Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  1. Rorissa, A.: User-generated descriptions of individual images versus labels of groups of images : a comparison using basic level theory (2008) 0.02
    0.015969018 = product of:
      0.06387607 = sum of:
        0.06387607 = weight(_text_:engines in 2122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06387607 = score(doc=2122,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04479146 = queryNorm
            0.2806784 = fieldWeight in 2122, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2122)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Although images are visual information sources with little or no text associated with them, users still tend to use text to describe images and formulate queries. This is because digital libraries and search engines provide mostly text query options and rely on text annotations for representation and retrieval of the semantic content of images. While the main focus of image research is on indexing and retrieval of individual images, the general topic of image browsing and indexing, and retrieval of groups of images has not been adequately investigated. Comparisons of descriptions of individual images as well as labels of groups of images supplied by users using cognitive models are scarce. This work fills this gap. Using the basic level theory as a framework, a comparison of the descriptions of individual images and labels assigned to groups of images by 180 participants in three studies found a marked difference in their level of abstraction. Results confirm assertions by previous researchers in LIS and other fields that groups of images are labeled using more superordinate level terms while individual image descriptions are mainly at the basic level. Implications for design of image browsing interfaces, taxonomies, thesauri, and similar tools are discussed.
  2. Konkova, E.; MacFarlane, A.; Göker, A.: Analysing creative image search information needs (2016) 0.02
    0.015969018 = product of:
      0.06387607 = sum of:
        0.06387607 = weight(_text_:engines in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06387607 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22757743 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04479146 = queryNorm
            0.2806784 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.080822 = idf(docFreq=746, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Creative professionals in advertising, marketing, design and journalism search for images to visually represent a concept for their project. The main purpose of this paper is to present search facets derived from an analysis of documents known as briefs, which are widely used in creative industries as requirement documents describing information needs. The briefs specify the type of image required, such as the content and context of use for the image and represent the topic from which the searcher builds an image query. We take three main sources-user image search behaviour, briefs, and image search engine search facets-to examine the search facets for image searching in order to examine the following research question-are search facet schemes for image search engines sufficient for user needs, or is revision needed? We found that there are three main classes of user search facet, which include business, contextual and image related information. The key argument in the paper is that the facet "keyword/tag" is ambiguous and does not support user needs for more generic descriptions to broaden search or specific descriptions to narrow their search-we suggest that a more detailed search facet scheme would be appropriate.
  3. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.01
    0.007585781 = product of:
      0.030343125 = sum of:
        0.030343125 = product of:
          0.06068625 = sum of:
            0.06068625 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06068625 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04479146 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  4. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.01
    0.0060686246 = product of:
      0.024274498 = sum of:
        0.024274498 = product of:
          0.048548996 = sum of:
            0.048548996 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048548996 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04479146 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
  5. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021) 0.01
    0.0060686246 = product of:
      0.024274498 = sum of:
        0.024274498 = product of:
          0.048548996 = sum of:
            0.048548996 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048548996 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04479146 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  6. Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012) 0.01
    0.005363957 = product of:
      0.021455828 = sum of:
        0.021455828 = product of:
          0.042911656 = sum of:
            0.042911656 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042911656 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04479146 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:02:10
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
  7. Weimer, K.H.: ¬The nexus of subject analysis and bibliographic description : the case of multipart videos (1996) 0.00
    0.0045514684 = product of:
      0.018205874 = sum of:
        0.018205874 = product of:
          0.036411747 = sum of:
            0.036411747 = weight(_text_:22 in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036411747 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04479146 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.5-18
  8. Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014) 0.00
    0.0045514684 = product of:
      0.018205874 = sum of:
        0.018205874 = product of:
          0.036411747 = sum of:
            0.036411747 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036411747 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04479146 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  9. White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006) 0.00
    0.0045514684 = product of:
      0.018205874 = sum of:
        0.018205874 = product of:
          0.036411747 = sum of:
            0.036411747 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036411747 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04479146 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
  10. Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002) 0.00
    0.0022757342 = product of:
      0.009102937 = sum of:
        0.009102937 = product of:
          0.018205874 = sum of:
            0.018205874 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018205874 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04479146 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27. 9.2005 14:22:19
  11. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.00
    0.0015171561 = product of:
      0.0060686246 = sum of:
        0.0060686246 = product of:
          0.012137249 = sum of:
            0.012137249 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012137249 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15685207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04479146 = queryNorm
                0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05