Search (10692 results, page 2 of 535)

0.1234585 = product of:
  0.246917 = sum of:
    0.06172925 = product of:
      0.18518774 = sum of:
        0.18518774 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18518774 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18518774 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18518774 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_

0.1234585 = product of:
  0.246917 = sum of:
    0.06172925 = product of:
      0.18518774 = sum of:
        0.18518774 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18518774 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18518774 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18518774 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.

0.12059105 = product of:
  0.2411821 = sum of:
    0.22222528 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22222528 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.01895682 = product of:
      0.03791364 = sum of:
        0.03791364 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03791364 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.

Date

10. 1.2013 19:22:47

0.12001766 = product of:
  0.24003533 = sum of:
    0.18746944 = weight(_text_:media in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18746944 = score(doc=2598,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.8581759 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
    0.05256588 = sum of:
      0.020971177 = weight(_text_:research in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.020971177 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046639 = queryNorm
          0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
      0.0315947 = weight(_text_:22 in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0315947 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046639 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyze the disciplinary orientation of scientific publications that were mentioned on different social media platforms, focussing on their differences and similarities with citation counts. Design/methodology/approach - Social media metrics and readership counts, associated with 500,216 publications and their citation data from the Web of Science database, were collected from Altmetric.com and Mendeley. Results are presented through descriptive statistical analyses together with science maps generated with VOSviewer. Findings - The results confirm Mendeley as the most prevalent social media source with similar characteristics to citations in their distribution across fields and their density in average values per publication. The humanities, natural sciences, and engineering disciplines have a much lower presence of social media metrics. Twitter has a stronger focus on general medicine and social sciences. Other sources (blog, Facebook, Google+, and news media mentions) are more prominent in regards to multidisciplinary journals. Originality/value - This paper reinforces the relevance of Mendeley as a social media source for analytical purposes from a disciplinary perspective, being particularly relevant for the social sciences (together with Twitter). Key implications for the use of social media metrics on the evaluation of research performance (e.g. the concentration of some social media metrics, such as blogs, news items, etc., around multidisciplinary journals) are identified.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Footnote

Teil eines Special Issue: Social Media Metrics in Scholarly Communication: exploring tweets, blogs, likes and other altmetrics.

0.11571442 = product of:
  0.23142885 = sum of:
    0.18087733 = weight(_text_:media in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18087733 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.8279993 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
    0.050551523 = product of:
      0.101103045 = sum of:
        0.101103045 = weight(_text_:22 in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101103045 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

30.11.1996 13:22:37

Imprint

Meckenheim : Media Scout Multimedia

0.11571442 = product of:
  0.23142885 = sum of:
    0.18087733 = weight(_text_:media in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18087733 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.8279993 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
    0.050551523 = product of:
      0.101103045 = sum of:
        0.101103045 = weight(_text_:22 in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101103045 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

7.11.1999 18:22:39

Imprint

Gerolstein : USM Koch Media

0.107215606 = product of:
  0.21443121 = sum of:
    0.18087733 = weight(_text_:media in 2432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18087733 = score(doc=2432,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.8279993 = fieldWeight in 2432, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2432)
    0.03355388 = product of:
      0.06710776 = sum of:
        0.06710776 = weight(_text_:research in 2432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06710776 = score(doc=2432,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.504341 = fieldWeight in 2432, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2432)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

School library media quarterly. 18(1990) no.2, S.108-111

0.107215606 = product of:
  0.21443121 = sum of:
    0.18087733 = weight(_text_:media in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18087733 = score(doc=2931,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.8279993 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
    0.03355388 = product of:
      0.06710776 = sum of:
        0.06710776 = weight(_text_:research in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06710776 = score(doc=2931,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.504341 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

Review of educational research. 61(1991) no.2, S.179-211

0.107215606 = product of:
  0.21443121 = sum of:
    0.18087733 = weight(_text_:media in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18087733 = score(doc=1717,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.8279993 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
    0.03355388 = product of:
      0.06710776 = sum of:
        0.06710776 = weight(_text_:research in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06710776 = score(doc=1717,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.504341 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

0.10307655 = product of:
  0.2061531 = sum of:
    0.18087733 = weight(_text_:media in 1739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18087733 = score(doc=1739,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.8279993 = fieldWeight in 1739, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1739)
    0.025275761 = product of:
      0.050551523 = sum of:
        0.050551523 = weight(_text_:22 in 1739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050551523 = score(doc=1739,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1739, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1739)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Der Beitrag plädiert für Social Media (social media) als Untersuchungsgegenstand der Informationsverhaltensforschung. Dabei wird vorgestellt, welche Charakteristika mit Facebook, Twitter und Co. als Informationsquellen verbunden sind, welche Fragestellungen für die Informationsverhaltensforschung im Kontext von social media relevant sind und welche Herausforderungen bei der Untersuchung solcher Plattformen bestehen. Studien und Forschungsarbeiten zur microblogging-Plattform Twitter, werden im Zuge einer allgemeinen Argumentation als Beispiele für konkrete Forschungsinteressen herangezogen.

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 66(2015) H.1, S.22-28

0.09882713 = product of:
  0.19765426 = sum of:
    0.18087733 = weight(_text_:media in 4768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18087733 = score(doc=4768,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.8279993 = fieldWeight in 4768, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4768)
    0.01677694 = product of:
      0.03355388 = sum of:
        0.03355388 = weight(_text_:research in 4768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03355388 = score(doc=4768,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.2521705 = fieldWeight in 4768, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4768)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Proposes an approach to defining units of analysis for Internet communication research. Defines the term Internet computer mediated communication, identifying the characteristics of Internet communication. Develops a set of definitions: media space, media class, media object and media instance, as units of analysis for Internet communication studies. Illustrates these units of analysis with some examples

0.0987668 = product of:
  0.1975336 = sum of:
    0.0493834 = product of:
      0.14815019 = sum of:
        0.14815019 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14815019 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.14815019 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14815019 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39540595 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.

0.09845334 = product of:
  0.19690669 = sum of:
    0.1787451 = weight(_text_:media in 4987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1787451 = score(doc=4987,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.8182386 = fieldWeight in 4987, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4987)
    0.018161573 = product of:
      0.036323145 = sum of:
        0.036323145 = weight(_text_:research in 4987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036323145 = score(doc=4987,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.2729826 = fieldWeight in 4987, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4987)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Recently, social media has become a potentially new way for scholarly journals to disseminate and evaluate research outputs. Scholarly journals have started promoting their research articles to a wide range of audiences via social media platforms. This article aims to investigate the social media presence of scholarly journals across disciplines. We extracted journals from Web of Science and searched for the social media presence of these journals on Facebook and Twitter. Relevant metrics and content relating to the journals' social media accounts were also crawled for data analysis. From our results, the social media presence of scholarly journals lies between 7.1% and 14.2% across disciplines; and it has shown a steady increase in the last decade. The popularity of scholarly journals on social media is distinct across disciplines. Further, we investigated whether social media metrics of journals can predict the Journal Impact Factor (JIF). We found that the number of followers and disciplines have significant effects on the JIF. In addition, a word co-occurrence network analysis was also conducted to identify popular topics discussed by scholarly journals on social media platforms. Finally, we highlight challenges and issues faced in this study and discuss future research directions.

0.09602068 = product of:
  0.19204137 = sum of:
    0.17945866 = weight(_text_:media in 239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17945866 = score(doc=239,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.82150507 = fieldWeight in 239, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=239)
    0.012582705 = product of:
      0.02516541 = sum of:
        0.02516541 = weight(_text_:research in 239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02516541 = score(doc=239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=239)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The study focuses on the web presence of the main Spanish media and seeks to determine whether hyperlink analysis of media and political parties can provide insight into their political orientation. The research included all major national media and political parties in Spain. Inlink and co-link data about these organizations were collected and analyzed using multidimensional scaling (MDS) and other statistical methods. In the MDS map, media are clustered based on their political orientation. There are significantly more co-links between media and parties with the same political orientation than there are between those with different political orientations. Findings from the study suggest the potential of using link analysis to gain new insights into the interactions among media and political parties.

0.0947661 = product of:
  0.1895322 = sum of:
    0.15987448 = weight(_text_:media in 4885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15987448 = score(doc=4885,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.7318549 = fieldWeight in 4885, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4885)
    0.02965772 = product of:
      0.05931544 = sum of:
        0.05931544 = weight(_text_:research in 4885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05931544 = score(doc=4885,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.44577867 = fieldWeight in 4885, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4885)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Presents a guide for lawyers, students, journalists and others who wish to research the body of law that deals with both the print and broadcast media. Specific subjects covered include first amendment constitutional law, defamation, privacy, obscenity, confidentiality of sources, access to information, and broadcasting law

0.0946329 = product of:
  0.1892658 = sum of:
    0.18087733 = weight(_text_:media in 3587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18087733 = score(doc=3587,freq=32.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.8279993 = fieldWeight in 3587, product of:
          5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
            32.0 = termFreq=32.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3587)
    0.00838847 = product of:
      0.01677694 = sum of:
        0.01677694 = weight(_text_:research in 3587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01677694 = score(doc=3587,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.12608525 = fieldWeight in 3587, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3587)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

A fascinating, research-based look at the impact of social media on businesses and consumers around the world, and what's in store for the future Social Media. You've heard the term, even if you don't use the tools. But just how big has social media become? Social media has officially surpassed pornography as the top activity on the Internet. People would rather give up their e-mail than their social network. It is so powerful that it is causing a macro shift in the way we live and conduct business. Brands can now be strengthened or destroyed by the use of social media. Online networking sites are being used as giant, free focus groups. Advertising is less effective at influencing consumers than the opinions of their peers. If you aren't using social media in your business strategy, you are already behind your competition. * Explores how the concept of "Socialnomics" is changing the way businesses produce, market, and sell, eliminating inefficient marketing and middlemen, and making products easier and cheaper for consumers to obtain * Learn how successful businesses are connecting with consumers like never before via Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and other social media sites * A must-read for anyone wanting to learn about, and harness the power of social media, rather than be squashed by it * Author Erik Qualman is a former online marketer for several Top 100 brands and the current Global Vice President of Online Marketing for the world's largest private education firm Socialnomics is essential book for anyone who wants to understand the implications of social media, and how businesses can tap the power of social media to increase their sales, cut their marketing costs, and reach consumers directly.

Content

Introduction: It's a people-driven economy, stupid -- Word of mouth goes world of mouth -- Social media = preventative behavior -- Social media = braggadocian behavior -- Obama's success driven by social media -- I care more about what my neighbor thinks than what Google thinks -- Death of social schizophrenia -- Winners and losers in a 140-character world -- Next step for companies and the "glass house generation" -- Socialnomics summary.

LCSH

Social media

Subject

Social media

0.09422127 = product of:
  0.18844254 = sum of:
    0.090438664 = weight(_text_:media in 3804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.090438664 = score(doc=3804,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 3804, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3804)
    0.09800388 = sum of:
      0.047452353 = weight(_text_:research in 3804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047452353 = score(doc=3804,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046639 = queryNorm
          0.35662293 = fieldWeight in 3804, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3804)
      0.050551523 = weight(_text_:22 in 3804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050551523 = score(doc=3804,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046639 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3804, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3804)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

While technological advances are constantly opening up possibilities for new formats and media, as well as the creation of more traditional products, and while the technology has been strongly promoted, little research has been conducted on the problems of using it cost effectively to create products or on testing and evaluating them: information management. Presents the findings from case studies in a range of business and institutions undertaken as part of a research programme designed to address both the practical and theoretical deficiencies

Source

Managing information. 2(1995) no.12, S.22-25

0.09266133 = product of:
  0.18532266 = sum of:
    0.067829 = weight(_text_:media in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.067829 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.31049973 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
    0.11749366 = sum of:
      0.07958002 = weight(_text_:research in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07958002 = score(doc=3612,freq=20.0), product of:
          0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046639 = queryNorm
          0.59807485 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
            4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
              20.0 = termFreq=20.0
            2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
      0.03791364 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03791364 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16332182 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046639 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

In this paper results of a field study into the need for research information of different user groups are presented: scientists, policy makers and policy researchers, industry and media. Main questions of semi-structured interviews were: what kind of research information users need, what kind of research information resources are used and which information resources are missing at the moment. User groups are missing for a diversity of reasons the overview of research, experts and institutes in the different scientific fields. Especially for the accessibility and transparency of the scientific world these overviews are reported to be needed. Neither Google nor any of the research institutes or policy research organisations are able to present surveys for different science fields at the moment. Giving users the possibility to search, browse and navigate through accessible and more specialised layers of research information might give answers to different user groups simultaneously.

Date

2. 7.2005 12:22:50

Source

Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase

0.09197053 = product of:
  0.18394107 = sum of:
    0.16614644 = weight(_text_:media in 3781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16614644 = score(doc=3781,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.76056594 = fieldWeight in 3781, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3781)
    0.017794631 = product of:
      0.035589263 = sum of:
        0.035589263 = weight(_text_:research in 3781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035589263 = score(doc=3781,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.2674672 = fieldWeight in 3781, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3781)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Social media has become integrated into the fabric of the scholarly communication system in fundamental ways, principally through scholarly use of social media platforms and the promotion of new indicators on the basis of interactions with these platforms. Research and scholarship in this area has accelerated since the coining and subsequent advocacy for altmetrics-that is, research indicators based on social media activity. This review provides an extensive account of the state-of-the art in both scholarly use of social media and altmetrics. The review consists of 2 main parts: the first examines the use of social media in academia, reviewing the various functions these platforms have in the scholarly communication process and the factors that affect this use. The second part reviews empirical studies of altmetrics, discussing the various interpretations of altmetrics, data collection and methodological limitations, and differences according to platform. The review ends with a critical discussion of the implications of this transformation in the scholarly communication system.

0.09184693 = product of:
  0.18369386 = sum of:
    0.15826766 = weight(_text_:media in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15826766 = score(doc=673,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.21845107 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046639 = queryNorm
        0.7244994 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
    0.0254262 = product of:
      0.0508524 = sum of:
        0.0508524 = weight(_text_:research in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0508524 = score(doc=673,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13306029 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046639 = queryNorm
            0.38217562 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The appropriateness of utilising a training resource programme consisting of a mix of media and technologies for the training of cataloguing students is evaluated. The findings from reported research and evaluation of the training resource programme made it possible to identify advantages and disadvantages of using such a programme. The results of the research enabled the researcher to derive guidelines for the design and development of a training resource programme consisting of a mix of media and technologies. The use of media and technologies, in a training research programme for cataloguing training, can be utilised in training cataloguing students in contact classes, distance education as well as in-service training.