Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × subject_ss:"Metadata"
  1. Hider, P.: Information resource description : creating and managing metadata (2012) 0.07
    0.06983038 = product of:
      0.17457594 = sum of:
        0.09598946 = weight(_text_:technological in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09598946 = score(doc=2086,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2312398 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043520276 = queryNorm
            0.41510788 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
        0.07858648 = product of:
          0.15717296 = sum of:
            0.15717296 = weight(_text_:innovations in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15717296 = score(doc=2086,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2958964 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.5311756 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    LCSH
    Libraries / Technological innovations
    Subject
    Libraries / Technological innovations
  2. Intner, S.S.; Lazinger, S.S.; Weihs, J.: Metadata and its impact on libraries (2005) 0.02
    0.019751012 = product of:
      0.04937753 = sum of:
        0.02714992 = weight(_text_:technological in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02714992 = score(doc=339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2312398 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043520276 = queryNorm
            0.117410235 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
        0.022227611 = product of:
          0.044455223 = sum of:
            0.044455223 = weight(_text_:innovations in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044455223 = score(doc=339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2958964 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.15023914 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Three experts of the cataloguing world tackle the topic of metadata, explaining fundamental concepts and their accompanying rationales, as well as exploring current developments and future innovations.
    Footnote
    Chapter 8 discusses issues of archiving and preserving digital materials. The chapter reiterates, "What is the point of all of this if the resources identified and catalogued are not preserved?" (Gorman, 2003, p. 16). Discussion about preservation and related issues is organized in five sections that successively ask why, what, who, how, and how much of the plethora of digital materials should be archived and preserved. These are not easy questions because of media instability and technological obsolescence. Stakeholders in communities with diverse interests compete in terms of which community or representative of a community has an authoritative say in what and how much get archived and preserved. In discussing the above-mentioned questions, the authors once again provide valuable information and lessons from a number of initiatives in Europe, Australia, and from other global initiatives. The Draft Charter on the Preservation of the Digital Heritage and the Guidelines for the Preservation of Digital Heritage, both published by UNESCO, are discussed and some of the preservation principles from the Guidelines are listed. The existing diversity in administrative arrangements for these new projects and resources notwithstanding, the impact on content produced for online reserves through work done in digital projects and from the use of metadata and the impact on levels of reference services and the ensuing need for different models to train users and staff is undeniable. In terms of education and training, formal coursework, continuing education, and informal and on-the-job training are just some of the available options. The intensity in resources required for cataloguing digital materials, the questions over the quality of digital resources, and the threat of the new digital environment to the survival of the traditional library are all issues quoted by critics and others, however, who are concerned about a balance for planning and resources allocated for traditional or print-based resources and newer digital resources. A number of questions are asked as part of the book's conclusions in Chapter 10. Of these questions, one that touches on all of the rest and upon much of the book's content is the question: What does the future hold for metadata in libraries? Metadata standards are alive and well in many communities of practice, as Chapters 2-6 have demonstrated. The usefulness of metadata continues to be high and innovation in various elements should keep information professionals engaged for decades to come. There is no doubt that metadata have had a tremendous impact in how we organize information for access and in terms of who, how, when, and where contact is made with library services and collections online. Planning and commitment to a diversity of metadata to serve the plethora of needs in communities of practice are paramount for the continued success of many digital projects and for online preservation of our digital heritage."
  3. Handbook of metadata, semantics and ontologies (2014) 0.02
    0.015358314 = product of:
      0.07679157 = sum of:
        0.07679157 = weight(_text_:technological in 5134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07679157 = score(doc=5134,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2312398 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043520276 = queryNorm
            0.3320863 = fieldWeight in 5134, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5134)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata research has emerged as a discipline cross-cutting many domains, focused on the provision of distributed descriptions (often called annotations) to Web resources or applications. Such associated descriptions are supposed to serve as a foundation for advanced services in many application areas, including search and location, personalization, federation of repositories and automated delivery of information. Indeed, the Semantic Web is in itself a concrete technological framework for ontology-based metadata. For example, Web-based social networking requires metadata describing people and their interrelations, and large databases with biological information use complex and detailed metadata schemas for more precise and informed search strategies. There is a wide diversity in the languages and idioms used for providing meta-descriptions, from simple structured text in metadata schemas to formal annotations using ontologies, and the technologies for storing, sharing and exploiting meta-descriptions are also diverse and evolve rapidly. In addition, there is a proliferation of schemas and standards related to metadata, resulting in a complex and moving technological landscape - hence, the need for specialized knowledge and skills in this area. The Handbook of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies is intended as an authoritative reference for students, practitioners and researchers, serving as a roadmap for the variety of metadata schemas and ontologies available in a number of key domain areas, including culture, biology, education, healthcare, engineering and library science.