Search (10692 results, page 1 of 535)

  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.30
    0.29630038 = product of:
      0.59260076 = sum of:
        0.14815019 = product of:
          0.44445056 = sum of:
            0.44445056 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.44445056 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.44445056 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44445056 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.25
    0.246917 = product of:
      0.493834 = sum of:
        0.1234585 = product of:
          0.37037548 = sum of:
            0.37037548 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.37037548 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.37037548 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37037548 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  3. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.24
    0.2364429 = product of:
      0.3152572 = sum of:
        0.074075095 = product of:
          0.22222528 = sum of:
            0.22222528 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22222528 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22222528 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22222528 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.01895682 = product of:
          0.03791364 = sum of:
            0.03791364 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03791364 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  4. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.23
    0.23166233 = product of:
      0.3088831 = sum of:
        0.074075095 = product of:
          0.22222528 = sum of:
            0.22222528 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22222528 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22222528 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22222528 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.012582705 = product of:
          0.02516541 = sum of:
            0.02516541 = weight(_text_:research in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02516541 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT for their abilities to reproduce human-level comprehension and compelling text generation. Two task challenges- summary and question answering- prompt ChatGPT to produce original content (98-99%) from a single text entry and sequential questions initially posed by Turing in 1950. We score the original and generated content against the OpenAI GPT-2 Output Detector from 2019, and establish multiple cases where the generated content proves original and undetectable (98%). The question of a machine fooling a human judge recedes in this work relative to the question of "how would one prove it?" The original contribution of the work presents a metric and simple grammatical set for understanding the writing mechanics of chatbots in evaluating their readability and statistical clarity, engagement, delivery, overall quality, and plagiarism risks. While Turing's original prose scores at least 14% below the machine-generated output, whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's true initial thoughts (the "Lovelace 2.0" test) remains unanswerable.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  5. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.21
    0.20507148 = product of:
      0.27342865 = sum of:
        0.0493834 = product of:
          0.14815019 = sum of:
            0.14815019 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14815019 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.209516 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.209516 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.014529257 = product of:
          0.029058514 = sum of:
            0.029058514 = weight(_text_:research in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029058514 = score(doc=5820,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.21838607 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The successes of information retrieval (IR) in recent decades were built upon bag-of-words representations. Effective as it is, bag-of-words is only a shallow text understanding; there is a limited amount of information for document ranking in the word space. This dissertation goes beyond words and builds knowledge based text representations, which embed the external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases, and provide richer and structured evidence for more advanced information retrieval systems. This thesis research first builds query representations with entities associated with the query. Entities' descriptions are used by query expansion techniques that enrich the query with explanation terms. Then we present a general framework that represents a query with entities that appear in the query, are retrieved by the query, or frequently show up in the top retrieved documents. A latent space model is developed to jointly learn the connections from query to entities and the ranking of documents, modeling the external evidence from knowledge bases and internal ranking features cooperatively. To further improve the quality of relevant entities, a defining factor of our query representations, we introduce learning to rank to entity search and retrieve better entities from knowledge bases. In the document representation part, this thesis research also moves one step forward with a bag-of-entities model, in which documents are represented by their automatic entity annotations, and the ranking is performed in the entity space.
    This proposal includes plans to improve the quality of relevant entities with a co-learning framework that learns from both entity labels and document labels. We also plan to develop a hybrid ranking system that combines word based and entity based representations together with their uncertainties considered. At last, we plan to enrich the text representations with connections between entities. We propose several ways to infer entity graph representations for texts, and to rank documents using their structure representations. This dissertation overcomes the limitation of word based representations with external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases. We believe this thesis research is a solid start towards the new generation of intelligent, semantic, and structured information retrieval.
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  6. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.20
    0.1975336 = product of:
      0.3950672 = sum of:
        0.0987668 = product of:
          0.29630038 = sum of:
            0.29630038 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.29630038 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.29630038 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29630038 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  7. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.20
    0.1975336 = product of:
      0.3950672 = sum of:
        0.0987668 = product of:
          0.29630038 = sum of:
            0.29630038 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.29630038 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.29630038 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29630038 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  8. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.20
    0.19630939 = product of:
      0.26174584 = sum of:
        0.06172925 = product of:
          0.18518774 = sum of:
            0.18518774 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18518774 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18518774 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18518774 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.01482886 = product of:
          0.02965772 = sum of:
            0.02965772 = weight(_text_:research in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02965772 = score(doc=855,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.22288933 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Converting UDC numbers manually to a complex format such as the one mentioned above is an unrealistic expectation; supporting building these representations, as far as possible automatically, is a well-founded requirement. An additional advantage of this approach is that the existing records could also be processed and converted. In my dissertation I would like to prove also that it is possible to design and implement an algorithm that is able to convert pre-coordinated UDC numbers into the introduced format by identifying all their elements and revealing their whole syntactic structure as well. In my dissertation I will discuss a feasible way of building a UDC-specific XML schema for describing the most detailed and complicated UDC numbers (containing not only the common auxiliary signs and numbers, but also the different types of special auxiliaries). The schema definition is available online at: http://piros.udc-interpreter.hu#xsd. The primary goal of my research is to prove that it is possible to support building, retrieving, and analyzing UDC numbers without compromises, by taking the whole syntactic richness of the scheme by storing the UDC numbers reserving the meaning of pre-coordination. The research has also included the implementation of a software that parses UDC classmarks attended to prove that such solution can be applied automatically without any additional effort or even retrospectively on existing collections.
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  9. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.19
    0.19417454 = product of:
      0.3883491 = sum of:
        0.074075095 = product of:
          0.22222528 = sum of:
            0.22222528 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22222528 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.31427398 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31427398 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  10. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.19
    0.19417454 = product of:
      0.3883491 = sum of:
        0.074075095 = product of:
          0.22222528 = sum of:
            0.22222528 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22222528 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.31427398 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31427398 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  11. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.19
    0.19336952 = product of:
      0.38673905 = sum of:
        0.090438664 = weight(_text_:media in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.090438664 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.29630038 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29630038 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  12. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.17
    0.17284189 = product of:
      0.34568378 = sum of:
        0.086420946 = product of:
          0.25926283 = sum of:
            0.25926283 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.25926283 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.25926283 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25926283 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  13. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.17
    0.17284189 = product of:
      0.34568378 = sum of:
        0.086420946 = product of:
          0.25926283 = sum of:
            0.25926283 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.25926283 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.25926283 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25926283 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  14. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.15
    0.14815019 = product of:
      0.29630038 = sum of:
        0.074075095 = product of:
          0.22222528 = sum of:
            0.22222528 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22222528 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22222528 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22222528 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  15. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.15
    0.14815019 = product of:
      0.29630038 = sum of:
        0.074075095 = product of:
          0.22222528 = sum of:
            0.22222528 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22222528 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22222528 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22222528 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  16. Zemmels, D.: Accessing virtual social worlds : a unique methodology for research in new media spaces (2014) 0.13
    0.13486318 = product of:
      0.26972637 = sum of:
        0.24456096 = weight(_text_:media in 1387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24456096 = score(doc=1387,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            1.1195228 = fieldWeight in 1387, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1387)
        0.02516541 = product of:
          0.05033082 = sum of:
            0.05033082 = weight(_text_:research in 1387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05033082 = score(doc=1387,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.37825575 = fieldWeight in 1387, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1387)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Qualitative research into contemporary media engagement is particularly challenged by the complexity and diversity of today's media channels. Further, the very conception of media is rapidly changing: social activities have become closely linked with media engagement. As media saturation in everyday life continues to expand, the study of everyday "practices" in "ordinary people's lives," or habitus , to use Bourdieu's term (1980), constitutes social identity and thus an important object for media research. I offer a reconceptualization of media engagement as a participatory media culture and outline a unique methodological approach developed for the study of this culture in new media spaces. The methodology incorporated use of a laptop to record and analyze the auto-ethnographic reports and actions of a panel of respondents. As an example of an outcome using this methodology, an extensive taxonomy of web sites is outlined, which can be helpful in disaggregating data on new media practices for media research. The methodology could be adapted widely to many disciplines interested in the everyday practices of media engagement.
  17. Vögel unserer Heimat (1999) 0.13
    0.13402842 = product of:
      0.26805684 = sum of:
        0.22382426 = weight(_text_:media in 4084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22382426 = score(doc=4084,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            1.0245968 = fieldWeight in 4084, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4084)
        0.04423258 = product of:
          0.08846516 = sum of:
            0.08846516 = weight(_text_:22 in 4084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08846516 = score(doc=4084,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4084, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4084)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    7.11.1999 18:22:54
    Imprint
    Gerolstein : Media Globe / Koch Media
  18. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.12
    0.1234585 = product of:
      0.246917 = sum of:
        0.06172925 = product of:
          0.18518774 = sum of:
            0.18518774 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18518774 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18518774 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18518774 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  19. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.12
    0.1234585 = product of:
      0.246917 = sum of:
        0.06172925 = product of:
          0.18518774 = sum of:
            0.18518774 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18518774 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18518774 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18518774 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  20. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.12
    0.1234585 = product of:
      0.246917 = sum of:
        0.06172925 = product of:
          0.18518774 = sum of:
            0.18518774 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18518774 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046639 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18518774 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18518774 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 9132
  • m 821
  • el 491
  • s 458
  • r 145
  • x 65
  • b 58
  • i 52
  • ? 12
  • p 7
  • d 6
  • n 5
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • ag 1
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications