Search (43 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Indexieren"
  1. Stankovic, R. et al.: Indexing of textual databases based on lexical resources : a case study for Serbian (2016) 0.06
    0.057702035 = product of:
      0.14425509 = sum of:
        0.1147731 = weight(_text_:publishing in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1147731 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21262453 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043520276 = queryNorm
            0.53979236 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
        0.029481983 = product of:
          0.058963966 = sum of:
            0.058963966 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058963966 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    Imprint
    Basel : Springer International Publishing
  2. Munkelt, J.; Schaer, P.; Lepsky, K.: Towards an IR test collection for the German National Library (2018) 0.05
    0.054218676 = product of:
      0.13554668 = sum of:
        0.06886386 = weight(_text_:publishing in 4311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06886386 = score(doc=4311,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21262453 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043520276 = queryNorm
            0.32387543 = fieldWeight in 4311, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4311)
        0.06668283 = product of:
          0.13336566 = sum of:
            0.13336566 = weight(_text_:innovations in 4311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13336566 = score(doc=4311,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2958964 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.45071742 = fieldWeight in 4311, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4311)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Automatic content indexing is one of the innovations that are increasingly changing the way libraries work. In theory, it promises a cataloguing service that would hardly be possible with humans in terms of speed, quantity and maybe quality. The German National Library (DNB) has also recognised this potential and is increasingly relying on the automatic indexing of their catalogue content. The DNB took a major step in this direction in 2017, which was announced in two papers. The announcement was rather restrained, but the content of the papers is all the more explosive for the library community: Since September 2017, the DNB has discontinued the intellectual indexing of series Band H and has switched to an automatic process for these series. The subject indexing of online publications (series O) has been purely automatical since 2010; from September 2017, monographs and periodicals published outside the publishing industry and university publications will no longer be indexed by people. This raises the question: What is the quality of the automatic indexing compared to the manual work or in other words to which degree can the automatic indexing replace people without a signi cant drop in regards to quality?
  3. Salton, G.: Automatic processing of foreign language documents (1985) 0.04
    0.039502025 = product of:
      0.09875506 = sum of:
        0.05429984 = weight(_text_:technological in 3650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05429984 = score(doc=3650,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2312398 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043520276 = queryNorm
            0.23482047 = fieldWeight in 3650, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3650)
        0.044455223 = product of:
          0.088910446 = sum of:
            0.088910446 = weight(_text_:innovations in 3650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.088910446 = score(doc=3650,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2958964 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.30047828 = fieldWeight in 3650, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3650)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The attempt to computerize a process, such as indexing, abstracting, classifying, or retrieving information, begins with an analysis of the process into its intellectual and nonintellectual components. That part of the process which is amenable to computerization is mechanical or algorithmic. What is not is intellectual or creative and requires human intervention. Gerard Salton has been an innovator, experimenter, and promoter in the area of mechanized information systems since the early 1960s. He has been particularly ingenious at analyzing the process of information retrieval into its algorithmic components. He received a doctorate in applied mathematics from Harvard University before moving to the computer science department at Cornell, where he developed a prototype automatic retrieval system called SMART. Working with this system he and his students contributed for over a decade to our theoretical understanding of the retrieval process. On a more practical level, they have contributed design criteria for operating retrieval systems. The following selection presents one of the early descriptions of the SMART system; it is valuable as it shows the direction automatic retrieval methods were to take beyond simple word-matching techniques. These include various word normalization techniques to improve recall, for instance, the separation of words into stems and affixes; the correlation and clustering, using statistical association measures, of related terms; and the identification, using a concept thesaurus, of synonymous, broader, narrower, and sibling terms. They include, as weIl, techniques, both linguistic and statistical, to deal with the thorny problem of how to automatically extract from texts index terms that consist of more than one word. They include weighting techniques and various documentrequest matching algorithms. Significant among the latter are those which produce a retrieval output of citations ranked in relevante order. During the 1970s, Salton and his students went an to further refine these various techniques, particularly the weighting and statistical association measures. Many of their early innovations seem commonplace today. Some of their later techniques are still ahead of their time and await technological developments for implementation. The particular focus of the selection that follows is an the evaluation of a particular component of the SMART system, a multilingual thesaurus. By mapping English language expressions and their German equivalents to a common concept number, the thesaurus permitted the automatic processing of German language documents against English language queries and vice versa. The results of the evaluation, as it turned out, were somewhat inconclusive. However, this SMART experiment suggested in a bold and optimistic way how one might proceed to answer such complex questions as What is meant by retrieval language compatability? How it is to be achieved, and how evaluated?
  4. Souza, R.R.; Gil-Leiva, I.: Automatic indexing of scientific texts : a methodological comparison (2016) 0.02
    0.021719936 = product of:
      0.10859968 = sum of:
        0.10859968 = weight(_text_:technological in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10859968 = score(doc=4913,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2312398 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043520276 = queryNorm
            0.46964094 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  5. Koch, T.: Experiments with automatic classification of WAIS databases and indexing of WWW : some results from the Nordic WAIS/WWW project (1994) 0.02
    0.019004943 = product of:
      0.09502471 = sum of:
        0.09502471 = weight(_text_:technological in 7209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09502471 = score(doc=7209,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2312398 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043520276 = queryNorm
            0.41093582 = fieldWeight in 7209, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7209)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The Nordic WAIS/WWW project sponsored by NORDINFO is a joint project between Lund University Library and the National Technological Library of Denmark. It aims to improve the existing networked information discovery and retrieval tools Wide Area Information System (WAIS) and World Wide Web (WWW), and to move towards unifying WWW and WAIS. Details current results focusing on the WAIS side of the project. Describes research into automatic indexing and classification of WAIS sources, development of an orientation tool for WAIS, and development of a WAIS index of WWW resources
  6. Salton, G.; Buckley, C.; Allan, J.: Automatic structuring of text files (1992) 0.02
    0.018363697 = product of:
      0.09181848 = sum of:
        0.09181848 = weight(_text_:publishing in 6507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09181848 = score(doc=6507,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21262453 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043520276 = queryNorm
            0.4318339 = fieldWeight in 6507, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6507)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Electronic publishing. 5(1992) no.1, S.1-17
  7. Dow Jones unveils knowledge indexing system (1997) 0.02
    0.018363697 = product of:
      0.09181848 = sum of:
        0.09181848 = weight(_text_:publishing in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09181848 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21262453 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043520276 = queryNorm
            0.4318339 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Dow Jones Interactive Publishing has developed a sophisticated automatic knowledge indexing system that will allow searchers of the Dow Jones News / Retrieval service to get highly targeted results from a search in the service's Publications Library. Instead of relying on a thesaurus of company names, the new system uses a combination of that basic algorithm plus unique rules based on the editorial styles of individual publications in the Library. Dow Jones have also announced its acceptance of the definitions of 'selected full text' and 'full text' from Bibliodata's Fulltext Sources Online directory
  8. Hlava, M.M.K.: Machine-Aided Indexing (MAI) in a multilingual environemt (1992) 0.02
    0.01778209 = product of:
      0.088910446 = sum of:
        0.088910446 = product of:
          0.17782089 = sum of:
            0.17782089 = weight(_text_:innovations in 2378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17782089 = score(doc=2378,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2958964 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.60095656 = fieldWeight in 2378, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2378)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The Machine-Aided Indexing (MAI) program, developed by Access Innovations, Inc., is a semantic based, Boolean statement, rule interpreting application designed to operate in a multilingual environment. Use of MAI across several languages with controlled vocabularies for each language provides a consistency in indexing not available through any other mechanism
  9. Hlava, M.M.K.; Hainebach, R.: Machine aided indexing : European Parliament study and results (1996) 0.02
    0.01778209 = product of:
      0.088910446 = sum of:
        0.088910446 = product of:
          0.17782089 = sum of:
            0.17782089 = weight(_text_:innovations in 5563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17782089 = score(doc=5563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2958964 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.60095656 = fieldWeight in 5563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a pilot study of the application of Access Innovations' machine aided indexing (MAI) system on the European Parliament's full text materials. Describes how the knowledge base used by the MAI software is created, and gives an evaluation of the system
  10. Hlava, M.M.K.: Machine aided indexing (MAI) in a multilingual environment (1993) 0.02
    0.015559328 = product of:
      0.07779664 = sum of:
        0.07779664 = product of:
          0.15559328 = sum of:
            0.15559328 = weight(_text_:innovations in 7405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15559328 = score(doc=7405,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2958964 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.525837 = fieldWeight in 7405, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7405)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The machine aided indexing (MAI) software devloped by Access Innovations, Inc., is a semantic based, Boolean statement, rule interpreting application with 3 modules: the MA engine which accepts input files, matches terms in the knowledge base, interprets rules, and outputs a text file with suggested indexing terms; a rule building application allowing each Boolean style rule in the knowledge base to be created or modifies; and a statistical computation module which analyzes performance of the MA software against text manually indexed by professional human indexers. The MA software can be applied across multiple languages and can be used where the text to be searched is in one language and the indexes to be output are in another
  11. Strobel, S.; Marín-Arraiza, P.: Metadata for scientific audiovisual media : current practices and perspectives of the TIB / AV-portal (2015) 0.01
    0.01147731 = product of:
      0.05738655 = sum of:
        0.05738655 = weight(_text_:publishing in 3667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05738655 = score(doc=3667,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21262453 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043520276 = queryNorm
            0.26989618 = fieldWeight in 3667, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3667)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Descriptive metadata play a key role in finding relevant search results in large amounts of unstructured data. However, current scientific audiovisual media are provided with little metadata, which makes them hard to find, let alone individual sequences. In this paper, the TIB / AV-Portal is presented as a use case where methods concerning the automatic generation of metadata, a semantic search and cross-lingual retrieval (German/English) have already been applied. These methods result in a better discoverability of the scientific audiovisual media hosted in the portal. Text, speech, and image content of the video are automatically indexed by specialised GND (Gemeinsame Normdatei) subject headings. A semantic search is established based on properties of the GND ontology. The cross-lingual retrieval uses English 'translations' that were derived by an ontology mapping (DBpedia i. a.). Further ways of increasing the discoverability and reuse of the metadata are publishing them as Linked Open Data and interlinking them with other data sets.
  12. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.01
    0.009434234 = product of:
      0.04717117 = sum of:
        0.04717117 = product of:
          0.09434234 = sum of:
            0.09434234 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09434234 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  13. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.01
    0.0082549555 = product of:
      0.041274775 = sum of:
        0.041274775 = product of:
          0.08254955 = sum of:
            0.08254955 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08254955 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
  14. Hlava, M.M.K.: Automatic indexing : comparing rule-based and statistics-based indexing systems (2005) 0.01
    0.0082549555 = product of:
      0.041274775 = sum of:
        0.041274775 = product of:
          0.08254955 = sum of:
            0.08254955 = weight(_text_:22 in 6265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08254955 = score(doc=6265,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6265, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6265)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information outlook. 9(2005) no.8, S.22-23
  15. Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.01
    0.0070756758 = product of:
      0.035378378 = sum of:
        0.035378378 = product of:
          0.070756756 = sum of:
            0.070756756 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070756756 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:44
  16. Hauer, M.: Automatische Indexierung (2000) 0.01
    0.0070756758 = product of:
      0.035378378 = sum of:
        0.035378378 = product of:
          0.070756756 = sum of:
            0.070756756 = weight(_text_:22 in 5887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070756756 = score(doc=5887,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5887, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5887)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Wissen in Aktion: Wege des Knowledge Managements. 22. Online-Tagung der DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 2.-4.5.2000. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  17. Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.01
    0.0070756758 = product of:
      0.035378378 = sum of:
        0.035378378 = product of:
          0.070756756 = sum of:
            0.070756756 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070756756 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:56
  18. Hauer, M.: Tiefenindexierung im Bibliothekskatalog : 17 Jahre intelligentCAPTURE (2019) 0.01
    0.0070756758 = product of:
      0.035378378 = sum of:
        0.035378378 = product of:
          0.070756756 = sum of:
            0.070756756 = weight(_text_:22 in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070756756 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.2, S.163-166
  19. Biebricher, N.; Fuhr, N.; Lustig, G.; Schwantner, M.; Knorz, G.: ¬The automatic indexing system AIR/PHYS : from research to application (1988) 0.01
    0.0058963965 = product of:
      0.029481983 = sum of:
        0.029481983 = product of:
          0.058963966 = sum of:
            0.058963966 = weight(_text_:22 in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058963966 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    16. 8.1998 12:51:22
  20. Kutschekmanesch, S.; Lutes, B.; Moelle, K.; Thiel, U.; Tzeras, K.: Automated multilingual indexing : a synthesis of rule-based and thesaurus-based methods (1998) 0.01
    0.0058963965 = product of:
      0.029481983 = sum of:
        0.029481983 = product of:
          0.058963966 = sum of:
            0.058963966 = weight(_text_:22 in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058963966 = score(doc=4157,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill