Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
lcsh's%3a%22Statistics %2f graphic methods%22 5

Aliprand, J.M.: Linking of alternate graphic representation in USMARC authority records (1993) 0.06
```
0.061921705 = product of:
  0.24768682 = sum of:
    0.24768682 = weight(_text_:graphic in 8341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24768682 = score(doc=8341,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045191016 = queryNorm
        0.8277142 = fieldWeight in 8341, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8341)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Discusses the facilities in USMARC for linking fields containing non Roman scripts to their Romanized counterparts. In USMARC authority records, the 880 field: Alternate graphic representation (which contains the authentic non Roman text); is linked to the field that contains the same information in romanized form. The 880 field was added to the USMARC Format for Bibliographic Data in 1984 and to the USMARC Format for Authority Data in 1991. The new data elements in the Authority Format are modeled on those of the Bibliographic Format
Aliprand, J.M.: Arabic script on RLIN (1992) 0.04
```
0.04378526 = product of:
  0.17514104 = sum of:
    0.17514104 = weight(_text_:graphic in 4561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17514104 = score(doc=4561,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045191016 = queryNorm
        0.5852823 = fieldWeight in 4561, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4561)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Input, retrieval and display of each Japanese, Arabic, Chinese, Korean, Persian, Hebrew and Yiddish (JACKPHY) language in its correct script is now available through the Research Libraries Information network (RLIN). Arabic was put into production in Nov 91 completing JACKPHY support. Discusses the implementation of non-Roman scripts, computer encoding of Arabic characters, the Research Libraries Group representation of Arabic script following USMARC specifications, graphic representation of Arabic script, input of Arabic script, non-Roman data in bibliographic records, RLIN output, Arabic and USMARC and the RLIN database
Aliprand, J.M.: Linkage in USMARC bibliographic records (1993) 0.04
```
0.0383121 = product of:
  0.1532484 = sum of:
    0.1532484 = weight(_text_:graphic in 544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1532484 = score(doc=544,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045191016 = queryNorm
        0.51212204 = fieldWeight in 544, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=544)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

USMARC records that contain non Roman scripts exhibit 2 types of linkage between the Latin script fields and their alternate graphic representation (the non Roman text): linkage based on systematic romanization, and linkage between names for the same person, place or thing. The lack of rules for linkage inhibits copy cataloging and causes inconsistency on record displays. To determine an unequivocal basis for linkage, 4 types of field association in bibliographic records are examined: hierarchy of components; functional equivalence; semantic equivalence; and systematic romanization. Concludes that semantic equivalence is the ideal basis for linkage and can be accomodated by the current structure of the USMARC format for bibliographic data

Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000) 0.01

0.0076534487 = product of:
  0.030613795 = sum of:
    0.030613795 = product of:
      0.06122759 = sum of:
        0.06122759 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06122759 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Aliprand, J.M.: Scripts, languages, and authority control (2005) 0.01

0.006122759 = product of:
  0.024491036 = sum of:
    0.024491036 = product of:
      0.048982073 = sum of:
        0.048982073 = weight(_text_:22 in 455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048982073 = score(doc=455,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 455, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=455)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Years

Types

Themes