Search (1580 results, page 1 of 79)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Birmingham, J.: Internet search engines (1996) 0.19 
    0.19284567 = product of:
  0.38569134 = sum of:
    0.38569134 = sum of:
      0.30267885 = weight(_text_:engines in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.30267885 = score(doc=5664,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          1.1667583 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
      0.08301249 = weight(_text_:22 in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08301249 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Basically a good listing in table format of features from the major search engines
    Content
    Darstellung zu verschiedenen search engines des Internet
    Date
    10.11.1996 16:36:22
  2. Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999) 0.15 
    0.15036245 = product of:
  0.3007249 = sum of:
    0.3007249 = sum of:
      0.20387699 = weight(_text_:engines in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20387699 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.7858995 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
      0.096847914 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.096847914 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Ariadne. 1999, no.22
  3. Hsieh-Yee, I.: ¬The retrieval power of selected search engines : how well do they address general reference questions and subject questions? (1998) 0.14 
    0.13818268 = product of:
  0.27636537 = sum of:
    0.27636537 = sum of:
      0.22794142 = weight(_text_:engines in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22794142 = score(doc=2186,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.87866247 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
      0.048423957 = weight(_text_:22 in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048423957 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Evaluates the performance of 8 major Internet search engines in answering 21 real reference questions and 5 made up subject questions. Reports on the retrieval and relevancy ranking abilities of the search engines. Concludes that the search engines did not produce good results for the reference questions unlike for the subject questions. The best engines are identified by type of questions, with Infoseek best for the subject questions, and OpenText best for refrence questions
    Date
    25.12.1998 19:22:51
  4. Conhaim, W.W.: Search tools (1996) 0.13 
    0.12856379 = product of:
  0.25712758 = sum of:
    0.25712758 = sum of:
      0.2017859 = weight(_text_:engines in 4738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2017859 = score(doc=4738,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.7778389 = fieldWeight in 4738, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4738)
      0.055341665 = weight(_text_:22 in 4738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055341665 = score(doc=4738,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4738, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4738)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Describes the 3 most popular searching tools for the WWW: InfoSeek, Yahoo and Lycos. Searching Internet directories can also be a useful search technique. Lists other searching engines. Points out a number of evaluations of these search engines published on the WWW. A number of search tools are available for specialized areas. Sites are available that enable parallel searching using several tools at once. Describes WWW pages with information about search engines
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:39:31
  5. Notess, G.R.: Toward more comprehensive Web searching : single searching versus megasearching (1998) 0.13 
    0.12856379 = product of:
  0.25712758 = sum of:
    0.25712758 = sum of:
      0.2017859 = weight(_text_:engines in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2017859 = score(doc=3278,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.7778389 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
      0.055341665 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055341665 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In spite of their size, the major Web indexes are not comprehensive. Considers approaches carrying out comprehensive searches, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages. In the single search tool approach, users search the largest of the databses one by one, using the command language uniqe to each to increase the precision of the esearch. In the megasearch approach, search engines use 1 form that simultaneously seands a single query to a number of search engines and then presents the results. Inference Find, Dogpile and MetaFind are examples of good metasearch engines
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.2, S.73-76
  6. Berinstein, P.: Turning visual : image search engines on the Web (1998) 0.13 
    0.12856379 = product of:
  0.25712758 = sum of:
    0.25712758 = sum of:
      0.2017859 = weight(_text_:engines in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2017859 = score(doc=3595,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.7778389 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
      0.055341665 = weight(_text_:22 in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055341665 = score(doc=3595,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Gives an overview of image search engines on the Web. They work by: looking for graphics files; looking for a caption; looking for Web sites whose titles indicate the presence of picturres on a certain subject; or employing human intervention. Describes the image search capabilities of: AltaVista; Amazing Picture Machine (Http://www.ncrtec.org/picture.htm); HotBot; ImageSurfer (http://ipix.yahoo.com); Lycos; Web Clip Art Search Engine and WebSEEK. The search engines employing human intervention provide the best results
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.37-38,40-42
  7. Marchiori, M.: ¬The quest for correct information on the Web : hyper search engines (1997) 0.13 
    0.12615047 = product of:
  0.25230095 = sum of:
    0.25230095 = sum of:
      0.20387699 = weight(_text_:engines in 7453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20387699 = score(doc=7453,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.7858995 = fieldWeight in 7453, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7453)
      0.048423957 = weight(_text_:22 in 7453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048423957 = score(doc=7453,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7453, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7453)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Presents a novel method to extract from a web object its hyper informative content, in contrast with current search engines, which only deal with the textual information content. This method is not only valuable per se, but it is shown to be able to considerably increase the precision of current search engines. It integrates with existing search engine technology since it can be implemented on top of every search engine, acting as a post-processor, thus automatically transforming a search engine into its corresponding hyper version. Shows how the hyper information can be usefully employed to face the search engines persuasion problem
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  8. Hock, R.E.: How to do field searching in Web search engines : a field trip (1998) 0.12 
    0.12151121 = product of:
  0.24302243 = sum of:
    0.24302243 = sum of:
      0.16475749 = weight(_text_:engines in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16475749 = score(doc=3601,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.63510275 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
      0.07826494 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07826494 = score(doc=3601,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Explains how 5 Internet search engines (AltaVista, HotBot, InfoSeek, Lycos, and Yahoo) handle field searching. Includes a chart which identifies where on a search engine's page a particular field is searched and the prefix syntax used, and gives examples. Details the individual fields that can be searched: data, title, URL, images, audiovideo and other page content, links and page depth
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.18-22
  9. Fong, W.W.: Searching the World Wide Web (1996) 0.11 
    0.110049576 = product of:
  0.22009915 = sum of:
    0.22009915 = sum of:
      0.16475749 = weight(_text_:engines in 6597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16475749 = score(doc=6597,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.63510275 = fieldWeight in 6597, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6597)
      0.055341665 = weight(_text_:22 in 6597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055341665 = score(doc=6597,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6597, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6597)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Reviews the availability on the WWW, of search engines designed to organize various web information sources. Discusses the differences and similarities of each search engine and their advantages and disadvantages. Search engines included in the study were: AltaVista, CUI W3 Catalog, InfoSeek, Lycos, Magellan, Yahoo
    Source
    Journal of library and information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.15-36
  10. Sieverts, E.: Slimmerds onder de zoekmachines (1998) 0.11 
    0.110049576 = product of:
  0.22009915 = sum of:
    0.22009915 = sum of:
      0.16475749 = weight(_text_:engines in 2414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16475749 = score(doc=2414,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.63510275 = fieldWeight in 2414, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2414)
      0.055341665 = weight(_text_:22 in 2414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055341665 = score(doc=2414,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2414, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2414)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Web search engines generally use best match search techniques, rather than traditional Boolean operators. Precision in searching will depend on the numbers of selected terms appearing in a document and the inclusion of less-common words in the search string. Users are, therefore, recommended to enter as many words as possible. ExCite and WebCrawler lead users from a relevant document to other documents containing similar word patterns, while MusCat and EuroFerret suggest additional keywords for searching
    Date
    29.12.1998 11:22:34
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Top of the class among the search engines
  11. Loeper, D. von: Sherlock Holmes im Netz (1997) 0.11 
    0.10740174 = product of:
  0.21480349 = sum of:
    0.21480349 = sum of:
      0.14562641 = weight(_text_:engines in 6566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14562641 = score(doc=6566,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.5613568 = fieldWeight in 6566, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6566)
      0.06917708 = weight(_text_:22 in 6566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06917708 = score(doc=6566,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6566, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6566)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Beitrag zu den search engines des Internet
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:50:29
  12. Notess, G.R.: DejaNews and other Usenet search tools (1998) 0.10 
    0.09738304 = product of:
  0.19476607 = sum of:
    0.19476607 = sum of:
      0.11650113 = weight(_text_:engines in 5229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11650113 = score(doc=5229,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.44908544 = fieldWeight in 5229, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5229)
      0.07826494 = weight(_text_:22 in 5229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07826494 = score(doc=5229,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 5229, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5229)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Internet Newsgroup archives on services such as DejaNews offer important sources of information that may not be found elsewhere online. Describes the content of the DejaNews Database which goes back to 1995 and covers more than 14,000 newsgroups. There are 2 search options: quick search and power search. Most Web search engines offer links to DejaNews, but AltaVista offers a smaller alternative and supplement to DejaNews. Reference.COM also offers a searchable archive, as well as a useful current awareness service which allows setting up multiple searches under the user profile tab
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.22-28
  13. Hancock, B.: Subject-specific search engines : using the Harvest system to gather and maintain information on the Internet (1998) 0.10 
    0.09629338 = product of:
  0.19258676 = sum of:
    0.19258676 = sum of:
      0.1441628 = weight(_text_:engines in 3238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1441628 = score(doc=3238,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.5557149 = fieldWeight in 3238, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3238)
      0.048423957 = weight(_text_:22 in 3238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048423957 = score(doc=3238,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3238, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3238)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The increasing expansion of the Internet has made resources available to users in sometimes unmanageable abundance. To help users manage this proliferation of information, librarians have begun to add URLs to their home pages. As well, specialized search engines are being used to retrieve information from selected sources in aneffort to return pertinent results. Describes the Harvest system which has been used to develop Index Antiquus, a specialized engine, for the classics and mediaeval studies. Presents a working example of how to search Index Antiquus
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  14. Duval, B.K.; Main, L.: Searching on the Net : general overview (1996) 0.09 
    0.0859214 = product of:
  0.1718428 = sum of:
    0.1718428 = sum of:
      0.11650113 = weight(_text_:engines in 7268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11650113 = score(doc=7268,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.44908544 = fieldWeight in 7268, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7268)
      0.055341665 = weight(_text_:22 in 7268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055341665 = score(doc=7268,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7268, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7268)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    First of a 3 part series discussing how to access and use Web search engines on the Internet. Distinguishes between FTP sites, Gopher sites, Usenet News sites and Web sites. Considers subject searching versus keyword; how to improve search strategies and success rates; bookmarks; Yahoo!, Lycos; InfoSeek; Magellan; Excite; Inktomi; HotBot and AltaVista
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  15. Quint, B.; Liddy, E.: Search engine designer for tomorrow : interview with TextWise's Elizabeth Liddy (1998) 0.09 
    0.0859214 = product of:
  0.1718428 = sum of:
    0.1718428 = sum of:
      0.11650113 = weight(_text_:engines in 2288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11650113 = score(doc=2288,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.44908544 = fieldWeight in 2288, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2288)
      0.055341665 = weight(_text_:22 in 2288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055341665 = score(doc=2288,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2288, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2288)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Presents an interview with E. Liddy, president and CEO of Textwise, a US research and development company designing advanced natural language search engines for government and commercial clients. Describes the company's current products and projects for 1998, and considers how these new advanced information analysis systems will affect the role of information professionals
    Source
    Searcher. 6(1998) no.3, S.19-22
  16. Howe, A.E.; Dreilinger, D.: SavvySearch: a metasearch engine that learns with search engines to query (1997) 0.08 
    0.07705826 = product of:
  0.15411653 = sum of:
    0.15411653 = product of:
      0.30823305 = sum of:
        0.30823305 = weight(_text_:engines in 1190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30823305 = score(doc=1190,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            1.1881685 = fieldWeight in 1190, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1190)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Metasearch engines reduce the burden to users of search engines by dispatching queries to multiple search engines in parallel. The SavvySearch metasearch engine is designed to effiently query other search engines by carefully selecting those search engines likely to return useful results and responding to fluctuating load demands on the WWW. SavvySearch learns to identify which search engines are most appropriate for particular queries, reasons about resource demands, and represents an iterative parallel search strategy as a simple plan
  17. Campbell, K.: Understanding and comparing search engines (1996) 0.08 
    0.07566971 = product of:
  0.15133943 = sum of:
    0.15133943 = product of:
      0.30267885 = sum of:
        0.30267885 = weight(_text_:engines in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30267885 = score(doc=5666,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051058397 = queryNorm
            1.1667583 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A meta-list of 11 other sites that critique search engines
    Content
    Hinweis auf Beiträge zu den verschiedenen search engines des Internet
  18. Lawrence, S.; Giles, C.L.: Inquirus, the NECI meta search engine (1998) 0.08 
    0.07518122 = product of:
  0.15036245 = sum of:
    0.15036245 = sum of:
      0.10193849 = weight(_text_:engines in 3604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10193849 = score(doc=3604,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.39294976 = fieldWeight in 3604, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3604)
      0.048423957 = weight(_text_:22 in 3604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048423957 = score(doc=3604,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3604, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3604)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Presents Inquirus, a WWW meta search engine which works by downloading and analysing the individual documents. It makes improvements over existing search engines in a number of areas: more useful document summaries incorporating query term context, identification of both pages which no longer exist and pages which no longer contain the query terms, advanced detection of duplicate pages, improved document ranking using proximity information, dramatically improved precision for certain queries by using specific expressive forms, and quick jump links and highlighting when viewing the full document
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  19. Joss, M.W.; Wszola, S.: ¬The engines that can : text search and retrieval software, their strategies, and vendors (1996) 0.06 
    0.06444105 = product of:
  0.1288821 = sum of:
    0.1288821 = sum of:
      0.08737585 = weight(_text_:engines in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08737585 = score(doc=5123,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.33681408 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
      0.041506246 = weight(_text_:22 in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041506246 = score(doc=5123,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    12. 9.1996 13:56:22
  20. Nieuwenhuysen, P.; Vanouplines, P.: Document plus program hybrids on the Internet and their impact on information transfer (1998) 0.06 
    0.06444105 = product of:
  0.1288821 = sum of:
    0.1288821 = sum of:
      0.08737585 = weight(_text_:engines in 1893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08737585 = score(doc=1893,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25941864 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.33681408 = fieldWeight in 1893, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1893)
      0.041506246 = weight(_text_:22 in 1893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041506246 = score(doc=1893,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17879781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051058397 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1893, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1893)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Examines some of the advanced tools, techniques, methods and standards related to the Internet and WWW which consist of hybrids of documents and software, called 'document program hybrids'. Early Internet systems were based on having documents on one side and software on the other, neatly separated, apart from one another and without much interaction, so that the static document can also exist without computers and networks. Documentation program hybrids blur this classical distinction and all components are integrated, interwoven and exist in synergy with each other. Illustrates the techniques with particular reference to practical examples, including: dara collections and dedicated software; advanced HTML features on the WWW, multimedia viewer and plug in software for Internet and WWW browsers; VRML; interaction through a Web server with other servers and with instruments; adaptive hypertext provided by the server; 'webbots' or 'knowbots' or 'searchbots' or 'metasearch engines' or intelligent software agents; Sun's Java; Microsoft's ActiveX; program scripts for HTML and Web browsers; cookies; and Internet push technology with Webcasting channels
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.2, S.55-72

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1336
  • m 132
  • s 74
  • el 41
  • i 13
  • b 7
  • r 7
  • x 6
  • ? 5
  • d 3
  • p 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications