Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Hartley, J."
  1. Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in non-medical science journals? (1998) 0.06 
    0.056112804 = product of:
  0.1683384 = sum of:
    0.1683384 = product of:
      0.3366768 = sum of:
        0.3366768 = weight(_text_:periodicals in 2999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3366768 = score(doc=2999,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.29623938 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046078403 = queryNorm
            1.1365025 = fieldWeight in 2999, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2999)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to consider whether or not structured abstracts can be used efectively in non medical science periodicals. Reviews a selection of studies on structured abstracts from the medical and psychological literature, presents examples of structured abstracts published in non medical science periodicals and considers how original abstracts might be written in a structured form for these periodicals. Concludes that, in light of these example studies, editors of these periodicals should consider the value of adopting structured abstracts
  2. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.05 
    0.054570578 = product of:
  0.16371173 = sum of:
    0.16371173 = sum of:
      0.1262538 = weight(_text_:periodicals in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1262538 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.29623938 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046078403 = queryNorm
          0.42618844 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
      0.037457924 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037457924 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16135871 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046078403 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Structured abstracts are abstracts which include subheadings such as: background, aims, participants methods and results. These are rapidly replacing traditional abstracts in medical periodicals, but the number and detail of the subheadings used varies, and there is a range of different typographic settings. Reviews a number of studies designed to investigate readers' preferences for different typographic settings and layout. Over 400 readers took part in the study: students; postgraduates; research workers and academics in the social sciences. The most preferred version emerged from the last of 3 studies and 2 additional studies were then carried out to determine preferences for the overall position and layout of this most preferred version on a A4 page. The most preferred version for the setting of the subheadings are printed in bold capital letters
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  3. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Structured abstracts in the social sciences : presentation, readability and recall (1995) 0.02 
    0.0210423 = product of:
  0.0631269 = sum of:
    0.0631269 = product of:
      0.1262538 = sum of:
        0.1262538 = weight(_text_:periodicals in 2383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1262538 = score(doc=2383,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29623938 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046078403 = queryNorm
            0.42618844 = fieldWeight in 2383, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2383)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to explore the possibilities of extending the use of structured abstracts (which use subheadings such as background, aims, participants method, results, conclusions) of the type often found in biomedical periodicals; to test whether or not such structured abstracts are more easily searched, comprehended and recalled than abstracts set in the traditional manner; and to examine readers' preferences for different typographic settings for structured abstracts. Results indicated: that it is possible to produce structured abstracts for periodical articles in the social sciences; and that such abstracts may be easier to read, search and recall than abstracts presented in the traditional manner. Suggests that abstracts use 6 subheadings (background, aims, method, results, conclusions, and, optionally, comment) and recommends that these subheadings are conveyed in bold capital letters and, ideally, set apart from the main text by printer's rules
  4. Hartley, J.: Applying psychology to text design : a case history (1997) 0.01 
    0.01040498 = product of:
  0.031214938 = sum of:
    0.031214938 = product of:
      0.062429875 = sum of:
        0.062429875 = weight(_text_:22 in 616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062429875 = score(doc=616,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16135871 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046078403 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 616, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=616)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.1, S.3-10
  5. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.01 
    0.00520249 = product of:
  0.015607469 = sum of:
    0.015607469 = product of:
      0.031214938 = sum of:
        0.031214938 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031214938 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16135871 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046078403 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356

Authors

Types

Themes