Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Petrucciani, A."
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Petrucciani, A.: From the FRBR model to the Italian Cataloguing Code (and vice versa?) (2012) 0.03
    0.026922192 = product of:
      0.053844385 = sum of:
        0.053844385 = product of:
          0.10768877 = sum of:
            0.10768877 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10768877 = score(doc=1920,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 1920, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model has been the main framework of reference for the new Italian cataloging rules. The code puts the work at the center of the catalog and of the rules because users are mostly interested in works and the most wanted works are increasingly available in multiple manifestations. Every work should be identified in the catalog and responsibility relations should be recorded at the proper level. The code is tailored to the specific needs of library cataloging and based on a new thorough analysis of the phenomena to be reflected, organized, and made accessible via the catalog.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.5/7, S.603-621
  2. Petrucciani, A.: Quality of library catalogs and value of (good) catalogs (2015) 0.02
    0.021981878 = product of:
      0.043963756 = sum of:
        0.043963756 = product of:
          0.08792751 = sum of:
            0.08792751 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08792751 = score(doc=1878,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 1878, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The quality of large catalogs is uneven and often low, but this issue is underrated and understudied. Library catalogs often fail to communicate correct and clear information to users and their low quality is not simply due to faults, duplications, and so on but also to unwise cataloging standards and policies. While there is plenty of uncontrolled information about books and other publications, the need for good-quality bibliographic information is apparent and library catalogs may provide a trustworthy map of the publishing output, with full control of editions, works, authors, and so on and effective navigation functions, which are lacking in today's information-rich environment.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 53(2015) no.3/4, S.303-313
  3. Petrucciani, A.: ¬The other half of cataloguing : new models and perspectives for the control of authors and works (2004) 0.01
    0.011102525 = product of:
      0.02220505 = sum of:
        0.02220505 = product of:
          0.0444101 = sum of:
            0.0444101 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0444101 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051756795 = queryNorm
                0.21771818 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 38(2004) nos.3/4, S.xx-xx