Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Halverson, J."
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Salas-Tull, L.; Halverson, J.: Subject heading revision : a comparative study (1987) 0.04
    0.038073726 = product of:
      0.07614745 = sum of:
        0.07614745 = product of:
          0.1522949 = sum of:
            0.1522949 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1522949 = score(doc=382,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.7466178 = fieldWeight in 382, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=382)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloging departments must weigh the goal of high quality cataloging against the need to make materials available to the patron in a timely, cost effective fashion. Many cataloging departments still review and revise subject headings assigned by OCLC member libraries to achieve quality cataloging for their libraries. This study evaluates this procedure and compares the number of subject heading revisions made to OCLC cooperative cataloging copy input by research, academic and public libraries. Percentages of revisions did not differ greatly among the three types of libraries and were lower than expected. A reassessment of the library's procedures was recommended and several issues that all libraries should consider were enumerated.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1987) no.3, S.3-12
  2. Vendrell, N.V.; Halverson, J.; Salas-Tull, L.: Evaluation of a program for assigning subject headings to local thesis and dissertations (1988) 0.03
    0.03108707 = product of:
      0.06217414 = sum of:
        0.06217414 = product of:
          0.12434828 = sum of:
            0.12434828 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12434828 = score(doc=1783,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.6096109 = fieldWeight in 1783, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1783)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 9(1988) no.2, S.81-92