-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.03
0.027811704 = product of:
0.05562341 = sum of:
0.05562341 = product of:
0.11124682 = sum of:
0.11124682 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11124682 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051318336 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.03
0.027811704 = product of:
0.05562341 = sum of:
0.05562341 = product of:
0.11124682 = sum of:
0.11124682 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11124682 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051318336 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.: Banking (on) different forms of symbolic capital (2002)
0.02
0.024878116 = product of:
0.049756233 = sum of:
0.049756233 = product of:
0.099512465 = sum of:
0.099512465 = weight(_text_:media in 1263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.099512465 = score(doc=1263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.051318336 = queryNorm
0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 1263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The accrual of symbolic capital is an important aspect of academic life. Successful capital formation is commonly signified by the trappings of scholarly distinction or acknowledged status as a public intellectual. We consider and compare three potential indices of symbolic capital: citation counts, Web hits, and media mentions. Our Eindings, which are domain specific, suggest that public intellectuals are notable by their absence within the information studies community.
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.024582304 = product of:
0.049164608 = sum of:
0.049164608 = product of:
0.098329216 = sum of:
0.098329216 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098329216 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051318336 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Riviera, E.: Scientific communities as autopoietic systems : the reproductive function of citations (2013)
0.02
0.018658588 = product of:
0.037317175 = sum of:
0.037317175 = product of:
0.07463435 = sum of:
0.07463435 = weight(_text_:media in 970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07463435 = score(doc=970,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.051318336 = queryNorm
0.31049973 = fieldWeight in 970, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=970)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The increasing employment of bibliometric measures for assessing, describing, and mapping science inevitably leads to the increasing need for a citation theory constituting a theoretical frame for both citation analysis and the description of citers' behavior. In this article a theoretical model, encompassing both normative and constructivist approaches, is suggested. The conceptualization of scientific communities as autopoietic systems, the components of which are communicative events, allows us to observe the reproductive function of citations conceived as codes and media of scientific communication. Citations, thanks to their constraining and enabling properties, constitute the engine of the structuration process ensuring the reproduction of scientific communities. By referring to Giddens' structuration theory, Luhmann's theory about social systems as communicative networks, Merton's "sociology of science" and his conceptualizations about the functions of citations, as well as Small's proposal about citations as concept-symbols, a sociologically integrated approach to scientometrics is proposed.
-
Wouters, P.; Vries, R. de: Formally citing the Web (2004)
0.02
0.017591486 = product of:
0.03518297 = sum of:
0.03518297 = product of:
0.07036594 = sum of:
0.07036594 = weight(_text_:media in 3093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07036594 = score(doc=3093,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24036849 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.051318336 = queryNorm
0.29274195 = fieldWeight in 3093, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3093)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- How do authors refer to Web-based information sources in their formal scientific publications? It is not yet weIl known how scientists and scholars actually include new types of information sources, available through the new media, in their published work. This article reports an a comparative study of the lists of references in 38 scientific journals in five different scientific and social scientific fields. The fields are sociology, library and information science, biochemistry and biotechnology, neuroscience, and the mathematics of computing. As is weIl known, references, citations, and hyperlinks play different roles in academic publishing and communication. Our study focuses an hyperlinks as attributes of references in formal scholarly publications. The study developed and applied a method to analyze the differential roles of publishing media in the analysis of scientific and scholarly literature references. The present secondary databases that include reference and citation data (the Web of Science) cannot be used for this type of research. By the automated processing and analysis of the full text of scientific and scholarly articles, we were able to extract the references and hyperlinks contained in these references in relation to other features of the scientific and scholarly literature. Our findings show that hyperlinking references are indeed, as expected, abundantly present in the formal literature. They also tend to cite more recent literature than the average reference. The large majority of the references are to Web instances of traditional scientific journals. Other types of Web-based information sources are less weIl represented in the lists of references, except in the case of pure e-journals. We conclude that this can be explained by taking the role of the publisher into account. Indeed, it seems that the shift from print-based to electronic publishing has created new roles for the publisher. By shaping the way scientific references are hyperlinking to other information sources, the publisher may have a large impact an the availability of scientific and scholarly information.
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.02
0.017382314 = product of:
0.03476463 = sum of:
0.03476463 = product of:
0.06952926 = sum of:
0.06952926 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06952926 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051318336 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.014749384 = product of:
0.029498767 = sum of:
0.029498767 = product of:
0.058997534 = sum of:
0.058997534 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058997534 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051318336 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.01
0.013905852 = product of:
0.027811704 = sum of:
0.027811704 = product of:
0.05562341 = sum of:
0.05562341 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05562341 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051318336 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.01
0.0121676205 = product of:
0.024335241 = sum of:
0.024335241 = product of:
0.048670482 = sum of:
0.048670482 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048670482 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051318336 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.01
0.0121676205 = product of:
0.024335241 = sum of:
0.024335241 = product of:
0.048670482 = sum of:
0.048670482 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048670482 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051318336 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.01
0.0121676205 = product of:
0.024335241 = sum of:
0.024335241 = product of:
0.048670482 = sum of:
0.048670482 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048670482 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051318336 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.01
0.010429389 = product of:
0.020858778 = sum of:
0.020858778 = product of:
0.041717555 = sum of:
0.041717555 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041717555 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051318336 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.01
0.010429389 = product of:
0.020858778 = sum of:
0.020858778 = product of:
0.041717555 = sum of:
0.041717555 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041717555 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051318336 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
-
wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003)
0.01
0.010429389 = product of:
0.020858778 = sum of:
0.020858778 = product of:
0.041717555 = sum of:
0.041717555 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041717555 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051318336 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.01
0.010429389 = product of:
0.020858778 = sum of:
0.020858778 = product of:
0.041717555 = sum of:
0.041717555 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041717555 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051318336 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.01
0.010429389 = product of:
0.020858778 = sum of:
0.020858778 = product of:
0.041717555 = sum of:
0.041717555 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041717555 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051318336 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.01
0.010429389 = product of:
0.020858778 = sum of:
0.020858778 = product of:
0.041717555 = sum of:
0.041717555 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041717555 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051318336 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.01
0.010429389 = product of:
0.020858778 = sum of:
0.020858778 = product of:
0.041717555 = sum of:
0.041717555 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041717555 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051318336 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
-
Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014)
0.01
0.010429389 = product of:
0.020858778 = sum of:
0.020858778 = product of:
0.041717555 = sum of:
0.041717555 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041717555 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17970806 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051318336 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 16:52:04
