
-
Siddiqui, M.A.: ¬A bibliometric study of authorship characteristics in four international information science journals (1997)
0.02
0.023297938 = product of:
0.046595875 = sum of:
0.02735406 = weight(_text_:information in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02735406 = score(doc=853,freq=16.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
0.019241815 = product of:
0.03848363 = sum of:
0.03848363 = weight(_text_:22 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03848363 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a bibliometric study of the authorship characteristics of articles published in 4 major information science periodicals: JASIS, Information technology and libraries, Journal of information science, and Program. The aim was to determine the details of their authors, such as: sex, occupation, affiliation, geographic distribution, and institutional affiliation. A total of 163 articles published in 1993 and written by 294 authors were analyzed. Results indicate that: men (206 or 70%) publish 3.0 times more articles than women (69 or 23,5%). Schools of library and information science contributed the most authors. The majority of authors came from the USA (148 or 50,3%), with the Midwest region claiming the largest share (110 or 25,0%). Academic libraries (110 or 37,4%) account for the major share of library publication. 12 schools of library and information science, in the USA, contributed 32 authors (50,0%) and assistant professors (25 or 39,1%) publish the most in these library schools. Male school of library and information science authors publish 1,6 times more than their female counterparts
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.3-23
-
Forde, J.L.: ¬An international survey of reading and library use by Nobel laureates (1997)
0.02
0.023089435 = product of:
0.04617887 = sum of:
0.011282975 = weight(_text_:information in 271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011282975 = score(doc=271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=271)
0.034895893 = product of:
0.06979179 = sum of:
0.06979179 = weight(_text_:services in 271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06979179 = score(doc=271,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 271, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=271)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study, conducted in 8 languages, to examine the reading and library use habits of eminent individuals. All living Nobel Prize Laureates were contacted and asked to provide information about their childhood interests and habits and also those which characterize their adult careers. Respondents indicated that as children they enjoyed reading and many relied on library services to provide them with the material they read. The Laureates who grew up in the USA had more access to library services, tended to make more use of libraries as children, and felt more competent to use libraries at earlier ages than did many of their counterparts outside the USA. The reading habit persisted into adulthood more predictably than did library use or their involvement in other leisure activities
-
Tsay, M.-y.: Literature growth, journal characteristics, and suthor productivity in subject indexing, 1977 to 2000 (2004)
0.02
0.02241971 = product of:
0.04483942 = sum of:
0.023689311 = weight(_text_:information in 2070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023689311 = score(doc=2070,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 2070, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2070)
0.021150107 = product of:
0.042300213 = sum of:
0.042300213 = weight(_text_:services in 2070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042300213 = score(doc=2070,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 2070, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2070)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This study employed the Perl program, Excel software, and some bibliometric techniques to investigate growth pattern, journal characteristics, and author productivity of the subject indexing literature from 1977 to 2000, based an the subject search of a descriptor field in the Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) database. The literature growth from 1977 to 2000 in subject indexing could be fitted well by the logistic curve. The Bradford plot of journal literature fits the typical Bradford-Zipf S-shaped curve. Twenty core journals making a significant contribution could be identified from the Bradford-Zipf distribution. Four major research topics in the area of subject indexing were identified as: (1) information organization, (2) information processing, (3) information storage and retrieval, and (4) information systems and services. It was also found that a vast majority of authors (76.7%) contributed only one article, which is a much larger percentage than the 60% of original Lotka's data. The 15 most productive authors and the key concepts of their research were identified.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 55(2004) no.1, S.64-73
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.02
0.022414599 = product of:
0.044829197 = sum of:
0.02558738 = weight(_text_:information in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02558738 = score(doc=201,freq=14.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.019241815 = product of:
0.03848363 = sum of:
0.03848363 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03848363 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1263-1274
-
Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96)
0.02
0.021945897 = product of:
0.043891795 = sum of:
0.01823604 = weight(_text_:information in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01823604 = score(doc=673,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
0.025655756 = product of:
0.05131151 = sum of:
0.05131151 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05131151 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a bibliometric study of 111 theses accepted by the Department of Library and Information Science, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria, between 1977 and 1992. The analysis was based on year, type and degree awarded, subject, type of library and geographical area. Concludes that the highest number of submissions was 1991, when 108 MLS theses (97,29%) and 3 PhD theses (2,71%) were accepted. Libraries and readers was the most concetrated subject while the academic library was the most discussed type of library
- Source
- Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
-
Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998)
0.02
0.021945897 = product of:
0.043891795 = sum of:
0.01823604 = weight(_text_:information in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01823604 = score(doc=3691,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
0.025655756 = product of:
0.05131151 = sum of:
0.05131151 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05131151 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- International bibliographic databases and related biblimetric indicators together provide an analytical framework and appropriate measure to cover both the 'supply side' - research capabilities and outputs - and 'demand side' - collaboration, diffusion and citation impact - related to information and communication technologies (ICT) research. Presents results of such a bibliometric study describing macro level features of this ICT knowledge base
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:26:54
