-
Tenopir, C.: Electronic publishing : research issues for academic librarians and users (2003)
0.02
0.019477641 = product of:
0.09738821 = sum of:
0.09738821 = weight(_text_:publishing in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09738821 = score(doc=35,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21262453 = queryWeight, product of:
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.45802903 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Increased reliance on electronic resources requires examination of the roles of librarians in several key ways. This paper addresses the need for further research into three important areas of electronic publishing. How is the change to digital information sources affecting the scholarly work of college and university students? Previous research shows that students rely on Web and online resources and ask for less help from librarians. We do not know, however, how these changes will affect the learning and scholarly work of college and university students. Research is also needed to determine how the differences between separate article and full journal databases affect the way research is done. What are the implications for scholarship of decisions being made about what publishers publish and what librarians purchase? Finally, are librarians--as intermediaries to the search process--still necessary in a digital age? Online systems are designed to be used independently but that may not always yield the best results.
-
Tenopir, C.; Levine, K.; Allard, S.; Christian, L.; Volentine, R.; Boehm, R.; Nichols, F.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Herman, E.; Watkinson, A.: Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age : results of an international questionnaire (2016)
0.02
0.019477641 = product of:
0.09738821 = sum of:
0.09738821 = weight(_text_:publishing in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09738821 = score(doc=3113,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21262453 = queryWeight, product of:
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.45802903 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- An international survey of over 3,600 researchers examined how trustworthiness and quality are determined for making decisions on scholarly reading, citing, and publishing and how scholars perceive changes in trust with new forms of scholarly communication. Although differences in determining trustworthiness and authority of scholarly resources exist among age groups and fields of study, traditional methods and criteria remain important across the board. Peer review is considered the most important factor for determining the quality and trustworthiness of research. Researchers continue to read abstracts, check content for sound arguments and credible data, and rely on journal rankings when deciding whether to trust scholarly resources in reading, citing, or publishing. Social media outlets and open access publications are still often not trusted, although many researchers believe that open access has positive implications for research, especially if the open access journals are peer reviewed.
-
Wilson, C.S.; Tenopir, C.: Local citation analysis, publishing and reading patterns : using multiple methods to evaluate faculty use of an academic library's research collection (2008)
0.01
0.01147731 = product of:
0.05738655 = sum of:
0.05738655 = weight(_text_:publishing in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05738655 = score(doc=1960,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21262453 = queryWeight, product of:
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.26989618 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Tenopir, C.; Ennis, L.: ¬The digital reference work of academic libraries (1998)
0.01
0.0058371346 = product of:
0.029185673 = sum of:
0.029185673 = product of:
0.058371346 = sum of:
0.058371346 = weight(_text_:22 in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058371346 = score(doc=5170,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.22-28
-
Tenopir, C.: Reference services from RLG (1995)
0.00
0.004717117 = product of:
0.023585586 = sum of:
0.023585586 = product of:
0.04717117 = sum of:
0.04717117 = weight(_text_:22 in 2612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04717117 = score(doc=2612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2612)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 25.11.1995 19:22:01
-
Tenopir, C.: Integrating electronic reference (1995)
0.00
0.004717117 = product of:
0.023585586 = sum of:
0.023585586 = product of:
0.04717117 = sum of:
0.04717117 = weight(_text_:22 in 2616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04717117 = score(doc=2616,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2616, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2616)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 25.11.1995 19:22:01
-
Tenopir, C.; Neufang, R.: Electronic reference options : how they stack up in research libraries (1992)
0.00
0.0041274778 = product of:
0.020637387 = sum of:
0.020637387 = product of:
0.041274775 = sum of:
0.041274775 = weight(_text_:22 in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041274775 = score(doc=2343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Online. 16(1992) no.2, S.22-28
-
Allard, S.; Levine, K.J.; Tenopir, C.: Design engineers and technical professionals at work : observing information usage in the workplace (2009)
0.00
0.0029481982 = product of:
0.014740991 = sum of:
0.014740991 = product of:
0.029481983 = sum of:
0.029481983 = weight(_text_:22 in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029481983 = score(doc=2735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:37
