Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Jeng, L.H."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Jeng, L.H.: From cataloging to organization of information : a paradigm for the core curriculum (1993) 0.03 
    0.032634623 = product of:
  0.06526925 = sum of:
    0.06526925 = product of:
      0.1305385 = sum of:
        0.1305385 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 7379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1305385 = score(doc=7379,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.63995814 = fieldWeight in 7379, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7379)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The traditional library and information science (LIS) curriculum for organization of information assumes a cataloging paradigm that is built on the concepts and theories developed throughout the history of library cataloging as well as practical knowledge and skills of applying current standards and systems developed specifically for practice in cataloging. Advocates for LIS curriculum reform point out, however, that this cataloging paradigm must be replaced by knowledge of resources and systems management in order to equip LIS graduates with the knowledge and skills needed for an information society. By comparing the traditional and nontraditional curricula in the area of organization of information, this paper proposes a paradigm for organization of information in which information is defined in the context of five attributes and cataloging is perceived as a mode of organizational behavior. Some implications of this paradigm on the core curriculum for organization of information are suggested
  2. Jeng, L.H.: What authority? : Why control? (2002) 0.03 
    0.03076822 = product of:
  0.06153644 = sum of:
    0.06153644 = product of:
      0.12307288 = sum of:
        0.12307288 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12307288 = score(doc=5475,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.6033583 = fieldWeight in 5475, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5475)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper compares the difference between approaches to defining database quality in cataloging and in online databases. Authority control is a solution created by catalogers to ensure that access points are both collocated and differentiated in a library catalog. This time consuming and costly method of quality control is used by catalogers based on the principle that the quality of individual cataloging records determines the success rate for user searching the library catalog. The principle is not shared by creators of online databases, who universally prefer speed to uniformity and standardization of access points.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 34(2002) no.4, S.91-97
  3. Jeng, L.H.: Knowledge, technology, and research in cataloging (1997) 0.03 
    0.03076822 = product of:
  0.06153644 = sum of:
    0.06153644 = product of:
      0.12307288 = sum of:
        0.12307288 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12307288 = score(doc=5611,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.6033583 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and classification: trends, transformations, teaching, and training."
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 24(1997) nos.1/2, S.113-127
  4. Jeng, L.H.: ¬An expert system for determining title proper in descriptive cataloging : a conceptual model (1986) 0.02 
    0.021981878 = product of:
  0.043963756 = sum of:
    0.043963756 = product of:
      0.08792751 = sum of:
        0.08792751 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08792751 = score(doc=375,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 375, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=375)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1986) no.2, S.55-70
  5. Jeng, L.H.: ¬A converging vision of cataloging in the electronic world (1996) 0.02 
    0.015543535 = product of:
  0.03108707 = sum of:
    0.03108707 = product of:
      0.06217414 = sum of:
        0.06217414 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 7686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06217414 = score(doc=7686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 7686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7686)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Years

Themes