-
Jones, P.A.; Bradbeer, P.V.G.: Discovery of optimal weights in a concept selection system (1996)
0.02
0.02450097 = product of:
0.09800388 = sum of:
0.09800388 = sum of:
0.047452353 = weight(_text_:research in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047452353 = score(doc=6974,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046639 = queryNorm
0.35662293 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
0.050551523 = weight(_text_:22 in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050551523 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046639 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Johnson, F.C.: ¬A critical view of system-centered to user-centered evaluation of automatic abstracting research (1999)
0.01
0.008897316 = product of:
0.035589263 = sum of:
0.035589263 = product of:
0.071178526 = sum of:
0.071178526 = weight(_text_:research in 2994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071178526 = score(doc=2994,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046639 = queryNorm
0.5349344 = fieldWeight in 2994, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- New review of information and library research. 5(1999), S.49-63
-
Goh, A.; Hui, S.C.: TES: a text extraction system (1996)
0.01
0.0063189403 = product of:
0.025275761 = sum of:
0.025275761 = product of:
0.050551523 = sum of:
0.050551523 = weight(_text_:22 in 6599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050551523 = score(doc=6599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046639 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6599)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 26. 2.1997 10:22:43
-
Robin, J.; McKeown, K.: Empirically designing and evaluating a new revision-based model for summary generation (1996)
0.01
0.0063189403 = product of:
0.025275761 = sum of:
0.025275761 = product of:
0.050551523 = sum of:
0.050551523 = weight(_text_:22 in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050551523 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046639 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
-
Sparck Jones, K.; Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Introduction: automatic summarizing (1995)
0.01
0.005931544 = product of:
0.023726176 = sum of:
0.023726176 = product of:
0.047452353 = sum of:
0.047452353 = weight(_text_:research in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047452353 = score(doc=2931,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046639 = queryNorm
0.35662293 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Automatic summarizing is a research topic whose time has come. The papers illustrate some of the relevant work already under way. Places these papers in their wider context: why research and development on automatic summarizing is timely, what areas of work and ideas it should draw on, how future investigations and experiments can be effectively framed
-
Johnson, F.: Automatic abstracting research (1995)
0.01
0.005931544 = product of:
0.023726176 = sum of:
0.023726176 = product of:
0.047452353 = sum of:
0.047452353 = weight(_text_:research in 3847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047452353 = score(doc=3847,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046639 = queryNorm
0.35662293 = fieldWeight in 3847, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3847)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Discusses the attraction for researchers of the prospect of automatically generating abstracts but notes that the promise of superseding the human effort has yet to be realized. Notes ways in which progress in automatic abstracting research may come about and suggests a shift in the aim from reproducing the conventional benefits of abstracts to accentuating the advantages to users of the computerized representation of information in large textual databases
-
Su, H.: Automatic abstracting (1996)
0.01
0.0052427943 = product of:
0.020971177 = sum of:
0.020971177 = product of:
0.041942354 = sum of:
0.041942354 = weight(_text_:research in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041942354 = score(doc=150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046639 = queryNorm
0.31521314 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Presents an introductory overview of research into the automatic construction of abstracts from the texts of documents. Discusses the origin and definition of automatic abstracting; reasons for using automatic abstracting; methods of automatic abstracting; and evaluation problems
-
Endres-Niggemeyer, B.; Maier, E.; Sigel, A.: How to implement a naturalistic model of abstracting : four core working steps of an expert abstractor (1995)
0.00
0.0036699555 = product of:
0.014679822 = sum of:
0.014679822 = product of:
0.029359644 = sum of:
0.029359644 = weight(_text_:research in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029359644 = score(doc=2930,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046639 = queryNorm
0.22064918 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- 4 working steps taken from a comprehensive empirical model of expert abstracting are studied in order to prepare an explorative implementation of a simulation model. It aims at explaining the knowledge processing activities during professional summarizing. Following the case-based and holistic strategy of qualitative empirical research, the main features of the simulation system were developed by investigating in detail a small but central test case - 4 working steps where an expert abstractor discovers what the paper is about and drafts the topic sentence of the abstract
-
Salton, G.: Automatic text structuring and summarization (1997)
0.00
0.0036699555 = product of:
0.014679822 = sum of:
0.014679822 = product of:
0.029359644 = sum of:
0.029359644 = weight(_text_:research in 145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029359644 = score(doc=145,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046639 = queryNorm
0.22064918 = fieldWeight in 145, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=145)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Applies the ideas from the automatic link generation research to automatic text summarisation. Using techniques for inter-document link generation, generates intra-document links between passages of a document. Based on the intra-document linkage pattern of a text, characterises the structure of the text. Applies the knowledge of text structure to do automatic text summarisation by passage extraction. Evaluates a set of 50 summaries generated using these techniques by comparing the to paragraph extracts constructed by humans. The automatic summarisation methods perform well, especially in view of the fact that the summaries generates by 2 humans for the same article are surprisingly dissimilar
-
Moens, M.-F.; Uyttendaele, C.; Dumotier, J.: Abstracting of legal cases : the potential of clustering based on the selection of representative objects (1999)
0.00
0.0031456763 = product of:
0.012582705 = sum of:
0.012582705 = product of:
0.02516541 = sum of:
0.02516541 = weight(_text_:research in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02516541 = score(doc=2944,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046639 = queryNorm
0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The SALOMON project automatically summarizes Belgian criminal cases in order to improve access to the large number of existing and future court decisions. SALOMON extracts text units from the case text to form a case summary. Such a case summary facilitates the rapid determination of the relevance of the case or may be employed in text search. an important part of the research concerns the development of techniques for automatic recognition of representative text paragraphs (or sentences) in texts of unrestricted domains. these techniques are employed to eliminate redundant material in the case texts, and to identify informative text paragraphs which are relevant to include in the case summary. An evaluation of a test set of 700 criminal cases demonstrates that the algorithms have an application potential for automatic indexing, abstracting, and text linkage
-
Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Summarizing information (1998)
0.00
0.0031456763 = product of:
0.012582705 = sum of:
0.012582705 = product of:
0.02516541 = sum of:
0.02516541 = weight(_text_:research in 688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02516541 = score(doc=688,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046639 = queryNorm
0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 688, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=688)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Summarizing is the process of reducing the large information size of something like a novel or a scientific paper to a short summary or abstract comprising only the most essential points. Summarizing is frequent in everyday communication, but it is also a professional skill for journalists and others. Automated summarizing functions are urgently needed by Internet users who wish to avoid being overwhelmed by information. This book presents the state of the art and surveys related research; it deals with everyday and professional summarizing as well as computerized approaches. The author focuses in detail on the cognitive pro-cess involved in summarizing and supports this with a multimedia simulation systems on the accompanying CD-ROM
