Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0397216 = product of:
  0.0794432 = sum of:
    0.0794432 = product of:
      0.1588864 = sum of:
        0.1588864 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1588864 = score(doc=5477,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.7789323 = fieldWeight in 5477, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5477)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Sara Shatford Layne discusses her career in cataloging and her work in several areas of cataloging theory. Topics covered include the intellectual attractions of cataloging, seriality and the serial "work," development of revised Chapter 12 of AACR, subject access to visual images, OPAC design, and cataloging education.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 36(2003) no.2, S.3-16

0.03108707 = product of:
  0.06217414 = sum of:
    0.06217414 = product of:
      0.12434828 = sum of:
        0.12434828 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12434828 = score(doc=5622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.6096109 = fieldWeight in 5622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5622)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 28(1999) no.4, S.71-89

0.026922192 = product of:
  0.053844385 = sum of:
    0.053844385 = product of:
      0.10768877 = sum of:
        0.10768877 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10768877 = score(doc=2012,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 2012, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2012)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Volltext unter: http://lib.myilibrary.com?id=568636. Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 53(2015) no.2, S.252-255 (Robert Rendall)

LCSH

Descriptive cataloging / Handbooks, manuals, etc

Subject

Descriptive cataloging / Handbooks, manuals, etc

0.011102525 = product of:
  0.02220505 = sum of:
    0.02220505 = product of:
      0.0444101 = sum of:
        0.0444101 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0444101 = score(doc=3776,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051756795 = queryNorm
            0.21771818 = fieldWeight in 3776, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3776)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), is the title of a report prepared by an IFLA study group and published in 1998. The term "FRBR" is used to refer both to the report and to the conceptual model described in that report. The FRBR report defined the user tasks find, identify, select, and obtain; developed the FRBR conceptual model to describe bibliographic data; and mapped the user tasks to the bibliographic data. The FRBR model is based on entity-relationship modeling and identifies three groups of entities. Group 1, consisting of work, expression, manifestation, and item is the most fully developed. Group 2 consists of persons and corporate bodies. Group 3 consists of entities that can serve as subjects but that belong to neither Group 1 nor Group 2. The FRBR model has generated both theoretical discussion and applied research, and has affected the modeling of authority data, the development of cataloging rules, and the design of systems for the display of bibliographic data. Although there are unresolved issues associated with the FRBR model it still provides hope for a useful organization of the bibliographic universe.