-
Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994)
0.05
0.048140053 = product of:
0.12035013 = sum of:
0.09708525 = weight(_text_:business in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09708525 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21714608 = queryWeight, product of:
5.0583196 = idf(docFreq=763, maxDocs=44218)
0.042928502 = queryNorm
0.4470965 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.0583196 = idf(docFreq=763, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.023264877 = product of:
0.046529755 = sum of:
0.046529755 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046529755 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042928502 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The nature and implications of electrocopying are summarised. After a brief review of the principles of copyright, the issue of whether electrocopying infringes copyright is debated. Publishers are aware of the threat that electrocopying poses to their business. The various options available to publishers for responding to electrocopying are summarised. Patterns of scholarly communications and the relationships between authors, publishers and libraries are being challenged. Constructive dialogue is necessary if the issues are to be resolved
- Source
- Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
-
Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009)
0.04
0.03610504 = product of:
0.0902626 = sum of:
0.07281394 = weight(_text_:business in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07281394 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21714608 = queryWeight, product of:
5.0583196 = idf(docFreq=763, maxDocs=44218)
0.042928502 = queryNorm
0.33532238 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.0583196 = idf(docFreq=763, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.017448656 = product of:
0.034897313 = sum of:
0.034897313 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034897313 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042928502 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- A review of recent developments in electronic publishing, with a focus on Open Access (OA) is provided. It describes the two main types of OA, i.e. the `gold' OA journal route and the 'green' repository route, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of the two, and the reactions of the publishing industry to these developments. Quality, cost and copyright issues are explored, as well as some of the business models of OA. It is noted that whilst so far there is no evidence that a shift to OA will lead to libraries cancelling subscriptions to toll-access journals, this may happen in the future, and that despite the apparently compelling reasons for authors to move to OA, so far few have shown themselves willing to do so. Conclusions about the future of scholarly publications are drawn.
- Date
- 8. 7.2010 19:22:45
-
Oppenheim, C.: ¬An agenda for action to achieve the information society in the UK (1996)
0.00
0.0046529756 = product of:
0.023264877 = sum of:
0.023264877 = product of:
0.046529755 = sum of:
0.046529755 = weight(_text_:22 in 7670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046529755 = score(doc=7670,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042928502 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7670, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7670)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.6, S.407-421
-
Oppenheim, C.: Intellectual property : legal and other issues (1997)
0.00
0.0034897313 = product of:
0.017448656 = sum of:
0.017448656 = product of:
0.034897313 = sum of:
0.034897313 = weight(_text_:22 in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034897313 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042928502 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information studies. 3(1997) no.1, S.5-22
-
Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬The h-index : a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator (2010)
0.00
0.0029081097 = product of:
0.014540548 = sum of:
0.014540548 = product of:
0.029081097 = sum of:
0.029081097 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029081097 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1503283 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042928502 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 8. 1.2011 19:22:13
