Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Wouters, P.; Vries, R. de: Formally citing the Web (2004) 0.02
    0.015903428 = product of:
      0.07951714 = sum of:
        0.07951714 = weight(_text_:publishing in 3093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07951714 = score(doc=3093,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21262453 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043520276 = queryNorm
            0.37397915 = fieldWeight in 3093, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3093)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    How do authors refer to Web-based information sources in their formal scientific publications? It is not yet weIl known how scientists and scholars actually include new types of information sources, available through the new media, in their published work. This article reports an a comparative study of the lists of references in 38 scientific journals in five different scientific and social scientific fields. The fields are sociology, library and information science, biochemistry and biotechnology, neuroscience, and the mathematics of computing. As is weIl known, references, citations, and hyperlinks play different roles in academic publishing and communication. Our study focuses an hyperlinks as attributes of references in formal scholarly publications. The study developed and applied a method to analyze the differential roles of publishing media in the analysis of scientific and scholarly literature references. The present secondary databases that include reference and citation data (the Web of Science) cannot be used for this type of research. By the automated processing and analysis of the full text of scientific and scholarly articles, we were able to extract the references and hyperlinks contained in these references in relation to other features of the scientific and scholarly literature. Our findings show that hyperlinking references are indeed, as expected, abundantly present in the formal literature. They also tend to cite more recent literature than the average reference. The large majority of the references are to Web instances of traditional scientific journals. Other types of Web-based information sources are less weIl represented in the lists of references, except in the case of pure e-journals. We conclude that this can be explained by taking the role of the publisher into account. Indeed, it seems that the shift from print-based to electronic publishing has created new roles for the publisher. By shaping the way scientific references are hyperlinking to other information sources, the publisher may have a large impact an the availability of scientific and scholarly information.
  2. Bucy, E.P.; Lang, A.; Potter, R.F.; Grabe, M.E.: Formal features of cyberspace : relationships between Web page complexity and site traffic (1999) 0.01
    0.01357496 = product of:
      0.0678748 = sum of:
        0.0678748 = weight(_text_:technological in 4060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0678748 = score(doc=4060,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2312398 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043520276 = queryNorm
            0.29352558 = fieldWeight in 4060, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4060)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Although the Internet is not without its critics, many popular and academic writers are particular effusive in the praise of the WWW's interactive features. A content analysis of the formal features of 496 Web sites, drawn randomly from a sample of the top 5.000 most visited sites determined by 100hot.com, was performed to explore whether the capabilities of the WWW are being exploited by Web page designers to the extent that the literature suggests they are. Specifically, the study examines the differences between the formal features of commercial versus non-commercial sites as well as the relationship between Web page complexity and the amount of traffic a site receives. Findings indicate that, although most pages in this stage of the Web's development remain technological simple and noninteractive, there are significant relationships between site traffic and home-page structure for Web sites in the commercial (.com) as well as educational (.edu) domains. As the Web continues to expand and the amount of information redundancy increases, it is argued that a site's information packaging will become increasingly important in gaining users' attention and interest
  3. Raan, A.F.J. van; Noyons, E.C.M.: Discovery of patterns of scientific and technological development and knowledge transfer (2002) 0.01
    0.01357496 = product of:
      0.0678748 = sum of:
        0.0678748 = weight(_text_:technological in 3603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0678748 = score(doc=3603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2312398 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043520276 = queryNorm
            0.29352558 = fieldWeight in 3603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3603)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  4. Stuart, D.: Web metrics for library and information professionals (2014) 0.01
    0.008034117 = product of:
      0.040170584 = sum of:
        0.040170584 = weight(_text_:publishing in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040170584 = score(doc=2274,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21262453 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043520276 = queryNorm
            0.18892732 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This is a practical guide to using web metrics to measure impact and demonstrate value. The web provides an opportunity to collect a host of different metrics, from those associated with social media accounts and websites to more traditional research outputs. This book is a clear guide for library and information professionals as to what web metrics are available and how to assess and use them to make informed decisions and demonstrate value. As individuals and organizations increasingly use the web in addition to traditional publishing avenues and formats, this book provides the tools to unlock web metrics and evaluate the impact of this content. The key topics covered include: bibliometrics, webometrics and web metrics; data collection tools; evaluating impact on the web; evaluating social media impact; investigating relationships between actors; exploring traditional publications in a new environment; web metrics and the web of data; the future of web metrics and the library and information professional. The book will provide a practical introduction to web metrics for a wide range of library and information professionals, from the bibliometrician wanting to demonstrate the wider impact of a researcher's work than can be demonstrated through traditional citations databases, to the reference librarian wanting to measure how successfully they are engaging with their users on Twitter. It will be a valuable tool for anyone who wants to not only understand the impact of content, but demonstrate this impact to others within the organization and beyond.
  5. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.00
    0.004717117 = product of:
      0.023585586 = sum of:
        0.023585586 = product of:
          0.04717117 = sum of:
            0.04717117 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04717117 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
  6. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.00
    0.0041693817 = product of:
      0.020846909 = sum of:
        0.020846909 = product of:
          0.041693818 = sum of:
            0.041693818 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041693818 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
  7. Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998) 0.00
    0.0041274778 = product of:
      0.020637387 = sum of:
        0.020637387 = product of:
          0.041274775 = sum of:
            0.041274775 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041274775 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 1.1999 16:22:37
  8. Tonta, Y.: Scholarly communication and the use of networked information sources (1996) 0.00
    0.0035378379 = product of:
      0.017689189 = sum of:
        0.017689189 = product of:
          0.035378378 = sum of:
            0.035378378 = weight(_text_:22 in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035378378 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.240-245
  9. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.00
    0.0035378379 = product of:
      0.017689189 = sum of:
        0.017689189 = product of:
          0.035378378 = sum of:
            0.035378378 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035378378 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15240058 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043520276 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11