Search (847 results, page 1 of 43)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.25 
    0.25062913 = product of:
  0.50125825 = sum of:
    0.12531456 = product of:
      0.37594366 = sum of:
        0.37594366 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37594366 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.37594366 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37594366 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.20 
    0.20050329 = product of:
  0.40100658 = sum of:
    0.100251645 = product of:
      0.30075493 = sum of:
        0.30075493 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30075493 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.30075493 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30075493 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  3. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.13 
    0.12531456 = product of:
  0.25062913 = sum of:
    0.06265728 = product of:
      0.18797183 = sum of:
        0.18797183 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18797183 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18797183 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18797183 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40135044 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  4. Haslhofer, B.: Uniform SPARQL access to interlinked (digital library) sources (2007) 0.07 
    0.07198419 = product of:
  0.14396837 = sum of:
    0.012894828 = weight(_text_:information in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012894828 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
    0.13107355 = sum of:
      0.07976204 = weight(_text_:services in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07976204 = score(doc=541,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.45892134 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
      0.05131151 = weight(_text_:22 in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05131151 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In this presentation, we therefore focus on a solution for providing uniform access to Digital Libraries and other online services. In order to enable uniform query access to heterogeneous sources, we must provide metadata interoperability in a way that a query language - in this case SPARQL - can cope with the incompatibility of the metadata in various sources without changing their already existing information models.
    Content
    Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:46
  5. Panzer, M.: Designing identifiers for the DDC (2007) 0.05 
    0.051909752 = product of:
  0.103819504 = sum of:
    0.0048355605 = weight(_text_:information in 1752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0048355605 = score(doc=1752,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.058186423 = fieldWeight in 1752, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1752)
    0.09898394 = sum of:
      0.055957925 = weight(_text_:services in 1752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055957925 = score(doc=1752,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.32196122 = fieldWeight in 1752, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1752)
      0.043026015 = weight(_text_:22 in 1752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043026015 = score(doc=1752,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.2595412 = fieldWeight in 1752, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1752)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    "Although the Dewey Decimal Classification is currently available on the web to subscribers as WebDewey and Abridged WebDewey in the OCLC Connexion service and in an XML version to licensees, OCLC does not provide any "web services" based on the DDC. By web services, we mean presentation of the DDC to other machines (not humans) for uses such as searching, browsing, classifying, mapping, harvesting, and alerting. In order to build web-accessible services based on the DDC, several elements have to be considered. One of these elements is the design of an appropriate Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) structure for Dewey. The design goals of mapping the entity model of the DDC into an identifier space can be summarized as follows: * Common locator for Dewey concepts and associated resources for use in web services and web applications * Use-case-driven, but not directly related to and outlasting a specific use case (persistency) * Retraceable path to a concept rather than an abstract identification, reusing a means of identification that is already present in the DDC and available in existing metadata. We have been working closely with our colleagues in the OCLC Office of Research (especially Andy Houghton as well as Eric Childress, Diane Vizine-Goetz, and Stu Weibel) on a preliminary identifier syntax. The basic identifier format we are currently exploring is: http://dewey.info/{aspect}/{object}/{locale}/{type}/{version}/{resource} where * {aspect} is the aspect associated with an {object}-the current value set of aspect contains "concept", "scheme", and "index"; additional ones are under exploration * {object} is a type of {aspect} * {locale} identifies a Dewey translation * {type} identifies a Dewey edition type and contains, at a minimum, the values "edn" for the full edition or "abr" for the abridged edition * {version} identifies a Dewey edition version * {resource} identifies a resource associated with an {object} in the context of {locale}, {type}, and {version}
    Some examples of identifiers for concepts follow: <http://dewey.info/concept/338.4/en/edn/22/> This identifier is used to retrieve or identify the 338.4 concept in the English-language version of Edition 22. <http://dewey.info/concept/338.4/de/edn/22/> This identifier is used to retrieve or identify the 338.4 concept in the German-language version of Edition 22. <http://dewey.info/concept/333.7-333.9/> This identifier is used to retrieve or identify the 333.7-333.9 concept across all editions and language versions. <http://dewey.info/concept/333.7-333.9/about.skos> This identifier is used to retrieve a SKOS representation of the 333.7-333.9 concept (using the "resource" element). There are several open issues at this preliminary stage of development: Use cases: URIs need to represent the range of statements or questions that could be submitted to a Dewey web service. Therefore, it seems that some general questions have to be answered first: What information does an agent have when coming to a Dewey web service? What kind of questions will such an agent ask? Placement of the {locale} component: It is still an open question if the {locale} component should be placed after the {version} component instead (<http://dewey.info/concept/338.4/edn/22/en>) to emphasize that the most important instantiation of a Dewey class is its edition, not its language version. From a services point of view, however, it could make more sense to keep the current arrangement, because users are more likely to come to the service with a present understanding of the language version they are seeking without knowing the specifics of a certain edition in which they are trying to find topics. Identification of other Dewey entities: The goal is to create a locator that does not answer all, but a lot of questions that could be asked about the DDC. Which entities are missing but should be surfaced for services or user agents? How will those services or agents interact with them? Should some entities be rendered in a different way as presented? For example, (how) should the DDC Summaries be retrievable? Would it be necessary to make the DDC Manual accessible through this identifier structure?"
  6. Stapleton, M.; Adams, M.: Faceted categorisation for the corporate desktop : visualisation and interaction using metadata to enhance user experience (2007) 0.05 
    0.047230437 = product of:
  0.094460875 = sum of:
    0.01367703 = weight(_text_:information in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01367703 = score(doc=718,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
    0.080783844 = sum of:
      0.042300213 = weight(_text_:services in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042300213 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
      0.03848363 = weight(_text_:22 in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03848363 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Mark Stapleton and Matt Adamson began their presentation by describing how Dow Jones' Factiva range of information services processed an average of 170,000 documents every day, drawn from over 10,000 sources in 22 languages. These documents are categorized within five facets: Company, Subject, Industry, Region and Language. The digital feeds received from information providers undergo a series of processing stages, initially to prepare them for automatic categorization and then to format them ready for distribution. The categorization stage is able to handle 98% of documents automatically, the remaining 2% requiring some form of human intervention. Depending on the source, categorization can involve any combination of 'Autocoding', 'Dictionary-based Categorizing', 'Rules-based Coding' or 'Manual Coding'
  7. Nicholson, D.: Help us make HILT's terminology services useful in your information service (2008) 0.04 
    0.041644625 = product of:
  0.08328925 = sum of:
    0.019741092 = weight(_text_:information in 3654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019741092 = score(doc=3654,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 3654, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3654)
    0.063548155 = product of:
      0.12709631 = sum of:
        0.12709631 = weight(_text_:services in 3654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12709631 = score(doc=3654,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.73126525 = fieldWeight in 3654, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The JISC-funded HILT project is looking to make contact with staff in information services or projects interested in helping it test and refine its developing terminology services. The project is currently working to create pilot web services that will deliver machine-readable terminology and cross-terminology mappings data likely to be useful to information services wishing to extend or enhance the efficacy of their subject search or browse services. Based on SRW/U, SOAP, and SKOS, the HILT facilities, when fully operational, will permit such services to improve their own subject search and browse mechanisms by using HILT data in a fashion transparent to their users. On request, HILT will serve up machine-processable data on individual subject schemes (broader terms, narrower terms, hierarchy information, preferred and non-preferred terms, and so on) and interoperability data (usually intellectual or automated mappings between schemes, but the architecture allows for the use of other methods) - data that can be used to enhance user services. The project is also developing an associated toolkit that will help service technical staff to embed HILT-related functionality into their services. The primary aim is to serve JISC funded information services or services at JISC institutions, but information services outside the JISC domain may also find the proposed services useful and wish to participate in the test and refine process.
  8. Tudhope, D.: Knowledge Organization System Services : brief review of NKOS activities and possibility of KOS registries (2007) 0.04 
    0.040391922 = product of:
  0.16156769 = sum of:
    0.16156769 = sum of:
      0.084600426 = weight(_text_:services in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.084600426 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.4867596 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
      0.07696726 = weight(_text_:22 in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07696726 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  9. Information als Rohstoff für Innovation : Programm der Bundesregierung 1996-2000 (1996) 0.04 
    0.038550586 = product of:
  0.07710117 = sum of:
    0.025789656 = weight(_text_:information in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025789656 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
    0.05131151 = product of:
      0.10262302 = sum of:
        0.10262302 = weight(_text_:22 in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10262302 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:26:34
  10. Ask me[@sk.me]: your global information guide : der Wegweiser durch die Informationswelten (1996) 0.04 
    0.038550586 = product of:
  0.07710117 = sum of:
    0.025789656 = weight(_text_:information in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025789656 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
    0.05131151 = product of:
      0.10262302 = sum of:
        0.10262302 = weight(_text_:22 in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10262302 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    30.11.1996 13:22:37
  11. Blosser, J.; Michaelson, R.; Routh. R.; Xia, P.: Defining the landscape of Web resources : Concluding Report of the BAER Web Resources Sub-Group (2000) 0.04 
    0.037327398 = product of:
  0.074654795 = sum of:
    0.00911802 = weight(_text_:information in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00911802 = score(doc=1447,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
    0.065536775 = sum of:
      0.03988102 = weight(_text_:services in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03988102 = score(doc=1447,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.22946067 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.025655756 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.025655756 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.
    Date
    21. 4.2002 10:22:31
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  12. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.03 
    0.033659935 = product of:
  0.13463974 = sum of:
    0.13463974 = sum of:
      0.07050035 = weight(_text_:services in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07050035 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.405633 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
      0.06413939 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06413939 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047340166 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  13. Kirk, J.: Theorising information use : managers and their work (2002) 0.03 
    0.03267823 = product of:
  0.06535646 = sum of:
    0.04068134 = weight(_text_:information in 560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04068134 = score(doc=560,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.4895196 = fieldWeight in 560, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=560)
    0.024675125 = product of:
      0.04935025 = sum of:
        0.04935025 = weight(_text_:services in 560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04935025 = score(doc=560,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 560, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=560)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The focus of this thesis is information use. Although a key concept in information behaviour, information use has received little attention from information science researchers. Studies of other key concepts such as information need and information seeking are dominant in information behaviour research. Information use is an area of interest to information professionals who rely on research outcomes to shape their practice. There are few empirical studies of how people actually use information that might guide and refine the development of information systems, products and services.
    Theme
    Information
  14. Matylonek, J.C.; Ottow, C.; Reese, T.: Organizing ready reference and administrative information with the reference desk manager (2001) 0.03 
    0.030993123 = product of:
  0.061986245 = sum of:
    0.03207548 = weight(_text_:information in 1156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03207548 = score(doc=1156,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.38596505 = fieldWeight in 1156, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1156)
    0.029910767 = product of:
      0.059821535 = sum of:
        0.059821535 = weight(_text_:services in 1156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059821535 = score(doc=1156,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.344191 = fieldWeight in 1156, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1156)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Non-academic questions regarding special services, phone numbers, web-sites, library policies, current procedures, technical notices, and other pertinent local institutional information are often asked at the academic library reference desk. These frequent and urgent information requests require tools and resources to answer efficiently. Although ready reference collections at the desk provide a tool for academic information, specialized local information resources are more difficult to create and maintain. As reference desk responsibilities become increasingly complex and communication becomes more problematic, a web database to collect and manage this non-academic, local information can be very useful. At the Oregon State University, librarians in the Reference Services Management group created a custom-designed web-log bulletin board to deal with this non-academic, local information. The resulting database provides reference librarians a one-stop location for the information and makes it easier for them to update the information, via email, as conditions, procedures, and information needs change in their busy, highly computerized information commons.
  15. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.03 
    0.030735964 = product of:
  0.061471928 = sum of:
    0.016118534 = weight(_text_:information in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016118534 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
    0.045353394 = product of:
      0.09070679 = sum of:
        0.09070679 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09070679 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
    Source
    Information Research. 6(2001), no.2
  16. High-Level Thesaurus (HILT) project : recent work (2007) 0.03 
    0.029022612 = product of:
  0.058045223 = sum of:
    0.02279505 = weight(_text_:information in 5676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02279505 = score(doc=5676,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 5676, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5676)
    0.035250176 = product of:
      0.07050035 = sum of:
        0.07050035 = weight(_text_:services in 5676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07050035 = score(doc=5676,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.405633 = fieldWeight in 5676, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5676)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    HILT aims to facilitate cross-searching distributed information services by subject in a multi-scheme, multi-lingual "common information environment.
  17. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.03 
    0.028912935 = product of:
  0.05782587 = sum of:
    0.019342242 = weight(_text_:information in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019342242 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
    0.03848363 = product of:
      0.07696726 = sum of:
        0.07696726 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07696726 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16577719 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
    Source
    Information Research. 6(2001), no.2
  18. Kenney, A.R.; McGovern, N.Y.; Martinez, I.T.; Heidig, L.J.: Google meets eBay : what academic librarians can learn from alternative information providers (2003) 0.03 
    0.027836949 = product of:
  0.055673897 = sum of:
    0.015792875 = weight(_text_:information in 1200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015792875 = score(doc=1200,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.19003606 = fieldWeight in 1200, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1200)
    0.03988102 = product of:
      0.07976204 = sum of:
        0.07976204 = weight(_text_:services in 1200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07976204 = score(doc=1200,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.45892134 = fieldWeight in 1200, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1200)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In April 2002, the dominant Internet search engine, GoogleT, introduced a beta version of its expert service, Google Answers, with little fanfare. Almost immediately the buzz within the information community focused on implications for reference librarians. Google had already been lauded as the cheaper and faster alternative for finding information, and declining reference statistics and Online Public Access Catalog (OPAC) use in academic libraries had been attributed in part to its popularity. One estimate suggests that the Google search engine handles more questions in a day and a half than all the libraries in the country provide in a year. Indeed, Craig Silverstein, Google's Director of Technology, indicated that the raison d'être for the search engine was to "seem as smart as a reference librarian," even as he acknowledged that this goal was "hundreds of years away". Bill Arms had reached a similar conclusion regarding the more nuanced reference functions in a thought-provoking article in this journal on automating digital libraries. But with the launch of Google Answers, the power of "brute force computing" and simple algorithms could be combined with human intelligence to represent a market-driven alternative to library reference services. Google Answers is part of a much larger trend to provide networked reference assistance. Expert services have sprung up in both the commercial and non-profit sector. Libraries too have responded to the Web, providing a suite of services through the virtual reference desk (VRD) movement, from email reference to chat reference to collaborative services that span the globe. As the Internet's content continues to grow and deepen - encompassing over 40 million web sites - it has been met by a groundswell of services to find and filter information. These services include an extensive range from free to fee-based, cost-recovery to for-profit, and library providers to other information providers - both new and traditional. As academic libraries look towards the future in a dynamic and competitive information landscape, what implications do these services have for their programs, and what can be learned from them to improve library offerings? This paper presents the results of a modest study conducted by Cornell University Library (CUL) to compare and contrast its digital reference services with those of Google Answers. The study provided an opportunity for librarians to shift their focus from fearing the impact of Google, as usurper of the library's role and diluter of the academic experience, to gaining insights into how Google's approach to service development and delivery has made it so attractive.
  19. Goodchild, M.F.: ¬The Alexandria Digital Library Project : review, assessment, and prospects (2004) 0.03 
    0.02721929 = product of:
  0.05443858 = sum of:
    0.019542687 = weight(_text_:information in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019542687 = score(doc=1153,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
    0.034895893 = product of:
      0.06979179 = sum of:
        0.06979179 = weight(_text_:services in 1153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06979179 = score(doc=1153,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 1153, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1153)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The Alexandria Digital Library (ADL) was established in the late 1990s as a response to several perceived problems of traditional map libraries, notably access and organization. By 1999 it had evolved into an operational digital library, offering a well-defined set of services to a broad user community, based on an extensive collection of georeferenced information objects. The vision of ADL continues to evolve, as technology makes new services possible, as its users become more sophisticated and demanding, and as the broader field of geographic information science (GIScience) identifies new avenues for research and application.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  20. Schmiede, R.: Upgrading academic scholarship (2009) 0.03 
    0.026156329 = product of:
  0.052312657 = sum of:
    0.02763753 = weight(_text_:information in 2807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02763753 = score(doc=2807,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.08310462 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047340166 = queryNorm
        0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 2807, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2807)
    0.024675125 = product of:
      0.04935025 = sum of:
        0.04935025 = weight(_text_:services in 2807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04935025 = score(doc=2807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1738033 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047340166 = queryNorm
            0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 2807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2807)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Digital information and the increasing amount and availability of its basis, data, is changing scholarship to a more or less dramatic extent. New areas of research and knowledge have been created by machine-produced data, calculations, and simulations in various academic disciplines. However, no adequate infrastructure for digital information has emerged yet. Whereas in the field of scientific information providers (libraries, document centers, publishers etc.) new services, arrangements and business models are being experimented, the scholarly disciplines are, by and large, lagging behind these developments, as are most scientific work practices. To sum up: An information infrastructure of scholarly information has been developed, but not one for scholarly information, yet. What this means, and some ideas of what could be done about it, shall be discussed in the talk.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 401
  • r 20
  • m 19
  • i 17
  • s 17
  • x 16
  • n 10
  • b 4
  • p 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications