Search (47 results, page 1 of 3)

0.03840532 = product of:
  0.07681064 = sum of:
    0.031913072 = weight(_text_:information in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031913072 = score(doc=7322,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
    0.04489757 = product of:
      0.08979514 = sum of:
        0.08979514 = weight(_text_:22 in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08979514 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.17-22

0.022108905 = product of:
  0.04421781 = sum of:
    0.019542687 = weight(_text_:information in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019542687 = score(doc=4650,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
    0.024675125 = product of:
      0.04935025 = sum of:
        0.04935025 = weight(_text_:services in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04935025 = score(doc=4650,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Contents enhancement of catalog records may increase access to books in collections and aid in effective resource sharing by providing more detailed descriptions about library holdings in the catalog. A sample of monographs in San Diego State Univ. Library was studied to determine the extent to which information in books from parts of the collection could be represented better by content notes, and to determine how much of this information has subject or analytical applications. The study revealed that approximately 23% of the books contain discrete content information not already represented in catalog records that could be added. Of those, 52% would be citation-based enhancements and 48% would be subject-based. Nearly 65% would require fewer than 25 enhancements, with an average of 8.03 enhancements per book for the total population

Source

Library resources and technical services. 37(1993) no.2, S.167-180

0.020547485 = product of:
  0.04109497 = sum of:
    0.012894828 = weight(_text_:information in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012894828 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
    0.028200142 = product of:
      0.056400284 = sum of:
        0.056400284 = weight(_text_:services in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056400284 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This paper analyzes proposals for augmenting library bibliographic records for improved subject searching in online catalogs. Possible fields for enrichment are described and their likely value assessed. The assessment determines that the main value of enriched records would be to provide access to parts of books. The paper presents arguments for and against adding book content indexing to the online catalog and analyzes the feasibility of eleven alternatives for providing such information

Source

Library resources and technical services. 29(1985), S.5-15

0.020547485 = product of:
  0.04109497 = sum of:
    0.012894828 = weight(_text_:information in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012894828 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
    0.028200142 = product of:
      0.056400284 = sum of:
        0.056400284 = weight(_text_:services in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056400284 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

As librarians plan ahead to make subject enhancements available to online searchers in various possible file locations and formats, they may want to base their decisions on implications for online searching. This paper explores some of these implications with respect to unique and misleading terminology in tables of contents, Choice abstracts, and reviews from Computing reviews for thirty-six books on information and computer science chosen from the 1987 issues of Choice. It also discusses possible interacting functions in the search process served by these subject enhancements, assigned LCSH, and book title terminology

Source

Technical services quarterly. 7(1990), S.35-52

0.015410613 = product of:
  0.030821227 = sum of:
    0.009671121 = weight(_text_:information in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009671121 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
    0.021150107 = product of:
      0.042300213 = sum of:
        0.042300213 = weight(_text_:services in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042300213 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The author collected information about tables of content and index terms in 125 books borrowed by patrons in a medium-sized academic library. To learn how useful the term would be as subject terms in a library catalog, he determined which of these terms were the same as the words used by the patrons to describe the books. For 72,4% of the books assigned LCSH, the patron's term matched the LCheading. The patron's term matched the table of contents term for (1,3% of the books with tables of contents. If the catalog had included terms from the tables of contents and the indexes in addition to the LCSH, the success rate would have been 97,3%. One problem in using terms from books in a library catalog is that many books lack indexes and/or tables of context

Source

Library resources and technical services. 30(1986), S.402-412

0.014456468 = product of:
  0.028912935 = sum of:
    0.009671121 = weight(_text_:information in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009671121 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
    0.019241815 = product of:
      0.03848363 = sum of:
        0.03848363 = weight(_text_:22 in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03848363 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05

Imprint

Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science

0.014310377 = product of:
  0.028620753 = sum of:
    0.015792875 = weight(_text_:information in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015792875 = score(doc=520,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.19003606 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
    0.012827878 = product of:
      0.025655756 = sum of:
        0.025655756 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025655756 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Myriad new information resources are available to contemporary library users. While print remains the foundation of most collections, libraries are also beginning to provide access to an array of bibliographic, numeric, and full-text databases. As more and more information is produced in electronic form and presented at computer workstations, the library catalog is being given an expanded role. The expanded catalog will play a crucial part in organizing information in electronic libraries, and in providing navigational assistance to library users. Like the traditional card catalog, the expanded catalog will not only lead to specific items or groups of sources, but also will provide connections to related materials. These connections will uses standard data elements to link the results of a search in one database with related material in another. For example, links will show local library holdings of sources in citation databases. Cornell University's Mann Library serves the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, the College of Human Ecology, and the Division of Biological Sciences. As part of electronic library development, Mann staff have been analyzing issues involved in making it possible for Agricola and BIOSIS users to see, automatically, which of their retrieved citations are from sources available in the Cornell libraries. Samples of citations from Agricola and BIOSIS were drawn, and data elements present in these records were compared with bibliographic records of the library's holdings. In some cases, links would be provided by ISSNs. The study shows, however, that the presence of standard identifiers such as ISSN, USBN, or CODEN cannot be assumed, and other linking algorithms must be developed. This article presents study results, provides an overview of several linking systems, and identifies some of the difficulties caused by lack of standardization between different bibliographic databases. It is clear that the concept of an expanded catalog will require not only links between information resources but agreements among information professionals on standard data elements.

Date

8. 1.2007 17:22:25

Footnote

Simultaneously published as Enhancing Access to Information: Designing Catalogs for the 21st Century

0.013716185 = product of:
  0.02743237 = sum of:
    0.011397525 = weight(_text_:information in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011397525 = score(doc=1942,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
    0.016034847 = product of:
      0.032069694 = sum of:
        0.032069694 = weight(_text_:22 in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032069694 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Vom verflixten siebten Jahr kann man in Bregenz bisher nicht sprechen, im Gegenteil: Die Vorarlberger Landesbibliothek (VLB) hat kurz vor Ostern 2008 ihr 100.000. Inhaltsverzeichnis mit intelligentCAPTURE gescannt. Damit ist der Katalogeintrag von etwa 70 Prozent des betroffenen Freihandbestandes und sämtlicher Neuzugänge ab 2002 zusätzlich mit dem Inhaltsverzeichnis und zum Teil mit der Abbildung des Buchdeckels versehen. Die derzeitige Durchsatzrate beträgt pro Jahr 30.000 bibliographische Einheiten bei einem Personaleinsatz von 40 Stunden pro Woche. Die vollständige Erschließung des Buchbestandes in der Freihandaufstellung ist in Reichweite; ganz ohne Fördermittel im laufenden Betrieb; eine schlanke Lösung sowohl organisatorisch als auch finanziell. Da im Rahmen der Zusammenarbeit mit dandelon.com inzwischen weitere Bibliotheken in einem elegant gelösten Arbeitsablauf kooperativ erschließen, können wir bei Neuerscheinungen bereits die Hälfte als Fremddaten übernehmen. Die VLB hat mit der Digitalisierung, OCR-Konvertierung und maschinellen Indexierung von Inhaltsverzeichnissen und dem mehrsprachigen, semantischen Retrieval in der Suchmaschine dandelon.com zusammen mit der Firma AGI. Information Management Consultants Impulse im Bibliothekswesen gesetzt. Wer 2002 noch bezweifelte, dass dieser Ansatz erfolgreich sein wurde, wurde inzwischen eines Besseren belehrt. Zu offensichtlich ist der Mehrwert, den allein die Moglichkeit der entscheidend verbesserten Relevanzbeurteilung uber den OPAC bietet (http://vlb-katalog.vorarlberg.de). Er erfordert von einer zeitgemasen Bibliothek geradezu das Angebot solcher Zusatzinformationen. Aber die Anreicherung mit den Angaben aus den Inhaltsverzeichnissen bieten weit mehr, denn es entsteht durch die maschinelle Indexierung eine vollig neue Dimension an Retrievalmoglichkeiten. Die vollständige Erfassung unseres Bestandes war immer erklärtes Ziel unseres Projektes, weil wir gesehen haben, dass wir den Nutzern dadurch einen erheblichen Zusatznutzen bieten können, der in einem unbeschreiblich günstigen Verhältnis zum personellen und finanziellen Einsatz steht. Damit, dass wir dieses Ziel so schnell erreichen könnten, hatten wir nicht gerechnet.

Date

22. 6.2008 17:14:24

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.4, S.241-242

0.012047057 = product of:
  0.024094114 = sum of:
    0.008059267 = weight(_text_:information in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008059267 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
    0.016034847 = product of:
      0.032069694 = sum of:
        0.032069694 = weight(_text_:22 in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032069694 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a

0.011224393 = product of:
  0.04489757 = sum of:
    0.04489757 = product of:
      0.08979514 = sum of:
        0.08979514 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08979514 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22

0.00911802 = product of:
  0.03647208 = sum of:
    0.03647208 = weight(_text_:information in 3901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03647208 = score(doc=3901,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 3901, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3901)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Information retrieval. 2(2000), S.165-176

0.0070500355 = product of:
  0.028200142 = sum of:
    0.028200142 = product of:
      0.056400284 = sum of:
        0.056400284 = weight(_text_:services in 6965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056400284 = score(doc=6965,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 6965, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6965)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This article reports the findings of a survey of heads of cataloging in Ohio public libraries. The survey focused on subject enhancements in automated catalogs. Results reveal that additional subject access points and more anaytical entries ranked as the most useful enhancements for patrons. These enhancements were seen as less useful for technical services staff.

0.006447414 = product of:
  0.025789656 = sum of:
    0.025789656 = weight(_text_:information in 389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025789656 = score(doc=389,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 389, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=389)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of information science. 3(1981), S.39-43

0.006447414 = product of:
  0.025789656 = sum of:
    0.025789656 = weight(_text_:information in 845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025789656 = score(doc=845,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 845, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=845)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

International forum on information and documentation. 8(1983), S.13-15

0.006447414 = product of:
  0.025789656 = sum of:
    0.025789656 = weight(_text_:information in 1399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025789656 = score(doc=1399,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1399, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1399)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

International forum on information and documentation. 8(1983) no.3, S.13-15

0.006447414 = product of:
  0.025789656 = sum of:
    0.025789656 = weight(_text_:information in 2195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025789656 = score(doc=2195,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2195, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2195)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.006447414 = product of:
  0.025789656 = sum of:
    0.025789656 = weight(_text_:information in 4430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025789656 = score(doc=4430,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 4430, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4430)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.0056414874 = product of:
  0.02256595 = sum of:
    0.02256595 = weight(_text_:information in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02256595 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Imprint

Syracuse, NY : Syracuse Univ., School of Information Studies

0.0056414874 = product of:
  0.02256595 = sum of:
    0.02256595 = weight(_text_:information in 3116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02256595 = score(doc=3116,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3116, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3116)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

International forum on information and documentation. 6(1981), S.24-28

0.0048856717 = product of:
  0.019542687 = sum of:
    0.019542687 = weight(_text_:information in 3385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019542687 = score(doc=3385,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 3385, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3385)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reports results of research into the feasibility of using OCR scanner technology to capture contents pages of collective monographs and to extract the bibliographic information of each individual work and process this using a standardized language, such as SGML, for tagging electronic documents. By this means, data can be used as electronic information or stored in OPACs, thus providing additional access points. Outlines a pilot system to test the initial hypotheses, show the feasibility of achieving the suggested goals and develop the tasks required for them to be carried out as automatically as possible

Source

Information technology and libraries. 17(1998) no.3, S.161-172