-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980)
0.03
0.02743237 = product of:
0.05486474 = sum of:
0.02279505 = weight(_text_:information in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02279505 = score(doc=5835,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.032069694 = product of:
0.06413939 = sum of:
0.06413939 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06413939 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:44
- Source
- Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u, L. Kajberg
-
Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012)
0.02
0.021208894 = product of:
0.042417787 = sum of:
0.019741092 = weight(_text_:information in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019741092 = score(doc=4888,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.022676697 = product of:
0.045353394 = sum of:
0.045353394 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045353394 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper centres on the tools for the management of new digital documents, which are not only textual, but also visual-video, audio or multimedia in the full sense. Among the aims is to demonstrate that operating within the terms of generic Information Retrieval through textual language only is limiting, and it is instead necessary to consider ampler criteria, such as those of MultiMedia Information Retrieval, according to which, every type of digital document can be analyzed and searched by the proper elements of language for its proper nature. MMIR is presented as the organic complex of the systems of Text Retrieval, Visual Retrieval, Video Retrieval, and Audio Retrieval, each of which has an approach to information management that handles the concrete textual, visual, audio, or video content of the documents directly, here defined as content-based. In conclusion, the limits of this content-based objective access to documents is underlined. The discrepancy known as the semantic gap is that which occurs between semantic-interpretive access and content-based access. Finally, the integration of these conceptions is explained, gathering and composing the merits and the advantages of each of the approaches and of the systems to access to information.
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:02:10
- Footnote
- Bezugnahme auf: Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval. In: Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.3-42.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
-
Hidderley, R.; Rafferty, P.: Democratic indexing : an approach to the retrieval of fiction (1997)
0.02
0.02031583 = product of:
0.04063166 = sum of:
0.015956536 = weight(_text_:information in 1783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015956536 = score(doc=1783,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1783, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1783)
0.024675125 = product of:
0.04935025 = sum of:
0.04935025 = weight(_text_:services in 1783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04935025 = score(doc=1783,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 1783, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1783)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Examines how an analytical framework to describe the contents of images may be extended to deal with time based materials like film and music. A levels of meanings table was developed and used as an indexing template for image retrieval purposes. Develops a concept of democratic indexing which focused on user interpretation. Describes the approach to image or pictorial information retrieval. Extends the approach in relation to fiction
- Source
- Information services and use. 17(1997) nos.2/3, S.101-109
-
Hutchins, W.J.: ¬The concept of 'aboutness' in subject indexing (1978)
0.02
0.02031583 = product of:
0.04063166 = sum of:
0.015956536 = weight(_text_:information in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015956536 = score(doc=1961,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
0.024675125 = product of:
0.04935025 = sum of:
0.04935025 = weight(_text_:services in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04935025 = score(doc=1961,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The common view of the 'aboutness' of documents is that the index entries (or classifications) assigned to documents represent or indicate in some way the total contents of documents; indexing and classifying are seen as processes involving the 'summerization' of the texts of documents. In this paper an alternative concept of 'aboutness' is proposed based on an analysis of the linguistic organization of texts, which is felt to be more appropriate in many indexing environments (particularly in non-specialized libraries and information services) and which has implications for the evaluation of the effectiveness of indexing systems
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.93-97.
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Why indexing fails the researcher (1988)
0.02
0.01944235 = product of:
0.0388847 = sum of:
0.013959061 = weight(_text_:information in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013959061 = score(doc=703,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
0.024925638 = product of:
0.049851276 = sum of:
0.049851276 = weight(_text_:services in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049851276 = score(doc=703,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.28682584 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- It is a truism in information science that indexing is associated with 'aboutness', and that index terms that accurately represent what a document is about will serve the needs of the user/searcher well. It is contended in this paper that indexing which is limited to the representation of aboutness serves the novice in a discipline adequately, but does not serve the scholar or researcher, who is concerned with highly specific aspects of or points-of-view on a subject. The linguistic analogs of 'aboutness' and 'aspects' are 'topic' and 'comment' respectively. Serial indexing services deal with topics at varyng levels of specificity, but neglect comment almost entirely. This may explain the underutilization of secondary information services by scholars, as has been repeatedly demonstrated in user studies. It may also account for the incomplete lists of bibliographic references in many research papers. Natural language searching of fulltext databases does not solve this problem, because the aspect of a topic of interest to researchers is often inexpressible in concrete terms. The thesis is illustrated with examples of indexing failures in research projects the author has conducted on a range of linguistic and library-information science topics. Finally, the question of whether indexing can be improved to meet the needs of researchers is examined
-
Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992)
0.02
0.019275293 = product of:
0.038550586 = sum of:
0.012894828 = weight(_text_:information in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012894828 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.025655756 = product of:
0.05131151 = sum of:
0.05131151 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05131151 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:08
-
Solomon, P.: Access to fiction for children : a user-based assessment of options and opportunities (1997)
0.02
0.01797905 = product of:
0.0359581 = sum of:
0.011282975 = weight(_text_:information in 5845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011282975 = score(doc=5845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5845)
0.024675125 = product of:
0.04935025 = sum of:
0.04935025 = weight(_text_:services in 5845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04935025 = score(doc=5845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 5845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Information services and use. 17(1997) nos.2/3, S.139-146
-
Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014)
0.01
0.014456468 = product of:
0.028912935 = sum of:
0.009671121 = weight(_text_:information in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009671121 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.019241815 = product of:
0.03848363 = sum of:
0.03848363 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03848363 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper reports on the preliminary findings of a study that explores mental associations made by novices viewing art images. In a controlled environment, 20 Taiwanese college students responded to the question "What does the painting remind you of?" after viewing each digitized image of 15 oil paintings by a famous Taiwanese artist. Rather than focusing on the representation or interpretation of art, the study attempted to solicit information about how non-experts are stimulated by art. This paper reports on the analysis of participant responses to three of the images, and describes a12-type taxonomy of association emerged from the analysis. While 9 of the types are derived and adapted from facets in the Art & Architecture Thesaurus, three new types - Artistic Influence Association, Reactive Association, and Prototype Association - are discovered. The conclusion briefly discusses both the significance of the findings and the implications for future research.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006)
0.01
0.014456468 = product of:
0.028912935 = sum of:
0.009671121 = weight(_text_:information in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009671121 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.019241815 = product of:
0.03848363 = sum of:
0.03848363 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03848363 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Content analysis is a highly flexible research method that has been widely used in library and information science (LIS) studies with varying research goals and objectives. The research method is applied in qualitative, quantitative, and sometimes mixed modes of research frameworks and employs a wide range of analytical techniques to generate findings and put them into context. This article characterizes content analysis as a systematic, rigorous approach to analyzing documents obtained or generated in the course of research. It briefly describes the steps involved in content analysis, differentiates between quantitative and qualitative content analysis, and shows that content analysis serves the purposes of both quantitative research and qualitative research. The authors draw on selected LIS studies that have used content analysis to illustrate the concepts addressed in the article. The article also serves as a gateway to methodological books and articles that provide more detail about aspects of content analysis discussed only briefly in the article.
- Source
- Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
-
Allen, B.; Reser, D.: Content analysis in library and information science research (1990)
0.01
0.00911802 = product of:
0.03647208 = sum of:
0.03647208 = weight(_text_:information in 7510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03647208 = score(doc=7510,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 7510, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7510)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library and information science research. 12(1990) no.3, S.251-262
-
Belkin, N.J.: ¬The problem of 'matching' in information retrieval (1980)
0.01
0.008375437 = product of:
0.033501748 = sum of:
0.033501748 = weight(_text_:information in 1329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033501748 = score(doc=1329,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 1329, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1329)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u. L. Kajberg
-
Schlapfer, K.: ¬The information content of images (1995)
0.01
0.008375437 = product of:
0.033501748 = sum of:
0.033501748 = weight(_text_:information in 521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033501748 = score(doc=521,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 521, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=521)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Reviews the methods of calculating the information content of images, with particular reference to the information content of printed and photographic images; and printed and television images
-
Renouf, A.: Making sense of text : automated approaches to meaning extraction (1993)
0.01
0.007978268 = product of:
0.031913072 = sum of:
0.031913072 = weight(_text_:information in 7111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031913072 = score(doc=7111,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 7111, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7111)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Imprint
- Oxford : Learned Information
- Source
- Online information 93: 17th International Online Meeting Proceedings, London, 7.-9.12.1993. Ed. by D.I. Raitt et al
-
Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002)
0.01
0.007228234 = product of:
0.014456468 = sum of:
0.0048355605 = weight(_text_:information in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0048355605 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.058186423 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
0.009620908 = product of:
0.019241815 = sum of:
0.019241815 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019241815 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 27. 9.2005 14:22:19
- Footnote
- This document will be particularly useful to subject cataloguing teachers and trainers who could use the model to design case descriptions and exercises. We believe it is an accurate description of the reality of subject cataloguing today. But now that we know how things are dope, the next interesting question may be: Is that the best way? Is there a better, more efficient, way to do things? We can only hope that Dr. Sauperl will soon provide her own view of methods and techniques that could improve the flow of work or address the cataloguers' concern as to the lack of feedback an their work. Her several excellent suggestions for further research in this area all build an bits and pieces of what is done already, and stay well away from what could be done by the various actors in the area, from the designers of controlled vocabularies and authority files to those who use these tools an a daily basis to index, classify, or search for information."
-
Morehead, D.R.; Pejtersen, A.M.; Rouse, W.B.: ¬The value of information and computer-aided information seeking : problem formulation and application to fiction retrieval (1984)
0.01
0.0069093825 = product of:
0.02763753 = sum of:
0.02763753 = weight(_text_:information in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02763753 = score(doc=5828,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Issues concerning the formulation and application of a model of how humans value information are examined. Formulation of a value function is based on research from modelling, value assessment, human information seeking behavior, and human decision making. The proposed function is incorporated into a computer-based fiction retrieval system and evaluated using data from nine searches. Evaluation is based on the ability of an individual's value function to discriminate among novels selected, rejected, and not considered. The results are discussed in terms of both formulation and utilization of a value function as well as the implications for extending the proposed formulation to other information seeking environments
- Source
- Information processing and management. 20(1984), S.583-601
-
Farrow, J.: Indexing as a cognitive process (1994)
0.01
0.006447414 = product of:
0.025789656 = sum of:
0.025789656 = weight(_text_:information in 1257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025789656 = score(doc=1257,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1257, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1257)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.53, [=Suppl.16]
-
Kremer-Marietti, A.: Thematic analysis (1986)
0.01
0.006447414 = product of:
0.025789656 = sum of:
0.025789656 = weight(_text_:information in 1273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025789656 = score(doc=1273,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1273, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1273)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.41, [=Suppl.6]
-
Baxendale, P.: Content analysis, specification and control (1966)
0.01
0.006447414 = product of:
0.025789656 = sum of:
0.025789656 = weight(_text_:information in 218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025789656 = score(doc=218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=218)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 1(1966), S.71-106
-
Sharp, J.R.: Content analysis, specification, and control (1967)
0.01
0.006447414 = product of:
0.025789656 = sum of:
0.025789656 = weight(_text_:information in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025789656 = score(doc=226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 2(1967), S.87-122
-
Taulbee, O.E.: Content analysis, specification, and control (1968)
0.01
0.006447414 = product of:
0.025789656 = sum of:
0.025789656 = weight(_text_:information in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025789656 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047340166 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 3(1968), S.105-136
