Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

0.034499135 = product of:
  0.06899827 = sum of:
    0.05473157 = weight(_text_:graphic in 1150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05473157 = score(doc=1150,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045191016 = queryNorm
        0.18290073 = fieldWeight in 1150, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1150)
    0.0142667005 = product of:
      0.028533401 = sum of:
        0.028533401 = weight(_text_:methods in 1150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028533401 = score(doc=1150,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.15704739 = fieldWeight in 1150, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1150)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Interdisciplinarity draws its strength from the ontological view that reality may be explained from various different angles that permit interpretation of phenomena in a more complete way without becoming mere eclecticism. From an epistemological point of view, interdisciplinarity attempts to unify the field of action of the disciplines that study social facts and phenomena. It has no intention of achieving a priori integration of the paradigms of knowledge. Rather, its efforts are aimed at the enrichment and rational exchanging of the methods of various disciplines, to some extent independently of the categories specific to each science, in order to improve study of reality. Transdisciplinarity, for its part, simultaneously covers what lies between disciplines, cuts across various disciplines or goes beyond any discipline. Its aim is to understand the present world, one essential feature of which is the unity of knowledge. Transdisciplinary research is in no way antagonistic to multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research, but rather is complementary to it.

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: García Marco, F.J. et al.: Proyectos internacionales de reforma y ampliación de las normas sobre tesauros para su adaptación a los nuevos contextos de integración e interoperabilidad en el entorno digital; De Beer, C.S.: Knowledge is everywhere: a philosophical exploration; Hajdu Barát, Á.: Heisenberg and the structure of conceptcontent and dimension; López-Huertas, M.J.: Gestión del conocimiento multidimensional en los sistemas de organización del conocimiento; Sánchez Gómez, L., Campos Havidich, M.: The idealist paradigm in knowledge representation; González Alcaide, G., et al.: Ámbitos de investigación y colaboració entre disciplinas en la producción científica española sobre abuso de sustancias; Yukimo Kobashio, N., Santos, R.N.M.: Information organization and representation by graphic devices: an interdisciplinary approach; Gnoli, C., Bosch, M., Mazzocchi, F.: A new relationship for multidisciplinary knowledge organization systems: dependence; González de Gómez, M.N., Goyannes Dill Orrico, E., Graciosa, L.: Grupos de investigación interdisciplinaria: flujos transversals de información; Rodríguez López, M. Del C., Santos de Paz, L., Gallego Lorenzo, J., Morán Suárez, M.A.: La red social conocimiento para la inmigración: el caso de Castilla y León; Ferrer Morillo, L.M., Portillo de Hernández, R.: Tesauros transdisciplinarios: del reduccionismo científico a la unidad del conocimiento; Guimarães, J.A.C. et al.: Los valores éticos en organización y representación del conocimiento (ORC); Davies, S.: Mediating knowledge across the activities of information science; Borrego Díaz, J., Chávez González, A.M.: Anomalías en ontologías provisionales; Bräscher, M., Monteiro, F., Silva, A.: Life cycle assessment ontology; Szotak, R.: Interdisciplinarity and the classification of scholarly documents by phenomena, theories and methods; Polsinelli Rubi, M., Spotti Lopes Fujita, M.: La política de indización en la perspectiva del conocimiento organizacional; Gutiérrez García, B., Rodríguez Yunta, L., Román Román, A.: Bases de datos bibliográficas y clasificación de revistas científicas: problemas de la interisciplinariedad para la automatización de procesos; Rodríguez Isaías García, F.,

0.008070464 = product of:
  0.032281857 = sum of:
    0.032281857 = product of:
      0.064563714 = sum of:
        0.064563714 = weight(_text_:methods in 1119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064563714 = score(doc=1119,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.35535768 = fieldWeight in 1119, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1119)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Originaltitel: Spaces of significance and knowledge representation: an analysis on theories and methods of the organization of concepts in Information Science

0.006122759 = product of:
  0.024491036 = sum of:
    0.024491036 = product of:
      0.048982073 = sum of:
        0.048982073 = weight(_text_:22 in 1105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048982073 = score(doc=1105,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1105, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1105)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

29.12.2007 19:28:22