Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Carlyle, A."
  1. Carlyle, A.: Understanding FRBR as a conceptual model : FRBR and the bibliographic universe (2006) 0.05
    0.047683053 = product of:
      0.095366105 = sum of:
        0.095366105 = sum of:
          0.053292118 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053292118 = score(doc=1050,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
          0.042073987 = weight(_text_:22 in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042073987 = score(doc=1050,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) presents a complex conceptual model. Because of this, it is not easy for everyone to understand. The purpose of this paper is to make some of the more difficult aspects of the FRBR model, in particular the Croup 1 entities work, expression, manifestation, and item, easier to understand by placing FRBR in the context of what it is: a conceptual entity-relationship model. To this end, a definition of the term "model" is presented, a variety of types and junctions of models are introduced, conceptual models are discussed in detail, modeling an abstraction is explained, and different ways of interpreting FRBR are suggested. Various models used in the history of cataloging are introduced to place FRBR in the context of the historical development of document models.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Carlyle, A.: ¬An interview with Martha M. Yee (2000) 0.03
    0.03108707 = product of:
      0.06217414 = sum of:
        0.06217414 = product of:
          0.12434828 = sum of:
            0.12434828 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12434828 = score(doc=3897,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.6096109 = fieldWeight in 3897, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3897)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 29(2000) no.3, S.5-19
  3. Carlyle, A.; Ranger, S.; Summerlin, J.: Making the pieces fit : little women, works, and the pursuit of quality (2008) 0.02
    0.021981878 = product of:
      0.043963756 = sum of:
        0.043963756 = product of:
          0.08792751 = sum of:
            0.08792751 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08792751 = score(doc=799,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 799, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=799)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In current cataloging practice, the identification of an item as a member of a particular work set is accomplished by assigning a main entry heading, or main entry citation, in the bibliographic record representing that item. The main entry citation is normally comprised of a primary author name and the uniform title associated with the work. However, the quality of bibliographic records varies, and this means of identification is not universally used by catalogers. Thus, consistent identification and retrieval of records representing editions of works is not guaranteed. Research is reported that investigates the extent to which records that are members of a particular work set may be automatically identified as such.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 46(2008) no.1, S.35-63
  4. Carlyle, A.; Summerlin, J.: Transforming catalog displays : record clustering for works of fiction (2002) 0.02
    0.015543535 = product of:
      0.03108707 = sum of:
        0.03108707 = product of:
          0.06217414 = sum of:
            0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06217414 = score(doc=5626,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5626, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5626)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 33(2002) nos.3/4, S.xx-xx
  5. Carlyle, A.: Matching LCSH and user vocabulary in the library catalog (1989) 0.01
    0.0133230295 = product of:
      0.026646059 = sum of:
        0.026646059 = product of:
          0.053292118 = sum of:
            0.053292118 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053292118 = score(doc=449,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 449, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=449)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1989) nos.1/2, S.37-63