Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Järvelin, K."
  1. Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023) 0.03
    0.03008753 = product of:
      0.07521883 = sum of:
        0.06067828 = weight(_text_:business in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06067828 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21714608 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0583196 = idf(docFreq=763, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042928502 = queryNorm
            0.2794353 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0583196 = idf(docFreq=763, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
        0.014540548 = product of:
          0.029081097 = sum of:
            0.029081097 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029081097 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042928502 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The paper reports a longitudinal analysis of the topical and methodological development of Library and Information Science (LIS). Its focus is on the effects of researchers' disciplines on these developments. The study extends an earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) by a coordinated dataset representing a content analysis of articles published in 31 scholarly LIS journals in 1995, 2005, and 2015. It is novel in its coverage of authors' disciplines, topical and methodological aspects in a coordinated dataset spanning two decades thus allowing trend analysis. The findings include a shrinking trend in the share of LIS from 67 to 36% while Computer Science, and Business and Economics increase their share from 9 and 6% to 21 and 16%, respectively. The earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) for the year 2015 identified three topical clusters of LIS research, focusing on topical subfields, methodologies, and contributing disciplines. Correspondence analysis confirms their existence already in 1995 and traces their development through the decades. The contributing disciplines infuse their concepts, research questions, and approaches to LIS and may also subsume vital parts of LIS in their own structures of knowledge production.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:15:06
  2. Niemi, T.; Hirvonen, L.; Järvelin, K.: Multidimensional data model and query language for informetrics (2003) 0.02
    0.018045506 = product of:
      0.09022752 = sum of:
        0.09022752 = weight(_text_:great in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09022752 = score(doc=1753,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24172091 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042928502 = queryNorm
            0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Multidimensional data analysis or On-line analytical processing (OLAP) offers a single subject-oriented source for analyzing summary data based an various dimensions. We demonstrate that the OLAP approach gives a promising starting point for advanced analysis and comparison among summary data in informetrics applications. At the moment there is no single precise, commonly accepted logical/conceptual model for multidimensional analysis. This is because the requirements of applications vary considerably. We develop a conceptual/logical multidimensional model for supporting the complex and unpredictable needs of informetrics. Summary data are considered with respect of some dimensions. By changing dimensions the user may construct other views an the same summary data. We develop a multidimensional query language whose basic idea is to support the definition of views in a way, which is natural and intuitive for lay users in the informetrics area. We show that this view-oriented query language has a great expressive power and its degree of declarativity is greater than in contemporary operation-oriented or SQL (Structured Query Language)-like OLAP query languages.
  3. Vakkari, P.; Chang, Y.-W.; Järvelin, K.: Disciplinary contributions to research topics and methodology in Library and Information Science : leading to fragmentation? (2022) 0.01
    0.012135657 = product of:
      0.06067828 = sum of:
        0.06067828 = weight(_text_:business in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06067828 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21714608 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0583196 = idf(docFreq=763, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042928502 = queryNorm
            0.2794353 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0583196 = idf(docFreq=763, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The study analyses contributions to Library and Information Science (LIS) by researchers representing various disciplines. How are such contributions associated with the choice of research topics and methodology? The study employs a quantitative content analysis of articles published in 31 scholarly LIS journals in 2015. Each article is seen as a contribution to LIS by the authors' disciplines, which are inferred from their affiliations. The unit of analysis is the article-discipline pair. Of the contribution instances, the share of LIS is one third. Computer Science contributes one fifth and Business and Economics one sixth. The latter disciplines dominate the contributions in information retrieval, information seeking, and scientific communication indicating strong influences in LIS. Correspondence analysis reveals three clusters of research, one focusing on traditional LIS with contributions from LIS and Humanities and survey-type research; another on information retrieval with contributions from Computer Science and experimental research; and the third on scientific communication with contributions from Natural Sciences and Medicine and citation analytic research. The strong differentiation of scholarly contributions in LIS hints to the fragmentation of LIS as a discipline.
  4. Järvelin, K.; Kristensen, J.; Niemi, T.; Sormunen, E.; Keskustalo, H.: ¬A deductive data model for query expansion (1996) 0.00
    0.0034897313 = product of:
      0.017448656 = sum of:
        0.017448656 = product of:
          0.034897313 = sum of:
            0.034897313 = weight(_text_:22 in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034897313 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042928502 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIR '96), Zürich, Switzerland, August 18-22, 1996. Eds.: H.P. Frei et al
  5. Saastamoinen, M.; Järvelin, K.: Search task features in work tasks of varying types and complexity (2017) 0.00
    0.0034897313 = product of:
      0.017448656 = sum of:
        0.017448656 = product of:
          0.034897313 = sum of:
            0.034897313 = weight(_text_:22 in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034897313 = score(doc=3589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042928502 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Information searching in practice seldom is an end in itself. In work, work task (WT) performance forms the context, which information searching should serve. Therefore, information retrieval (IR) systems development/evaluation should take the WT context into account. The present paper analyzes how WT features: task complexity and task types, affect information searching in authentic work: the types of information needs, search processes, and search media. We collected data on 22 information professionals in authentic work situations in three organization types: city administration, universities, and companies. The data comprise 286 WTs and 420 search tasks (STs). The data include transaction logs, video recordings, daily questionnaires, interviews. and observation. The data were analyzed quantitatively. Even if the participants used a range of search media, most STs were simple throughout the data, and up to 42% of WTs did not include searching. WT's effects on STs are not straightforward: different WT types react differently to WT complexity. Due to the simplicity of authentic searching, the WT/ST types in interactive IR experiments should be reconsidered.
  6. Näppilä, T.; Järvelin, K.; Niemi, T.: ¬A tool for data cube construction from structurally heterogeneous XML documents (2008) 0.00
    0.0029081097 = product of:
      0.014540548 = sum of:
        0.014540548 = product of:
          0.029081097 = sum of:
            0.029081097 = weight(_text_:22 in 1369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029081097 = score(doc=1369,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042928502 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1369, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1369)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9. 2.2008 17:22:42