Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Borgman, C.L."
  1. Borgman, C.L.: Big data, little data, no data : scholarship in the networked world (2015) 0.06
    0.0558643 = product of:
      0.13966075 = sum of:
        0.07679157 = weight(_text_:technological in 2785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07679157 = score(doc=2785,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2312398 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043520276 = queryNorm
            0.3320863 = fieldWeight in 2785, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2785)
        0.062869176 = product of:
          0.12573835 = sum of:
            0.12573835 = weight(_text_:innovations in 2785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12573835 = score(doc=2785,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2958964 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.42494047 = fieldWeight in 2785, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2785)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    LCSH
    Communication in learning and scholarship / Technological innovations
    Subject
    Communication in learning and scholarship / Technological innovations
  2. Borgman, C.L.: ¬The conundrum of sharing research data (2012) 0.03
    0.028124008 = product of:
      0.14062004 = sum of:
        0.14062004 = sum of:
          0.11113805 = weight(_text_:innovations in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11113805 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2958964 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043520276 = queryNorm
              0.37559783 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
          0.029481983 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029481983 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043520276 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Researchers are producing an unprecedented deluge of data by using new methods and instrumentation. Others may wish to mine these data for new discoveries and innovations. However, research data are not readily available as sharing is common in only a few fields such as astronomy and genomics. Data sharing practices in other fields vary widely. Moreover, research data take many forms, are handled in many ways, using many approaches, and often are difficult to interpret once removed from their initial context. Data sharing is thus a conundrum. Four rationales for sharing data are examined, drawing examples from the sciences, social sciences, and humanities: (1) to reproduce or to verify research, (2) to make results of publicly funded research available to the public, (3) to enable others to ask new questions of extant data, and (4) to advance the state of research and innovation. These rationales differ by the arguments for sharing, by beneficiaries, and by the motivations and incentives of the many stakeholders involved. The challenges are to understand which data might be shared, by whom, with whom, under what conditions, why, and to what effects. Answers will inform data policy and practice.
    Date
    11. 6.2012 15:22:29
  3. Borgman, C.L.: Will the global information infrastructure be the library of the future? : Central and Eastern Europe as a case example (1996) 0.00
    0.0035378379 = product of:
      0.017689189 = sum of:
        0.017689189 = product of:
          0.035378378 = sum of:
            0.035378378 = weight(_text_:22 in 5507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035378378 = score(doc=5507,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5507, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5507)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.2, S.121-127
  4. Borgman, C.L.; Scharnhorst, A.; Golshan, M.S.: Digital data archives as knowledge infrastructures : mediating data sharing and reuse (2019) 0.00
    0.0029481982 = product of:
      0.014740991 = sum of:
        0.014740991 = product of:
          0.029481983 = sum of:
            0.029481983 = weight(_text_:22 in 5325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029481983 = score(doc=5325,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5325, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5325)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    7. 7.2019 11:58:22
  5. Borgman, C.L.; Smart, L.J.; Millwood, K.A.; Finley, J.R.; Champeny, L.; Gilliland, A.J.; Leazer, G.H.: Comparing faculty information seeking in teaching and research : implications for the design of digital libraries (2005) 0.00
    0.0023585586 = product of:
      0.011792793 = sum of:
        0.011792793 = product of:
          0.023585586 = sum of:
            0.023585586 = weight(_text_:22 in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023585586 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    3. 6.2005 20:40:22