-
Nohr, H.: ¬The training of librarians in content analysis : some thoughts on future necessities (1991)
0.10
0.09699743 = product of:
0.24249358 = sum of:
0.15358314 = weight(_text_:technological in 5149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15358314 = score(doc=5149,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2312398 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.6641726 = fieldWeight in 5149, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5149)
0.088910446 = product of:
0.17782089 = sum of:
0.17782089 = weight(_text_:innovations in 5149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17782089 = score(doc=5149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2958964 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.60095656 = fieldWeight in 5149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The training of librarians in content analysis undergoes influences resulting both from the realities existing in the various application fields and from technological innovations. The present contribution attempts to identify components of such training that are necessary for a future-oriented instruction, and it stresses the importance of furnishing a sound theoretical basis, especially in the light of technological developments. Purpose of the training is to provide the foundation for 'action competence' on the part of the students
-
Naun, C.C.: Objectivity and subject access in the print library (2006)
0.02
0.019004943 = product of:
0.09502471 = sum of:
0.09502471 = weight(_text_:technological in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09502471 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2312398 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.41093582 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Librarians have inherited from the print environment a particular way of thinking about subject representation, one based on the conscious identification by librarians of appropriate subject classes and terminology. This conception has played a central role in shaping the profession's characteristic approach to upholding one of its core values: objectivity. It is argued that the social and technological roots of traditional indexing practice are closely intertwined. It is further argued that in traditional library practice objectivity is to be understood as impartiality, and reflects the mediating role that librarians have played in society. The case presented here is not a historical one based on empirical research, but rather a conceptual examination of practices that are already familiar to most librarians.
-
Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002)
0.01
0.013218527 = product of:
0.033046316 = sum of:
0.02714992 = weight(_text_:technological in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02714992 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2312398 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.117410235 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.0058963965 = product of:
0.011792793 = sum of:
0.011792793 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011792793 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Sigel, A.: How can user-oriented depth analysis be constructively guided? (2000)
0.01
0.009502471 = product of:
0.047512356 = sum of:
0.047512356 = weight(_text_:technological in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047512356 = score(doc=133,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2312398 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.20546791 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- It is vital for library and information science to understand the subject indexing process thoroughly. However, document analysis, the first and most important step in indexing, has not received sufficient attention. As this is an exceptionally hard problem, we still do not dispose of a sound indexing theory. Therefore we have difficulties in teaching indexing and in explaining why a given subject representation is "better" than another. Technological advancements have not helped to close this fundamental gap. To proceed, we should ask the right questions instead. Several types of indexer inconsistencies can be explained as acceptable, yet different conceptualizations which resulting of the variety of groups dealing with a problem from their respective viewpoints. Multiple indexed documents are regarded as the normal case. Intersubjectively replicable indexing results are often questionable or do not constitute interesting cases of indexing at all. In the context of my ongoing dissertation in which I intend to develop an enhanced indexing theory by investigating improvements within a social sciences domain, this paper explains user-oriented selective depth analysis and why I chose that configuration. Strongly influenced by Mai's dissertation, I also communicate my first insights concerning current indexing theories. I agree that I cannot ignore epistemological stances and philosophical issues in language and meaning related to indexing and accept the openness of the interpretive nature of the indexing process. Although I present arguments against the employment of an indexing language as well, it is still indispensable in situations which demand easier access and control by devices. Despite the enormous difficulties the user-oriented and selective depth analysis poses, I argue that it is both feasible and useful if one achieves careful guidance of the possible interpretations. There is some hope because the number of useful interpretations is limited: Every summary is tailored to a purpose, audience and situation. Domain, discourse and social practice entail additional constraints. A pluralistic method mix that focusses on ecologically valid, holistic contexts and employs qualitative methods is recommended. Domain analysis urgently has to be made more practical and applicable. Only then we will be able to investigate empirically domains in order to identify their structures shaped by the corresponding discourse communities. We plan to represent the recognized problem structures and indexing questions of relevance to a small domain in formal, ontological computer models -- if we can find such stable knowledge structures. This would allow us to tailor dynamically summaries for user communities. For practical purposes we suggest to assume a less demanding position than Hjorland's "totality of the epistemological potential". It is sufficent that we identify and represent iteratively the information needs of today's user groups in interactive knowledge-based systems. The best way to formalize such knowledge gained about discourse communities is however unknown. Indexers should stay in direct contact with the community they serve or be part of it to ensure agreement with their viewpoints. Checklist/request-oriented indexing could be very helpful but it remains to be demonstrated how well it will be applicable in the social sciences. A frame-based representation or at least a sophisticated grouping of terms could help to express relational knowledge structures. There remains much work to do since in practice no one has shown yet how such an improved indexing system would work and if the indexing results were really "better".
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980)
0.01
0.0058963965 = product of:
0.029481983 = sum of:
0.029481983 = product of:
0.058963966 = sum of:
0.058963966 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058963966 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:44
-
Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992)
0.00
0.004717117 = product of:
0.023585586 = sum of:
0.023585586 = product of:
0.04717117 = sum of:
0.04717117 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04717117 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:08
-
Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021)
0.00
0.004717117 = product of:
0.023585586 = sum of:
0.023585586 = product of:
0.04717117 = sum of:
0.04717117 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04717117 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 5.2021 12:43:05
-
Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012)
0.00
0.0041693817 = product of:
0.020846909 = sum of:
0.020846909 = product of:
0.041693818 = sum of:
0.041693818 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041693818 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:02:10
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
-
Weimer, K.H.: ¬The nexus of subject analysis and bibliographic description : the case of multipart videos (1996)
0.00
0.0035378379 = product of:
0.017689189 = sum of:
0.017689189 = product of:
0.035378378 = sum of:
0.035378378 = weight(_text_:22 in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035378378 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.5-18
-
Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014)
0.00
0.0035378379 = product of:
0.017689189 = sum of:
0.017689189 = product of:
0.035378378 = sum of:
0.035378378 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035378378 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006)
0.00
0.0035378379 = product of:
0.017689189 = sum of:
0.017689189 = product of:
0.035378378 = sum of:
0.035378378 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035378378 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
-
Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002)
0.00
0.0017689189 = product of:
0.0088445945 = sum of:
0.0088445945 = product of:
0.017689189 = sum of:
0.017689189 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017689189 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043520276 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 27. 9.2005 14:22:19
