-
Johnson, E.H.: Distributed thesaurus Web services (2004)
0.02
0.01916282 = product of:
0.07665128 = sum of:
0.07665128 = weight(_text_:engines in 4863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07665128 = score(doc=4863,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.33681408 = fieldWeight in 4863, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4863)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The World Wide Web and the use of HTML-based information displays has greatly increased access to online information sources, but at the same time limits the ways in which they can be used. By the same token, Web-based indexing and search engines give us access to the full text of online documents, but make it difficult to access them in any kind of organized, systematic way. For years before the advent of the Internet, lexicographers built weIl-structured subject thesauri to organize large collections of documents. These have since been converted into electronic form and even put online, but in ways that are largely uncoordinated and not useful for searching. This paper describes some of the ways in which XML-based Web services could be used to coordinate subject thesauri and other online vocabulary sources to create a "Thesauro-Web" that could be used by both searchers and indexers to improve subject access an the Internet.
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: ¬The Information Retrieval Thesaurus (2019)
0.02
0.01916282 = product of:
0.07665128 = sum of:
0.07665128 = weight(_text_:engines in 5210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07665128 = score(doc=5210,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.33681408 = fieldWeight in 5210, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5210)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In the post-war period before computers were readily available, urgent demand for scientific and industrial develop-ment stimulated research and development (R&D) that led to the birth of the information retrieval thesaurus. This article traces the early history, speciation and progressive improvement of the thesaurus to reach the state now conveyed by guidelines in inter-national and national standards. Despite doubts about the effec-tiveness of the thesaurus throughout this period, and notwith-standing the dominance of Google and other search engines in the information retrieval (IR) scene today, the thesaurus still plays a complementary part in the organization of knowledge and in-formation resources. Success today depends on interoperability, and is opening up opportunities in linked data applications. At the same time, the IR demand from workers in the knowledge society drives interest in hybrid forms of knowledge organization system (KOS) that may pool the genes of thesauri with those of ontologies and classification schemes.
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.: New approaches in thesaurus application (1991)
0.02
0.018607298 = product of:
0.07442919 = sum of:
0.07442919 = product of:
0.14885838 = sum of:
0.14885838 = weight(_text_:programming in 2111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14885838 = score(doc=2111,freq=2.0), product of:
0.29361802 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.5069797 = fieldWeight in 2111, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2111)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- To show the difference and explain the move to a new kind of thesauri in the information science area, some of the main characteristics of conventional thesauri are pointed out as well as their side-effects. The new approaches for thesauri apllication are seen to exist in (1) expert systems, (2) interface systems, (3) object oriented design and programming, (4) hypertext systems, (5) machine translation, and (6) machine abstracting. These areas are shortly described including also the new problem which they might create. A discussion of the limitations of the new thesaurus application areas finishes the article which challenges, finally, an awareness to meet the new possibilities of a thesaural retrieval
-
Bandholtz, T.; Schulte-Coerne, T.; Glaser, R.; Fock, J.; Keller, T.: iQvoc - open source SKOS(XL) maintenance and publishing tool (2010)
0.02
0.018607298 = product of:
0.07442919 = sum of:
0.07442919 = product of:
0.14885838 = sum of:
0.14885838 = weight(_text_:programming in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14885838 = score(doc=604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.29361802 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.5069797 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- iQvoc is a new open source SKOS-XL vocabulary management tool developed by the Federal Environment Agency, Germany, and innoQ Deutschland GmbH. Its immediate purpose is maintaining and publishing reference vocabularies in the upcoming Linked Data cloud of environmental information, but it may be easily adapted to host any SKOS- XL compliant vocabulary. iQvoc is implemented as a Ruby on Rails application running on top of JRuby - the Java implementation of the Ruby Programming Language. To increase the user experience when editing content, iQvoc uses heavily the JavaScript library jQuery.
-
¬The thesaurus: review, renaissance and revision (2004)
0.01
0.00958141 = product of:
0.03832564 = sum of:
0.03832564 = weight(_text_:engines in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03832564 = score(doc=3243,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.16840704 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Enthält u.a. folgende Aussage von J. Aitchison u. S. Dextre Clarke: "We face a paradox. Ostensibly, the need and the opportunity to apply thesauri to information retrieval are greater than ever before. On the other hand, users resist most efforts to persuade them to apply one. The drive for interoperability of systems means we must design our vocabularies for easy integration into downstream applications such as content management systems, indexing/metatagging interfaces, search engines, and portals. Summarizing the search for vocabularies that work more intuitively, we see that there are trends working in opposite directions. In the hugely popular taxonomies an the one hand, relationships between terms are more loosely defined than in thesauri. In the ontologies that will support computer-to-computer communications in AI applications such as the Semantic Web, we see the need for much more precisely defined term relationships."
-
ISO 25964 Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies (2008)
0.01
0.00958141 = product of:
0.03832564 = sum of:
0.03832564 = weight(_text_:engines in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03832564 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.16840704 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- T.1: Today's thesauri are mostly electronic tools, having moved on from the paper-based era when thesaurus standards were first developed. They are built and maintained with the support of software and need to integrate with other software, such as search engines and content management systems. Whereas in the past thesauri were designed for information professionals trained in indexing and searching, today there is a demand for vocabularies that untrained users will find to be intuitive. ISO 25964 makes the transition needed for the world of electronic information management. However, part 1 retains the assumption that human intellect is usually involved in the selection of indexing terms and in the selection of search terms. If both the indexer and the searcher are guided to choose the same term for the same concept, then relevant documents will be retrieved. This is the main principle underlying thesaurus design, even though a thesaurus built for human users may also be applied in situations where computers make the choices. Efficient exchange of data is a vital component of thesaurus management and exploitation. Hence the inclusion in this standard of recommendations for exchange formats and protocols. Adoption of these will facilitate interoperability between thesaurus management systems and the other computer applications, such as indexing and retrieval systems, that will utilize the data. Thesauri are typically used in post-coordinate retrieval systems, but may also be applied to hierarchical directories, pre-coordinate indexes and classification systems. Increasingly, thesaurus applications need to mesh with others, such as automatic categorization schemes, free-text search systems, etc. Part 2 of ISO 25964 describes additional types of structured vocabulary and gives recommendations to enable interoperation of the vocabularies at all stages of the information storage and retrieval process.
-
Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999)
0.01
0.009102937 = product of:
0.036411747 = sum of:
0.036411747 = product of:
0.072823495 = sum of:
0.072823495 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072823495 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 15. 3.2000 10:22:37
-
Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001)
0.01
0.009102937 = product of:
0.036411747 = sum of:
0.036411747 = product of:
0.072823495 = sum of:
0.072823495 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072823495 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 24. 8.2005 19:20:22
-
Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007)
0.01
0.007585781 = product of:
0.030343125 = sum of:
0.030343125 = product of:
0.06068625 = sum of:
0.06068625 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06068625 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:22:07
-
Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995)
0.01
0.0060686246 = product of:
0.024274498 = sum of:
0.024274498 = product of:
0.048548996 = sum of:
0.048548996 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048548996 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22
-
Z39.19-1993: Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual thesauri (1993)
0.01
0.0060686246 = product of:
0.024274498 = sum of:
0.024274498 = product of:
0.048548996 = sum of:
0.048548996 = weight(_text_:22 in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048548996 = score(doc=4092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.180-181 (M. Hudon)
-
Berti, Jr., D.W.; Lima, G.; Maculan, B.; Soergel, D.: Computer-assisted checking of conceptual relationships in a large thesaurus (2018)
0.01
0.0060686246 = product of:
0.024274498 = sum of:
0.024274498 = product of:
0.048548996 = sum of:
0.048548996 = weight(_text_:22 in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048548996 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 17. 1.2019 19:04:22
-
Eastman, C.M.: Overlaps in postings to thesaurus terms : a preliminary study (1988)
0.01
0.0053100465 = product of:
0.021240186 = sum of:
0.021240186 = product of:
0.042480372 = sum of:
0.042480372 = weight(_text_:22 in 3555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042480372 = score(doc=3555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3555)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 25.12.1995 22:52:34
-
Crouch, C.J.: ¬An approach to the automatic construction of global thesauri (1990)
0.01
0.0053100465 = product of:
0.021240186 = sum of:
0.021240186 = product of:
0.042480372 = sum of:
0.042480372 = weight(_text_:22 in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042480372 = score(doc=4042,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 4.1996 3:39:53
-
Busch, J.A.: Building and accessing vocabulary resources for networked resource discovery and navigation (1998)
0.01
0.0053100465 = product of:
0.021240186 = sum of:
0.021240186 = product of:
0.042480372 = sum of:
0.042480372 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042480372 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001)
0.01
0.0053100465 = product of:
0.021240186 = sum of:
0.021240186 = product of:
0.042480372 = sum of:
0.042480372 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042480372 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:45:57
-
Nielsen, M.L.: Thesaurus construction : key issues and selected readings (2004)
0.01
0.0053100465 = product of:
0.021240186 = sum of:
0.021240186 = product of:
0.042480372 = sum of:
0.042480372 = weight(_text_:22 in 5006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042480372 = score(doc=5006,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5006, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5006)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 18. 5.2006 20:06:22
-
Schneider, J.W.; Borlund, P.: ¬A bibliometric-based semiautomatic approach to identification of candidate thesaurus terms : parsing and filtering of noun phrases from citation contexts (2005)
0.01
0.0053100465 = product of:
0.021240186 = sum of:
0.021240186 = product of:
0.042480372 = sum of:
0.042480372 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042480372 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 8. 3.2007 19:55:22
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007)
0.01
0.0053100465 = product of:
0.021240186 = sum of:
0.021240186 = product of:
0.042480372 = sum of:
0.042480372 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042480372 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 8.12.2007 19:25:22
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.: Thesaurus and beyond : an advanced formula for linguistic engineering and information retrieval (1999)
0.00
0.0045514684 = product of:
0.018205874 = sum of:
0.018205874 = product of:
0.036411747 = sum of:
0.036411747 = weight(_text_:22 in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036411747 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04479146 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 26(1999) no.1, S.10-22
