Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"06.35 Informationsmanagement"
  1. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.01
    0.013905852 = product of:
      0.027811704 = sum of:
        0.027811704 = product of:
          0.05562341 = sum of:
            0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05562341 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
  2. Borgman, C.L.: Big data, little data, no data : scholarship in the networked world (2015) 0.01
    0.012439058 = product of:
      0.024878116 = sum of:
        0.024878116 = product of:
          0.049756233 = sum of:
            0.049756233 = weight(_text_:media in 2785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049756233 = score(doc=2785,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.20699982 = fieldWeight in 2785, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2785)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    "Big Data" is on the covers of Science, Nature, the Economist, and Wired magazines, on the front pages of the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times. But despite the media hyperbole, as Christine Borgman points out in this examination of data and scholarly research, having the right data is usually better than having more data; little data can be just as valuable as big data. In many cases, there are no data -- because relevant data don't exist, cannot be found, or are not available. Moreover, data sharing is difficult, incentives to do so are minimal, and data practices vary widely across disciplines. Borgman, an often-cited authority on scholarly communication, argues that data have no value or meaning in isolation; they exist within a knowledge infrastructure -- an ecology of people, practices, technologies, institutions, material objects, and relationships. After laying out the premises of her investigation -- six "provocations" meant to inspire discussion about the uses of data in scholarship -- Borgman offers case studies of data practices in the sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities, and then considers the implications of her findings for scholarly practice and research policy. To manage and exploit data over the long term, Borgman argues, requires massive investment in knowledge infrastructures; at stake is the future of scholarship.
  3. Dominich, S.: Mathematical foundations of information retrieval (2001) 0.01
    0.008691157 = product of:
      0.017382314 = sum of:
        0.017382314 = product of:
          0.03476463 = sum of:
            0.03476463 = weight(_text_:22 in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03476463 = score(doc=1753,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 12:26:32
  4. Kuhlthau, C.C: Seeking meaning : a process approach to library and information services (2004) 0.01
    0.0077744117 = product of:
      0.015548823 = sum of:
        0.015548823 = product of:
          0.031097647 = sum of:
            0.031097647 = weight(_text_:media in 3347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031097647 = score(doc=3347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.12937489 = fieldWeight in 3347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information Research, 9(3), review no. R129 (T.D. Wilson): "The first edition of this book was published ten years ago and rapidly become something of a classic in the field of information seeking behaviour. It is good to see the second edition which incorporates not only the work the author has done since 1993, but also related work by other researchers. Kuhlthau is one of the most cited authors in the field and her model of the information search process, involving stages in the search and associated feelings, has been used by others in a variety of contexts. However, what makes this book different (as was the case with the first edition) is the author's dedication to the field of practice and the book's sub-title demonstrates her commitment to the transfer of research. In Kuhlthau's case this is the practice of the school library media specialist, but her research has covered students of various ages as well as a wide range of occupational groups. Because the information search model is so well known, I shall concentrate in this review on the relationship between the research findings and practice. It is necessary, however, to begin with the search process model, because this is central. Briefly, the model proposes that the searcher goes through the stages of initiation, selection, exploration, formulation, collection and presentation, and, at each stage, experiences various feelings ranging from optimism and satisfaction to confusion and disappointment. Personally, I occasionally suffer despair, but perhaps that is too extreme for most!
  5. Knowledge organization for a global learning society : Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria (2006) 0.01
    0.0052146944 = product of:
      0.010429389 = sum of:
        0.010429389 = product of:
          0.020858778 = sum of:
            0.020858778 = weight(_text_:22 in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020858778 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051318336 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27.12.2008 11:22:36

Types