Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Gorman, M."
  1. Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999) 0.10
    0.099105485 = product of:
      0.19821097 = sum of:
        0.19821097 = sum of:
          0.14211231 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14211231 = score(doc=6095,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
          0.05609865 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05609865 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18124348 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051756795 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
  2. Gorman, M.: Why teach cataloguing and classification? (2002) 0.04
    0.0397216 = product of:
      0.0794432 = sum of:
        0.0794432 = product of:
          0.1588864 = sum of:
            0.1588864 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1588864 = score(doc=5446,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.7789323 = fieldWeight in 5446, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5446)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Enemies of cataloging today include ill-informed administrators, information scientists in library schools, and those who think that alternatives to vocabulary control and bibliographic architecture-such as Google-are better and cheaper than cataloging. Bibliographic control and cataloging should be at the heart of library education. An ideal library school is described.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Education for cataloging and the organization of information: pitfalls and the pendulum; Part I
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 34(2002) nos.1/2, S.1-14
  3. Gorman, M.: ¬The concise AACR2 1988 revision (1990) 0.04
    0.03768322 = product of:
      0.07536644 = sum of:
        0.07536644 = product of:
          0.15073287 = sum of:
            0.15073287 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15073287 = score(doc=5814,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.73896 = fieldWeight in 5814, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5814)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    LCSH
    Descriptive cataloging / Rules
    Subject
    Descriptive cataloging / Rules
  4. Gorman, M.: How cataloging and classification should be taught (1992) 0.04
    0.03552808 = product of:
      0.07105616 = sum of:
        0.07105616 = product of:
          0.14211231 = sum of:
            0.14211231 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14211231 = score(doc=5379,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 5379, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5379)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Gorman, M.: 1941: an analysis and appreciation of Andrew Osborn's 'The crisis in cataloging' (1982) 0.04
    0.03552808 = product of:
      0.07105616 = sum of:
        0.07105616 = product of:
          0.14211231 = sum of:
            0.14211231 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 6166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14211231 = score(doc=6166,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 6166, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6166)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Gorman, M.: Cataloging in an electronic age (2003) 0.04
    0.03552808 = product of:
      0.07105616 = sum of:
        0.07105616 = product of:
          0.14211231 = sum of:
            0.14211231 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14211231 = score(doc=5503,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 5503, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5503)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the achievements in bibliographic control of the last thirty years and the strides made toward Universal Bibliographic Control. Discusses the intended and unintended effects of three standards-the MARC format, ISBD, and AACR. Analyzes the types of resources in cyberspace to be organized and their similarities to and differences from documents librarians already know. Suggests strategies for solving the seemingly insoluble problems of cataloging the Internet and predicts how metadata will evolve.
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Electronic cataloging: AACR2 and metadata for serials and monographs"
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 36(2003) nos.3/4, S.5-17
  7. Gorman, M.: Mutating the genome (1983) 0.03
    0.03108707 = product of:
      0.06217414 = sum of:
        0.06217414 = product of:
          0.12434828 = sum of:
            0.12434828 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12434828 = score(doc=2852,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.6096109 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 3(1983) nos.2/3, S.19-25
  8. Gorman, M.: ¬The origins and making of the ISBD : a personal history, 1966-1978 (2014) 0.02
    0.021981878 = product of:
      0.043963756 = sum of:
        0.043963756 = product of:
          0.08792751 = sum of:
            0.08792751 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08792751 = score(doc=1995,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 1995, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1995)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    What follows are my memories of the events, starting almost five decades ago, that led to the International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD)-still the most successful and widely used international cataloging standard in history. Many of the documents of the time were little more than ephemera (working papers and the like) and some are not now available to me. I have checked my recollections in all the documents to which I have access and apologize in advance for any errors of time or place. I also apologize for the, alas, unavoidable, given the nature of the essay, many repetitions of the words "I" and "me."
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.8, S.821-834
  9. Gorman, M.: ¬The corruption of cataloging (1995) 0.02
    0.015543535 = product of:
      0.03108707 = sum of:
        0.03108707 = product of:
          0.06217414 = sum of:
            0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06217414 = score(doc=4441,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 4441, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4441)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Gorman, M.: Authority control in the context of bibliographic control in the electronic environment (2004) 0.01
    0.0133230295 = product of:
      0.026646059 = sum of:
        0.026646059 = product of:
          0.053292118 = sum of:
            0.053292118 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053292118 = score(doc=5662,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 5662, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5662)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 38(2004) nos.3/4, S.xx-xx