Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Kranz, J."
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Kranz, J.: Microcomputer software cataloging : the need for consistency (1988) 0.04 
    0.04112433 = product of:
  0.08224866 = sum of:
    0.08224866 = product of:
      0.16449732 = sum of:
        0.16449732 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16449732 = score(doc=437,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.80643946 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Bibliographic records for microcomputer software in the OCLC Online Union Catalog are evaluated primarily for the purpose of focusing catalogers' attention on selected record areas in need of more consistent treatment. The degree of cataloging inconsistency evident in these records is examined with respect to the application of rules and prescriptions embodied in AACR2 Chapter 9, the ALA Guidelines for cataloging microcomputer software, and the application of Library of Congress subject cataloging practice to these materials. A secondary purpose of this quantitative/qualitative study is to provide a general assessment of the overall composition of microcomputer software cataloging during this transition period between the use of available but disparate sources of descriptive cataloging guidance and their eventual consolidation in the future edition of AACR2.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 9(1988) no.1, S.83-96
  2. Kranz, J.: Paraprofessional involvement in music cataloging : a case study (1990) 0.04 
    0.03996909 = product of:
  0.07993818 = sum of:
    0.07993818 = product of:
      0.15987636 = sum of:
        0.15987636 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15987636 = score(doc=475,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.78378546 = fieldWeight in 475, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=475)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Although the last few years has witnessed a trend toward shifting increased cataloging responsibilities to paraprofessionals, catalog department staffing patterns in some large public, college, and university libraries continue to perpetuate a division of workload reflecting traditional attitudes toward professional versus nonprofessional cataloging responsibilities. Assigning cataloging responsibilities on this traditional basis tends to restrict downshifting what was formerly professional work to paraprofessionals. This situation is perhaps more apparent in the area of music materials cataloging where the subject expertise required to catalog printed and recorded music is usually held by the professional music cataloger. The relative lack of this expertise among paraprofessionals has tended to slow a similar trend to downshift the cataloging of music materials. The involvement of paraprofessionals in the University Libraries at California State University, Northridge with OCLC member-input copy for printed music and sound recordings, the specific activities they perform, and the training methods employed to effect their cataloging proficiency are examined in this commentary. Additionally, a description of paraprofessional involvement in music cataloging based on a survey of practices in six other libraries is included for comparison purposes.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 10(1990) no.4, S.89-98
  3. Kranz, J.: Enhanced access to pamphlets : the application of AACR2 first level of description (1985) 0.03 
    0.026646059 = product of:
  0.053292118 = sum of:
    0.053292118 = product of:
      0.106584236 = sum of:
        0.106584236 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.106584236 = score(doc=349,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 349, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=349)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A broad and diverse compendium of underutilized information is available in pamphlet format in the academic library. Its enhanced use is impeded by the lack of an effective means of catalog access. The traditional library practice of accessing pamphlets by a single subject heading assignment/arrangement greatly limits accessibility. The alternative of full cataloging regularly accorded books is generally provided only for selected pamphlets for reasons of cost. It is suggested that the provision of AACR2 first level of description may be a desirable and practical compromise between single subject assignment and full cataloging. The availability and ease of access to the information required for inclusion in cataloging of this type is examined based on a survey of pamphlets cataloged for the collections of the University Libraries at California State University, Northridge.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 5(1985) no.4, S.39-45

Years