-
Allen, R.B.: Navigating and searching in digital library catalogs (1994)
0.03
0.027365785 = product of:
0.10946314 = sum of:
0.10946314 = weight(_text_:graphic in 2414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10946314 = score(doc=2414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.36580145 = fieldWeight in 2414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2414)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Two interfaces are described for navigating large collections of document and book records. An Online Public Access Catalog interface uses a classification hierarchy to facilitate browsing and searching. The system has been implemented and currently runs with over 50,000 book records. Interface widgets allow the hierarchy to be displayed and traversed easily. For example, the Book Shelf dynamically updates itself to reflect searches and attribute selections. A second interface, not yet fully implemented, allows access to the ACM Computing Reviews classification. By browsing a graphic structure such as a classification hierarchy or term network, the user can select or negate terms to incrementally enlarge or refine the query. A number of systems have been proposed that utilise this type of interface: Allen [1] allows users to traverse sections of a classification hierarchy that are adjacent to documents retrieved by a search; Doyle [6] discusses a graph-based interactive browsing environment; Croft [4] extends Doyle's termbased graph with vertices and edges representing individual documents and their degrees of similarity to each other; Frei and Jauslin [7] use tree structures to represent both system command menus and document indexing structures; and Godin [10] and Pedersen [16] model a collection's conceptual structure with termdocument lattices.
-
Classification research for knowledge representation and organization : Proc. of the 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991 (1992)
0.02
0.02322064 = product of:
0.09288256 = sum of:
0.09288256 = weight(_text_:graphic in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09288256 = score(doc=2072,freq=4.0), product of:
0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.31039283 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: SVENONIUS, E.: Classification: prospects, problems, and possibilities; BEALL, J.: Editing the Dewey Decimal Classification online: the evolution of the DDC database; BEGHTOL, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: Concept relation structures and their graphic display; FUGMANN, R.: Illusory goals in information science research; GILCHRIST, A.: UDC: the 1990's and beyond; GREEN, R.: The expression of syntagmatic relationships in indexing: are frame-based index languages the answer?; HUMPHREY, S.M.: Use and management of classification systems for knowledge-based indexing; MIKSA, F.L.: The concept of the universe of knowledge and the purpose of LIS classification; SCOTT, M. u. A.F. FONSECA: Methodology for functional appraisal of records and creation of a functional thesaurus; ALBRECHTSEN, H.: PRESS: a thesaurus-based information system for software reuse; AMAESHI, B.: A preliminary AAT compatible African art thesaurus; CHATTERJEE, A.: Structures of Indian classification systems of the pre-Ranganathan era and their impact on the Colon Classification; COCHRANE, P.A.: Indexing and searching thesauri, the Janus or Proteus of information retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: A general versus a special algorithm in the graphic display of thesauri; DAHLBERG, I.: The basis of a new universal classification system seen from a philosophy of science point of view: DRABENSTOTT, K.M., RIESTER, L.C. u. B.A.DEDE: Shelflisting using expert systems; FIDEL, R.: Thesaurus requirements for an intermediary expert system; GREEN, R.: Insights into classification from the cognitive sciences: ramifications for index languages; GROLIER, E. de: Towards a syndetic information retrieval system; GUENTHER, R.: The USMARC format for classification data: development and implementation; HOWARTH, L.C.: Factors influencing policies for the adoption and integration of revisions to classification schedules; HUDON, M.: Term definitions in subject thesauri: the Canadian literacy thesaurus experience; HUSAIN, S.: Notational techniques for the accomodation of subjects in Colon Classification 7th edition: theoretical possibility vis-à-vis practical need; KWASNIK, B.H. u. C. JORGERSEN: The exploration by means of repertory grids of semantic differences among names of official documents; MICCO, M.: Suggestions for automating the Library of Congress Classification schedules; PERREAULT, J.M.: An essay on the prehistory of general categories (II): G.W. Leibniz, Conrad Gesner; REES-POTTER, L.K.: How well do thesauri serve the social sciences?; REVIE, C.W. u. G. SMART: The construction and the use of faceted classification schema in technical domains; ROCKMORE, M.: Structuring a flexible faceted thsaurus record for corporate information retrieval; ROULIN, C.: Sub-thesauri as part of a metathesaurus; SMITH, L.C.: UNISIST revisited: compatibility in the context of collaboratories; STILES, W.G.: Notes concerning the use chain indexing as a possible means of simulating the inductive leap within artificial intelligence; SVENONIUS, E., LIU, S. u. B. SUBRAHMANYAM: Automation in chain indexing; TURNER, J.: Structure in data in the Stockshot database at the National Film Board of Canada; VIZINE-GOETZ, D.: The Dewey Decimal Classification as an online classification tool; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Restructuring UDC: problems and possibilies; WILSON, A.: The hierarchy of belief: ideological tendentiousness in universal classification; WILSON, B.F.: An evaluation of the systematic botany schedule of the Universal Decimal Classification (English full edition, 1979); ZENG, L.: Research and development of classification and thesauri in China; CONFERENCE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
-
Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999)
0.02
0.021289835 = product of:
0.08515934 = sum of:
0.08515934 = sum of:
0.048422787 = weight(_text_:methods in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048422787 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.03673655 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03673655 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A fascinating, broad-ranging article about classification, knowledge, and how they relate. Hierarchies, trees, paradigms (a two-dimensional classification that can look something like a spreadsheet), and facets are covered, with descriptions of how they work and how they can be used for knowledge discovery and creation. Kwasnick outlines how to make a faceted classification: choose facets, develop facets, analyze entities using the facets, and make a citation order. Facets are useful for many reasons: they do not require complete knowledge of the entire body of material; they are hospitable, flexible, and expressive; they do not require a rigid background theory; they can mix theoretical structures and models; and they allow users to view things from many perspectives. Facets do have faults: it can be hard to pick the right ones; it is hard to show relations between them; and it is difficult to visualize them. The coverage of the other methods is equally thorough and there is much to consider for anyone putting a classification on the web.
- Source
- Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
-
Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984)
0.01
0.012245518 = product of:
0.048982073 = sum of:
0.048982073 = product of:
0.097964145 = sum of:
0.097964145 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097964145 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
-
Day, M.; Koch, T.: ¬The role of classification schemes in Internet resource description and discovery : DESIRE - Development of a European Service for Information on Research and Education. Specification for resource description methods, part 3 (1997)
0.01
0.010088081 = product of:
0.040352322 = sum of:
0.040352322 = product of:
0.080704644 = sum of:
0.080704644 = weight(_text_:methods in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.080704644 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.4441971 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Frost, C.O.; Janes, J.: ¬An empirical test of gopher searching using three organizational schemes : background and methods (1994)
0.01
0.009986691 = product of:
0.039946765 = sum of:
0.039946765 = product of:
0.07989353 = sum of:
0.07989353 = weight(_text_:methods in 3031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07989353 = score(doc=3031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.43973273 = fieldWeight in 3031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3031)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This paper describes the background underlying and the methods to be used in an investigation of use of the gopher protocol for browsing and searching for information via the Internet. Networked information resources are notoriously difficult to find; gopher is one attempt to facilitate the processes of organization and retrieval in that environment. Our project will design classification schemes based on traditional library models (i.e. Dewey and Library of Congress) and compare use of these to use of an existing gopher. We describe the project, the research questions, literature on related issues, the construction of the classification schemes, and the experimental methodology used
-
Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000)
0.01
0.009184138 = product of:
0.03673655 = sum of:
0.03673655 = product of:
0.0734731 = sum of:
0.0734731 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0734731 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:42:47
-
Wheatley, A.: Subject trees on the Internet : a new role for bibliographic classification? (2000)
0.01
0.008070464 = product of:
0.032281857 = sum of:
0.032281857 = product of:
0.064563714 = sum of:
0.064563714 = weight(_text_:methods in 6108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064563714 = score(doc=6108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.35535768 = fieldWeight in 6108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Internet information retrieval is largely the preserve of search engines and the even more popular subject trees. Subject trees have adapted principles of conventional bibliographic classification for structuring hierarchic browsing interfaces, thus providing easily used pathways to their selected resources. This combination of browsing and selectivity is especially valuable to untrained users. For the forseeable future, it appears that subject trees will remain the Internet's only practicable use of classificatory methods for information retrieval
-
Dunsire, G.: Digital decimals : Dewey and online libraries (2008)
0.01
0.008070464 = product of:
0.032281857 = sum of:
0.032281857 = product of:
0.064563714 = sum of:
0.064563714 = weight(_text_:methods in 2164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064563714 = score(doc=2164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.35535768 = fieldWeight in 2164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2164)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The paper discusses practical methods of apply DDC to digital library services arising from recent technical developments. These include the use of DDC summaries to create hierarchical browsing and tag cloud interfaces, the utility of DDC as a switching language between different subject heading and classification schemes, and the development of terminology servers for interoperability with digital libraries. The focus is on services based in Europe.
-
Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990)
0.01
0.0076534487 = product of:
0.030613795 = sum of:
0.030613795 = product of:
0.06122759 = sum of:
0.06122759 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06122759 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 8. 1.2007 12:22:40
-
Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009)
0.01
0.0076534487 = product of:
0.030613795 = sum of:
0.030613795 = product of:
0.06122759 = sum of:
0.06122759 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06122759 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 8.2009 12:54:24
-
National Seminar on Classification in the Digital Environment : Papers contributed to the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment, Bangalore, 9-11 August 2001 (2001)
0.01
0.007096612 = product of:
0.028386448 = sum of:
0.028386448 = sum of:
0.016140928 = weight(_text_:methods in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016140928 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.08883942 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.012245518 = weight(_text_:22 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012245518 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 2. 1.2004 10:35:22
- Footnote
- SELVI (Knowledge Classification of Digital Information Materials with Special Reference to Clustering Technique) finds that it is essential to classify digital material since the amount of material that is becoming available is growing. Selvi suggests using automated classification to "group together those digital information materials or documents that are "most similar" (p. 65). This can be attained by using Cluster analysis methods. PRADHAN and THULASI (A Study of the Use of Classification and Indexing Systems by Web Resource Directories) compare and contrast the classificatory structures of Google, Yahoo, and Looksmart's directories and compare the directories to Dewey Decimal Classification, Library of Congress Classification and Colon Classification's classificatory structures. They find differentes between the directories' and the bibliographic classification systems' classificatory structures and principles. These differentes stem from the fact that bibliographic classification systems are used to "classify academic resources for the research community" (p. 83) and directories "aim to categorize a wider breath of information groups, entertainment, recreation, govt. information, commercial information" (p. 83). NEELAMEGHAN (Hierarchy, Hierarchical Relation and Hierarchical Arrangement) reviews the concept of hierarchy and the formation of hierarchical structures across a variety of domains. NEELAMEGHAN and PRADAD (Digitized Schemes for Subject Classification and Thesauri: Complementary Roles) demonstrate how thesaural relationships (NT, BT, and RT) can be applied to a classification scheme, the Colon Classification in this Gase. NEELAMEGHAN and ASUNDI (Metadata Framework for Describing Embodied Knowledge and Subject Content) propose to use the Generalized Facet Structure framework which is based an Ranganathan's General Theory of Knowledge Classification as a framework for describing the content of documents in a metadata element set for the representation of web documents. CHUDAMANI (Classified Catalogue as a Tool for Subject Based Information Retrieval in both Traditional and Electronic Library Environment) explains why the classified catalogue is superior to the alphabetic cata logue and argues that the same is true in the digital environment.
-
Hajdu Barát, A.: Usability and the user interfaces of classical information retrieval languages (2006)
0.01
0.0070616566 = product of:
0.028246626 = sum of:
0.028246626 = product of:
0.056493253 = sum of:
0.056493253 = weight(_text_:methods in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056493253 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.31093797 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This paper examines some traditional information searching methods and their role in Hungarian OPACs. What challenges are there in the digital and online environment? How do users work with them and do they give users satisfactory results? What kinds of techniques are users employing? In this paper I examine the user interfaces of UDC, thesauri, subject headings etc. in the Hungarian library. The key question of the paper is whether a universal system or local solutions is the best approach for searching in the digital environment.
-
Fagan, J.C.: Usability studies of faceted browsing : a literature review (2010)
0.01
0.0070616566 = product of:
0.028246626 = sum of:
0.028246626 = product of:
0.056493253 = sum of:
0.056493253 = weight(_text_:methods in 4396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056493253 = score(doc=4396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.31093797 = fieldWeight in 4396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4396)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Faceted browsing is a common feature of new library catalog interfaces. But to what extent does it improve user performance in searching within today's library catalog systems? This article reviews the literature for user studies involving faceted browsing and user studies of "next-generation" library catalogs that incorporate faceted browsing. Both the results and the methods of these studies are analyzed by asking, What do we currently know about faceted browsing? How can we design better studies of faceted browsing in library catalogs? The article proposes methodological considerations for practicing librarians and provides examples of goals, tasks, and measurements for user studies of faceted browsing in library catalogs.
-
Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010)
0.01
0.006494167 = product of:
0.025976667 = sum of:
0.025976667 = product of:
0.051953334 = sum of:
0.051953334 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051953334 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
- Date
- 22. 1.2010 15:06:54
-
Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003)
0.01
0.006122759 = product of:
0.024491036 = sum of:
0.024491036 = product of:
0.048982073 = sum of:
0.048982073 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048982073 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 30. 7.2004 12:22:52
-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.01
0.006122759 = product of:
0.024491036 = sum of:
0.024491036 = product of:
0.048982073 = sum of:
0.048982073 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048982073 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
-
Van Dijck, P.: Introduction to XFML (2003)
0.01
0.006122759 = product of:
0.024491036 = sum of:
0.024491036 = product of:
0.048982073 = sum of:
0.048982073 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048982073 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html
-
Neelameghan, A.: S.R. Ranganathan's general theory of knowledge classification in designing, indexing and retrieving from specialised databases (1997)
0.01
0.0060528484 = product of:
0.024211394 = sum of:
0.024211394 = product of:
0.048422787 = sum of:
0.048422787 = weight(_text_:methods in 3) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048422787 = score(doc=3,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 3, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Summarizes some experiences of the application of the priciples and postulates of S.R. Ranganathan's General Theory of Knowledge Classification, incorporating the freely faceted approach and analytico synthetic methods, to the design and development of specialized databases, including indexing, user interfaces and retrieval. Enumerates some of the earlier instances of the facet method in machine based systems, beginning with Hollerith's punched card system for the data processing of the US Census. Elaborates on Ranganathan's holistic approach to information systems and services provided by his normative principles. Notes similarities between the design of databases and faceted classification systems. Examples from working systems are given to demonstrate the usefulness of selected canons and principles of classification and the analytico synthetic methodology to database design. The examples are mostly operational database systems developed using Unesco's Micro CDS-ISIS software
-
Spiteri, L.: ¬A simplified model for facet analysis : Ranganathan 101 (1998)
0.01
0.0060528484 = product of:
0.024211394 = sum of:
0.024211394 = product of:
0.048422787 = sum of:
0.048422787 = weight(_text_:methods in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048422787 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.045191016 = queryNorm
0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Ranganathan's canons, principles, and postulates can easily confuse readers, especially because he revised and added to them in various editions of his many books. The Classification Research Group, who drew on Ranganathan's work as their basis for classification theory but developed it in their own way, has never clearly organized all their equivalent canons and principles. In this article Spiteri gathers the fundamental rules from both systems and compares and contrasts them. She makes her own clearer set of principles for constructing facets, stating the subject of a document, and designing notation. Spiteri's "simplified model" is clear and understandable, but certainly not simplistic. The model does not include methods for making a faceted system, but will serve as a very useful guide in how to turn initial work into a rigorous classification. Highly recommended
