Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bianchini, C."
  1. Bianchini, C.; Zappalà, P.: ISBD and mechanical musical devices : a case study of the Department of Musicology and Cultural Heritage, University of Pavia, Italy (2014) 0.03
    0.026922192 = product of:
      0.053844385 = sum of:
        0.053844385 = product of:
          0.10768877 = sum of:
            0.10768877 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10768877 = score(doc=2002,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 2002, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The collection of nearly 1,000 piano rolls housed within the Department of Musicology and Cultural Heritage, University of Pavia, Cremona, Italy, remains in need of preservation. A digitalization project requires cataloging based on international cataloging standards. A distinction among instruments and media must be introduced and specific features of mechanical musical devices are to be identified. Four main classes of media have been identified: disks, pinned barrels, books, and rolls. Lastly, morphological peculiarities of the media must be examined to establish their correct and complete description within the International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD) areas.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.8, S.940-960
  2. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: ¬A turning point for catalogs : Ranganathan's possible point of view (2015) 0.02
    0.023076165 = product of:
      0.04615233 = sum of:
        0.04615233 = product of:
          0.09230466 = sum of:
            0.09230466 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09230466 = score(doc=2006,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.45251876 = fieldWeight in 2006, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2006)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Since the end of the last century, catalogs have been changing more and more quickly. This change is following a recognizable course, beginning with the publication of Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, passing through the reorganization of international cataloging principles, the revision of international standards of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (International Standard for Bibliographic Description), and the foundation of new cataloging codes, such as Resource Description and Access. While principles, models, and rules are well established, bibliographic formats seem to be a bottleneck and users seem far from libraries. This article aims to present an overview of current changes, potential convergences, developments, and weak points from Ranganathan's point of view.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 53(2015) no.3/4, S.341-351
  3. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: ¬The international diffusion of RDA : a wide overview on the new guidelines (2016) 0.02
    0.01776404 = product of:
      0.03552808 = sum of:
        0.03552808 = product of:
          0.07105616 = sum of:
            0.07105616 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07105616 = score(doc=2944,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This issue of Jlis.it is focused on RDA, Resource Description and Access. In light of increasing international acceptance of this new cataloging content standard, the editors of Jlis.it wish to capture the background of how RDA came to be and the implications of its implementation at this time. This special issue offers a wide overview on the new guidelines from their making to their spreading around the world.
  4. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: From bibliographic models to cataloguing rules : remarks on FRBR, ICP, ISBD, and RDA and the relationships between them (2009) 0.02
    0.015543535 = product of:
      0.03108707 = sum of:
        0.03108707 = product of:
          0.06217414 = sum of:
            0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06217414 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 47(2009) no.2, S.xx-xx
  5. Bianchini, C.; Willer, M.: ISBD resource and Its description in the context of the Semantic Web (2014) 0.02
    0.015543535 = product of:
      0.03108707 = sum of:
        0.03108707 = product of:
          0.06217414 = sum of:
            0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06217414 = score(doc=1998,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 1998, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1998)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.8, S.869-887
  6. Bianchini, C.; Bargioni, S.: Automated classification using linked open data : a case study on faceted classification and Wikidata (2021) 0.02
    0.015543535 = product of:
      0.03108707 = sum of:
        0.03108707 = product of:
          0.06217414 = sum of:
            0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06217414 = score(doc=724,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 724, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=724)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.8, p.835-852
  7. Bianchini, C.: Arrangement of FRBR entities in Colon Classification call numbers (2012) 0.01
    0.0133230295 = product of:
      0.026646059 = sum of:
        0.026646059 = product of:
          0.053292118 = sum of:
            0.053292118 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053292118 = score(doc=1914,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 1914, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1914)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.5/7, S.473-493
  8. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: International cataloguing tradition and Italian rules : common ground and specific features (2007) 0.01
    0.011102525 = product of:
      0.02220505 = sum of:
        0.02220505 = product of:
          0.0444101 = sum of:
            0.0444101 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0444101 = score(doc=258,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.21771818 = fieldWeight in 258, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=258)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 44(2007) nos.1/2, S.131-150
  9. Bianchini, C.: Colon Classification and Nuovo Soggettario : the case of the Library of the Natural History Museum of Udine, Italy (2012) 0.01
    0.010518497 = product of:
      0.021036994 = sum of:
        0.021036994 = product of:
          0.042073987 = sum of:
            0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042073987 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:05:47