Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Volltextretrieval"
  1. Poler, E.M.: Overcoming limitations in database searches (1992) 0.01
    0.010088081 = product of:
      0.040352322 = sum of:
        0.040352322 = product of:
          0.080704644 = sum of:
            0.080704644 = weight(_text_:methods in 2329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.080704644 = score(doc=2329,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.4441971 = fieldWeight in 2329, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2329)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the advantages of full text databases and full text searching, particularly in the context of law databases, the drawbacks to such searching in terms of recall, precision and errors, and methods of overcoming some of these problems
  2. Mallinson, P.: Developments in free text retrieval systems (1993) 0.01
    0.010088081 = product of:
      0.040352322 = sum of:
        0.040352322 = product of:
          0.080704644 = sum of:
            0.080704644 = weight(_text_:methods in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.080704644 = score(doc=4931,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.4441971 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a typical traditional 1989 free text system and discusses developments in data storage, in search strategy and in the storage and retrieval of real time data. Outlines the following areas in which free text systems are likely to develop: standards; integration; dynamic data exchange; improved user interfaces; and better retrieval methods
  3. Cochrane, P.A.: Subject access - free text and controlled : the case of Papua New Guinea (1985) 0.01
    0.008070464 = product of:
      0.032281857 = sum of:
        0.032281857 = product of:
          0.064563714 = sum of:
            0.064563714 = weight(_text_:methods in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064563714 = score(doc=1459,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.35535768 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The online catalogue can provide the user with efficient and effective access through a variety of access points. New interests in subject heading is indicated. Keyword access and free text searching are considered alternatice methods. An investigation is suggested into the symbiotic relationship between classification and subject heading
  4. Ashford, J.H.: Full text retrieval in document management : a review (1995) 0.01
    0.008070464 = product of:
      0.032281857 = sum of:
        0.032281857 = product of:
          0.064563714 = sum of:
            0.064563714 = weight(_text_:methods in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064563714 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.35535768 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Full text management which applied to document management tends to be centred on text storage and retrieval. Recent developments are concerned with integration with relational database management system products to deliver document management services offering both the flexibility of text retrieval and the ability to support process based funnctions. There has been a move towards client server architectures, more user friendly user interfaces and more flexible and easier to understand retrieval. Advocates caution in choosing tasks for full text methods. Identifies document management functions for which the combined use of database management systems or special purpose tools should be considered
  5. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.01
    0.006122759 = product of:
      0.024491036 = sum of:
        0.024491036 = product of:
          0.048982073 = sum of:
            0.048982073 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048982073 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
  6. Reinisch, F.: Wer suchet - der findet? : oder Die Überwindung der sprachlichen Grenzen bei der Suche in Volltextdatenbanken (2000) 0.01
    0.006122759 = product of:
      0.024491036 = sum of:
        0.024491036 = product of:
          0.048982073 = sum of:
            0.048982073 = weight(_text_:22 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048982073 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 17:48:06
  7. Zillmann, H.: OSIRIS und eLib : Information Retrieval und Search Engines in Full-text Databases (2001) 0.01
    0.006122759 = product of:
      0.024491036 = sum of:
        0.024491036 = product of:
          0.048982073 = sum of:
            0.048982073 = weight(_text_:22 in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048982073 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2001 12:22:31
  8. Dambeck, H.; Engler, T.: Gesucht und gefunden : Neun Volltext-Suchprogramme für den Desktop (2002) 0.01
    0.006122759 = product of:
      0.024491036 = sum of:
        0.024491036 = product of:
          0.048982073 = sum of:
            0.048982073 = weight(_text_:22 in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048982073 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    c't. 2002, H.22, S.190-197
  9. Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval : Evaluation and implications (1986) 0.01
    0.0060528484 = product of:
      0.024211394 = sum of:
        0.024211394 = product of:
          0.048422787 = sum of:
            0.048422787 = weight(_text_:methods in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048422787 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Recently, a detailed evaluation of a large, operational full-text document retrieval system was reported in the literature. Values of precision and recall were estimated usind traditional statistical sampling methods and blind evaluation procedures. The results of this evaluation demonstrated that the system tested was retrieving less then 20% of the relevant documents when the searchers believed it was retrieving over 75% of the relevant documents. This evaluation is described including some data not reported in the original article. Also discussed are the implications which this study has for how the subjects of documents should be represented, as well as the importance of rigorous retrieval evaluations for the furtherhance of information retrieval research
  10. Pearce, C.; Nicholas, C.: TELLTALE: Experiments in a dynamic hypertext environment for degraded and multilingual data (1996) 0.01
    0.0060528484 = product of:
      0.024211394 = sum of:
        0.024211394 = product of:
          0.048422787 = sum of:
            0.048422787 = weight(_text_:methods in 4071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048422787 = score(doc=4071,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 4071, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4071)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Methods and tools for finding documents relevant to a user's needs in a document corpora can be found in the information retrieval, library science, and hypertext communities. Typically, these systems provide retrieval capabilities for fairly static copora, their algorithms are dependent on the language for which they are written, e.g. English, and they do not perform well when presented with misspelled words or text that has been degraded by OCR techniques. In this article, we present experimentation results for the TELLTALE system. TELLTALE is a dynamic hypertext environment that provides full-text search from a hypertext-style user interface for text corpora that may be garbled by OCR or transmission errors, and that may contain languages other than English. TELLTALE uses several techniques based on n-grams (n character sequences of text). With these results we show that the dynamic linkage mechanisms in TELLTALE are tolerant of garbles in up to 30% of the characters in the body of the texts
  11. Pirkola, A.; Jarvelin, K.: ¬The effect of anaphor and ellipsis resolution on proximity searching in a text database (1995) 0.01
    0.0050440403 = product of:
      0.020176161 = sum of:
        0.020176161 = product of:
          0.040352322 = sum of:
            0.040352322 = weight(_text_:methods in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040352322 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.22209854 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    So far, methods for ellipsis and anaphor resolution have been developed and the effects of anaphor resolution have been analyzed in the context of statistical information retrieval of scientific abstracts. No significant improvements has been observed. Analyzes the effects of ellipsis and anaphor resolution on proximity searching in a full text database. Anaphora and ellipsis are classified on the basis of the type of their correlates / antecedents rather than, as traditional, on the basis of their own linguistic type. The classification differentiates proper names and common nouns of basic words, compound words, and phrases. The study was carried out in a newspaper article database containing 55.000 full text articles. A set of 154 keyword pairs in different categories was created. Human resolution of keyword ellipsis and anaphora was performed to identify sentences and paragraphs which would match proximity searches after resolution. Findings indicate that ellipsis and anaphor resolution is most relevant for proper name phrases and only marginal in the other keyword categories. Therefore the recall effect of restricted resolution of proper name phrases only was analyzed for keyword pairs containing at least 1 proper name phrase. Findings indicate a recall increase of 38.2% in sentence searches, and 28.8% in paragraph searches when proper name ellipsis were resolved. The recall increase was 17.6% sentence searches, and 19.8% in paragraph searches when proper name anaphora were resolved. Some simple and computationally justifiable resolution method might be developed only for proper name phrases to support keyword based full text information retrieval. Discusses elements of such a method
  12. Ellis, D.; Furner, J.; Willett, P.: On the creation of hypertext links in full-text documents : measurement of retrieval effectiveness (1996) 0.01
    0.0050440403 = product of:
      0.020176161 = sum of:
        0.020176161 = product of:
          0.040352322 = sum of:
            0.040352322 = weight(_text_:methods in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040352322 = score(doc=4214,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.22209854 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    An important stage in the process or retrieval of objects from a hypertext database is the creation of a set of internodal links that are intended to represent the relationships existing between objects; this operation is often undertaken manually, just as index terms are often manually assigned to documents in a conventional retrieval system. In an earlier article (1994), the results were published of a study in which several different sets of links were inserted, each by a different person, between the paragraphs of each of a number of full-text documents. These results showed little similarity between the link-sets, a finding that was comparable with those of studies of inter-indexer consistency, which suggest that there is generally only a low level of agreement between the sets of index terms assigned to a document by different indexers. In this article, a description is provided of an investigation into the nature of the relationship existing between (i) the levels of inter-linker consistency obtaining among the group of hypertext databases used in our earlier experiments, and (ii) the levels of effectiveness of a number of searches carried out in those databases. An account is given of the implementation of the searches and of the methods used in the calculation of numerical values expressing their effectiveness. Analysis of the results of a comparison between recorded levels of consistency and those of effectiveness does not allow us to draw conclusions about the consistency - effectiveness relationship that are equivalent to those drawn in comparable studies of inter-indexer consistency
  13. Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989) 0.00
    0.004592069 = product of:
      0.018368276 = sum of:
        0.018368276 = product of:
          0.03673655 = sum of:
            0.03673655 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03673655 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191016 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    9. 1.1996 10:22:31